Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:56:52.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some inequalities between $M(a,b,c;L;n)$ and the partition function $p(n)$

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2024

Bing He*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, HNP-LAMA, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, People’s Republic of China e-mail: [email protected]
Linpei Li
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, HNP-LAMA, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, People’s Republic of China e-mail: [email protected]
Jian Cao
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, People’s Republic of China e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let $p(n)$ and $M(m,L;n)$ be the number of partitions of n and the number of partitions of n with crank congruent to m modulo L, respectively, and let

$$ \begin{align*}M(a,b,c;L;n):= M(a,L;n) + M(b,L;n) + M(c,L;n).\end{align*} $$

In this paper, we focus on some relations between $M(m,L;n)$ and $p(n),$ which Dyson, Andrews, and Garvan etc. have studied previously. By applying a modification of the circle method to estimate the Fourier coefficients of generating functions, we establish the following inequalities between $M(a,b,c;L;n)$ and $p(n):$ for $n \geq 467$,

$$ \begin{align*} M(0,1,1;9;n)> \frac{p(n)}{3} &\;\: \mathrm{when}\;\: n \equiv 0,1,5,8 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9), \\ M(0,1,1;9;n) < \frac{p(n)}{3} &\;\: \mathrm{when}\;\: n \equiv 2,3,4,6,7 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9), \\ M(2,3,4;9;n) < \frac{p(n)}{3} &\;\: \mathrm{when}\;\: n \equiv 0,1,5,8 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9), \\ M(2,3,4;9;n)> \frac{p(n)}{3} &\;\: \mathrm{when}\;\: n \equiv 2,3,4,6,7 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9). \end{align*} $$

In the proof of these inequalities, an inequality for the logarithm of the generating function for $p(n)$ is derived and applied. Our method reduces the last possible counterexamples to $467 \leq n \leq 22471$, and it will produce more effective estimates when proving inequalities of such types.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Mathematical Society

1 Introduction

A partition of a positive integer n is a nonincreasing sequence of positive integers whose sum equals n. Typically, $p(n)$ is used to denote the number of partitions of $n.$ The generating function for $p(n)$ is as follows:

$$ \begin{align*} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} p(n) q^n = \frac{1}{(q;q)_{\infty}}. \end{align*} $$

Here and in what follows, $|q| < 1,$ and

$$ \begin{align*} \quad (a;q)_{\infty}: = \prod_{i=0}^{\infty} (1-aq^{i}). \end{align*} $$

In 1944, Dyson [Reference Dyson12] defined the rank of a partition to be the largest part minus the number of parts. Let $N(m;n)$ be the number of partitions of n with rank m and $N(m,L;n)$ the number of partitions of n with rank congruent to m modulo $L.$ Dyson conjectured that

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} N(a,5;5n+4) = \frac{p(5n+4)}{5}, \\ N(a,7;7n+5) = \frac{p(5n+4)}{7}, \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

which provide combinatorial proofs for the cases of modulo 5 and 7 in Ramanujan’s congruences. In addition, Dyson conjectured that there exists a crank function for partitions which would supply a combinatorial proof of Ramanujan’s congruences modulo 11. In 1954, Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer [Reference Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer5] proved the above identities of Dyson by applying the generating function for $N(m,L;n).$

Forty years later, Andrews and Garvan [Reference Andrews and Garvan3] defined the crank function for partitions. Let $M(m;n)$ be the number of partitions of n with crank m and let $M(m,L;n)$ be the number of partitions of n with crank congruent to m modulo $L.$ Andrews and Garvan proved that

$$ \begin{align*} M(m,11;11n+6) = \frac{p(11n+6)}{11}, \quad 0\leq m \leq 10, \end{align*} $$

which provides a combinatorial proof for Ramanujan’s congruences modulo 11. Recently, many inequalities for $M(m,L;n)$ and $N(m,L;n)$ modulo 11 were deduced by Borozenets [Reference Borozenets7] and Bringmann and Pandey [Reference Bringmann and Pandey8]. For inequalities between the rank counts $N(m,L;n)$ or between the crank counts $M(m,L;n),$ see, for example, [Reference Andrews and Lewis1, Reference Chan and Mao10, Reference Chen, Chern, Fan and Xia11, Reference Mao16]. For distributions of rank and crank statistics for integer partitions, see, for example, [Reference Zhou20, Reference Zhou21].

For convenience, we adopt the following notations:

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} N(a,b,c;L;n)&:= N(a,L;n) + N(b,L;n) + N(c,L;n), \\ M(a,b,c;L;n)&:= M(a,L;n) + M(b,L;n) + M(c,L;n). \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

In [Reference Kang15, Theorem 4.1], Kang showed the following relationship between rank and crank:

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} \sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty} & \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (N(3m-1;n)+N(3m;n)+N(3m+1;n))z^m q^n \\ = & \frac{(q^3;q^3)_{\infty}}{(q;q)_{\infty}}\sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} M(m;n)z^m q^{3n}. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

Inspired by this relationship, Aygin and Chan [Reference Aygin and Chan6] provided a series of generating functions for $M(a,b,c;L;n)$ . For $L \in \{6,9,12\}$ , Aygin and Chan found generating functions of

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} N(3j-1,3j,3j+1;L;n), \quad \mathrm{for} ~ 0\leq j \leq L/3 - 1, \\ M(3j-1,3j,3j+1;L;n), \quad \mathrm{for} ~ 0\leq j \leq L/3 - 1, \\ M(3j-2,3j-1,3j;L;n), \quad \mathrm{for} ~ 0\leq j \leq L/3 - 1 \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

and used the periodicity of the sign of the Fourier coefficients of these generating functions to prove many inequalities between $M(a,b,c;L;n)$ and the partition function $p(n).$ At the end of the paper, they proposed 18 inequalities of such type as a conjecture. In [Reference Fan, Xia and Zhao13], Fan, Xia, and Zhao established some generating functions for $N(a,12;n)$ and $M(a,12;n)$ with $0 \leq a \leq 11$ , and used them to confirm the first 6 inequalities in the conjecture of Aygin and Chan. Later, Yao [Reference Yao19] proved that the remaining 12 inequalities hold for sufficiently large n. Simultaneously, at the end of their paper, Aygin and Chan said that “Additionally, the referee pointed out that the signs of theta parts of $M(0,1,1;9;n)$ , $M(2,3,4;9;n)$ , $M(0,1,2;9;n)$ , $M(3,4,5;9;n)$ , and $M(6,7,8;9;n)$ are periodic modulo 9 when $n \geq 467.$ Thus, conjectures similar to Conjecture 8.1 can be stated for $M(0,1,1;9;n)$ , $M(2,3,4;9;n)$ , $M(0,1,2;9;n)$ , $M(3,4,5;9;n)$ and $M(6,7,8;9;n)$ .” Up to now, as far as we are concerned, no inequality for $M(0,1,1;9;n)$ , $M(2,3,4;9;n)$ , $M(0,1,2;9;n)$ , $M(3,4,5;9;n)$ and $M(6,7,8;9;n),$ which is similar to [Reference Aygin and Chan6, Conjecture 8.1], has been proposed explicitly and proved.

In this paper, we state some inequalities for $M(0,1,1;9;n)$ and $M(2,3,4;9;n)$ and prove them.

Theorem 1.1 For $n \geq 467$ , we have

$$ \begin{align*} M(0,1,1;9;n)> \frac{p(n)}{3}&\;\: \mathrm{when}\;\: n \equiv 0,1,5,8 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9), \\ M(0,1,1;9;n) < \frac{p(n)}{3}&\;\: \mathrm{when}\;\: n \equiv 2,3,4,6,7 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9), \\ M(2,3,4;9;n) < \frac{p(n)}{3}&\;\: \mathrm{when}\;\: n \equiv 0,1,5,8 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9), \\ M(2,3,4;9;n)> \frac{p(n)}{3}&\;\: \mathrm{when}\;\: n \equiv 2,3,4,6,7 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9). \end{align*} $$

We will employ the modification [Reference Kane14] of the circle methodFootnote 1 to estimate the Fourier coefficients of generating functions for $M(0,1,1;9;n)$ and $M(2,3,4;9;n)$ , obtaining information about the sign of the coefficients of $g(q)-3h(q)$ (see (3.1) and (3.2) for the definitions of $g(q)$ and $h(q)$ ), and thereby prove the inequalities in Theorem 1.1. An inequality for the logarithm of the generating function for $p(n)$ will be derived and used to reduce the last possible counterexamples to $467 \leq n \leq 22471.$ This method will produce more effective estimates when proving such types of inequalities.

