Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:37:29.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence-based strategies needed to combat malnutrition in Sub-Saharan countries facing different stages of nutrition transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2021

Hélène Delisle*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal
Mieke Faber
Affiliation:
Non-Communicable Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council
Pascal Revault
Affiliation:
Action contre la Faim (ACF), France
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

No continent or country is exempt from malnutrition, which may take several forms that may even be combined: undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, obesity and other diet-related chronic diseases and risk thereof. Some populations are more affected than others primarily owing to poverty, and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is among those. However, SSA, which includes forty-eight countries, is not a monolith, with low- and as well as middle-income countries, and even two high-income country (Mauritius and Seychelles). Out of twenty-nine low-income countries in 2019 (GNI < $1036), twenty-three are in SSA, while only twenty-one out of the 106 middle-income countries ($1036 – $12 535) are in SSA(1). It is therefore not surprising that the burden of malnutrition is particularly heavy in SSA, with 32·7 % of children under five being stunted in 2019(2). Also, many SSA countries face the double burden of malnutrition(Reference Popkin, Corvalan and Grummer-Strawn3), that is, the overlap of undernutrition and overweight/obesity in the same population, or even the triple burden of malnutrition (stunting in children under five, anaemia in women of reproductive age and overweight/obesity in adult women). Of forty-one countries that faced the triple burden of malnutrition in 2018, thirty were in Africa(4).

This special issue of PHN on maternal and child nutrition in SSA is particularly relevant given the nutrition challenges facing the region and the vulnerability of mothers and young children to malnutrition. Nutrition interventions worldwide focus on the ‘First 1000 days’ as a critical window of opportunity to intervene. Preconception nutrition is also increasingly recognised as being very important(Reference Stephensen, Heslehurst and Hall5). This special issue is a reminder that research is essential for achieving progress in tackling all forms of malnutrition even in resource-poor regions such as SSA, and beyond the 1000 d. It is also timely in consideration of the current global mobilisation for improved nutrition. However, the call for papers predated the COVID-19 pandemic. This crisis is not addressed in the papers, although it severely affects food security and nutrition in SSA as well as in other fragile regions(Reference Pérez-Escamilla, Cunningham and Moran6).

Nutrition has been enjoying a particular momentum recently. The need to improve nutrition globally is recognised in the Sustainable Development Goals adopted by the UN in 2015, with two of the seventeen Sustainable Development Goals explicitly targeting nutrition(7). Sustainable Development Goal 2 aims to end hunger, achieve food security and promote sustainable agriculture, and Sustainable Development Goal 3 is to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages which includes enabling people to make healthy food choices. Another major milestone is the Decade of Action on Nutrition (2016–2025), which is a commitment by the UN and member countries to undertake 10 years of sustained and coherent implementation of policies, programmes and increased investments to eliminate malnutrition in all its forms, everywhere, leaving no one behind(8). The WHO’s Member States have endorsed global nutrition targets for 2025, which include substantial reductions of stunting, anaemia, low birth weight and wasting while increasing the rate of exclusive breast-feeding in the first 6 months and avoiding any increase in childhood overweight. The Lancet Journal is increasingly involved in nutrition, and in 2019 only, two important Commission Reports pertaining to nutrition were published, one on the global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition and climate change(Reference Swinburn, Kraak and Allender9) and a second one on healthy diets for sustainable development(Reference Willett, Rockström and Loken10). The same year, The Lancet also published the WHO Series on the double burden of malnutrition(11). Yet, one may wonder why progress has so far been so meagre despite the opportunities offered by these goals and commitments intended to achieve nutrition impact. Acknowledging that progress on malnutrition is not only too slow but also unfair, the 2020 Global Nutrition Report introduces the concept of nutrition equity, identifies priority actions focusing on food and health systems and stresses the need for better nutrition coordination, financing and accountability(12).

The papers published in this special issue report on innovative studies, qualitative or quantitative, in SSA, with the focus on optimal nutrition in children, adolescents and women of reproductive age (pre-pregnant, pregnant and lactating). The special issue includes a total of nineteen papers. Nearly all papers come from English-speaking countries, the only exception being French-speaking Burkina Faso (three papers). Interestingly, ten papers report on qualitative studies, whereas publications using quantitative research are usually predominant. Four qualitative studies looked at community solutions to malnutrition in a novel and participatory approach with the population(Reference Debpuur, Nonterah and Chatio13Reference Compaoré, Ouedraogo and Boua16), while one study looked at factors influencing the implementation of a multisectoral, community-level nutrition programme aimed at improving infant and young child feeding practices(Reference Ouedraogo, Doudou and Drabo17). The other qualitative studies explored nutrition-related behaviours of mothers(Reference Wrottesley, Prioreschi and Slemming18,Reference Dusingizimana, Weber and Ramilan19) , women outside of their maternal role(Reference Yiga, Ogwok and Achiend20), parents(Reference Klingberg, van Sluijs and Draper21), and adolescents(Reference Trübswasser, Baye and Holdsworth22).

According to the ecological framework, food choices are shaped by individual factors, as well as social, physical and macro-level environments(Reference Story, Kaphingst and Robinson-O’Brien23). Poverty and concerns related to affordability of food were reported to influence food choices in most of the studies included in this special issue. The nutrition transition currently observed in low- and middle-income countries, including African countries, is driven to a large extent by changes in local food systems(Reference Popkin, Corvalan and Grummer-Strawn3). SSA countries are however at different stages of economic and nutrition transition. Four papers report on the community’s perceptions of factors affecting maternal and child nutrition in three SSA countries that are at different stages of transition, namely Burkina Faso, Ghana and South Africa, and results show that food choices and barriers to optimum nutrition reflect the stage of the country’s transition(Reference Debpuur, Nonterah and Chatio13Reference Compaoré, Ouedraogo and Boua16). In Ghana, for example, lack of irrigated agricultural land and poor harvests were reported as main barriers to optimal nutrition(Reference Debpuur, Nonterah and Chatio13). In contrast, in the urban setting in South Africa, which has a more modernised food system, there is an increasing reliance on processed takeaway foods(Reference Erzse, Goldstein and Norris14). In Ethiopia, concerns related to hygiene in the physical food environment and informal food outlets were key factors influencing the food choices of adolescents, and as a result, packaged foods were viewed as healthier options(Reference Trübswasser, Baye and Holdsworth22).

Qualitative studies further highlight the importance of family dynamics, cultural beliefs and social media with regard to food choices. Infant feeding is reported to be strongly influenced by family matriarchs in South Africa, although the advice given is not aligned with infant and young child feeding recommendations(Reference Wrottesley, Prioreschi and Slemming18). The conflict between traditional knowledge on infant feeding and information provided by health workers is also highlighted in a study in Rwanda(Reference Dusingizimana, Weber and Ramilan19). The importance of social media as source of nutrition information and determinant of food choices is reflected in a study in Ghana(Reference Yiga, Ogwok and Achiend20). In a study in South Africa, parents noted that preschool children even at this very young age are drawn to devices such as smartphones, tablets and laptops and that TV was regularly watched; these habits may limit physical activity, thereby favouring overweight(Reference Klingberg, van Sluijs and Draper21).

Out of the nine quantitative papers in this special issue, seven are epidemiological studies and only three pertain to interventions. The epidemiological studies focused on iodine(Reference Atukunda, Muhoozi and Diep24,Reference Businge, Longo-Mbenza and Kengne25) , anaemia(Reference Weze, Abiove and Obiajunwa26,Reference Acharya, Yang and Jones27) , linear growth(Reference Tessema, De Groote and Brouwer28) and obesity(Reference Kigaru, Ndung’u and Macharia-Mutie29). All three intervention studies deal with undernutrition(Reference Nyamasege, Kimani-Murage and Wanjohi30Reference Zombré, De Allegri and Ridde32). The double burden of malnutrition and the ‘double duty actions’(Reference Hawkes, Ruel and Salm33) are not specifically addressed although the issue is discussed in the qualitative papers on community solutions.

None of the studies included in this issue applied implementation research methods and tools even if one study examined the facilitating factors and challenges of implementing multisectoral nutrition programmes(Reference Ouedraogo, Doudou and Drabo17). This is an area where further research should be advocated. It is also unfortunate that no selected paper dealt directly with local food systems considering their importance for nutritional health and sustainability of the planet. Globally, SSA is the region with the highest prevalence of hunger (22·0 % in 2019), and food security in the region is adversely affected by a wide range of factors including poverty, conflicts, violence and changes in environmental conditions(34). At the same time, changes in the food systems have resulted in less-nutritious food being cheaper, more accessible and more convenient which, together with reduced physical activity, have led to increasing overweight and obesity(Reference Reardon, Tschirley and Liverpool-Tasie35). Food systems in SSA therefore need to supply affordable and environmentally sustainable healthy diets to both the undernourished and the overweight.

