Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:24:15.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative analysis of the root posture of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with wavy roots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2024

Hiroki Yagi
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Natural Science, Konan University, Kobe 658-8501, Japan
Ikuko Hara-Nishimura
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Konan University, Kobe 658-8501, Japan
Haruko Ueda*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Natural Science, Konan University, Kobe 658-8501, Japan Faculty of Science and Engineering, Konan University, Kobe 658-8501, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Haruko Ueda; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Plant postures are affected by environmental stimuli. When the gravitational direction changes, the Arabidopsis thaliana mutants myosin xif xik (xif xik) and atp-binding cassette b19 (abcb19) exhibit aberrantly enhanced organ bending. Whether their phenotypes are due to the same mechanism is unknown. We characterized the primary root postures of these mutants. Their roots exhibited enhanced gravitropic bending with the same root-tip angles. The wavy roots of vertically grown plants were quantitatively evaluated using four indices. The straightness index (root base-to-tip length to total root-length ratio) was similar for xif xik and abcb19, and it slightly decreased for xif xik abcb19. The curvature index was similar for abcb19 and xif xik abcb19, but it decreased for xif xik, suggesting the ABCB19 deficiency caused the roots to curve more sharply. Combination of these indices for quantitative analyses of root postures may distinguish between similar wavy-root phenotypes and clarify genetic relationships.

Type
Original Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with John Innes Centre

1. Introduction

Plant posture is influenced by various environmental stimuli, including gravity, light and touch (Darwin, Reference Darwin1880; Gilroy, Reference Gilroy2008; Harmer & Brooks, Reference Harmer and Brooks2018). Tropism refers to the directional movement of plant organs in response to stimuli. After plants perceive a change in the direction of gravity, polar auxin transport is altered (Žádníková et al., Reference Žádníková, Smet, Zhu, Van Der Straeten and Benková2015; Nakamura et al., Reference Nakamura, Nishimura and Morita2019). The differential distribution of auxin induces differential cell growth, leading to organ bending (Esmon et al., Reference Esmon, Pedmale and Liscum2005a, Reference Esmon, Tinsley, Ljung, Sandberg, Hearne and Liscum2005b). The primary inflorescence stems and the primary roots grow against and towards the direction of gravity, respectively. In Arabidopsis thaliana, mutations to auxin transporter genes result in aberrant responses to gravity (Müller et al., Reference Müller, Guan, Gälweiler, Tänzler, Huijser, Marchant, Parry, Bennett, Wisman and Palme1998; Marchant et al., Reference Marchant, Kargul, May, Muller, Delbarre, Perrot-Rechenmann and Bennett1999; Friml et al., Reference Friml, Wiśniewska, Benková, Mendgen and Palme2002). For example, in abcb19 mutants, the deficient expression of ATP-BINDING CASSETTE SUBFAMILY B19 (ABCB19)/MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE PROTEIN1 (MDR1)/P-GLYCOPROTEIN 19 (PGP19), which encodes an auxin efflux transporter, leads to enhanced gravitropism (Noh et al., Reference Noh, Murphy and Spalding2001, Reference Noh, Bandyopadhyay, Peer, Spalding and Murphy2003; Geisler et al., Reference Geisler, Blakeslee, Bouchard, Lee, Vincenzetti, Bandyopadhyay, Titapiwatanakun, Peer, Bailly, Richards, Ejendal, Smith, Baroux, Grossniklaus, Müller, Hrycyna, Dudler, Murphy and Martinoia2005; Rojas-Pierce et al., Reference Rojas-Pierce, Titapiwatanakun, Sohn, Fang, Larive, Blakeslee, Cheng, Cuttler, Peer, Murphy and Raikhel2007; Bailly et al., Reference Bailly, Sovero, Vincenzetti, Santelia, Bartnik, Koenig, Mancuso, Martinoia and Geisler2008), enhanced phototropism (Noh et al., Reference Noh, Bandyopadhyay, Peer, Spalding and Murphy2003) and wavy roots and hypocotyls (Noh et al., Reference Noh, Bandyopadhyay, Peer, Spalding and Murphy2003; Lewis et al., Reference Lewis, Miller, Splitt, Wu and Spalding2007; Nagashima et al., Reference Nagashima, Suzuki, Uehara, Saji, Furukawa, Koshiba, Sekimoto, Fujioka, Kuroha, Kojima, Sakakibara, Fujisawa, Okada and Sakai2008; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Liu, Mo, Qian, Cao and Cui2013).

Previous studies on gravitropism revealed that tropisms are likely mediated by organ bending and organ straightening (Stanković et al., Reference Stanković, Volkmann and Sack1998; Bastien et al., Reference Bastien, Bohr, Moulia and Douady2013; Okamoto et al., Reference Okamoto, Ueda, Shimada, Tamura, Kato, Tasaka, Morita and Hara-Nishimura2015). The straightening process (i.e., autotropism or autostraightening) maintains a straight posture, probably through the perception of the degree of bending (Stanković et al., Reference Stanković, Volkmann and Sack1998; Haga & Iino, Reference Haga and Iino2006; Okamoto et al., Reference Okamoto, Ueda, Shimada, Tamura, Kato, Tasaka, Morita and Hara-Nishimura2015). Although mathematical modelling studies have demonstrated the importance of the organ straightening process for controlling posture (Bastien et al., Reference Bastien, Bohr, Moulia and Douady2013, Reference Bastien, Douady and Moulia2014; Moulton et al., Reference Moulton, Oliveri and Goriely2020), the underlying molecular mechanism remains largely unknown. Intriguingly, organ straightening occurs without a reversal of the asymmetrical distribution of auxin during tropic responses (Haga & Iino, Reference Haga and Iino2006). The only known regulator of organ straightening is the actin–myosin XI cytoskeleton. The A. thaliana mutants myosin xif xik (xif xik) and actin8/frizzy1 are defective in the organ straightening process required for restoring posture (Okamoto et al., Reference Okamoto, Ueda, Shimada, Tamura, Kato, Tasaka, Morita and Hara-Nishimura2015). Various organs, such as roots, hypocotyls and inflorescence stems, of the xif xik mutants exhibit enhanced bending in response to gravity and light (Okamoto et al., Reference Okamoto, Ueda, Shimada, Tamura, Kato, Tasaka, Morita and Hara-Nishimura2015). Therefore, the xif xik and actin8/frizzy1 plants have a kinked gross morphology (Okamoto et al., Reference Okamoto, Ueda, Shimada, Tamura, Kato, Tasaka, Morita and Hara-Nishimura2015; Ueda et al., Reference Ueda, Tamura and Hara-Nishimura2015). By combining mathematical modelling and quantitative analyses of the shoot-bending behaviour of wild-type and xif xik plants, we recently demonstrated that the distribution of stress is modulated by the straightening process, resulting in a mechanically favourable shape (Tsugawa et al., Reference Tsugawa, Miyake, Okamoto, Toyota, Yagi, Morita, Hara-Nishimura and Ueda2023).