2 Preliminaries

For $f(s) = \sum _{n=0}^{\infty } \alpha (n) s^n$ , we apply the residue theorem to the generating function to get

$$ \begin{align*} \alpha(n) = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_{|s|=r} \frac{f(s)}{s^{n+1}} ds \end{align*} $$

with r smaller than the convergence radius.

2.1 Splitting integral intervals with Farey fractions

We set $r :=e^{-2\pi \varrho }$ with $\varrho =1/N^2$ for some $N>0$ . Let $h/k$ be a Farey fraction of order N, and let $\xi _{h,k} := [-\theta _{h,k}^{\prime },\theta _{h,k}^{\prime \prime }]$ with $\theta _{h,k}^{\prime },\theta _{h,k}^{\prime \prime }$ being the distance from $h/k$ to its neighboring mediants. If we set

$$\begin{align*}s:= r e^{2\pi i \theta} = e^{-2\pi \varrho} e^{2\pi i \theta},\end{align*}$$

and let $\theta := h/k + \varphi $ on each $\xi _{h,k}$ , then

$$\begin{align*}ds = 2\pi i e^{-2\pi \varrho} e^{2\pi i h/k} e^{2\pi i \varphi} d\varphi ,\end{align*}$$

so that

$$ \begin{align*} \alpha(n) = \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h<k \leq N \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} f(e^{2\pi i(h/k + i\varrho + \varphi)}) e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi. \end{align*} $$

Set $z:=k(\varrho -i\varphi )$ and $\tau :=(h+iz)/k$ to get

(2.1) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned} \alpha(n) &= \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h<k \leq N \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} f(e^{2\pi i(h+iz)/k}) e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ &= \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h<k \leq N \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} f(e^{2\pi i \tau}) e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi. \end{aligned} \end{align} $$

2.2 Dedekind’s eta-function

The Dedekind eta-function is defined by

$$\begin{align*}\eta(\tau):=q^{1/24}(q;q)_{\infty},\end{align*}$$

where $q=e^{2\pi i \tau }$ with $\mathrm {Im}(\tau )> 0.$ A well-known transformation formula for the Dedekind eta-function is as follows [Reference Apostol4, p. 52].

For $\gamma = \left (\begin {matrix} a & b \\ c & d \end {matrix}\right ) \in \varGamma :=\mathrm {SL}_2(\mathbb {Z})$ , $c>0$ , we have [Reference Apostol4, Theorem 3.4]

(2.2) $$ \begin{align} \eta(\gamma \tau) = e^{-\pi i s(d,c)} e^{\pi i (a+d)/(12c)} \sqrt{-i(c\tau + d)} \eta(\tau), \end{align} $$

where $s(d,c)$ is the Dedekind sum given by

$$ \begin{align*} s(d,c) := \sum_{n=0}^{c-1} \frac{n}{c} \left(\frac{dn}{c}-\left\lfloor \frac{dn}{c} \right\rfloor-\frac{1}{2} \right). \end{align*} $$

Set

$$ \begin{align*} F(e^{2\pi i \tau}) := \frac{1}{(q;q)_{\infty}} = \frac{e^{\pi i \tau/12}}{\eta(\tau)}. \end{align*} $$

It follows from (2.2) that

$$ \begin{align*} F(e^{2\pi i \tau}) = e^{\pi i (\tau - \gamma\tau)/12} e^{- \pi i s(d,c)} e^{\pi i (a + d)/(12c)} \sqrt{-i(c\tau + d)} F(e^{2\pi i \gamma\tau}). \end{align*} $$

For the interval $\xi _{h,k},$ if $\mathrm {gcd}(n,k)=1$ , then we choose an integer $h_n^{\prime }$ such that $nhh_n^{\prime } \equiv -1 ~ (\mathrm {mod} ~ k).$ Hence, there exists $b_n\in \mathbb {Z}$ such that $nhh_n^{\prime } - b_n k = -1.$ Set

$$ \begin{align*} \gamma_{(nh,k)} := \left(\begin{matrix} h_n^{\prime} & -b_n \\ k & -nh \end{matrix} \right) \in \varGamma. \end{align*} $$

Then,

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} \gamma_{(nh,k)} = \frac{h_n^{\prime} \frac{nh+inz}{k}-b_n}{k \frac{nh+inz}{k}-nh} = \frac{h_n^{\prime} nh - b_n k + in h_n^{\prime} z}{k i nz} = \frac{h_n^{\prime}}{k} + i\frac{1}{knz}, \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

so that

(2.3) $$ \begin{align} \mathrm{Im}(\gamma_{(nh,k)}) = \mathrm{Re}\left(\frac{1}{knz}\right) = \frac{1}{kn} \mathrm{Re}\left(\frac{1}{z}\right), \end{align} $$

and

(2.4) $$ \begin{align} F(e^{2\pi i n \tau}) = e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{1}{nz}-nz)}e^{\pi i s(nh,k)}\sqrt{nz} F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(nh,k)}(n\tau)}). \end{align} $$

2.3 Some bounds and an integral

It is obvious to observe that

$$ \begin{align*} \frac{1}{2kN} \leq \theta_{h,k}^{\prime}, \theta_{h,k}^{\prime \prime} \leq \frac{1}{kN}. \end{align*} $$

From this, we have

$$ \begin{align*} \frac{1}{kN} \leq |\xi_{h,k}| \leq \frac{2}{kN}, \end{align*} $$

and

$$ \begin{align*}|\varphi| \leq (kN)^{-1}.\end{align*} $$

Notice that $z=k(\varrho - i \varphi ).$ Then,

(2.5) $$ \begin{align} \mathrm{Re}\left(\frac{1}{z}\right) = \mathrm{Re}\left(\frac{1}{k(\varrho - i \varphi)}\right) = \frac{1}{k}\frac{\varrho}{\varrho^2 + \varphi^2} \geq \frac{1}{k}\frac{N^{-2}}{N^{-4} + k^{-2}N^{-2}} \geq \frac{k}{2}. \end{align} $$

Also, we have

(2.6) $$ \begin{align} |z|^{-1/2} = \frac{1}{k^{1/2}} \frac{1}{(\varrho^2 + \varphi^2)^{1/4}} \leq \frac{1}{(k^2\varrho^2)^{1/4}} = k^{-1/2} N. \end{align} $$

We now estimate the function $\mathrm {log}F(x)$ for $0 < x < 1.$ Since $0 < x <1$ , we have

$$ \begin{align*} mx^{m-1} \leq \frac{1-x^m}{1-x} = 1 + x + x^2 + \cdots + x^{m-1} \leq m. \end{align*} $$

From this, we deduce that

$$ \begin{align*} \frac{m(1-x)}{x} \leq \frac{1-x^m}{x^m} \leq \frac{m(1-x)}{x^m}, \end{align*} $$

so that

$$ \begin{align*} \frac{x^m}{m^2(1-x)} \leq \frac{x^m}{m(1-x^m)} \leq \frac{x}{m^2(1-x)}. \end{align*} $$

Then

(2.7) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned} \mathrm{log}F(x) &= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} - \mathrm{log}(1-x^n) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^{nm}}{m} = \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^m}{m(1-x^m)}\\ &\leq \frac{x}{1-x} \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{m^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6} \frac{x}{1-x}. \end{aligned} \end{align} $$

Let $q_m(n)$ denote the number of m-colored partitions of n into an even number of distinct parts minus the number of m-colored partitions of n into an odd number of distinct parts. Then, by [Reference Andrews and Berndt2, eq.(6.1.3)]

$$ \begin{align*} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} q_1(n) e^{2\pi i n \tau} =\frac{1}{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})}= (q;q)_{\infty}. \end{align*} $$

Define $\hat {a}_1(n)$ (resp. $\hat {a}_2(n)$ ) as the number of partitions of n into an even (resp. odd) number of parts with distinct elements. Then, we have $q_1(n) = \hat {a}_1(n) - \hat {a}_2(n).$ Since $0 \leq \hat {a}_1(n) \leq p(n)$ , $0 \leq \hat {a}_2(n) \leq p(n)$ , we have

(2.8) $$ \begin{align} |q_1(n)| = |\hat{a}_1(n) - \hat{a}_2(n)| \leq p(n). \end{align} $$

Then,

(2.9) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned} \left| \frac{1}{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})} \right| &\leq \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} |q_1(n)| |e^{2\pi i n \tau}| \leq \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} p(n) |e^{2\pi i n \tau}| \\ &=F(|e^{2\pi i \tau}|) = F(e^{-2\pi \mathrm{Im}(\tau)})\\ & \leq \mathrm{exp} \left(\frac{\pi^2 e^{-2\pi \mathrm{Im}(\tau)}}{6(1-e^{-2\pi \mathrm{Im}(\tau)})}\right), \end{aligned} \end{align} $$

where the last inequality follows from (2.7).

An inequality for $F(e^{2\pi i \tau })$ is given in the following lemma.

Lemma 2.1 Let $\tau _1,\tau _2,\cdots ,\tau _n \in \mathbb {C}$ and let $m_1,m_2,\cdots ,m_n \in \mathbb {Z}\backslash \{0\}.$ Then,

(2.10) $$ \begin{align} \left|\prod_{i=1}^{n} F(e^{2\pi i \tau_i})^{m_i} - 1\right| \leq \mathrm{exp}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{|m_i| \pi^2 e^{-2\pi \mathrm{Im}(\tau_i)}}{6(1-e^{-2\pi \mathrm{Im}(\tau_i)})} \right) - 1. \end{align} $$

Proof Let

$$ \begin{align*} F(e^{2\pi i \tau_i})^{m_i} =: \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_i(n) e^{2\pi i n \tau_i}, \quad F(e^{2\pi i \tau_i})^{|m_i|} =: \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \tilde{c}_i(n) e^{2\pi i n \tau_i}. \end{align*} $$

If $m_i \geq 0$ , then $|c_i(n)| = \tilde {c}_i(n);$ if $m_i < 0$ , then, by (2.8),

$$ \begin{align*} |c_i(n)| \leq \sum_{\substack{1 \leq j \leq |m_i| \\ \sum n_j= n}} |q_1(n_j)| \leq \sum_{\substack{1 \leq j \leq |m_i| \\ \sum n_j = n}} p(n_j) = \tilde{c}_i(n). \end{align*} $$

Hence, by (2.7),

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} \left|\prod_{i=1}^{n} F(e^{2\pi i \tau_i})^{m_i} - 1\right| &\leq \left|\sum_{k_1=0}^{\infty}\cdots \sum_{k_n=0}^{\infty}c_1(k_1)\cdots c_n(k_n)e^{2\pi i k_1 \tau_1}\cdots e^{2\pi i k_n \tau_n} - 1\right|\\ & \leq \mathop{\sum_{k_1=0}^{\infty} \cdots\sum_{k_n=0}^{\infty}}\limits_{(k_1,\cdots,k_n)\neq (0,\cdots,0)} \tilde{c}_1(k_1)\cdots \tilde{c}_n(k_n)|e^{2\pi i k_1 \tau_1}|\cdots |e^{2\pi i k_n \tau_n}|\\&= \prod_{i=1}^{n} F(|e^{2\pi i \tau_i}|)^{|m_i|} - 1\\ &\leq \mathrm{exp}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{|m_i| \pi^2 e^{-2\pi \mathrm{Im}(\tau_i)}}{6(1-e^{-2\pi \mathrm{Im}(\tau_i)})} \right) - 1. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

This completes the proof.

To facilitate certain bounds in the proof of Theorem 1.1, we examine monotonicity of a function here.

Lemma 2.2 Let $u_1,u_2,\cdots ,u_n \in \mathbb {R}_{\geq 1}$ and let $m_1,m_2,\cdots ,m_n \in \mathbb {N}.$ Then,

$$ \begin{align*} W(x) := \frac{1}{x}\left(\mathrm{exp}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{m_i \pi^2 x^{u_i}}{6(1-x^{u_i})}\right) - 1\right) \end{align*} $$

is a nondecreasing function of x on $(0,1)$ .

Proof Taking derivative of $W(x)$ yields

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} W^{\prime}(x) = & -\frac{1}{x^2}\left(\mathrm{exp}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{m_i \pi^2 x^{u_i}}{6(1-x^{u_i})}\right) - 1\right) \\ & + \frac{1}{x}\mathrm{exp}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{m_i \pi^2 x^{u_i}}{6(1-x^{u_i})}\right) \sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{\pi^2 m_i}{6} \left(\frac{u_ix^{u_i-1}}{(1-x^{u_i})^2}\right). \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

Therefore, it suffices to prove

(2.11) $$ \begin{align} \sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{\pi^2 m_i}{6} \left(\frac{u_ix^{u_i}}{(1-x^{u_i})^2}\right) + \mathrm{exp}\left(-\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{\pi^2 m_i}{6}\frac{x^{u_i}}{1-x^{u_i}}\right) \geq 1 \end{align} $$

for $x \in (0,1)$ . Since

$$ \begin{align*} \frac{u_ix^{u_i}}{(1-x^{u_i})^2} - \frac{x^{u_i}}{1-x^{u_i}} = \frac{(u_i-1) x^{u_i} + x^{2u_i}}{(1-x^{u_i})^2}\geq 0 \end{align*} $$

for $u_i \geq 1$ , we have

(2.12) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned} & \sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{\pi^2 m_i}{6} \left(\frac{u_ix^{u_i}}{(1-x^{u_i})^2}\right) + \mathrm{exp}\left(-\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{\pi^2 m_i}{6}\frac{x^{u_i}}{1-x^{u_i}}\right) \\ &\qquad \geq \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{\pi^2 m_i}{6}\frac{x^{u_i}}{1-x^{u_i}}+ \mathrm{exp}\left(-\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{\pi^2 m_i}{6}\frac{x^{u_i}}{1-x^{u_i}}\right). \end{aligned} \end{align} $$

Let

$$ \begin{align*} y := \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{\pi^2 m_i}{6}\frac{x^{u_i}}{1-x^{u_i}}. \end{align*} $$

Then, $y>0$ , and so $y + e^{-y} \geq 1.$ From this and (2.12), we easily obtain the inequality (2.11).

An estimate for a useful integral is given in the following form. Even though it contains the result in [Reference Chan9, Lemma 3.2] as a special case, its proof is similar to that of [Reference Chan9, Lemma 3.2], and we omit it here.

Lemma 2.3 Let $(h,k)=1$ , $b \in \mathbb {R}_{\geq 0}$ , and define

$$ \begin{align*} I := \int_{\xi_{h,k}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{b}{z}-z)} z^{-\frac{1}{2}} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi. \end{align*} $$

Then,

$$ \begin{align*} I = \sqrt{\frac{2}{k(n-1/24)}} b^{1/4} \mathrm{cosh}\left(\frac{\pi}{k} \sqrt{\frac{2b}{3}\left(n-\frac{1}{24}\right)} \right) + E^{(b)}(I), \end{align*} $$

where

$$ \begin{align*} |E^{(b)}(I)| \leq \sqrt{2} \pi^{-1} e^{b \pi / 3 } \frac{e^{2\pi (n-1/24) \varrho} N^{1/2}}{n-1/24}. \end{align*} $$

The following inequalities are also important in the proof of Theorem 1.1.

$$ \begin{align*} \sum_{k=1}^{N} k^n \leq \begin{cases} N^{n+1}, & \mathrm{if} ~ n\geq0, \\ \frac{1}{n+1} N^{n+1}, & \mathrm{if} ~ -1 < n<0. \end{cases} \end{align*} $$

3 Proof of Theorem 1.1

Let

(3.1) $$ \begin{align} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a(n) q^n := \frac{(q^9;q^9)_{\infty}^{3}}{(q;q)_{\infty}(q^{27};q^{27})_{\infty}} = \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})^3}=: g(q) \end{align} $$

and

(3.2) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b(n) q^n &:= q^2 \frac{(q^3;q^3)_{\infty}(q^{27};q^{27})_{\infty}^2}{(q;q)_{\infty}(q^9;q^9)_{\infty}}\\ &= e^{2\pi i (2\tau)} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})^2}=: h(q) \end{aligned}\end{align} $$

with $q=e^{2\pi i \tau }.$

In this section, we first employ the modification [Reference Kane14] of the circle method to estimate the coefficient $a(n)$ of $g(q)$ and the coefficient $b(n)$ of $h(q)$ and then obtain information about the sign of the coefficients $\{a(n) - 3b(n)\}_{n \geq 0}$ of $g(q)-3h(q).$ Finally, by [Reference Aygin and Chan6, eqs.(2.10) and (2.11)], we know that

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} M(0,1,1;9;n) - \frac{p(n)}{3} &= \frac{2}{3}(a(n) - 3b(n) ), \\ M(2,3,4;9;n) - \frac{p(n)}{3} &= -\frac{1}{3}(a(n) - 3b(n) ). \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

Therefore, from the sign information of the coefficients $\{a(n) - 3b(n)\}_{n \geq 0}$ , we can deduce the inequalities in Theorem 1.1.

Since $\mathrm {gcd}(k,27)=1,3,9$ or $27,$ we split each of the sums $\sum _{\substack {0 \leq h<k \leq N \\ (h,k) = 1}}$ for $a(n)$ and $b(n)$ into four parts according to the values of $\mathrm {gcd}(k,27).$

It follows from (2.1) that

(3.3) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned} a(n)&= \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h<k \leq N \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})^3} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ &=\bigg(\sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} + \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 3}} + \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} + \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 27}}\bigg) \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \\ & \;\;\times \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})^3} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ &=: S_1(A) + S_2(A) + S_3(A) + S_4(A) \end{aligned} \end{align} $$

with

$$ \begin{align*} A = \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})^3} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} \end{align*} $$

and

$$ \begin{align*} z = k(\varrho - i\varphi), \qquad \tau = \frac{h+iz}{k}. \end{align*} $$

Similarly, we get

(3.4) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned} b(n)&=\sum_{\substack{0 \leq h<k \leq N \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} e^{2\pi i (2\tau)} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})^2} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ &=\bigg (\sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} + \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 3}} + \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} + \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 27}}\bigg) \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \\ &\;\;\times \int_{\xi_{h,k}} e^{2\pi i (2\tau)} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})^2} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ &=: S_1(B) + S_2(B) + S_3(B) + S_4(B) \end{aligned} \end{align} $$

with

$$ \begin{align*} B = e^{2\pi i (2\tau)} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})^2} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi}. \end{align*} $$

3.1 Transformation formulas for g and h

We apply (2.4) to transform g and h according to the values of $\mathrm {gcd}(k,27).$

Case 1: $\mathrm {gcd}(k,27)=1$ . By (2.4), we have

(3.5) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})^3}\ &= \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,k)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(27h,k)} (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(9h,k)} (9\tau)})^3} \\ &\quad\times e^{\pi i (s(h,k) + s(27h,k) - 3s(9h,k))} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} - z)} \end{aligned} \end{align} $$

and

(3.6) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned} &e^{2\pi i (2\tau)} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})^2}\\ &\quad= \frac{1}{9 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,k)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(9h,k)} (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,k)} (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(27h,k)} (27\tau)})^2} \\ &\qquad\times e^{2\pi i (2h/k)} e^{\pi \frac{-48z}{12k}}e^{\pi i (s(h,k) + s(9h,k) - s(3h,k) - 2s(27h,k))} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} + 47z)} \\ &\quad= \frac{1}{9 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,k)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(9h,k)} (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,k)} (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(27h,k)} (27\tau)})^2} \\ &\qquad \times e^{2\pi i (2h/k)} e^{\pi i (s(h,k) + s(9h,k) - s(3h,k)) - 2s(27h,k)} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} - z)}. \end{aligned} \end{align} $$

Case 2: $\mathrm {gcd}(k,27)=3$ . Let $k = 3l_1.$ Then,

(3.7) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})^3} &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,3l_1)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(9h,l_1)} (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,l_1)} (9\tau)})^3}\\ &\quad \times e^{\pi i (s(h,3l_1) + s(9h,l_1) - 3s(3h,l_1))} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(-\frac{5}{3z} - z)} \end{aligned} \end{align} $$

and

(3.8) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned} &e^{2\pi i (2\tau)} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})^2}\\ &\quad=\frac{1}{3 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,3l_1)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,l_1)} (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,l_1)} (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(9h,l_1)} (27\tau)})^2}\\ & \qquad \times e^{2\pi i (2h/k)} e^{\pi i (s(h,3l_1) + s(3h,l_1) - s(h,l_1) - 2s(9h,l_1))} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(-\frac{5}{3z} - z)}. \end{aligned} \end{align} $$

Case 3: $\mathrm {gcd}(k,27)=9$ . Let $k = 9l_2.$ It follows that

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})^3} &= \frac{\sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{z}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,9l_2)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,l_2)} (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,l_2)} (9\tau)})^3}\\ &\quad \times e^{\pi i (s(h,9l_2) + s(3h,l_2) - 3s(h,l_2))} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(-\frac{23}{z} - z)} \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

and

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} &e^{2\pi i (2\tau)} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})^2}\\ &\quad=\frac{1}{3 \sqrt{z}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,9l_2)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,l_2)} (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,3l_2)} (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,l_2)} (27\tau)})^2}\\ &\qquad \times e^{2\pi i (2h/k)} e^{\pi i (s(h,9l_2) + s(h,l_2) - s(h,3l_1) - 2s(3h,l_2))} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{1}{z} - z)}. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

Case 4: $\mathrm {gcd}(k,27)=27$ . Let $k = 27l_3.$ We have

(3.9) $$ \begin{align} \begin{aligned} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})^3} = & \frac{1}{\sqrt{z}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,27l_3)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,l_3)} (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,3l_3)} (9\tau)})^3} \\ & \times e^{\pi i (s(h,27l_3) + s(h,l_3) - 3s(h,3l_3))} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{1}{z} - z)} \end{aligned} \end{align} $$

and

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} &e^{2\pi i (2\tau)} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})^2}\\ &\quad=\frac{1}{\sqrt{z}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,27l_3)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,3l_3)} (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,9l_3)} (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,l_3)} (27\tau)})^2} \\ &\qquad\times e^{2\pi i (2h/k)} e^{\pi i (s(h,27l_3) + s(h,3l_3) - s(h,9l_3) - 2s(h,l_3))} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(-\frac{47}{z} -z)}. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

From the above transformation formulas for g and h, we see that the integrands of the integrals in $S_2(A), S_2(B),S_3(A)$ , and $S_4(B)$ have factors of the forms $e^{\frac {\delta }{z}}$ with $\delta <0.$ For these integrals, we use (2.3), (2.5), (2.6), and (2.9) to give bounds. However, since the integrands of the integrals in $S_1(A), S_1(B), S_3(B)$ , and $S_4(A)$ contain factors of the forms $e^{\frac {\delta }{z}}$ with $\delta>0,$ we split these integrals into two parts and then apply Lemma 2.2, (2.3), (2.5), (2.6), and (2.10) to estimate the second parts. For the first parts, we employ Lemma 2.3 to tackle the integrals. It should be mentioned that our main term $P(n)$ (in Subsection 3.3) originates from $S_3(B).$

3.2 Bounding $S_2(A)$ , $S_2(B)$ , $S_3(A)$ , and $S_4(B)$

For $S_2(A)$ , we apply (3.7) to deduce that

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} A = & \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} z^{-\frac{1}{2}} e^{\pi i (s(h,3l_1) + s(9h,l_1) - 3s(3h,l_1))} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k} \left(-\frac{5}{3z}-z\right)} \\ & \times \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,3l_1)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(9h,l_1)} (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,l_1)} (9\tau)})^3} e^{2 \pi n \varrho} e^{-2 \pi i n \varphi} \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

with $k=3l_1$ . Using (2.3), (2.5), (2.6), and (2.9), we find that

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |A| \leq & \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} F(e^{-2\pi(\frac{1}{k})\mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})}) F(e^{-2\pi(\frac{3}{k})\mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{9z})}) F(e^{-2\pi(\frac{3}{k})\mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{3z})})^3 \\ & \times e^{-\frac{5\pi}{36k}\mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})} e^{-\frac{\pi}{12k}\mathrm{Re}(z)} |z|^{-\frac{1}{2}} e^{2\pi n \varrho} \\ \leq & \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \mathrm{exp}\left(\frac{2\pi^2 e^{-\pi}}{3(1-e^{-\pi})} + \frac{\pi^2 e^{-\pi/3}}{6(1-e^{-\pi/3})}\right) \times e^{-\frac{5\pi}{72}} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} k^{-\frac{1}{2}} N \\ \leq & \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} e^{0.969} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} k^{-\frac{1}{2}} N. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