It is globally recognised that nutrition strategies on their own will not be sufficient to eliminate malnutrition. Combining nutrition-specific interventions such as breast-feeding promotion or micronutrient fortification and nutrition-sensitive interventions addressing underlying causes of malnutrition (such as food insecurity or poor sanitation) is needed(36). These interventions however need to be context-specific, considering local factors as highlighted in several of the papers in this issue.

The annual research conference on undernutrition organised by ACF/Action Against Hunger is of importance for advancing evidence-based strategies to combat under nutrition in low- and middle-income countries, and notably in SSA(37). It is intended to share research findings with the humanitarian, developmental and academic networks. The conclusions of the last conference held in December 2019 corroborate some of the recommendations arising from the work presented in this special issue(Reference Gomez, Revault and Patil38). In particular: the effectiveness of concrete actions that involve families and individuals within the community to tackle stunting; the need to also address food systems; and the relevance of revisiting more broadly the determinants of under nutrition such as those related to gender. The importance of considering undernutrition as a continuum, with the co-existence of wasting, stunting and micronutrient malnutrition, integrating prevention and treatment, and based on intervention research was stressed by all participants.

This special issue on maternal and child nutrition in Africa fostered the publication of African researchers’ work. It is to be hoped that another special issue on nutrition in Africa will be programmed in the near future, this time with emphasis on the growing issue of the double burden of malnutrition and on diet-related non-communicable diseases.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: Not applicable. Financial support: There was no funding for this editorial. Conflict of interest: All three authors confirm that they have no conflict of interest. Authorship: H.D. drafted the paper, and M.F. and P.R. contributed to the provisional and final version of the editorial. Ethics of human subject participation: not applicable.