Quantitative analysis of root posture is an effective and easy means to determine the degree of organ straightening. Grabov et al. (Reference Grabov, Ashley, Rigas, Hatzopoulos, Dolan and Vicente-Agullo2005) proposed the following three root posture indices: vertical growth index (VGI), horizontal growth index (HGI) and straightness (hereafter referred to as straightness index (SI)) (Grabov et al., Reference Grabov, Ashley, Rigas, Hatzopoulos, Dolan and Vicente-Agullo2005). Previous research indicated that VGI can distinguish the root posture of tiny root hair1, a gravitropism-deficient mutant, from that of the wild-type, but root length cannot (Vicente-Agullo et al., Reference Vicente-Agullo, Rigas, Desbrosses, Dolan, Hatzopoulos and Grabov2004; Grabov et al., Reference Grabov, Ashley, Rigas, Hatzopoulos, Dolan and Vicente-Agullo2005). Both HGI and SI were used for a quantitative trait locus analysis of the root morphology of A. thaliana accessions Landsberg erecta and Cape Verde Islands (Vaughn & Masson, Reference Vaughn and Masson2011). In addition, these two indices were useful for differentiating between the root postures of the A. thaliana accessions Columbia-0 (Col-0) and Wassilewskija (Schultz et al., Reference Schultz, Zupanska, Sng, Paul and Ferl2017). It is also reported that SI could be affected by the growth conditions including plant age (Grabov et al., Reference Grabov, Ashley, Rigas, Hatzopoulos, Dolan and Vicente-Agullo2005) and the presence of sucrose in the culture medium (García-González et al., Reference García-González, Lacek, Wechwerthm and Retzer2022).

Exploration of the relationship between mutants with similar postures, such as aberrantly wavy roots, can be challenging. In this study, we aimed to establish simple phenotyping methods to evaluate plant posture using the readily manipulable roots of A. thaliana. First, to understand the genetic relationship between MYOSIN XI genes and ABCB19 in posture control in response to gravity, we compared the gravitropic responses of roots of xif xik and abcb19, which have not been directly compared in previous studies. Second, we quantitatively compared the wavy posture of vertically grown roots of these mutants by calculating the curvature index (CI) in addition to the VGI, HGI and SI. The results indicated that a combination of these indices may enable the classification of similar wavy-root phenotypes and clarification of genetic relationships.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plant materials and growth conditions

Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0, myosin xif-1 xik-2 (hereafter referred to as xif xik; Okamoto et al., Reference Okamoto, Ueda, Shimada, Tamura, Kato, Tasaka, Morita and Hara-Nishimura2015), two abcb19 mutants (abcb19-101/atmdr1-101 and abcb19-102/atmdr1-102; Lin & Wang, Reference Lin and Wang2005) and the xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 triple mutants were used in this study. The xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 mutants were generated via genetic crosses. Seeds were surface-sterilized in 70% (v/v) ethanol and then aseptically sown on plates containing Murashige and Skoog medium (Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) gellan gum (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan), 0.5% MES-KOH (pH 5.7), 0.01% myo-inositol and with or without 1% (w/v) sucrose. The seeds were incubated at 4°C in darkness for a day to break dormancy, and then at 22°C under light condition for a day. Plants were grown almost vertically (pitches were 80–90°) along the surface of the medium at 22°C for 3 or 5 days in darkness to mitigate the effect of phototropism on root posture. Subsequently, the plants were used for a gravitropism assay or quantitative analysis of root posture.

2.2. Root gravitropism assay

Three-day-old etiolated seedlings grown on medium supplemented with sucrose in plates were reoriented by 90° in darkness. After gravistimulation for 8 hours, the plates were scanned with exposure to light using a scanner (GT-X830, EPSON, Nagano, Japan). The angle between the horizontal plane and the root tip was measured using ImageJ/Fiji v1.53f51/Java 1.8.0 software (Schindelin et al., Reference Schindelin, Arganda-Carreras, Frise, Kaynig, Longair, Pietzsch, Preibisch, Rueden, Saalfeld, Schmid, Tinevez, White, Hartenstein, Eliceiri, Tomancak and Cardona2012; National Institute of Health). Figure 1a shows a schematic illustration of measurement of the bending angle. The data were statistically processed using R v4.1.2 (R Core Team, 2021) and circular histograms were plotted using the “ggplot2” R package (Wickam, Reference Wickam2016). The sample sizes (n) were as follows: 147 (Col-0), 135 (xif xik), 73 (abcb19-101), 93 (abcb19-102), 129 (xif xik abcb19-101) and 133 (xif xik abcb19-102). The Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to analyse the differences among mean ranks as implemented in default R. The Steel–Dwass test was performed for post hoc nonparametric multiple pairwise comparisons with “pSDCFlig” function (method = “Asymptotic”) as implemented in the “NSM3” R package (Schneider et al., Reference Schneider, Chicken and Becvarik2022).

Figure 1. Measurement of gravitropic bending angles of roots. Three-day-old wild-type (Col-0), myosin xif xik (xif xik), abcb19-101, abcb19-102, xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 etiolated seedlings grown on agar medium in plates were reoriented by 90° in darkness. After gravistimulation for 8 hours, the plates were photographed. (a) Schematic diagram of an etiolated seedling after gravistimulation for 8 hours and the root-tip angle with a horizontal plane (purple circular arch). (b) Representative images of the wild-type (Col-0) and mutant plants. Magnified images of the root tips are shown in the inset images. Scale bars indicate 2.5 mm. (c) Circular histograms of the root-tip angles that were grouped into 20° classes. The mean ± standard deviation and sample number (n) are provided. (d) P-values for the differences in the root-tip angles between each pair of genotypes that were estimated by the Steel–Dwass test as a post hoc test following the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA (P ANOVA < 2.2E−16). *, P < 0.05; n.s., not significant.

2.3. Quantitative analysis of root posture

Plants were grown almost vertically on medium supplemented with or without sucrose in darkness for 3 or 5 days. The etiolated seedlings on the plates were scanned with exposure to light using a scanner. The “segmented line” regions of interest (ROIs) along the roots (from the root–hypocotyl junction to the root tip) were determined manually using ImageJ/Fiji v1.53f51/Java 1.8.0 software and transformed into “smoothed line” ROIs using the Fiji function “Fit Spline.” In total, 100–450 dots were marked along the root and then the coordinate data were exported to R v4.1.2. The sequential coordinates were fitted via spline interpolation to comprise 1,000 dots cm−1 using the “smoothr” R package (Strimas-Mackey, Reference Strimas-Mackey2023). Supplementary Figure S1 summarizes the procedure to obtain the root coordinates. The primary root length (L), VGI, HGI and SI were calculated as described by Grabov et al. (Reference Grabov, Ashley, Rigas, Hatzopoulos, Dolan and Vicente-Agullo2005) (Graphical definition of these indices is depicted in Figure 2c). In brief, VGI and HGI are the vertical and horizontal distances between the starting and ending points of the root (Ly and Lx ) per L, respectively. SI is the distance between the starting and ending points (Lc ) per L. The CI was calculated as the ratio of the angle and distance between three sequential points. In other words, CI reflects the rate of change in the tangential angle of the curve. The CI of a straight line is 0, and the value increases as the sharpness of the curve increases. Next, a simple moving average of 0.005 cm before and after (0.01 cm in total) was used, considering the human error in the ROI setting in ImageJ/Fiji. The first and last 20 dots were eliminated from the curvature calculation. When calculating the mean CI for each root, the 1%-trimmed mean (the 0.5% lowest and highest values each were removed) was used. Root postures with or without CI-indicating colour were plotted on a two-dimensional plane using the “ggplot2” R package. All box and dot plots were generated using the “ggplot2” and “gghalves” R packages (Tiedemann, Reference Tiedemann2022). The sample sizes (n) for investigation of the effects of incubation time and sucrose on the root posture of Col-0 were as follows: 33 (3-day-old without sucrose; 3d−Suc), 29 (3-day-old with sucrose; 3d+Suc), 39 (5-day-old without sucrose; 5d−Suc) and 35 (5-day-old with sucrose; 5d+Suc). The Brunner–Munzel nonparametric test implemented in the “brunnermunzel” R package (Ara, Reference Ara2022) with the Bonferroni correction was performed for comparisons of 3d−Suc versus 3d+Suc, 3d−Suc versus 5d−Suc, 3d+Suc versus 5d+Suc and 5d−Suc versus 5d+Suc. The data included outliers; however, the Brunner–Munzel test is robust to outliers and independent of homoscedasticity. To compare the root posture between genotypes, plants were grown on medium supplemented with sucrose for 5 days. The sample sizes (n) were as follows: 71 (Col-0), 77 (xif xik), 62 (abcb19-101), 59 (abcb19-102), 66 (xif xik abcb19-101) and 78 (xif xik abcb19-102). Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric one-way ANOVA and the Steel–Dwass test for post hoc nonparametric multiple pairwise comparisons. It should be noted that the ANOVA P-values (P ANOVA) throughout the study, including the root gravitropism assay, were below the Bonferroni threshold of 0.05 (0.05/9 = 0.0056), except for HGI (Supplementary Figure S4a).

Figure 2. Evaluation of root postures in vertically grown seedlings by the straightness index (SI). Wild-type (Col-0), myosin xif xik (xif xik), abcb19-101, abcb19-102, xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 seedlings were grown vertically along the surface of the medium in darkness for 5 days. (a) Representative images of 5-day-old seedlings. Scale bars indicate 1 cm. (b) Posture plots of 15 individual roots for each genotype. The coordinate (0,0) indicates the basal point (the root–hypocotyl junction) of each root. (c) Schematic diagram of the root posture-related horizontal growth index (HGI), vertical growth index (VGI) and straightness index (SI). (d, e) Quantitative comparisons of root length (d) and SI (e) presented as box and dot plots. The bars indicate the sample ranges, each box indicates the first and third quantiles and the bold horizontal line is the median. The number of samples (n) is as follows: 71 (Col-0), 77 (xif xik), 62 (abcb19-101), 59 (abcb19-102), 66 (xif xik abcb19-101) and 78 (xif xik abcb19-102). Different letters (a, b and c) indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05; Steel–Dwass test following the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA (P ANOVA = 1.22E−11 in root length, and P ANOVA < 2.2E−16 in SI)).

3. Results

3.1. Roots of xif xik and abcb19 mutants exhibited similar enhancement of gravitropic bending

We compared the root gravitropic response of the xif xik mutant, two abcb19 mutants (abcb19-101 and abcb19-102) and the xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 triple mutants. The bending of the primary roots and hypocotyls was greater for all mutants than for the wild-type (Col-0) control (Figure 1b). In this study, we focused on root posture because hypocotyls often did not elongate along the surface of the medium and were difficult to quantify. The Col-0 roots had the smallest bending angle (51.4 ± 12.5°; mean ± standard deviation) among the analysed genotypes (Figure 1c, d). The xif xik, abcb19-101 and abcb19-102 mutant roots had similar bending angles (76.8 ± 15.5, 71.9 ± 21.4 and 75.2 ± 15.0°, respectively; Figure 1c, d). Thus, following gravistimulation for 8 hours, the xif xik and abcb19 roots were indistinguishable. The bending angles of the triple mutants xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 (85.9 ±16.6 and 84.7 ± 17.0°, respectively; Figure 1c, d) were significantly larger than those of xif xik and abcb19.