So we have

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |S_2(A)| \leq & \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 3}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} e^{0.969} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} k^{-\frac{1}{2}} N d\varphi \\ \leq & \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 3}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} e^{0.969} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} \frac{2}{k^{\frac{3}{2}}} \\ \leq & \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}} e^{0.969} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} \sum_{1 \leq k \leq N} k^{-\frac{1}{2}} \\ \leq & \frac{4}{\sqrt{3}} e^{0.969} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}}. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

For $S_2(B)$ , we apply (3.8) to give

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} B = & \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{3}} z^{-\frac{1}{2}} e^{2\pi i (2h/k)} e^{\pi i (s(h,3l_1) + s(3h,l_1) - s(h,l_1) - 2s(9h,l_1))} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(-\frac{5}{3z} - z)} \\ & \times \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,3l_1)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,l_1)} (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,l_1)} (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(9h,l_1)} (27\tau)})^2} e^{2 \pi n \varrho} e^{-2 \pi i n \varphi} \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

with $k=3l_1$ . Using (2.3), (2.5), (2.6), and (2.9), we find that

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |B| \leq & \frac{1}{3\sqrt{3}} F(e^{-2\pi(\frac{1}{k})\mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})}) F(e^{-2\pi(\frac{3}{k})\mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{3z})}) F(e^{-2\pi(\frac{3}{k})\mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})}) F(e^{-2\pi(\frac{3}{k})\mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{9z})})^2 \\ & \times e^{-\frac{5\pi}{36k}\mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})} e^{-\frac{\pi}{12k}\mathrm{Re}(z)} |z|^{-\frac{1}{2}} e^{2\pi n \varrho} \\ \leq & \frac{1}{3\sqrt{3}} \mathrm{exp}\left(\frac{\pi^2 e^{-\pi}}{3(1-e^{-\pi})} + \frac{\pi^2 e^{-3\pi}}{6(1-e^{-3\pi})} + \frac{\pi^2 e^{-\pi/3}}{3(1-e^{-\pi/3})}\right) e^{-\frac{5\pi}{72}} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} k^{-\frac{1}{2}} N \\ \leq & \frac{1}{3\sqrt{3}} e^{1.710} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} k^{-\frac{1}{2}} N \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

and

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |S_2(B)| \leq & \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 3}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3\sqrt{3}} e^{1.710} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} k^{-\frac{1}{2}} N d\varphi \\ \leq & \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 3}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \frac{1}{3\sqrt{3}} e^{1.710} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} \frac{2}{k^{\frac{3}{2}}} \\ \leq & \frac{2}{3\sqrt{3}} e^{1.710} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} \sum_{1 \leq k \leq N} k^{-\frac{1}{2}} \\ \leq & \frac{4}{3\sqrt{3}} e^{1.710} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}}. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

Similarly, for $S_3(A)$ and $S_4(B)$ , we get

$$ \begin{align*} |S_3(A)| \leq 4\sqrt{3} e^{-2.047} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}} \end{align*} $$

and

$$ \begin{align*} |S_4(B)| \leq 4e^{-6.077} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}}. \end{align*} $$

3.3 Tackling $S_1(A)$ , $S_1(B)$ , $S_3(B)$ , and $S_4(A)$

For $S_1(A)$ , set

$$ \begin{align*}\omega^{(1)}_{(h,k)} := e^{\pi i (s(h,k) + s(27h,k) - 3s(9h,k))}.\end{align*} $$

We apply (3.5) to deduce

$$ \begin{align*} S_1(A) &= \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})^3} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ &= \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \omega^{(1)}_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} - z)} \\ & \quad\times \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,k)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(27h,k)} (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(9h,k)} (9\tau)})^3} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ \notag &= \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \omega^{(1)}_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} - z)} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ \notag &\quad + \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \omega^{(1)}_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} - z)} \\ \notag & \quad\times \left(\frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,k)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(27h,k)} (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(9h,k)} (9\tau)})^3} - 1 \right) e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ \notag & =: T_{1} + T_{2}. \notag \end{align*} $$

By (2.9) and (2.10), we have

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} \left| e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}\left(\frac{19}{27z}\right)} \left(\frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,k)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(27h,k)} (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(9h,k)} (9\tau)})^3} - 1 \right) \right| \leq e^{\frac{19\pi}{27\times12k}\mathrm{Re}\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)} \left( e^{f(k,z)}- 1\right), \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

where

$$ \begin{align*}f(k,z)=\frac{\pi^2 e^{-2\pi \frac{1}{k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})}}{6(1-e^{-2\pi \frac{1}{k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})})} + \frac{\pi^2 e^{-2\pi \frac{1}{27k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})}}{6(1-e^{-2\pi \frac{1}{27k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})})} + \frac{3\pi^2 e^{-2\pi \frac{1}{9k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})}}{6(1-e^{-2\pi \frac{1}{9k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})})} .\end{align*} $$

Let

$$ \begin{align*} x := e^{-\frac{19\pi}{27\times12k}\mathrm{Re}\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)}. \end{align*} $$

Then,

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} & \left| e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}\left(\frac{19}{27z}\right)} \left(\frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,k)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(27h,k)} (27\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(9h,k)} (9\tau)})^3} - 1 \right) \right| \\ &\quad \leq \frac{1}{x} \left(\mathrm{exp}\left(\frac{\pi^2 x^{\frac{648}{19}}}{6(1-x^{\frac{648}{19}})}+\frac{\pi^2 x^{\frac{24}{19}}}{6(1-x^{\frac{24}{19}})}+\frac{3\pi^2 x^{\frac{72}{19}}}{6(1-x^{\frac{72}{19}})}\right) - 1\right)=: W_1(x). \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

By Lemma 2.2 and (2.5), we get

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} W_1(x) & \leq W_1(e^{-\frac{19\pi}{648}}) = e^{\frac{19\pi}{648}} \left(\mathrm{exp}\left(\frac{\pi^2 e^{-\pi}}{6(1-e^{-\pi})}+\frac{\pi^2 e^{-\pi/27}}{6(1-e^{-\pi/27})}+\frac{3\pi^2 e^{-\pi/9}}{6(1-e^{-\pi/9})}\right) - 1\right) \\ & \leq 9.819 \times 10^{10}. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

Then, by (2.6),

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |T_{2}| \leq & \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} 1.890 \times 10^{10} e^{-\frac{\pi}{12k}\mathrm{Re}(z)} |z|^{-1/2} e^{-2\pi i n \varrho} d\varphi \\ \leq & \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} 1.890 \times 10^{10} e^{2\pi (n - 1/24) \varrho} \frac{2}{k^{3/2}} \\ \leq & \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} 1.890 \times 10^{10} e^{2\pi (n - 1/24) \varrho} \frac{2}{k^{1/2}} \\ \leq & 7.560 \times 10^{10} e^{2\pi (n - 1/24) \varrho} N^{1/2}. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

Similarly, we use (3.6) to derive that

$$ \begin{align*} S_1(B)=R_{1} + R_{2}, \end{align*} $$

where

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} R_{1} := \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \omega^{(2)}_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{9 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} - z)} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi, \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

and

$$ \begin{align*} |R_{2}| \leq 1.435 \times 10^{13} e^{2\pi i (n - 1/24) \varrho} N^{1/2}. \end{align*} $$

Here, $\omega ^{(2)}_{(h,k)} := e^{\pi i (s(h,k) + s(9h,k) - s(3h,k) - 2s(27h,k))}.$

