Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:06:12.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does identity fusion give rise to the group – or the reverse? Politics- versus community-based groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Elias L. Khalil*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia. [email protected]://research.monash.edu/en/persons/elias-khalil

Abstract

This comment questions Whitehouse's theory. This comment proffers that people first choose their identity and later employ shared facts from the past to cement it. This is true with respect to two kinds of group identity: politics- and community-based identities. Contrary to Whitehouse, neither shared biology nor shared experience from the past is necessary for the constitution of either kind.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Khalil, E. L. (2018) A tale of two loves: Love of country contra love of humankind. Unpublished working paper.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1982) The theory of moral sentiments. ed. Raphael, D. D. & Macfie, A. L.. Liberty Fund. (Original work published in 1759.).Google Scholar