Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:15:57.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Movement control, decision-making, and the building of Roman roads to link them

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

Reza Shadmehr
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD21205, USA
Alaa A. Ahmed
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO80027, USA

Abstract

In science, as in life, one can only hope to both inform others, and be informed by them. The commentaries associated with our book Vigor have highlighted the many ways in which the theory that we proposed can be improved. For example, there are a myriad of factors that need to be considered in a fully encompassing objective function. The neural mechanisms underlying the links between movement and decision-making have yet to be unraveled. The implications of a two-way interaction between movement and decisions at both the individual and social levels remain to be understood. The commentaries outline future questions, and encouragingly highlight the diversity of science communities that may be linked via the concept of vigor.

Type
Authors’ Response
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnard, C. J., & Brown, C. A. J. (1985). Risk-sensitive foraging in common shrews (Sorex araneus L.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 16(2):161164, doi: 10.1007/BF00295150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bautista, L. M., Tinbergen, J., & Kacelnik, A. (2001). To walk or to fly? How birds choose among foraging modes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(0027–8424 (Print)):10891094, doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, L. C., Hendrix, E. C., & Dean, J. C. (2010). The cost of walking downhill: Is the preferred gait energetically optimal? Journal of Biomechanics, 43(10):19101915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonikaitis, D., & Deubel, H. (2011). Independent allocation of attention to eye and hand targets in coordinated eye-hand movements. Psychological Science, 22(3):339347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovejoy, L. P., & Krauzlis, R. J. (2010). Inactivation of primate superior colliculus impairs covert selection of signals for perceptual judgments. Nature Neuroscience, 13(1097–6256 (Linking)):261266, doi: 10.1038/nn.2470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolfs, M., & Carrasco, M. (2012). Rapid simultaneous enhancement of visual sensitivity and perceived contrast during saccade preparation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(40):13744–1352a, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2676-12.2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seideman, J. A., Stanford, T. R., & Salinas, E. (2018). Saccade metrics reflect decisionmaking dynamics during urgent choices. Nature Communications, 9, 2907. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05319-w.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seo, C., Guru, A., Jin, M., Ito, B., Sleezer, B. J., Ho, Y. Y., … & Warden, M. R. (2019). Intense threat switches dorsal raphe serotonin neurons to a paradoxical operational mode. Science, 363(6426), 538542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shadmehr, R., Reppert, T. R., Summerside, E. M., Yoon, T., & Ahmed, A. A. (2019). Movement vigor as a reflection of subjective economic utility. Trends in Neurosciences, 42:323336, doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2019.02.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, T., Geary, R. B., Ahmed, A. A., & Shadmehr, R. (2018). Control of movement vigor and decision making during foraging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(44):E10476E10485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, T., Jaleel, A., Ahmed, A. A., & Shadmehr, R. (2020). Saccade vigor and the subjective economic value of visual stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology, 123(6):21612172, doi: 10.1152/jn.00700.2019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed