Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:54:37.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-efficiency tandem Ho:YAG single-crystal fiber laser delivering more than 100 W output power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2024

Jianlei Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Laser & Infrared System, Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Qingdao, China
Zihao Tong
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Laser Technology and Emerging Industry, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China
Changsheng Zheng
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Laser Technology and Emerging Industry, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China
Tianyi Du
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Laser Technology and Emerging Industry, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China
Yongguang Zhao*
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Laser Technology and Emerging Industry, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China
Chun Wang*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Laser & Infrared System, Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Qingdao, China
*
Correspondence to: Y. Zhao, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Laser Technology and Emerging Industry, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China. Email: [email protected]; C. Wang, Key Laboratory of Laser & Infrared System, Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China. Email: [email protected]
Correspondence to: Y. Zhao, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Laser Technology and Emerging Industry, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China. Email: [email protected]; C. Wang, Key Laboratory of Laser & Infrared System, Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

We report on a high-efficiency, high-power tandem Ho:YAG single-crystal fiber (SCF) laser in-band pumped by a Tm-doped fiber laser at 1907 nm. In addition to the uniform heat distribution resulting from the large surface-to-volume ratio of this fiber-like thin-crystal rod, the long gain region provided by the tandem layout of two SCFs enables high lasing efficiency and power handling capability. More than 100 W output power is achieved at 2.1 μm, corresponding to a slope efficiency of 70.5% and an optical-to-optical efficiency of 67.6%. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest output power and efficiency ever reported from SCF lasers in the 2-μm spectral range.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with Chinese Laser Press

1 Introduction

High-power solid-state lasers in the 2-μm spectral range have been widely applied in various fields, including remote sensing, lidar, laser surgery and therapy, laser welding of transparent plastics and pumping mid-infrared (mid-IR) optical parametric oscillators (OPOs) for mid-IR frequency conversion[ Reference Henderson, Hale, Magee, Kavaya and Huffaker 1 Reference Mingareev, Weirauch, Olowinsky, Shah, Kadwani and Richardson 4 ]. Tm3+-doped, Ho3+-doped gain media provide the main approach to directly generate 2-μm high-power lasers[ Reference Godard 5 , Reference Walsh 6 ]. Compared to the Tm3+ ions, the large emission cross-section of Ho3+ ions doped crystals makes them more suitable to achieve high power 2-μm lasers; for instance, yttrium aluminum garnet (Y3Al5O12, YAG) crystals doped with Ho3+ ions have a gain cross-section seven times larger than that of Tm:YAG[ Reference Scholle, Lamrini, Koopmann and Fuhrberg 7 , Reference Lamrini, Koopmann, Schäfer, Scholle and Fuhrberg 8 ].

Figure 1 presents an overview of continuous-wave (CW) Ho lasers in the 2-μm spectral range[ Reference Lamrini, Koopmann, Schäfer, Scholle and Fuhrberg 8 Reference Hemming, Simakov, Davidson, Bennetts, Hughes, Carmody, Davies, Corena, Stepanov, Haub, Swain and Carter 26 ], containing Ho:YAG bulk, thin-disk, slab and Ho:fiber laser systems, illustrating the significant advances in terms of high power and efficiency that have been achieved in recent years. Currently, YAG is still the preferred host material for high-power laser operation due to its high thermal conductivity, mechanical robustness, ease-of-preparation and excellent chemical properties[ Reference Elder and Payne 27 ]. Nevertheless, further power scaling of Ho:YAG lasers remains challenging and needs to be combined with different strategies for high power generation, for example, high doping concentrations of Ho3+ ions[ Reference Shen, Yao, Duan, Dai, Ju and Wang 13 ], cryogenically cooled systems[ Reference Ganija, Hemming, Simakov, Boyd, Carmody, Veitch, Haub and Munch 9 , Reference Ganija, Hemming, Simakov, Boyd, Haub, Veitch and Munch 10 ], single gain medium or dual gain media in conjunction with dual-end-pumping schemes[ Reference Shen, Yao, Duan, Dai, Ju and Wang 13 , Reference Yao, Shen, Han, Qian, Duan, Ju and Wang 15 Reference Shen, Yao, Duan, Zhu, Wang, Ju and Wang 17 , Reference Duan, Shen, Yao and Wang 19 , Reference Ganija, Hemming, Boyd, Gambell and Simakov 20 , Reference Hemming, Bennetts, Simakov, Davidson, Haub and Carter 22 , Reference Hemming, Bennetts, Simakov, Davidson, Haub and Carter 23 ], wing pumping systems[ Reference Yao, Li, Shen, Ren, Zhao, Tang and Shen 21 ] and gain media with end caps[ Reference Ganija, Hemming, Boyd, Gambell and Simakov 20 ] or in special structures (i.e., the slab[ Reference Ganija, Hemming, Simakov, Boyd, Carmody, Veitch, Haub and Munch 9 , Reference Ganija, Hemming, Simakov, Boyd, Haub, Veitch and Munch 10 , Reference Duan, Shen, Yao and Wang 19 ] or thin-disk geometry[ Reference Zhang, Schulze, Mak, Pervak, Bauer, Sutter and Pronin 12 , Reference Tomilov, Hoffmann, Wang and Saraceno 18 ]). By comparison, current concepts for power scaling of 2-μm laser sources are inclined to use Tm-[ Reference Yao, Shen, Shao, Wang, Wang, Zhao and Shen 28 ] or Ho-doped silica fibers[ Reference Hemming, Bennetts, Simakov, Davidson, Haub and Carter 23 Reference Hemming, Simakov, Davidson, Bennetts, Hughes, Carmody, Davies, Corena, Stepanov, Haub, Swain and Carter 26 ] due to their simple thermal management, high brightness and compact structure; however, the nonlinear effects, optical damage, photon darkening and transverse mode instability (TMI)[ Reference Zervas and Codemard 29 , Reference Jauregui, Stihler and Limpert 30 ] in fiber lasers seriously limit further power scaling.

Alternatively, the optical fiber structure in combination with the crystal properties of YAG offers an effective approach for achieving high average/peak power. Theoretically, the critical power supported by YAG single-crystalline fibers is six times higher than that of traditional silica fibers[ Reference Dong, Ballato and Kolis 31 , Reference Parthasarathy, Hay, Fair and Hopkins 32 ]. Note that the concept of single-crystal fiber (SCF) is somewhat misleading but already established, referring to fiber-like thin-crystal rods with a large surface-to-volume ratio and characterized by a diameter of less than 1 mm and a length of a few centimeters. Some reports in the 1-μm spectral region, for example, a 250 W CW laser from a compact resonant cavity[ Reference Délen, Piehler, Didierjean, Aubry, Voss, Ahmed, Graf, Balembois and Georges 33 ] and an average power of 290 W with 829 fs pulses in a two-stage amplifier[ Reference Beirow, Eckerle, Graf and Ahmed 34 ] based on Yb-doped YAG SCFs[ Reference Zhao, Zheng, Huang, Gao, Dong, Tian, Yang, Chen and Petrov 35 , Reference Zheng, Du, Zhu, Wang, Tian, Zhao, Yang, Yu and Petrov 36 ], all indicate that SCFs are ideal gain media for high average/peak power laser oscillators/amplifiers.

However, there have been relatively few studies on high-power SCF lasers in the 2-μm spectral range to date. Most recently, we have reported on the wing-pumped Tm:YAG SCF laser delivering 63 W output power at 2.01 μm[ Reference Wang, Dong, Liu, Wang, Xu, Xue, Xu, Wang and Zhao 37 ]. In terms of lasers based on Ho:YAG SCFs, the Ho:YAG SCF fabricated by the laser heated pedestal growth (LHPG) method was reported for the first time at 2.09 μm, and a quasi-CW output power of 23.5 W was achieved under pulsed pumping (10 Hz repetition rate, 50% duty cycle), while an output power roll-off at 10 W was observed due to thermal issues under CW pumping[ Reference Li, Miller, Johnson, Nie, Bera, Harrington and Shori 38 ]. The CW output power of 35.2 W was achieved from an oscillator based on a YAG SCF doped with 0.6% (atomic fraction) Ho3+ ions grown by the micro-pulling-down (μ-PD) method[ Reference Zhao, Wang, Chen, Wang, Song, Xu, Liu, Shen, Xu, Mateos, Loiko, Wang, Xu, Griebner and Petrov 39 ], while the corresponding slope efficiency was less than 45% and the thermal effect was obvious at approximately 30 W laser power. Thus, the unique geometry structure of SCFs with large surface-to-volume ratio and the latest progress of SCF oscillators in the 2-μm spectral region motivated us to study the power scaling capability of CW SCF lasers, aiming to obtain high-power lasers.

In this paper, the CW laser performance of the tandem Ho:YAG SCF was investigated in a compact resonator with a 1907 nm Tm-doped fiber laser (TDFL) as the pump source. Benefiting from the high brightness of the in-band pumping scheme and the tandem-set SCFs with fiber-like geometry structure, a maximum output power of 101.3 W with a slope efficiency of 70.5% was achieved at the pump power of 153 W. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest power and efficiency of Ho:YAG SCF lasers, which proves the power scalability of SCF lasers and paves the way towards SCF ultrafast amplifiers emitting at 2 μm directly.

2 Experimental details

The experimental setup of the tandem Ho:YAG SCF laser with a physical cavity length of approximately 105 mm is depicted in Figure 2. A 1907-nm TDFL with a good beam quality of M 2 ~ 1.1 was used as the pump source. The pump beam passed through a telescope system, and then was focused into the latter part of the first SCF with a spot diameter of approximately 520 μm. Two series-arranged 0.5% (atomic fraction) Ho3+-doped YAG SCFs (966 μm in diameter and 50 mm in length) were employed as gain media, as shown in Figures 2(b) and 2(c), which were mechanically fabricated by cutting and grounding the Czochralski-grown Ho:YAG crystals. All the entire lateral surfaces and end facets of the SCFs were optically polished, and all end facets of SCFs were anti-reflection (AR) coated at 1.9 and 2.1 μm, which can avoid parasitic laser oscillations and etalon effects. Figure 2(b) displays a photograph of the end facet of the Ho:YAG SCF. The transmission losses of Ho:YAG SCFs were measured to be less than 3 dBm–1 at 632.8 nm. The mirror M1 was flat with high reflectivity at 2.1 μm and high transmission at 1.9 μm. The flat mirrors M2 with different transmissions (T OC = 30%, 50%, 70% and 90%) for the laser wavelength were used as output couplers (OCs). A dichroic mirror (DM3) was used to separate the laser and pump beams. To mitigate the thermal load, all SCFs were mounted on a specially designed water-cooled aluminum heat sink with both ends glue-sealed, which were directly water-cooled to 8°C, as shown in Figure 2(d).

Figure 2 Experimental setup of the tandem Ho:YAG SCF laser.

3 Results and discussion

Figure 3(a) shows the output power as a function of the incident pump power with different transmissions of T OC = 30%, 50%, 70% and 90%. The most efficient operation was achieved with T OC = 70% OC; a maximum output power of 101.3 W was achieved at the incident pump power of 153 W (~97.7% pump absorption ratio under lasing conditions), corresponding to a slope efficiency of 70.5% and an optical conversion efficiency of 67.6% at the maximum output power. Compared to the reported complex Ho:YAG (Ho ions doping concentration of 0.8% atomic fraction) dual-crystal folded cavity where each crystal is double-ended pumped by Tm:YLF lasers[ Reference Shen, Yao, Duan, Zhu, Wang, Ju and Wang 17 ], a more compact scheme (single-end pumped dual-SCFs) was utilized to achieve higher slope efficiency (>70%) in this work. The CW output power of 65 W was obtained with the OC of T OC = 30%, and the slope efficiency was decreased to 69%, which may be caused by the high-power density and the thermal effect at the low OC transmission. Output powers and slope efficiencies with high-transmission OCs (T OC = 50%, 70% and 90%) are higher compared to our previous report[ Reference Zhao, Wang, Chen, Wang, Song, Xu, Liu, Shen, Xu, Mateos, Loiko, Wang, Xu, Griebner and Petrov 39 ], which is attributed to the longer gain region, the spatial uniform distribution of pump intensity and the large overlap between the pump and laser beams in the directly water-cooled tandem SCFs, thus resulting in high slope efficiencies of more than 70% and 100-W-level output powers.

Figure 3 (a) CW laser output powers and (b) the corresponding optical spectra of the Ho:YAG tandem SCF laser with different OC transmissions (T OC = 30%, 50%, 70% and 90%).

The measured optical spectra of the tandem Ho:YAG SCF laser with different OCs are depicted in Figure 3(b) and the gain spectra of Ho:YAG[ Reference Wang, Lan, Mateos, Li, Hu, Li, Suomalainen, Harkonen, Guina, Petrov and Griebner 40 ] are also shown for easy comparison. Two emission peaks for high-transmission OCs may be caused by the same gain cross-sections. The wavelength of the laser emission operated from approximately 2090 nm to 2121 nm with decreasing transmittance of the OC, and such a wavelength red shift of approximately 31 nm is a typical feature of the quasi-three-level system due to the stronger reabsorption effect as there is lower population inversion with the low transmission of the OC[ Reference Zhao, Wang, Chen, Wang, Song, Xu, Liu, Shen, Xu, Mateos, Loiko, Wang, Xu, Griebner and Petrov 39 ].

By evaluating the round-trip resonator loss of the tandem Ho:YAG SCF laser, the modified Caird analysis was used as a commonly adapted method to plot the inverse of the slope efficiencies versus the inverse of the OC reflections. The losses and the intrinsic slope efficiency of the laser can be estimated by the following[ Reference Morris, Stevenson, Bookey, Kar, Brown, Hopkins, Dawson and Lagatsky 41 ]:

$$\begin{align*}1/{\eta}_{\mathrm{S}}=1/{\eta}_0\left(1+2\gamma /{\gamma}_{\mathrm{OC}}\right),\end{align*}$$
$$\begin{align*}\gamma =- \mathrm{ln}\left(1-L\right),\end{align*}$$
$$\begin{align*}{\gamma}_{\mathrm{OC}}=- \mathrm{ln}\left(1-{T}_{\mathrm{OC}}\right),\end{align*}$$

where ${\eta}_{\mathrm{S}}$ is the measured slope efficiency, ${\eta}_0$ is the intrinsic slope efficiency, L is the internal loss per pass, ${\gamma}_{\mathrm{OC}}$ is the output-coupling loss and T OC is the transmission of the OC. As shown in Figure 4, the linear relationship between the experimentally measured points of the inverse slope efficiency (1/ ${\eta}_{\mathrm{S}}$ ) as a function of OC reflections (–1/ln(R OC)) provides a straightforward way to determine the internal loss per pass (L) and intrinsic slope efficiency ( ${\eta}_0$ ). The best fit value of the propagation loss was determined to be L/l = 0.0004 cm–1, and the intrinsic slope efficiency was calculated to be approximately 70.9%, which is very nearly equal to the measured slope efficiency, indicating the great potential of the designed laser for further power scaling and future ultrashort-pulse SCF amplification experiments.

Figure 4 Caird plot for the tandem Ho:YAG SCF laser: inverse slope efficiency with respect to the inverse output-coupling loss.

The beam propagation factors (M 2) of the tandem Ho:YAG SCF laser with T OC = 70% were recorded to assess the beam quality with a mid-IR charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (WinCamD-IR-BB, Dataray, Inc.) at different pump powers. The similar trend of the beam propagation factors along the x- and y-axes indicates that tandem-set SCFs provide a uniform heat distribution in their transverse cross-section. As shown in Figure 5, when the incident pump power was less than 100 W, the M 2 factors measured in both the x- and y-directions were around 1.1 by taking advantage of the large surface-to-volume ratio of the SCF and the direct water-cooling scheme. However, the excitation of higher-order transverse modes gradually degrades the beam quality at the pump power of approximately 130 W, resulting in M 2 factors along the x- and y-directions of 2.11 and 2.48, respectively. The beam quality along the y-axis deteriorates more seriously than that along the x-axis, which may be caused by unidirectional heat dissipation of the approximately 1 mm protuberance of the SCF outside the module under high pump power levels. Further beam propagation factor optimization and power improvement can be realized by employing SCFs with diffusion-bonded undoped YAG end caps, or optimizing the directly water-cooled aluminum heat sink without protuberances of SCFs outside the module, thus mitigating thermal effects under high pump power levels.

Figure 5 The measured beam quality at different power levels; the insert is the corresponding near-field beam profiles.

