Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:19:19.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Importing social preferences across contexts and the pitfall of over-generalization across theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2012

Anne C. Pisor  and
Daniel M. T. Fessler
Anne C. Pisor
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3210. [email protected]://www.uweb.ucsb.edu/~pisor/
Daniel M. T. Fessler
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1553. [email protected]://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/fessler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Claims regarding negative strong reciprocity do indeed rest on experiments lacking established external validity, often without even a small “menu of options.” Guala's review should prompt strong reciprocity proponents to extend the real-world validity of their work, exploring the preferences participants bring to experiments. That said, Guala's approach fails to differentiate among group selection approaches and glosses over cross-cultural variability.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 34 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boehm, C. (1999) Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T., McElreath, R. & Smirnov, O. (2007) Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature 448:794–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egas, M. & Riedl, A. (2008) The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275(1637):871–78. Available at: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/275/1637/871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U. & Gächter, S. (2002) Strong reciprocity, human cooperation and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature 13:1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415(6868):137–40. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v415/n6868/abs/415137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guala, F. (2005) The methodology of experimental economics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F. (2008) Paradigmatic experiments: The ultimatum game from testing to measurement device. Philosophy of Science 75:658–69. Available at: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/594512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurven, M. & Winking, J. (2008) Collective action in action: Pro-social behavior in and out of the laboratory. American Anthropologist 110(2):179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Henrich, N. S., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q. & Tracer, D. (2005) “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6):795–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jack, K. B. (2009) Upstream-downstream transactions and watershed externalities: Experimental evidence from Kenya. Ecological Economics 68:1813–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquet, J., Hauert, C., Traulsen, A. & Milinski, M. (2011) Shame and honour drive cooperation. Biology Letters 1–3. (Published online before print, June 1, 2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamba, S. & Mace, R. (2010) People recognize when they are really anonymous in an economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior 31:271–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (2005) Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology 14:54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockenbach, B. & Milinski, M. (2006) The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment. Nature 444(7120):718–23. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature05229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rustagi, D., Engel, S. & Kosfeld, M. (2010) Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science 330(6006):961–65. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6006/961 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, S. A., El, Mouden, C. & Gardner, A. (2011) Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 32(4):231–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar