Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:51:56.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The waiting list is an inadequate benchmark for estimating the effectiveness of psychotherapy for depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2018

Ioana A. Cristea Open the ORCID record for Ioana A. Cristea [Opens in a new window]
Ioana A. Cristea*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author for correspondence: Ioana A. Cristea, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

PsychotherapyDepressionRandomised Controlled TrialsSystematic Reviews
Type
Commentary to Special Article
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 278 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barth, J, Munder, T, Gerger, H, Nuesch, E, Trelle, S, Znoj, H, Juni, P and Cuijpers, P (2013) Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine 10, e1001454.Google Scholar
Cooper, AA and Conklin, LR (2015) Dropout from individual psychotherapy for major depression: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Clinical Psychology Review 40, 57–65.Google Scholar
Cuijpers, P and Cristea, IA (2016) How to prove that your therapy is effective, even when it is not: a guideline. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 25, 428–435.Google Scholar
Cuijpers, P, Cristea, IA, Karyotaki, E, Reijnders, M and Huibers, MJ (2016) How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence. World Psychiatry 15, 245–258.Google Scholar
Cuijpers, P, Karyotaki, E, Reijnders, M and Ebert, DD (2018) Was Eysenck right after all? A reassessment of the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 1–10. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000057.Google Scholar
Dragioti, E, Karathanos, V, Gerdle, B and Evangelou, E (2017) Does psychotherapy work? An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 136, 236–246.Google Scholar
Fodor, LA, Cotet, CD, Cuijpers, P, Szamoskozi, S, David, D and Cristea, IA (2018) The effectiveness of virtual reality based interventions for symptoms of anxiety and depression: a meta-analysis. Scientific Reports 8, 10323.Google Scholar
Furukawa, TA, Noma, H, Caldwell, DM, Honyashiki, M, Shinohara, K, Imai, H, Chen, P, Hunot, V and Churchill, R (2014) Waiting list may be a nocebo condition in psychotherapy trials: a contribution from network meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 130, 181–192.Google Scholar
Ioannidis, JP (2016) Most psychotherapies do not really work, but those that might work should be assessed in biased studies. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 25, 436–438.Google Scholar
Khan, A, Faucett, J, Lichtenberg, P, Kirsch, I and Brown, WA (2012) A systematic review of comparative efficacy of treatments and controls for depression. PLoS ONE 7, e41778.Google Scholar
Lavori, PW, Rush, AJ, Wisniewski, SR, Alpert, J, Fava, M, Kupfer, DJ, Nierenberg, A, Quitkin, FM, Sackeim, HA, Thase, ME and Trivedi, M (2001) Strengthening clinical effectiveness trials: equipoise-stratified randomization. Biological Psychiatry 50, 792–801.Google Scholar
Lindström, D, Sundberg-Petersson, I, Adami, J and Tönnesen, H (2010) Disappointment and drop-out rate after being allocated to control group in a smoking cessation trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials 31, 22–26.Google Scholar
Lovell, K, Bower, P, Gellatly, J, Byford, S, Bee, P, McMillan, D, Arundel, C, Gilbody, S, Gega, L, Hardy, G, Reynolds, S, Barkham, M, Mottram, P, Lidbetter, N, Pedley, R, Molle, J, Peckham, E, Knopp-Hoffer, J, Price, O, Connell, J, Heslin, M, Foley, C, Plummer, F and Roberts, C (2017) Low-intensity cognitive-behaviour therapy interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder compared to waiting list for therapist-led cognitive-behaviour therapy: 3-arm randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness. PLoS Medicine 14, e1002337.Google Scholar
Munder, T, Flückiger, C, Leichsenring, F, Abbass, AA, Hilsenroth, MJ, Luyten, P, Rabung, S, Steinert, C, Wampold, BE (2019) Is psychotherapy effective? A re-analysis of treatments for depression. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 1–7. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000355.Google Scholar
Palpacuer, C, Gallet, L, Drapier, D, Reymann, JM, Falissard, B and Naudet, F (2017) Specific and non-specific effects of psychotherapeutic interventions for depression: results from a meta-analysis of 84 studies. Journal of Psychiatric Research 87, 95–104.Google Scholar
Peters, JL, Sutton, AJ, Jones, DR, Abrams, KR and Rushton, L (2007) Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity. Statistics in Medicine 26, 4544–4562.Google Scholar
Shalev, AY, Ankri, Y, Israeli-Shalev, Y, Peleg, T, Adessky, R and Freedman, S (2012) Prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder by early treatment: results from the Jerusalem trauma outreach and prevention study. Archives of General Psychiatry 69, 166–176.Google Scholar
Skingley, A, Bungay, H, Clift, S and Warden, J (2014) Experiences of being a control group: lessons from a UK-based randomized controlled trial of group singing as a health promotion initiative for older people. Health Promotion International 29, 751–758.Google Scholar