4 Conclusion

In summary, we have experimentally investigated the laser performance of tandem-set Ho:YAG SCFs. The maximum output power of more than 100 W was obtained with a slope efficiency of more than 70% by taking advantage of the long gain region, the large surface-to-volume ratio and the low propagation loss of SCFs. Compared to our previous work[ Reference Zhao, Wang, Chen, Wang, Song, Xu, Liu, Shen, Xu, Mateos, Loiko, Wang, Xu, Griebner and Petrov 39 ], we simply reduced the doping concentration of Ho3+ ions in the YAG SCF and employed two directly water-cooled tandem SCFs as the gain medium to reduce the thermal effect and extend the gain length, thus resulting in high-power, high-efficiency laser output. Such a high-performance laser based on the tandem-set SCFs demonstrates an efficient way to realize high-power output and lays the foundation for expanding the output power of SCF lasers to a few hundred watts in the near future. Furthermore, the tandem-set SCFs not only provide a long gain region and simple thermal management due to their fiber-like geometry and crystal properties, but also suppress nonlinear effects and nonlinear phase accumulation effectively, thus paving the way for high average/peak power femtosecond pulse amplification.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 62075090 and 52032009).

References

Henderson, S. W., Hale, C. P., Magee, J. R., Kavaya, M. J., and Huffaker, A. V., Opt. Lett. 16, 773 (1991).Google Scholar
Sumiyoshi, T., Sekita, H., Arai, T., Sato, S., Ishihara, M., and Kikuchi, M., IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 5, 936 (1999).Google Scholar
Dergachev, A., Armstrong, D., Smith, A., Drake, T., and Dubois, M., Opt. Express 15, 14404 (2007).Google Scholar
Mingareev, I., Weirauch, F., Olowinsky, A., Shah, L., Kadwani, P., and Richardson, M., Opt. Laser Technol. 44, 2095 (2012).Google Scholar
Godard, A., C. R. Phys. 8, 1100 (2007).Google Scholar
Walsh, B. M., Laser Phys. 19, 855 (2009).Google Scholar
Scholle, K., Lamrini, S., Koopmann, P., and Fuhrberg, P., in Frontiers in Guided Wave Optics and Optoelectronics (IntechOpen, 2010), p. 471.Google Scholar
Lamrini, S., Koopmann, P., Schäfer, M., Scholle, K., and Fuhrberg, P., Appl. Phys. B 106, 315 (2012).Google Scholar
Ganija, M., Hemming, A., Simakov, N., Boyd, K., Carmody, N., Veitch, P., Haub, J., and Munch, J., Appl. Phys. B 126, 72 (2020).Google Scholar
Ganija, M., Hemming, A., Simakov, N., Boyd, K., Haub, J., Veitch, P., and Munch, J., Opt. Express 25, 31889 (2017).Google Scholar
Yao, B., Shen, Y., Duan, X., Wang, W., Ju, Y., and Wang, Y., J. Russ. Laser Res. 34, 503 (2013).Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Schulze, F., Mak, K., Pervak, V., Bauer, D., Sutter, D., and Pronin, O., Laser Photonics Rev. 12, 1700273 (2018).Google Scholar
Shen, Y., Yao, B., Duan, X., Dai, T., Ju, Y., and Wang, Y., Appl. Opt. 51, 7887 (2012).Google Scholar
Chen, F., Cai, M., Zhang, Y., and Li, B., Proc. SPIE 11023, 110233P (2019).Google Scholar
Yao, B., Shen, Y., Han, L., Qian, C., Duan, X., Ju, Y., and Wang, Y., Opt. Quant. Electron 47, 211 (2015).Google Scholar
Mi, S., Tang, J., Wei, D., Yao, B., Li, J., Yang, K., Dai, T., and Duan, X., Opt. Express 30, 21501 (2022).Google Scholar
Shen, Y., Yao, B., Duan, X., Zhu, G., Wang, W., Ju, Y., and Wang, Y., Opt. Lett. 37, 3558 (2012).Google Scholar
Tomilov, S., Hoffmann, M., Wang, Y., and Saraceno, C. J., J. Phys. Photonics 3, 022002 (2021).Google Scholar
Duan, X., Shen, Y., Yao, B., and Wang, Y., Quantum Electron. 48, 691 (2018).Google Scholar
Ganija, M., Hemming, A., Boyd, K., Gambell, A., and Simakov, N., in CLEO Pacific Rim (Optica Publishing Group, 2020), paper C9A_2.Google Scholar
