Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:50:04.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of intra and inter-personal factors on adolescents' energy intakes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2019

A. S. Mohd Shahar
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Z. Ibrahim
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
M. N. Mohd Taib
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2019 

Adolescence is a crucial stage of development in human life and having adequate dietary intake plays an important role in the physical development and overall well-being. The dietary intake of adolescents is one of the major concerns in public health as there are growing evidences that link poor nutrition to elevated risks of obesity-related health problems. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the effect of intra and inter-personal factors on energy intake of the adolescents in Hulu Langat District of Selangor, Malaysia.

A total of 457 adolescents aged 13–16 years from five selected schools were recruited through multistage cluster sampling. Self-administered questionnaires consisted on socio demographic background, intra and interpersonal factors were distributed. Intrapersonal factors were operationalised as eating behaviour and personality traits. Whereas interpersonal factors include parenting styles and social support. Eating behaviours were assessed using Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18(Reference Karlsson, Persson and Sjostrom1). TFEQ-R18 has 18-item which measures three types of eating behaviours; restrained eating, uncontrolled eating and emotional eating. Personality traits were obtained using Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) Personality Inventory (USMaP-i)(Reference Muhd Saiful, Ahmad Fuad and Abdul Rahman2). USMaP-i has 60-item that measures respondents' personality which divided into extraversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism and openness to experience. Parenting styles were assessed through Parental Authority Questionnaire (Reference Reitman, Rhode and Hupp3), while social support was determined using Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)(Reference Wongpakaran, Wongpakaran and Ruktrakul4).The current dietary intake was measured through 24-hour dietary recall.  The estimated dietary intakes were computed in Nutritionist Pro software and the energy intakes were compared with Recommended Nutrient Intake (RNI) for adolescents.

The sample comprised of 84.2% Malays, 8.1% Chinese, 6.8% Indian, while 0.1% were from other ethnic groups. Distribution of the respondents according to age showed 30.0% aged 13 years old, while 33.9% and 36.1% aged 14 and 16 respectively. Energy intake of the respondents reached an average of 51.9% – 62.4% of RNI. Hierarchical multiple linear regression (adjusted for age, sex and ethnicity) (Table 1) revealed that both intra and interpersonal factors contributed to the dietary intakes of adolescents. Adolescents with uncontrolled eating behaviour (B = 0.171,CI: 3.95–11.85) and have significant support from family members (B = 0.101,CI: 7.20–21.40) were found to have strongest influence on their energy intakes. Nevertheless, those with conscientiousness personality trait (B=−0.096,CI: 2.02–25.49) were more cautious in controlling their energy intakes.

Table 1. Hierarchical multiple regressionv* prediction the dietary intake from intra and interpersonal factors among adolescents

* Adjusted for age, sex and ethinicity, R2=.136 [F (15, 441) = 4.609]

Energy consumption of adolescents could be influenced by both intra and interpersonal factors, which highlight a need to consider multiple approaches at individual, home and environment in planning and executing any health and nutrition intervention program.

References

1.Karlsson, J, Persson, LO, Sjostrom, L, et al. (2000) Inter J of Obesity & Related Met Dis 24, 17151725.Google Scholar
2.Muhd Saiful, BY, Ahmad Fuad, AR & Abdul Rahman, N (2010) The USM Personality Inventory (USMaP-i) Manual. Kelantan, Malaysia: KKMED Publications.Google Scholar
3.Reitman, D, Rhode, PC, Hupp, SDA et al. (2002) J of Psych & Behav Assess 24, 119127.Google Scholar
4.Wongpakaran, T, Wongpakaran, N & Ruktrakul, R (2011) Clin Prac & Epid in Mental Hlth 7, 161166.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Hierarchical multiple regressionv* prediction the dietary intake from intra and interpersonal factors among adolescents