3.2. Roots of xif xik and abcb19 mutants had a similarly low SI

We noticed that, when seedlings were grown vertically on agar medium supplemented with sucrose in darkness for 5 days, the xif xik mutant had similar phenotypes to the abcb19 mutants, which was in contrast to the straight roots and hypocotyls of the Col-0 plants (Figure 2a). Furthermore, the wavy phenotype was enhanced in the xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 mutants (Figure 2a). Plots of the coordinates for 15 representative root postures and for all root postures are presented in Figure 2b and Supplementary Figure S2, respectively. We first calculated three indices (HGI, VGI and SI) for quantification of the root postures (Grabov et al., Reference Grabov, Ashley, Rigas, Hatzopoulos, Dolan and Vicente-Agullo2005; Figure 2c). To investigate the effects of incubation time and sucrose on these indices, we compared Col-0 root postures under the following treatments: 3-day-old without sucrose (3d−Suc), 3-day-old with sucrose (3d+Suc), 5-day-old without sucrose (5d−Suc) and 5-day-old with sucrose (5d+Suc). The 3d+Suc treatment was identical to the gravitropism assay described in the preceding section. Roots grown under the 5d+Suc treatment were notably longer than those under the 3d+Suc and 5d−Suc treatments (Supplementary Figure S3a). The VGI and SI of the 5d+Suc roots were lower than those of the roots under the 3d+Suc and 5d−Suc treatments, whereas the HGI was invariant among all treatments (Supplementary Figure S3b–d). Under the 3d−Suc, 3d+Suc and 5d−Suc treatments, in which the roots were short, the three indices each showed large variance presumably affected by the direction of germination (Supplementary Figure S3). To mitigate these effects, the following experiments were conducted under the 5d+Suc treatment, which induced longer roots. Under the 5d+Suc treatment, the roots of all genotypes were sufficiently elongated to allow quantitative analysis (Figure 2d). With regard to HGI, no differences were observed among the genotypes, including Col-0 (Supplementary Figure S4a; Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA P ANOVA = 0.905). In contrast, SI and VGI were significantly lower for the xif xik, abcb19-101 and abcb19-102 mutants than for Col-0 (Figure 2e, Supplementary Figure S4b). The SI and VGI for the triple mutants were similar or slightly lower than those for the xif xik and abcb19 mutants (Figure 2e, Supplementary Figure S4b). These results suggest that SI and VGI are useful for distinguishing the root posture of the xif xik and abcb19 mutants from that of the wild-type control. However, these root posture indices are determined on the basis of the root length and the coordinates of the root starting and ending points. Therefore, details regarding local bending will be lost if these indices are used.

3.3. Roots of the abcb19 mutants had greater CI than roots of the xif xik mutant

The local bending of roots was quantitatively examined by calculating the root CI. Representative roots and their CI (coloured plots) are presented in Figure 3a. The mean and maximal CI were lowest for Col-0 (Figure 3b, c); they were higher for xif xik and highest for abcb19 and the triple mutants (Figure 3b, c). Density histograms of the CI for all obtained dots showed that the CI distributions of ABCB19-deficient mutants were more skewed to higher values than those of Col-0 and the xif xik mutant (Supplementary Figure S5). Because Col-0 and xif xik had few dots with CI > 50 cm−1 (Supplementary Figure S5), we set 50 cm−1 as the CI threshold and counted the number of dots exceeding this threshold per individual root. There were considerably more dots where CI exceeded this threshold for all of the ABCB19-deficient mutants, whereas almost no dots exceeded this threshold for Col-0 and the xif xik mutant (Figure 3d). Notably, unlike SI, the mean and maximal CI and the number of dots, where CI exceeded 50 cm−1, were useful for distinguishing between the root postures of the xif xik and abcb19 mutants (Figures 2e and 3bd).

Figure 3. Evaluation of root postures in vertically grown seedlings by the curvature index (CI). Wild-type (Col-0), myosin xif xik (xif xik), abcb19-101, abcb19-102, xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 seedlings were grown vertically along the surface of the medium in darkness for 5 days. (a) Images of two representative roots for each genotype and the corresponding coloured diagrams of the CI. Scale bars indicate 1 cm and the colour scale is presented on the right. (b–d) Quantitative comparisons of the mean CI (b), maximal CI (c) and number of dots where CI exceeded 50 cm−1 (d) are presented as box and dot plots. The bars indicate the sample ranges, each box indicates the first and third quantiles and the bold horizontal line is the median. Sample numbers (n) are the same as those in Figure 2d, e. Different letters (a, b and c) indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05; Steel–Dwass test following the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA (P ANOVA < 2.2E−16 for all indices)).

Figure 4. The apical side of the roots showed higher curvature than the basal side. Wild-type (Col-0), myosin xif xik (xif xik), abcb19-101, abcb19-102, xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 seedlings were grown vertically along the surface of the medium in darkness for 5 days. (a) Coloured diagrams of the curvature index (CI) of all samples. Sample numbers (n) are the same as those in Figure 2d, e. The coordinate (0,0) indicates the basal point (the root–hypocotyl junction) of each root. The colour scale is provided to the right of Col-0. (b) Plots of CI versus the distance from the basal point of each root. Red lines represent the generalized additive model regression curves of each genotype. (c) Comparison of the mean CI calculated for each of the following distances from the basal point: 0.0–0.5 cm, 0.5–1.0 cm and ≥1.0 cm. The bars indicate the sample ranges, each box indicates the first and third quantiles and the bold horizontal line is the median. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05; Steel–Dwass test following the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA (P ANOVA < 2.2E−16)).

3.4. The apical side of the roots had a higher CI than the basal side

We observed that CI tended to be relatively low and high on the basal and apical sides of the roots, respectively, for all of the analysed genotypes. The root postures of all samples are presented in Figure 4a, with colours indicating CI. In addition, “distance from the basal point (the root–hypocotyl junction)” versus CI was plotted (Figure 4b). For simplicity, the roots were divided into three compartments (0.0–0.5 cm, 0.5–1.0 cm and ≥1.0 cm from the basal point) and then the mean CI was calculated. In each compartment, the mean CI was lower for xif xik than for abcb19 and lowest for Col-0 (Figure 4c). Although the mean CI was higher for the triple mutants than for abcb19 in the 0.0–0.5 cm compartment, there was almost no difference in the mean CI between the triple mutants and abcb19 in the compartments ≥0.5 cm from the basal point (Figure 4c). Similar results were observed in the mean CI for the whole root length (Figure 3b). Comparison of the compartments revealed that the mean CI was lowest in the 0.0–0.5 cm compartment for all genotypes, whereas the mean CI in the 0.5–1.0 cm and ≥1.0 cm compartments was almost the same for the analysed genotypes, with the exception of xif xik, in which the mean CI was highest in the ≥1.0 cm compartment (Figure 4c). Moreover, the CI in the 0.5–1.0 cm compartment of the ABCB19-deficient mutants was higher than the mean CI in the ≥1.0 cm compartment of the xif xik mutant.

4. Discussion

In the current study, we used four indices to evaluate root posture, of which HGI, VGI and SI are determined only on the basis of the root length and the coordinates of the root starting and ending points (Grabov et al., Reference Grabov, Ashley, Rigas, Hatzopoulos, Dolan and Vicente-Agullo2005). When the plants were grown vertically, the xif xik abcb19 triple mutants had similar or slightly lower SI than the xif xik and abcb19 mutants (Figure 2e), indicative of the utility of SI for differentiating the root posture of xif xik abcb19 from that of xif xik and abcb19. Because of their simplicity, these indices are useful for processing large amounts of root data. However, these three indices were unable to distinguish between the xif xik and abcb19 roots with apparently similar phenotypes (Figure 2e and Supplementary Figure S3). We attempted to quantify the fine root bending using CI, which reflects the whole root posture. The xif xik roots had a higher CI than the Col-0 roots, but a lower CI than the abcb19 roots (Figures 3 and 4). These findings indicate that combination of SI and CI may enable the classification of a variety of root postures. Because verification of the straightening ability is labour-intensive and time-consuming (e.g., involving a clinostat analysis) (Okamoto et al., Reference Okamoto, Ueda, Shimada, Tamura, Kato, Tasaka, Morita and Hara-Nishimura2015; Ueda & Hara-Nishimura, Reference Ueda and Hara-Nishimura2019), screening for straightening mutants is extremely difficult. The present method, which evaluates root posture at a single time point, is applicable for screening with less effort. Certain automatic systems enable measurement of root gravitropic angle or root traits (Clark et al., Reference Clark, Famoso, Zhao, Shaff, Craft, Bustamante, McCouch, Aneshansley and Kochian2013; Serre & Fendrych, Reference Serre and Fendrych2022). In future, we intend to develop an automatic system for the present method. In the current system, the plates are exposed to light and the gravitational direction is changed to enable scanning (see Materials and Methods), which could alter the root posture. The next step will be to overcome these issues, for example, by using infrared cameras, which would allow measurements in a time series that could lead to a more detailed evaluation.

The present study provides insights into control of plant posture using the xif xik and abcb19 mutants. Plant posture is controlled by environmental and genetic factors. During the gravitropic response, plant posture is believed to be established by many processes, including gravity sensing, auxin redistribution leading to differential growth, organ bending, posture sensing and organ straightening. Aberrantly enhanced organ bending in response to gravity is due to an abnormality in one or more of these processes. In the present study, the xif xik and abcb19 roots with similar enhanced gravitropic bending differed in CI (Figures 1, 3 and 4), and the xif xik abcb19 triple mutants showed greater gravitropic bending than the xif xik and abcb19 mutants (Figure 1), suggesting that MYOSIN XIs and ABCB19 may affect different gravitropism-related processes. The SI was similar for the xif xik and abcb19 mutants (Figure 2), whereas the CI for abcb19 was higher than for xif xik (Figures 3 and 4). These results imply that the xif xik roots had large and gradual curves, whereas the abcb19 roots had small and sharp curves. Furthermore, the SI for the triple mutants was similar or slightly lower than for xif xik and abcb19, but the CI for the triple mutants was similar to that for abcb19 (Figures 2, 3 and 4). This may be because the roots of triple mutants have large and sharp curves. Previous research indicates that ABCB19 is essential for maintaining the auxin maxima at the root tip; when ABCB19 is deficient, the auxin accumulation at the root tip extends basally (upwards) (Lewis et al., Reference Lewis, Miller, Splitt, Wu and Spalding2007). Additionally, if the increased auxin contents in abcb19 roots are not distributed symmetrically, the resulting imbalanced cell elongation rates will lead to wavy roots (Lewis et al., Reference Lewis, Miller, Splitt, Wu and Spalding2007). MYOSIN XIf and MYOSIN XIk are crucial for straightening organs (Okamoto et al., Reference Okamoto, Ueda, Shimada, Tamura, Kato, Tasaka, Morita and Hara-Nishimura2015; Tsugawa et al., Reference Tsugawa, Miyake, Okamoto, Toyota, Yagi, Morita, Hara-Nishimura and Ueda2023), possibly through posture sensing or posture restoration, although how MYOSIN XI proteins function in these processes is unknown. At this point, we cannot rule out the possibility that ABCB19 also contributes to organ straightening. In the present study, the CI for the xif xik roots clearly increased when ABCB19 was deficient (Figures 3 and 4). However, the CI for the abcb19 roots was unaffected by deficiencies in both MYOSIN XIf and MYOSIN XIk (Figures 3 and 4). These results suggest that the deficiency in ABCB19 had a greater effect than the simultaneous deficiency in MYOSIN XIf and MYOSIN XIk on the CI.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Itsuki Kunita (University of the Ryukyus) for valuable comments on calculating root curvature. The authors would also like to thank Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding statement

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research to HY (JP21K20665 and JP22J00425), IH-N (JP15H05776) and HU (JP18H05496 and JP19K06732) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), a JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship to HY and the Hirao Taro Foundation of KONAN GAKUEN for Academic Research to HU and IH-N.

Competing interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

HY performed experiments and analysed data. HY, IHN and HU wrote and approved the manuscript.

Data availability statement

The data including raw images of plants and Arabidopsis thaliana seeds reported in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2024.12.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Dorota Kwiatkowska

References

Ara, T. (2022). brunnermunzel: (Permuted) Brunner-Munzel Test. R package version 2.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=brunnermunzel Google Scholar
Bailly, A., Sovero, V., Vincenzetti, V., Santelia, D., Bartnik, D., Koenig, B. W., Mancuso, S., Martinoia, E., & Geisler, M. (2008). Modulation of P-glycoproteins by auxin transport inhibitors is mediated by interaction with immunophilins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283, 2181721826. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M709655200 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastien, R., Bohr, T., Moulia, B., & Douady, S. (2013). Unifying model of shoot gravitropism reveals proprioception as a central feature of posture control in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 755760. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214301109 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastien, R., Douady, S., & Moulia, B. (2014). A unifying modeling of plant shoot gravitropism with an explicit account of the effects of growth. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00136 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, R. T., Famoso, A. N., Zhao, K., Shaff, J. E., Craft, E. J., Bustamante, C. D., McCouch, S. R., Aneshansley, D. J., & Kochian, L. V. (2013). High-throughput two-dimensional root system phenotyping platform facilitates genetic analysis of root growth and development. Plant, Cell & Environment, 36, 454466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02587.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1880). The power of movements in plants. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esmon, C. A., Pedmale, U. V., & Liscum, E. (2005a). Plant tropisms: Providing the power of movement to a sessile organism. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 49, 665674. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.052028ce CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esmon, C. A., Tinsley, A. G., Ljung, K., Sandberg, G., Hearne, L. B., & Liscum, E. (2005b). A gradient of auxin and auxin-dependent transcription precedes tropic growth responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 236241. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507127103 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friml, J., Wiśniewska, J., Benková, E., Mendgen, K., & Palme, K. (2002). Lateral relocation of auxin efflux regulator PIN3 mediates tropism in Arabidopsis . Nature, 415, 806809. https://doi.org/10.1038/415806a CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-González, J., Lacek, J., Wechwerthm, W., & Retzer, K. (2022). Throttling growth speed: Evaluation of aux1-7 root grwoth profile by combinating D-root system and root penetration assay. Plants, 11, 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11050650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisler, M., Blakeslee, J. J., Bouchard, R., Lee, O. R., Vincenzetti, V., Bandyopadhyay, A., Titapiwatanakun, B., Peer, W. A., Bailly, A., Richards, E. L., Ejendal, K. F. K., Smith, A. P., Baroux, C., Grossniklaus, U., Müller, A., Hrycyna, C. A., Dudler, R., Murphy, A. S., & Martinoia, E. (2005). Cellular efflux of auxin catalyzed by the Arabidopsis MDR/PGP transporter AtPGP1. The Plant Journal, 44, 179194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02519.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilroy, S. (2008). Plant tropisms. Current Biology, 18, R275R277. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470388297 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabov, A., Ashley, M. K., Rigas, S., Hatzopoulos, P., Dolan, L., & Vicente-Agullo, F. (2005). Morphometric analysis of root shape. The New Phytologist, 165, 641652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01258.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haga, K., & Iino, M. (2006). Asymmetric distribution of auxin correlates with gravitropism and phototropism but not with autostraightening (autotropism) in pea epicotyls. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57, 837847. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmer, S. L., & Brooks, C. J. (2018). Growth-mediated plant movements: Hidden in plain sight. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 41, 8994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2017.10.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, D. R., Miller, N. D., Splitt, B. L., Wu, G., & Spalding, E. P. (2007). Separating the roles of acropetal and basipetal auxin transport on gravitropism with mutations in two Arabidopsis multidrug resistance-like ABC transporter genes. The Plant Cell, 19, 18381850. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.051599 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, R., & Wang, H. (2005). Two homologous ATP-binding cassette transporter proteins, AtMDR1 and AtPGP1, regulate Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis and root development by mediating polar auxin transport. Plant Physiology, 138, 949964. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.061572 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchant, A., Kargul, J., May, S. T., Muller, P., Delbarre, A., Perrot-Rechenmann, C., & Bennett, M. J. (1999). AUX1 regulates root gravitropism in Arabidopsis by facilitating auxin uptake within root apical tissues. The EMBO Journal, 18, 20662073. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.8.2066 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moulton, D. E., Oliveri, H., & Goriely, A. (2020). Multiscale integration of environmental stimuli in plant tropism produces complex behaviors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117, 3222632237. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2016025117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, A., Guan, C., Gälweiler, L., Tänzler, P., Huijser, P., Marchant, A., Parry, G., Bennett, M., Wisman, E., & Palme, K. (1998). AtPIN2 defines a locus of Arabidopsis for root gravitropism control. The EMBO Journal, 17, 69036911. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.23.6903 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagashima, A., Suzuki, G., Uehara, Y., Saji, K., Furukawa, T., Koshiba, T., Sekimoto, M., Fujioka, S., Kuroha, T., Kojima, M., Sakakibara, H., Fujisawa, N., Okada, K., & Sakai, T. (2008). Phytochromes and cryptochromes regulate the differential growth of Arabidopsis hypocotyls in both a PGP19-dependent and a PGP19-independent manner. The Plant Journal, 53, 516529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03358.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, M., Nishimura, T., & Morita, M. T. (2019). Gravity sensing and signal conversion in plant gravitropism. Journal of Experimental Botany, 70, 34953506. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz158 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noh, B., Bandyopadhyay, A., Peer, W. A., Spalding, E. P., & Murphy, A. S. (2003). Enhanced gravi- and phototropism in plant mdr mutants mislocalizing the auxin efflux protein PIN1. Nature, 423, 9991002. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noh, B., Murphy, A. S., & Spalding, E. P. (2001). Multidrug resistance-like genes of Arabidopsis required for auxin transport and auxin-mediated development. The Plant Cell, 13, 24412454. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.13.11.2441 Google ScholarPubMed
Okamoto, K., Ueda, H., Shimada, T., Tamura, K., Kato, T., Tasaka, M., Morita, M. T., & Hara-Nishimura, I. (2015). Regulation of organ straightening and plant posture by an actin-myosin XI cytoskeleton. Nature Plants, 1, 15031. https://doi.org/10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team . (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing . R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
Rojas-Pierce, M., Titapiwatanakun, B., Sohn, E. J., Fang, F., Larive, C. K., Blakeslee, J., Cheng, Y., Cuttler, S., Peer, W. A., Murphy, A. S., & Raikhel, N. V. (2007). Arabidopsis P-glycoprotein19 participates in the inhibition of gravitropism by gravacin. Chemistry & Biology, 14, 13661376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2007.10.014 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., Tinevez, J.-Y., White, D. J., Hartenstein, V., Eliceiri, K., Tomancak, P., & Cardona, A. (2012). Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods, 9, 676682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, G., Chicken, E., & Becvarik, R. (2022). NSM3: Functions and Datasets to Accompany Hollander, Wolfe, and Chicken-Nonparametric Statistical Methods, Third Edition. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NSM3 Google Scholar
Schultz, E. R., Zupanska, A. K., Sng, N. J., Paul, A.-L., & Ferl, R. J. (2017). Skewing in Arabidopsis roots involves disparate environmental signaling pathways. BMC Plant Biology, 17, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0975-9 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serre, N. B. V., & Fendrych, M. (2022). ACORBA: Automated workflow to measure Arabidopsis thaliana root tip angle dynamics. Quantitative Plant Biology, 3, e9. https://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2022.4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanković, B., Volkmann, D., & Sack, F. D. (1998). Autotropism, automorphogenesis, and gravity. Physiologia Plantarum, 102, 328335. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1020222.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strimas-Mackey, M. (2023). Smoothr: Smooth and tidy spatial features. R package version 1.0.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=smoothr Google Scholar
Tiedemann, F. (2022). gghalves: Compose half-half plots using your favourite geoms. R package version 0.1.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gghalves Google Scholar
Tsugawa, S., Miyake, Y., Okamoto, K., Toyota, M., Yagi, H., Morita, M. T., Hara-Nishimura, I., & Ueda, H. (2023). Shoot gravitropism and organ straightening cooperate to arrive at a mechanically favorable shape in Arabidopsis . Scientific Reports, 13, 11165. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38069-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, H., & Hara-Nishimura, I. (2019). How to investigate the role of the actin-myosin cytoskeleton in organ straightening. In Phototropism. Methods in molecular biology, vol. 1924. pp. 215221. Humana Press: New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9015-3_18 Google Scholar
Ueda, H., Tamura, K., & Hara-Nishimura, I. (2015). Functions of plant-specific myosin XI: From intracellular motility to plant postures. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 28, 3038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.08.006 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaughn, L. M., & Masson, P. H. (2011). A QTL study for regions contributing to Arabidopsis thaliana root skewing on tilted surfaces. G3-Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 1, 105115. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.111.000331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vicente-Agullo, F., Rigas, S., Desbrosses, G., Dolan, L., Hatzopoulos, P., & Grabov, A. (2004). Potassium carrier TRH1 is required for auxin transport in Arabidopsis roots. The Plant Journal, 40, 523535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02230.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wickam, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis . Springer-Verlag New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žádníková, P., Smet, D., Zhu, Q., Van Der Straeten, D., & Benková, E. (2015). Strategies of seedlings to overcome their sessile nature: Auxin in mobility control. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00218 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, H., Liu, L., Mo, H., Qian, L., Cao, Y., Cui, S. et al. (2013). The ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCB19 regulates postembryonic organ separation in Arabidopsis . PLoS One, 8, e60809. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060809 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Measurement of gravitropic bending angles of roots. Three-day-old wild-type (Col-0), myosin xif xik (xif xik), abcb19-101, abcb19-102, xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 etiolated seedlings grown on agar medium in plates were reoriented by 90° in darkness. After gravistimulation for 8 hours, the plates were photographed. (a) Schematic diagram of an etiolated seedling after gravistimulation for 8 hours and the root-tip angle with a horizontal plane (purple circular arch). (b) Representative images of the wild-type (Col-0) and mutant plants. Magnified images of the root tips are shown in the inset images. Scale bars indicate 2.5 mm. (c) Circular histograms of the root-tip angles that were grouped into 20° classes. The mean ± standard deviation and sample number (n) are provided. (d) P-values for the differences in the root-tip angles between each pair of genotypes that were estimated by the Steel–Dwass test as a post hoc test following the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA (PANOVA < 2.2E−16). *, P < 0.05; n.s., not significant.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Evaluation of root postures in vertically grown seedlings by the straightness index (SI). Wild-type (Col-0), myosin xif xik (xif xik), abcb19-101, abcb19-102, xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 seedlings were grown vertically along the surface of the medium in darkness for 5 days. (a) Representative images of 5-day-old seedlings. Scale bars indicate 1 cm. (b) Posture plots of 15 individual roots for each genotype. The coordinate (0,0) indicates the basal point (the root–hypocotyl junction) of each root. (c) Schematic diagram of the root posture-related horizontal growth index (HGI), vertical growth index (VGI) and straightness index (SI). (d, e) Quantitative comparisons of root length (d) and SI (e) presented as box and dot plots. The bars indicate the sample ranges, each box indicates the first and third quantiles and the bold horizontal line is the median. The number of samples (n) is as follows: 71 (Col-0), 77 (xif xik), 62 (abcb19-101), 59 (abcb19-102), 66 (xif xik abcb19-101) and 78 (xif xik abcb19-102). Different letters (a, b and c) indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05; Steel–Dwass test following the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA (PANOVA = 1.22E−11 in root length, and PANOVA < 2.2E−16 in SI)).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Evaluation of root postures in vertically grown seedlings by the curvature index (CI). Wild-type (Col-0), myosin xif xik (xif xik), abcb19-101, abcb19-102, xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 seedlings were grown vertically along the surface of the medium in darkness for 5 days. (a) Images of two representative roots for each genotype and the corresponding coloured diagrams of the CI. Scale bars indicate 1 cm and the colour scale is presented on the right. (b–d) Quantitative comparisons of the mean CI (b), maximal CI (c) and number of dots where CI exceeded 50 cm−1 (d) are presented as box and dot plots. The bars indicate the sample ranges, each box indicates the first and third quantiles and the bold horizontal line is the median. Sample numbers (n) are the same as those in Figure 2d, e. Different letters (a, b and c) indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05; Steel–Dwass test following the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA (PANOVA < 2.2E−16 for all indices)).

Figure 3

Figure 4. The apical side of the roots showed higher curvature than the basal side. Wild-type (Col-0), myosin xif xik (xif xik), abcb19-101, abcb19-102, xif xik abcb19-101 and xif xik abcb19-102 seedlings were grown vertically along the surface of the medium in darkness for 5 days. (a) Coloured diagrams of the curvature index (CI) of all samples. Sample numbers (n) are the same as those in Figure 2d, e. The coordinate (0,0) indicates the basal point (the root–hypocotyl junction) of each root. The colour scale is provided to the right of Col-0. (b) Plots of CI versus the distance from the basal point of each root. Red lines represent the generalized additive model regression curves of each genotype. (c) Comparison of the mean CI calculated for each of the following distances from the basal point: 0.0–0.5 cm, 0.5–1.0 cm and ≥1.0 cm. The bars indicate the sample ranges, each box indicates the first and third quantiles and the bold horizontal line is the median. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05; Steel–Dwass test following the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA (PANOVA < 2.2E−16)).

Supplementary material: File

Yagi et al. supplementary material

Yagi et al. supplementary material
Download Yagi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.4 MB

Author comment: Quantitative analysis of the root posture of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with wavy roots — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Editor,

Thank you for inviting us to submit our manuscript. We would be grateful if you would consider the enclosed manuscript entitled “Quantitative analysis of the root posture of Arabidopsis mutants with wavy roots” for publication as an original research article in Quantitative Plant Biology. This manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal.

The growth of plants and crops strongly depends on tropisms, i.e., bending in response to gravity and light. In tropic responses, organ straightening is critical for maintaining mechanically favorable plant postures. However, the identified components of the straightening mechanism have been limited to a few actin-myosin XI associated-proteins. Here we show that the quantitative analysis of the root posture is an effective and easy way to determine the degree of organ straightening. Arabidopsis mutants myosin xif xik (xif xik) and atp-binding cassette b19 (abcb19) exhibited similar levels of gravitropic bending enhancement as well as wavy roots. These phenotypes were enhanced in the xif xik abcb19 triple mutants. Combining straightness index (SI) and curvature index (CI) enabled the classification of a variety of root postures. Our findings indicate that, by using xif xik for forward genetics-based screening, the unknown factors required for organ straightening may be isolated using SI and CI as indices. We believe that our study fits the scope of Quantitative Plant Biology.

Sincerely yours,

Haruko Ueda

Faculty of Science and Engineering

Konan University

E-mail: [email protected]

Recommendation: Quantitative analysis of the root posture of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with wavy roots — R0/PR2

Comments

The Reviewers appreciate the significance of the presented results and methods. They also give a number of valuable suggestions and comments that need to be addressed by the Authors. My recommendation is therefore a major revision.

Decision: Quantitative analysis of the root posture of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with wavy roots — R0/PR3

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Quantitative analysis of the root posture of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with wavy roots — R1/PR4

Comments

Dear Editor,

Thank you for encouraging us to resubmit a revised version of our manuscript. We are sincerely grateful for the constructive comments and suggestions by editor and reviewers. We did an additional experiment and presented the results in Supplementary Figures S3 and S5. We revised the manuscript carefully as suggested by reviewers 1 and 2. Below is a detailed response to the reviewer’s criticisms and explanation of the changes we have made. I also attach the modified manuscript with the major changes highlighted in blue and the modified figures. Thank you.

Sincerely yours,

Associate Professor Haruko Ueda

Faculty of Science and Engineering

Konan University

Recommendation: Quantitative analysis of the root posture of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with wavy roots — R1/PR5

Comments

The manuscript has been improved but there remains a problem with statistics methods that were used by the Authors. They are explained in detail by the Reviewer #2 who is an expert in statistics, who also provided specific advice on which tests the Authors can use. My recommendation is therefore minor revision. I strongly advice that the statistics is corrected in the final manuscript version.

Decision: Quantitative analysis of the root posture of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with wavy roots — R1/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Quantitative analysis of the root posture of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with wavy roots — R2/PR7

Comments

Dear Editor,

We are sincerely grateful for the valuable comments and suggestions by the editor and reviewers. We performed a statistical re-analysis of the data and revised the manuscript carefully as suggested by reviewer 2. Below is a detailed response to the reviewer’s criticisms and explanation of the changes we have made. We also attach the modified manuscript with the major changes highlighted in blue and the modified figures. Thank you.

Sincerely yours,

Associate Professor Haruko Ueda

Faculty of Science and Engineering

Konan University

Recommendation: Quantitative analysis of the root posture of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with wavy roots — R2/PR8

Comments

The statistics used in the manuscript has been modified according to the Reviewer’s suggestions, and the manuscript is now ready for publication.

Decision: Quantitative analysis of the root posture of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with wavy roots — R2/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.