Yao, W., Li, E., Shen, Y., Ren, C., Zhao, Y., Tang, D., and Shen, D., Laser Phys. Lett. 16, 115001 (2019).Google Scholar
Hemming, A., Bennetts, S., Simakov, N., Davidson, A., Haub, J., and Carter, A., Opt. Express 21, 4560 (2013).Google Scholar
Hemming, A., Bennetts, S., Simakov, N., Davidson, A., Haub, J., and Carter, A., in Advanced Photonics, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optica Publishing Group, 2011), paper SOMB1.Google Scholar
Beaumont, B., Bourdon, P., Barnini, A., Kervella, L., Robin, T., and Gouët, J. L., J. Lightwave. Technol. 40, 6480 (2022).Google Scholar
Gouët, J., Gustave, F., Bourdon, P., Robin, T., Laurent, A., and Cadier, B., Opt. Express 28, 22307 (2020).Google Scholar
Hemming, A., Simakov, N., Davidson, A., Bennetts, S., Hughes, M., Carmody, N., Davies, P., Corena, L., Stepanov, D., Haub, J., Swain, R., and Carter, A., in CLEO: 2013, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optica Publishing Group, 2013), paper CW1M.1.Google Scholar
Elder, I. F., and Payne, M. J. P., Opt. Commun. 148, 265 (1998).Google Scholar
Yao, W., Shen, C., Shao, Z., Wang, J., Wang, F., Zhao, Y., and Shen, D., Appl. Opt. 57, 5574 (2018).Google Scholar
Zervas, M. N. and Codemard, C. A., IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20, 0904123 (2014).Google Scholar
Jauregui, C., Stihler, C., and Limpert, J., Adv. Opt. Photonics 12, 429 (2020).Google Scholar
Dong, L., Ballato, J., and Kolis, J., Opt. Express 31, 6690 (2023).Google Scholar
Parthasarathy, T., Hay, R., Fair, G., and Hopkins, F., Opt. Eng. 49, 094302 (2010).Google Scholar
Délen, X., Piehler, S., Didierjean, J., Aubry, N., Voss, A., Ahmed, M. A., Graf, T., Balembois, F., and Georges, P., Opt. Lett. 37, 2898 (2012).Google Scholar
Beirow, F., Eckerle, M., Graf, T., and Ahmed, M. A., Appl. Phys. B 126, 148 (2020).Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Zheng, C., Huang, Z., Gao, Q., Dong, J., Tian, K., Yang, Z., Chen, W., and Petrov, V., Laser Photonics Rev. 16, 2200503 (2022).Google Scholar
Zheng, C., Du, T., Zhu, L., Wang, Z., Tian, K., Zhao, Y., Yang, Z., Yu, H., and Petrov, V., Photonics Res. 12, 27 (2024).Google Scholar
Wang, J., Dong, J., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Xu, X., Xue, Y., Xu, J., Wang, C., and Zhao, Y., Opt. Express 30, 29015 (2022).Google Scholar
Li, Y., Miller, K., Johnson, E. G., Nie, C. D., Bera, S., Harrington, J. A., and Shori, R., Opt. Express 24, 9751 (2016).Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Wang, L., Chen, W., Wang, J., Song, Q., Xu, X., Liu, Y., Shen, D., Xu, J., Mateos, X., Loiko, P., Wang, Z., Xu, X., Griebner, U., and Petrov, V., High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 8, e25 (2020).Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Lan, R., Mateos, X., Li, J., Hu, C., Li, C., Suomalainen, S., Harkonen, A., Guina, M., Petrov, V., and Griebner, U., Opt. Express 24, 18003 (2016).Google Scholar
Morris, J., Stevenson, N. K., Bookey, H. T., Kar, A. K., Brown, C. T. A., Hopkins, J. M., Dawson, M. D., and Lagatsky, A. A., Opt. Express 25, 14910 (2017).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Overview of 2-μm continuous-wave (CW) Ho:YAG and Ho:fiber lasers[826].

Figure 1

Figure 2 Experimental setup of the tandem Ho:YAG SCF laser.

Figure 2

Figure 3 (a) CW laser output powers and (b) the corresponding optical spectra of the Ho:YAG tandem SCF laser with different OC transmissions (TOC = 30%, 50%, 70% and 90%).

Figure 3

Figure 4 Caird plot for the tandem Ho:YAG SCF laser: inverse slope efficiency with respect to the inverse output-coupling loss.

Figure 4

Figure 5 The measured beam quality at different power levels; the insert is the corresponding near-field beam profiles.