Using the software Mathematica, we find thatFootnote 2

(3.10) $$ \begin{align} 4s(9h,k) - s(3h,k) -3s(27h,k) + \frac{4h}{k} \equiv 0 ~~ (\mathrm{mod} ~ 2), \end{align} $$

where $0\leq h < k \leq 17, (k,3)=1$ , and $(h,k)=1.$ From this, we have

$$ \begin{align*} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \omega^{(1)}_{(h,k)} = \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \omega^{(2)}_{(h,k)} \end{align*} $$

with $k \leq 17$ and $\mathrm {gcd}(k,27)=1.$ Then,

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |T_{1} - 3R_{1}| &= \bigg|\sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \omega^{(1)}_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} - z)} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ &\quad - \big. \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \omega^{(2)}_{(h,k)}\\&\quad \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} - z)} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \bigg| \\& \leq \bigg|\sum_{\substack{19 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \omega^{(1)}_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} - z)} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi\bigg| \\ &\quad + \bigg|\sum_{\substack{19 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \omega^{(2)}_{(h,k)}\\&\quad \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} - z)} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi\bigg|. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

By Lemma 2.3, we have

$$ \begin{align*} &\sum_{\substack{19 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \left|\int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{3} \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{19}{27z} - z)} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi\right| \\ \notag &\leq \sum_{\substack{19 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \sqrt{\frac{2}{k(n-1/24)}} \left(\frac{19}{27}\right)^{1/4} \mathrm{cosh}\left(\frac{\pi}{k} \sqrt{\frac{19}{27}\times\frac{2}{3}\left(n-\frac{1}{24}\right)} \right) \\ &\quad+ \sum_{\substack{19 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \sqrt{2} \pi^{-1} e^{19\pi/81} \frac{e^{2\pi (n-1/24) \varrho} N^{1/2}}{n-1/24} \\\notag &\leq \sum_{\substack{19 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} \sqrt{\frac{2k}{n-1/24}} \mathrm{cosh}\left(\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}\left(n-\frac{1}{24}\right)} \right) \\ \notag &\; + \sum_{\substack{19 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 1}} 1.2828 \frac{e^{2\pi (n-1/24) \varrho} k N^{1/2}}{n-1/24} \\ \notag & \leq N^{3/2} \sqrt{\frac{2}{n-1/24}} \mathrm{cosh}\left(\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}\left(n-\frac{1}{24}\right)} \right) + 1.2828 \frac{e^{2\pi (n-1/24) \varrho} N^{5/2}}{n-1/24}. \notag \end{align*} $$

So we have

$$ \begin{align*} |T_{1} - 3R_{1}| \leq 2N^{3/2} \sqrt{\frac{2}{(n-1/24)}} \mathrm{cosh}\left(\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}\left(n-\frac{1}{24}\right)} \right) + 2.5656 \frac{e^{2\pi (n-1/24) \varrho} N^{5/2}}{n-1/24}. \end{align*} $$

Setting $N:=\sqrt {2\pi (n-1/24)}$ , we obtain

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |T_{1} - 3R_{1}| &\leq 2 (2\pi)^{3/4} \sqrt{2} (n-1/24)^{(1/4)} (e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}}+1)\\ &+ 2.5656 e (2\pi)^{5/4} (n-1/24)^{(1/4)} \\ &\leq 11.225 (n-1/24)^{(1/4)} e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} + 80.601 (n-1/24)^{(1/4)}. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

For $S_3(B)$ , set $\Omega _{(h,k)} := e^{\pi i (s(h,9l_2) + s(h,l_2) - s(h,3l_1) - 2s(3h,l_2))}$ . We apply (3.1) to conclude that

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned}\! S_3(B)& = \!\sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \!\!e^{-2\pi i nh/k}\! \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \!e^{2\pi i (2\tau)} \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \tau})F(e^{2\pi i (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i (27\tau)})^2} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ & = \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \Omega_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{1}{z} - z)} \\ & \quad \times \frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,9l_2)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,l_2)} (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,3l_2)} (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,l_2)} (27\tau)})^2} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ &= \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \Omega_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{1}{z} - z)} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ & \quad + \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \Omega_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} \frac{1}{3 \sqrt{z}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{1}{z} - z)} \\ &\quad\times \left(\frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,9l_2)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,l_2)} (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,3l_2)} (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,l_2)} (27\tau)})^2} - 1 \right) e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ & =:P_{1} + P_{2} \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

with $k=9l_2$ .

For $P_2$ , by (2.10), we have

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} \left| e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{1}{z})} \left(\frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,9l_2)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,l_2)} (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,3l_2)} (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,l_2)} (27\tau)})^2} - 1 \right) \right| \leq e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}\mathrm{Re}\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)} \left( e^{g(k,z)}- 1\right), \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

where

$$ \begin{align*}g(k,z)=\frac{\pi^2 e^{-2\pi \frac{1}{k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})}}{6(1-e^{-2\pi \frac{1}{k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})})} + \frac{\pi^2 e^{-2\pi \frac{9}{k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})}}{6(1-e^{-2\pi \frac{9}{k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})})} + \frac{3\pi^2 e^{-2\pi \frac{3}{k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})}}{6(1-e^{-2\pi \frac{3}{k} \mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})})}.\end{align*} $$

Let

$$ \begin{align*} x := e^{-\frac{\pi}{12k}\mathrm{Re}(\frac{1}{z})}. \end{align*} $$

Then,

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} & \left| e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{1}{z})} \left(\frac{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,9l_2)} (\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,l_2)} (9\tau)})}{F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(h,3l_2)} (3\tau)})F(e^{2\pi i \gamma_{(3h,l_2)} (27\tau)})^2} - 1 \right) \right| \\ & \quad\leq \frac{1}{x} \left(\mathrm{exp}\left(\frac{\pi^2 x^{24}}{6(1-x^{24})}+\frac{\pi^2 x^{216}}{6(1-x^{216})}+\frac{3\pi^2 x^{72}}{6(1-x^{72})}\right) - 1\right) =: W_3(x). \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

By Lemma 2.2 and (2.5), we have

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} W_3(x) &\leq W_3(e^{-\frac{\pi}{24}}) = e^{\frac{\pi}{24}} \left(\mathrm{exp}\left(\frac{\pi^2 e^{-\pi}}{6(1-e^{-\pi})}+\frac{\pi^2 e^{-9\pi}}{6(1-e^{-9\pi})} + \frac{\pi^2 e^{-3\pi}}{2(1-e^{-3\pi})}\right) - 1\right) \\ & \leq 0.089. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

Hence,

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |P_2| &\leq 0.0297 \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} |z|^{-\frac{1}{2}} e^{\frac{-\pi}{12k}\mathrm{Re}(z)} e^{2\pi n \varrho} d\varphi \\ &\leq 0.0297 \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} k^{-\frac{1}{2}} N e^{2\pi (n - 1/24) \varrho} d\varphi \\ &\leq 0.0594 \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} k^{-\frac{3}{2}} e^{2\pi (n - 1/24) \varrho} \\ &\leq 0.0594 \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} k^{-\frac{1}{2}} e^{2\pi (n - 1/24) \varrho} \\&\leq 0.119 e^{2\pi (n - 1/24) \varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}}.\\ \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

For $P_1,$ applying Lemma 2.3 with $b=1$ , we establish

$$ \begin{align*} P_1 &= \frac{1}{3} \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \Omega_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{1}{z} - z)} z^{-\frac{1}{2}} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \notag \\ &=\frac{1}{3} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/9} \Omega_{(h,9)} \sqrt{\frac{2}{9(n-1/24)}} \mathrm{cosh}\left(\frac{\pi}{9} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}\left(n-\frac{1}{24}\right)} \right) \notag \\ & \quad+\frac{1}{3} \sum_{\substack{18 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \Omega_{(h,k)} \sqrt{\frac{2}{k(n-1/24)}} \mathrm{cosh}\left(\frac{\pi}{k} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}\left(n-\frac{1}{24}\right)} \right)\\ &\quad + \frac{1}{3} \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \Omega_{(h,k)} E^{(1)}(I) \\ &= \frac{1}{3} \bigg(\sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < 9 \\ (h,9) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/9} \Omega_{(h,9)}\bigg) \sqrt{\frac{2}{9(n-1/24)}} e^{\frac{\pi}{9} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} \notag \\ &\quad + \frac{1}{3} \bigg(\sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < 9 \\ (h,9) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/9} \Omega_{(h,9)}\bigg) \sqrt{\frac{2}{9(n-1/24)}} e^{-\frac{\pi}{9} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} \notag \\ & \quad+ \frac{1}{3} \sum_{\substack{18 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \Omega_{(h,k)} \sqrt{\frac{2}{k(n-1/24)}} \mathrm{cosh}\left(\frac{\pi}{k} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}\left(n-\frac{1}{24}\right)} \right) \notag \\ &\quad+ \frac{1}{3} \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \Omega_{(h,k)} E^{(1)}(I) \notag \\ & =:P(n) + Q \notag \end{align*} $$

with

$$ \begin{align*} P(n) = \bigg(\frac{1}{3} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < 9 \\ (h,9) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/9} \Omega_{(h,9)}\bigg) \sqrt{\frac{2}{9(n-1/24)}} e^{\frac{\pi}{9} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} \end{align*} $$

and

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |Q| \leq & \sum_{\substack{18 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 9}} \bigg(\frac{1}{3} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/k} \Omega_{(h,k)}\bigg) \sqrt{\frac{2}{k(n-1/24)}} \\ & \times \left(e^{\frac{\pi}{k} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{k} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}}\right) + \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3} + 11.563 (n-1/24)^{(1/4)}\\ \leq & \sum^{\lfloor\sqrt{2\pi(n-1/24)}/9\rfloor}_{2 \leq l_2 \leq N} \frac{\sqrt{k}}{3} \sqrt{\frac{2}{n-1/24}} \left(e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} + 1\right)\\ & + \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3} + 11.563 (n-1/24)^{(1/4)} \\ \leq & \left(\frac{\sqrt{2\pi(n-1/24)}}{9}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}} \sqrt{\frac{2}{n-1/24}} \left(e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} + 1\right) \\ & + \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3} + 11.563 (n-1/24)^{(1/4)} \\ \leq & 0.208(n-1/24)^{(1/4)} e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} + 11.771(n-1/24)^{(1/4)} + 0.943. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

Similarly, applying (3.9), we deduce that

$$ \begin{align*} S_4(A)= U_{1} + U_{2}, \end{align*} $$

with

$$ \begin{align*} U_{1} = \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 27}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i nh/k} \omega^{(3)}_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} z^{-\frac{1}{2}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{1}{z} - z)} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi, \end{align*} $$

and

$$ \begin{align*} |U_{2}| \leq 0.3536 e^{2\pi (n - 1/24) \varrho} N^{1/2}. \end{align*} $$

Here, $\omega ^{(3)}_{(h,k)} := e^{\pi i (s(h,27l_3) + s(h,l_3) - 3s(h,3l_3))}.$

For $U_1$ , we have

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |U_1| &= \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 27}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n)h/k} \omega^{(3)}_{(h,k)} \int_{\xi_{h,k}} z^{-\frac{1}{2}} e^{\frac{\pi}{12k}(\frac{1}{z} - z)} e^{2\pi n \varrho} e^{-2\pi i n \varphi} d\varphi \\ &\leq \bigg|\sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 27}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n)h/k} \omega^{(3)}_{(h,k)} \sqrt{\frac{2}{k(n-1/24)}} \mathrm{cosh}\left(\frac{\pi}{k} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}\left(n-\frac{1}{24}\right)} \right)\bigg| \\ &\quad + \bigg|\sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 27}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n)h/k} \omega^{(3)}_{(h,k)} E^{(1)}(I)\bigg| \\ &\leq \sum_{\substack{1 \leq k \leq N \\ (k,27) = 27}} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < k \\ (h,k) = 1}} \sqrt{\frac{2}{k(n-1/24)}} (e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}}+1) + 34.698 (n-1/24)^{(1/4)} \\ &\leq \sum^{\lfloor\sqrt{2\pi (n-1/24)}/27 \rfloor}_{l_3=1} \sqrt{\frac{54l_3}{n-1/24}} (e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}}+1) + 34.698 (n-1/24)^{(1/4)} \\ &\leq \left(\frac{\sqrt{2\pi (n-\frac{1}{24})}}{27}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}} \sqrt{\frac{54}{n-1/24}} (e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}}+1) + 34.698 (n-1/24)^{(1/4)} \\& \leq 0.208(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} + 34.897(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

3.4 Signs of the Fourier coefficients of $g(q)-3h(q)$

It follows from (3.1) and (3.2) that

$$ \begin{align*}g(q)-3h(q)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (a(n) - 3b(n))q^n.\end{align*} $$

From (3.3), (3.4) and the results in Subsections 3.2 and 3.3, we derive that

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} a(n) - 3b(n)& = S_1(A) + S_2(A) + S_3(A) + S_4(A) - 3(S_1(B) + S_2(B) + S_3(B) + S_4(B)) \\ & = T_1 - 3R_1 + T_2 - 3R_2 + S_2(A) + S_3(A) - 3S_2(B) \\ &\quad - 3P(n) -3P_2 -3Q + U_1 + U_2 - 3S_4(B) \\ &=: -3P(n) + E(n) \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

with

$$ \begin{align*} -3P(n) = -\bigg(\sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < 9 \\ (h,9) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/9} \Omega_{(h,9)}\bigg) \sqrt{\frac{2}{9(n-1/24)}} e^{\frac{\pi}{9} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}}. \end{align*} $$

From Subsctions 3.2 and 3.3, we know that

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{cases} |T_1 - 3R_1| & \leq \quad 11.225 (n-1/24)^{(1/4)} e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} + 80.601 (n-1/24)^{(1/4)}, \\ |T_2| & \leq \quad 7.560 \times 10^{10} e^{2\pi (n - 1/24) \varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}} = 3.254 \times 10^{11}(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}\\ |R_2| & \leq \quad 1.435 \times 10^{13} e^{2\pi i (n - 1/24) \varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}} = 6.176 \times 10^{13}(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}, \\ |S_2(A)| & \leq \quad \frac{4}{\sqrt{3}} e^{0.969} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}} = 26.193(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}, \\ |S_3(A)| & \leq \quad 4\sqrt{3} e^{-2.047} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}}= 3.850(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}, \\ |S_2(B)| & \leq \quad \frac{4}{3\sqrt{3}} e^{1.710} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}}=18.318(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}, \\ |P_2| & \leq \quad 0.119 e^{2\pi (n - 1/24) \varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}}=0.513(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}, \\ |Q| & \leq \quad 0.208(n-1/24)^{(1/4)} e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} + 11.771(n-1/24)^{(1/4)} + 0.943, \\ |U_1| & \leq \quad 0.208(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}e^{(\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})})} + 34.897(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}, \\ |U_2| & \leq \quad 0.3536 e^{2\pi (n - 1/24) \varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}} = 1.522(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}, \\ |S_4(B)| & \leq \quad 4e^{-6.077} e^{2\pi(n-\frac{1}{24})\varrho} N^{\frac{1}{2}}=0.040(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}, \end{cases} \end{align*} $$

so that

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |E(n)| &\leq |T_1 - 3R_1| + |T_2| + 3|R_2| + |S_2(A)| + |S_3(A)| + 3|S_2(B)| \\ &\quad + 3|P_2| + 3|Q| + |U_1| + |U_2| + 3|S_4(B)| \\ &\leq 12.057(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} + 3.772 \\ &\quad + (3.254 \times 10^{11} + 3\times6.176 \times 10^{13} + 26.193 + 3.850 + 3\times 18.318 + \\ &\qquad 3\times 0.513 + 3\times 12.969 + 12.969 + 1.522 + 3\times 0.040)\bigg(n-\frac{1}{24}\bigg)^{\frac{1}{4}} \\ &\leq 12.057(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} + 1.857\times 10^{14}\bigg(n-\frac{1}{24}\bigg)^{\frac{1}{4}}. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

It is observed that the signs of the main term $P(n)$ are determined by

$$ \begin{align*} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < 9 \\ (h,9) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/9} \Omega_{(h,9)} \end{align*} $$

with $\Omega _{(h,9)}:= e^{\pi i (s(h,9l_2) + s(h,l_2) - s(h,3l_1) - 2s(3h,l_2))}$ . After calculations, we have

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{cases} \Omega_{(1,9)} = e^{\frac{25}{54}\pi i},\quad \Omega_{(2,9)} = e^{\frac{11}{54}\pi i}, \\ \Omega_{(4,9)} = e^{-\frac{11}{54}\pi i},\quad \Omega_{(5,9)} = e^{\frac{11}{54}\pi i}, \\ \Omega_{(7,9)} = e^{-\frac{11}{54}\pi i},\quad \Omega_{(8,9)} = e^{-\frac{25}{54}\pi i}. \end{cases} \end{align*} $$

