The publishers apologise for an error in the above paper, as follows:
In the conclusion, is described that : “By reusing the same syringe and needle, from an animal with an acute infection for T. vivax, up to 30%, 50% and 80% bovines become infected by this protozoan by subcutaneous, intramuscular and intravenous routes, respectively.”
The correct text is: “By reusing the same syringe and needle, from an animal with an acute infection for T. vivax, up to 3/10 (30%), 5/10 (50%) and 8/10 (80%) bovines become infected by this protozoan by subcutaneous, intramuscular and intravenous routes, respectively.”