References

New World Bank Country Classification by income level – 2020–2021. https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata (accessed January 2021).Google Scholar
UNICEF/WHO/Word Bank group (2020) Levels and trends in child malnutrition: joint child malnutrition estimates. https://who.int/publications (accessed January 2021).Google Scholar
Popkin, BM, Corvalan, C & Grummer-Strawn, LM (2020) Dynamics of the double burden of malnutrition and the changing nutrition reality. Lancet 395, 6574.10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32497-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Global Nutrition Report (2020) Action on Equity to End Malnutrition. Bristol, UK: Development Initiatives Poverty Research Ltd.Google Scholar
Stephensen, J, Heslehurst, N, Hall, J et al (2018) Before the beginning: nutrition and lifestyle in the preconception period and its importance for future health. Lancet 391, 18301841.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30311-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Escamilla, R, Cunningham, K & Moran, VH (2020) COVID-19 and maternal and child food and nutrition insecurity: a complex syndemic (Editorial). Matern Child Nutr 16, e13036.10.1111/mcn.13036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN Sustainable Development Goals. https://un.org/sustainabledevelopment (accessed November 2020).Google Scholar
UN Decade of Action on Nutrition 2016–2025. www.un.org/nutrition (accessed January 2021).Google Scholar
Swinburn, BA, Kraak, VI, Allender, S et al (2019) The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: the Lancet Commission Report. Lancet 393, 791846.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willett, W, Rockström, J, Loken, B et al (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447492.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Lancet. The double burden of malnutrition, December 16, 2019. www.thelancet.com/series/double-burden-malnutrition (accessed December 2020).Google Scholar
Global Nutrition Report 2020. https://globalnutritionreport.org/reports/2020-global-nutrition-report (accessed November 2020).Google Scholar
Debpuur, C, Nonterah, EA, Chatio, ST et al (2021) Supporting maternal and child nutrition: views from community members in rural Northern Ghana. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S136898002000302XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erzse, A, Goldstein, S, Norris, SA et al (2021) Double-duty solutions for optimising maternal and child nutrition in urban South Africa: a qualitative study. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020002426CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D, Kehoe, SH, Erzse, A et al (2021) Community perspectives on maternal and child health during nutrition and economic transition in sub-Saharan Africa. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020003018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Compaoré, A, Ouedraogo, K, Boua, PR et al (2021) ‘Men are not playing their roles’, maternal and child nutrition in Nanoro, Burkina Faso. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020003365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouedraogo, O, Doudou, MH, Drabo, KM et al (2021) Facilitating factors and challenges of the implementation of multisectoral nutrition programmes at the community level to improve optimal infant and young child feeding practices: a qualitative study in Burkina Faso. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S136898002000347XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrottesley, SV, Prioreschi, A, Slemming, W et al (2021) Maternal perspectives on infant feeding practices in Soweto, South Africa. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020002451CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dusingizimana, T, Weber, JL, Ramilan, T et al (2021) A qualitative analysis of infant and young child feeding practices in rural Rwanda. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020001081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yiga, P, Ogwok, P, Achiend, J et al (2021) Determinants of dietary and physical activity behaviours among women of reproductive age in urban Uganda, a qualitative study. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020003432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingberg, S, van Sluijs, EMF & Draper, CE (2021) Parent perspectives on preschoolers’ movement and dietary behaviours: a qualitative study in Soweto, South Africa. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020003730CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trübswasser, U, Baye, K, Holdsworth, M et al (2021) Assessing factors influencing adolescents’ dietary behaviours in urban Ethiopia using participatory photography. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020002487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Story, M, Kaphingst, KM, Robinson-O’Brien, R et al (2008) Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health 29, 253272.10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atukunda, P, Muhoozi, G, Diep, LM et al (2021) The association of urine markers of iodine intake with development and growth among children in rural Uganda: a secondary analysis of a randomised education trial. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020001603CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Businge, CB, Longo-Mbenza, B, Kengne, AP (2021) Iodine nutrition status in Africa: potentially high prevalence of iodine deficiency in pregnancy even in countries classified as iodine sufficient. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020002384CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weze, Kk, Abiove, AI, Obiajunwa, C et al (2021) Spatio-temporal trends in anaemia among pregnant women, adolescents and preschool children in sub-Saharan Africa. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020004620CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acharya, Y, Yang, D & Jones, AD (2021) Livestock ownership and anaemia in Sub-Saharan African households. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020002827CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tessema, M, De Groote, H, Brouwer, ID et al (2021) Exposure to aflatoxins and fumonisins and linear growth of children in rural Ethiopia: a longitudinal study. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980021000422CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kigaru, DMD, Ndung’u, Z & Macharia-Mutie, CW (2021) Application of stable isotope dilution techniques to assess body fat and comparison with WHO BMI-for-age classification as a measure of obesity among schoolchildren in Nairobi, Kenya. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020001950CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyamasege, CK, Kimani-Murage, EW, Wanjohi, M et al (2021) Effect of maternal nutritional education and counselling on children’s stunting prevalence in urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020001962CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takyi, A, Tette, E, Goka, B et al (2021) Treatment outcomes among children treated for uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition: a retrospective study in Accra, Ghana. Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980020002463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zombré, D, De Allegri, M, Ridde, V et al (2021) User fees removal and community-based management of undernutrition in Burkina Faso: what effects on children’s nutritional status? Public Health Nutr.10.1017/S1368980021000732CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkes, C, Ruel, MT, Salm, L et al (2020) Double-duty actions : seizing programme and policy opportunities to address malnutrition in all forms. Lancet 395, 142155.10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32506-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (2020) The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. Transforming Food Systems for Affordable Healthy Diets. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Reardon, T, Tschirley, D, Liverpool-Tasie, LSO et al (2021) The processed food revolution in African food systems and the double burden of malnutrition. Glob Food Sec 28, 100466.10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100466CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Global Nutrition Report (2018) Shining a Light to Spur Action on Nutrition. Bristol, UK: Development Initiatives Poverty Research Ltd.Google Scholar
ACF Research for Nutrition Conference. https://research-for-nutrition-conference.org/conference-2019/ (accessed December 2020).Google Scholar
Gomez, A, Revault, P & Patil, P (2020) Operational research and malnutrition: state of knowledge and food for thought. http://alternatives-humanitaires.org/en/2020/03/18/operational-research (accessed January 2021).Google Scholar