Therefore,

$$ \begin{align*} \sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < 9 \\ (h,9) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/9} \Omega_{(h,9)} = \begin{cases} 2\mathrm{cos}(23\pi/54) + 4\mathrm{cos}(49\pi/54) & \mathrm{if} ~n \equiv 0 ~(\mathrm{mod} ~ 9) \\ 2\mathrm{cos}(35\pi/54) + 4\mathrm{cos}(37\pi/54) & \mathrm{if} ~n \equiv 1 ~(\mathrm{mod} ~ 9) \\ 2\mathrm{cos}(25\pi/54) + 4\mathrm{cos}(11\pi/54) & \mathrm{if} ~n \equiv 2 ~(\mathrm{mod} ~ 9) \\ 2\mathrm{cos}(49\pi/54) + 4\mathrm{cos}(13\pi/54) & \mathrm{if} ~n \equiv 3 ~(\mathrm{mod} ~ 9) \\ 2\mathrm{cos}(37\pi/54) + 4\mathrm{cos}(\pi/54) & \mathrm{if} ~n \equiv 4 ~(\mathrm{mod} ~ 9) \\ 2\mathrm{cos}(11\pi/54) + 4\mathrm{cos}(47\pi/54) & \mathrm{if} ~n \equiv 5 ~(\mathrm{mod} ~ 9) \\ 2\mathrm{cos}(13\pi/54) + 4\mathrm{cos}(23\pi/54) & \mathrm{if} ~n \equiv 6 ~(\mathrm{mod} ~ 9) \\ 2\mathrm{cos}(\pi/54) + 4\mathrm{cos}(35\pi/54) & \mathrm{if} ~n \equiv 7 ~(\mathrm{mod} ~ 9) \\ 2\mathrm{cos}(47\pi/54) + 4\mathrm{cos}(25\pi/54) & \mathrm{if} ~n \equiv 8 ~(\mathrm{mod} ~ 9). \\ \end{cases} \end{align*} $$

It is easily computed that

$$ \begin{align*} \bigg|\sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < 9 \\ (h,9) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/9} \Omega_{(h,9)}\bigg|\geq 0.20142 \end{align*} $$

for $n\in \mathbb {N}.$ When $n \geq 22472$ ,

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} |-3P(n)| &= \bigg|\bigg(\sum_{\substack{0 \leq h < 9 \\ (h,9) = 1}} e^{-2\pi i (n-2)h/9} \Omega_{(h,9)}\bigg) \sqrt{\frac{2}{9(n-1/24)}} e^{\frac{\pi}{9} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}}\bigg| \\ & \geq 0.20142 \sqrt{\frac{2}{9(n-1/24)}} e^{\frac{\pi}{9} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} \\ &> 12.057(n-1/24)^{(1/4)}e^{\frac{\pi}{18} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}(n-\frac{1}{24})}} + 1.857\times 10^{14}\bigg(n-\frac{1}{24}\bigg)^{\frac{1}{4}}\\ & \geq |E(n)|. \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

From this, we obtain that

(3.11) $$ \begin{align} \begin{cases} a(n) - 3b(n)> 0 & \mathrm{if} ~ n \equiv 0,1,5,8 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9) \\ a(n) - 3b(n) < 0 & \mathrm{if} ~ n \equiv 2,3,4,6,7 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9) \end{cases} \end{align} $$

holds for $n\geq 22472$ . Calculating the first $22471$ coefficients of $g(q)-3h(q)$ by using the software Mathematica, we find that (3.11) is also true for $467 \leq n \leq 22471.$

3.5 Proof of Theorem 1.1

It follows from the identities in [Reference Aygin and Chan6, eqs.(2.10) and (2.11)] that

$$ \begin{align*} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} M(0,1,1;9;n) q^n - \frac{1}{3(q;q)_{\infty}} = \frac{2}{3}(g(q)-3h(q)), \end{align*} $$

and

$$ \begin{align*} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} M(2,3,4;9;n) q^n - \frac{1}{3(q;q)_{\infty}} = -\frac{1}{3}(g(q)-3h(q)), \end{align*} $$

so that

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{aligned} M(0,1,1;9;n) - \frac{p(n)}{3} &= \frac{2}{3}(a(n) - 3b(n) ), \\ M(2,3,4;9;n) - \frac{p(n)}{3} &= -\frac{1}{3}(a(n) - 3b(n) ). \end{aligned} \end{align*} $$

It is known from Subsection 3.4 that (3.11) holds for $n \geq 467.$ Hence, when $n \geq 467,$

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{cases} M(0,1,1;9;n)> \frac{p(n)}{3}, & \mathrm{if} ~ n \equiv 0,1,5,8 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9), \\[1ex] M(0,1,1;9;n) < \frac{p(n)}{3}, & \mathrm{if} ~ n \equiv 2,3,4,6,7 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9), \\[1ex] M(2,3,4;9;n) < \frac{p(n)}{3}, & \mathrm{if} ~ n \equiv 0,1,5,8 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9), \\[1ex] M(2,3,4;9;n)> \frac{p(n)}{3}, & \mathrm{if} ~ n \equiv 2,3,4,6,7 ~ (\mathrm{mod}~9). \\[1ex] \end{cases} \end{align*} $$

This finishes the proof of Theorem 1.1.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referee for his/her meticulously thorough reading of this paper and for numerous helpful comments and suggestions which greatly improved the exposition of this paper. This work was partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Changsha (Grant No. kq2208251).

Footnotes

1 See [Reference Rademacher17] and [Reference Schlosser and Zhou18] for details of the circle method.

2 We conjecture here that the congruence (3.10) holds for $0\leq h < k, (k,3)=1$ , and $(h,k)=1.$

References

Andrews, G. A. and Lewis, R., The ranks and cranks of partitions moduli 2, 3, and 4 . J. Number Theory 85(2000), no. 1, 7484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G. E. and Berndt, B. C., Ramanujan’s lost notebook. Part III, Springer, New York, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G. E. and Garvan, F. G., Dyson’s crank of a partition . Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 18(1988), no. 2, 167171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apostol, T. M., Modular functions and Dirichlet series in number theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 41, second edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkin, A. O. L. and Swinnerton-Dyer, P., Some properties of partitions . Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 4(1954), 84106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aygin, Z. S. and Chan, S. H., Combinations of ranks and cranks of partitions moduli 6, 9 and 12 and their comparison with the partition function . Ann. Comb. 23(2019), nos. 3–4, 489509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borozenets, N., Deviation of the rank and crank modulo 11. Preprint, 2023, arXiv:2305.08751v3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bringmann, K. and Pandey, B.V., Biases among classes of rank-crank partitions (mod11) . J. Math. Anal. Appl. 536(2024), no. 2, Paper No. 128221, 17 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, O.-Y., Some asymptotics for cranks . Acta Arith. 120(2005), no. 2, 107143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, S. H. and Mao, R., Inequalities for ranks of partitions and the first moment of ranks and cranks of partitions . Adv. Math. 258(2014), 414437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, N., Chern, S., Fan, Y. and Xia, E. X. W., Some generating functions and inequalities for the Andrews-Stanley partition functions . Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) 65(2022), no. 1, 120135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, F. J., Some guesses in the theory of partitions . Eureka 8(1944), 1015.Google Scholar
Fan, Y., Xia, E. X. W. and Zhao, X., New equalities and inequalities for the ranks and cranks of partitions . Adv. in Appl. Math. 146(2023), Paper No. 102486, 37 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, D. M., Resolution of a conjecture of Andrews and Lewis involving cranks of partitions . Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132(8)( 2004), 22472256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S.-Y., Mock Jacobi forms in basic hypergeometric series . Compos. Math. 145(2009), no. 3, 553565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, R., Ranks of partitions modulo 10 . J. Number Theory 133(2013), no. 11, 36783702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rademacher, H., On the expansion of the partition function in a series . Ann. of Math. (2) 44(1943), 416422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosser, M. J. and Zhou, N.H., On the infinite Borwein product raised to a positive real power . Ramanujan J. 61(2023), no. 2, 515543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yao, O. X. M., Personal communications, 2023.Google Scholar
Zhou, N. H., On the distribution of rank and crank statistics for integer partitions . Res. Number Theory 5(2019), no. 2, Paper No. 18, 8 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, N. H., On the distribution of the rank statistic for strongly concave compositions . Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 100(2019), no. 2, 230238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar