Summary 599
I. Introduction 599
II. Concepts and terminology 600
III. Historical background 600
IV. Studies of experimental hybrids 601
1. Isolating mechanisms 601
2. Prezygotic barriers 602
(a) Gametic barriers to hybridization 602
3. Postzygotic barriers 603
(a) Chromosomal rearrangements 604
(b) Genic sterility or inviability 604
4. Hybrid vigour 605
5. Introgression 606
6. Hybrid speciation 607
V. Experimental manipulations of natural hybrid populations 609
1. Hybrid-zone formation 610
2. Pollinator-mediated selection 610
3. Habitat selection 612
VI. The biology of different classes of hybrids 612
1. Character expression 613
(a) Morphological characters 613
(b) Chemical characters 613
(c) Molecular characters 613
2. The fitness of different classes of hybrids 614
(a) The importance of variance 614
(b) Estimating hybrid fitness 615
3. Interactions with parasites and herbivores 616
4. Patterns of mating 617
(a) Outcrossing rate 617
(b) Hybridization frequency 618
(c) Mate choice 618
VII. Conclusions and future research 619
Acknowledgements 620
References 620
Most studies of plant hybridization are concerned with documenting its
occurrence in different plant groups.
Although these descriptive, historical studies are important, the majority
of recent advances in our understanding
of the process of hybridization are derived from a growing body of experimental
microevolutionary studies.
Analyses of artificially synthesized hybrids in the laboratory or glasshouse
have demonstrated the importance of
gametic selection as a prezygotic isolating barrier; the complex genetic
basis of hybrid sterility, inviability and
breakdown; and the critical role of fertility selection in hybrid speciation.
Experimental manipulations of natural
hybrid zones have provided critical information that cannot be obtained
in the glasshouse, such as the
evolutionary conditions under which hybrid zones are formed and the effects
of habitat and pollinator-mediated
selection on hybrid-zone structure and dynamics. Experimental studies also
have contributed to a better
understanding of the biology of different classes of hybrids. Analyses
of morphological character expression, for
example, have revealed transgressive segregation in the majority of later-generation
hybrids. Other studies have
documented a high degree of variability in fitness among different hybrid
genotypes and the rapid response of such
fitness to selection – evidence that hybridization need not be an
evolutionary dead end. However, a full accounting
of the role of hybridization in adaptive evolution and speciation will
probably require the integration of
experimental and historical approaches.