Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fnl2l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-20T11:48:45.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is there only one innate modular system for spatial navigation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2024

Alexandre Duval Open the ORCID record for Alexandre Duval [Opens in a new window]
Alexandre Duval*
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spelke convincingly argues that we should posit six innate modular systems beyond the periphery (i.e., beyond low-level perception and motor control). I focus on the case of spatial navigation (Ch. 3) to claim that there remain powerful considerations in favor of positing additional innate, nonperipheral modules. This opens the door to stronger forms of nativism and nonperipheral modularism than Spelke's.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e125
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bjerknes, T. L., Dagslott, N. C., Moser, E. I., & Moser, M.-B. (2018). Path integration in place cells of developing rats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(7), E1637–E1646.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheung, A., Ball, D., Milford, M., Wyeth, G., & Wiles, J. (2012). Maintaining a cognitive map in darkness: The need to fuse boundary knowledge with path integration. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(8), e1002651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duval, A. (2019). The representation selection problem: Why we should favor the geometric-module framework of spatial reorientation over the view-matching framework. Cognition, 192, 103985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eilam, D. (2014). Of mice and men: Building blocks in cognitive mapping. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 393–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etienne, A. S., & Jeffery, K. J. (2004). Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus, 14(2), 180–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischler-Ruiz, W., Clark, D. G., Joshi, N. R., Devi-Chou, V., Kitch, L., Schnitzer, M., … Axel, R. (2021). Olfactory landmarks and path integration converge to form a cognitive spatial map. Neuron, 109(24), 4036–4049.e5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallistel, C. R., & King, A. P. (2010). Memory and the computational brain: Why cognitive science will transform neuroscience. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maaswinkel, H., Jarrard, L. E., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1999). Hippocampectomized rats are impaired in homing by path integration. Hippocampus, 9(5), 553–561.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcombe, N. S., Huttenlocher, J., Drummey, A. B., & Wiley, J. G. (1998). The development of spatial location coding: Place learning and dead reckoning in the second and third years. Cognitive Development, 13(2), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, N. T. M., Descamps, L. A. L., Russell, L. E., Buchholz, M. O., Bicknell, B. A., Antonov, G. K., … Häusser, M. (2020). Targeted activation of hippocampal place cells drives memory-guided spatial behavior. Cell, 183(6), 1586–1599.e10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spelke, E. S. (2022). What babies know: Core knowledge and composition (Vol. 1, 1st ed.). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10(1), 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thrun, S. (2002). Robotic mapping: A survey. In Lakemeyer, G. & Nebel, B. (Eds.), Exploring artificial intelligence in the New Millennium (pp. 1–35). Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Wallace, D. G., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2003). NMDA lesions of Ammon's horn and the dentate gyrus disrupt the direct and temporally paced homing displayed by rats exploring a novel environment: Evidence for a role of the hippocampus in dead reckoning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18(3), 513–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed