Introduction
Paracapillaria Mendonça, 1963 is a genus of nematodes belonging to the family Capillariidae Railliet, 1915, whose members infect the digestive system of freshwater and marine fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals and humans (Moravec, Reference Moravec1986; Moravec and Justine, Reference Moravec and Justine2020). This genus is divided into 3 subgenera: Paracapillaria Mendonça, 1963 (in fishes and amphibians), Ophidiocapillaria Moravec, 2001 (reptiles) and Crossicapillaria Moravec, 2001 (birds and mammals) (Moravec, Reference Moravec1986; Moravec and Justine, Reference Moravec and Justine2020). Notably, one of the species within the genus, Paracapillaria (Crossicapillaria) philippinensis (Chitwood et al., Reference Chitwood, Valesquez and Salazar1968), has the potential to be zoonotic, causing intestinal capillariasis in humans (Chitwood et al., Reference Chitwood, Valesquez and Salazar1968; El-Karaksy et al., Reference El-Karaksy, El-Shabrawi, Mohsen, Kotb, El-Koofy and El-Deeb2004; Saichua et al., Reference Saichua, Nithikathkul and Kaewpitoon2008).
Although Paracapillaria has been extensively studied, certain aspects of this genus, such as its infection in wildlife species, particularly snakes of the subgenus Ophidiocapillaria, remain poorly understood. Over the past century, at least 12 Paracapillaria species, found in various snake hosts, have been described (Teixeira de Freitas and Lent, Reference Teixeira de Freitas and Lent1934; Skryabin et al., Reference Skryabin, Shikhobalova and Orlov1957; Pence, Reference Pence1970; Wang, Reference Wang1982; Biserkov et al., Reference Biserkov, Georgiev and Genov1985; Moravec, Reference Moravec1986; Moravec and Gibson, Reference Moravec and Gibson1986; De, Reference De1998) The subgenus Ophidiocapillaria, as established by Moravec (Reference Moravec1986), is of particular interest. However, the identification of these closely related species has primarily relied on morphological data, with limited molecular data and often a restricted number of host and parasite samples. These limitations can pose challenges in recognizing Ophidiocapillaria species, especially when they are discovered in new host species or geographical areas. Furthermore, the morphometric characteristics of the parasites may not align with previously described morphology due to the small sample sizes. It is important to note that morphology-based identification mainly applied to the adult stage of the parasites and may not provide comprehensive genetic information. Therefore, relying solely on morphology may not be sufficient for the identification of Ophidiocapillaria species.
Between 2000 and 2022, authors' parasitic surveys led to the recognition of capillariid worms collected from the monocled cobras (Naja kaouthia) in central parts of Thailand. Other studies have reported the presence of the worms in the same snake host and locality, but specific identification has been challenging, resulting in taxonomic determination only at the level of Capillaria sp. (Chaiyabutr and Chanhome, Reference Chaiyabutr and Chanhome2002; Vasaruchapong et al., Reference Vasaruchapong, Laoungbua, Tawan and Chanhome2017). These parasites were predominantly found in the oesophagus of the cobras and displayed morphological similarities to Paracapillaria (Ophidiocapillaria) najae. This species was initially described by De (Reference De1998) based on specimens from the Indian cobra Naja naja in West Bengal, India. However, the measured characteristics of the parasite specimens, such as body length and width, significantly deviated from the recorded morphological ranges. There were also morphological variations and differences compared to the original study by De (Reference De1998).
Recently, phylogenetic and microstructure imaging have proven invaluable in differentiating parasite species and detecting minor morphological variations (Eisenback, Reference Eisenback1986; Mattiucci and Nascetti, Reference Mattiucci, Nascetti, Rollinson and Hay2008; Cutillas et al., Reference Cutillas, Callejón, de Rojas, Tewes, Ubeda, Ariza and Guevara2009). Traditionally, studies on paracapillariid species infecting snakes relied solely on taxonomic methods, neglecting the collection of genetic data for species within this subgenus. Regarding P. (O.) najae, De's (Reference De1998) report provided comprehensive morphological data. However, the reliance on a single host specimen, combined with the absence of genetic data and microscopic imaging, resulted in misunderstandings related to morphology and measurements, leading to ambiguous species identification.
The objective of this current study was to offer a more comprehensive description of P. najae specimens found in a new host, the monocled cobra (N. kaouthia), in central Thailand. This involved using scanning electron microscopy to examine the morphological and morphometric characteristics and comparing them with those of P. najae, as initially described by De (Reference De1998). In addition to providing extensive morphological descriptions and illustrations of P. najae, the present study aimed to facilitate more accurate species identification for future research. Furthermore, the molecular characterization of P. najae was conducted by employing sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) and small subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) genes. This helped determine the phylogenetic position of P. najae among capillariid worms and provided a reference for future taxonomic identification. By integrating molecular and morphological data, the present study aimed to overcome the limitations of previous methods and enhance the understanding of this genus of parasites.
Materials and methods
Five wild monocled cobra carcasses were donated by the snake farm at Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute of the Thai Red Cross Society in Thailand. Each snake was dissected to examine parasites in the oesophagus following the guidelines described by Toland and Dehne (Reference Toland and Dehne1960). The organ was placed in a Petri dish quarter-filled with 0.85% normal saline before dissection, and it was examined under a stereo-microscope (Olympus, SZ30 and SZ51). The parasites were observed and isolated using micro-dissecting needles, and the paracapillariids were counted and placed in a small Petri dish filled with 0.85% normal saline. The parasites were then preserved in 70% ethanol at −20 °C until use. Some complete specimens were also preserved in glutaraldehyde for scanning electron microscopic imaging.
For the morphological studies, adult male and female worms were obtained from each of the 5 cobra hosts, resulting in the collection of a total of 21 males and 20 females. These parasites were randomly selected and examined under an inverted microscope (Zeiss, Primovert) equipped with a Zeiss Axiocam (ZEN2 blue edition software) to collect morphological information. Drawings were made under a light microscope with a camera lucida (Olympus, Thailand, Leitz) to illustrate the microscopic appearances of selected morphological characteristics of males and females. The measurement of these characteristics followed the methods described by Biserkov et al. (Reference Biserkov, Mészáros and Chipev1994) and De (Reference De1998). To compare character differences between males and females that were not clarified in De's (Reference De1998) study, the Mann–Whitney U test was employed. All measurements were recorded in micrometres (μm).
To examine the P. najae worms using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), 3 male and 3 female specimens were preserved in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sucrose phosphate buffer (SPB). The specimens underwent secondary fixation with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M SPB, dehydrated with ethanol, dried in a critical point drying device (CPD300 auto, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), coated with a coat-sputter (Q150R PLUS, Quorum, East Sussex, England) and examined under an SEM (JSM-6610LV, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
For DNA extraction, 2 male and 2 female specimens of P. najae were selected. Each specimen was homogenized and processed using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The extracted genomic DNA was eluted with 30 μL of nuclease-free water and quantified using spectrophotometry.
A partial sequence of COI gene was amplified from the selected samples. This gene locus has been previously demonstrated to be useful for resolving genetic divergence within nematode species (Chan et al., Reference Chan, Chaisiri, Morand, Saralamba and Thaenkham2020). Additionally, a nuclear gene, 18S rRNA, was amplified to support the results of the mitochondrial DNA analysis (Tokiwa et al., Reference Tokiwa, Harunari, Tanikawa, Komatsu, Koizumi, Tung, Suzuki, Kadosaka, Takada, Kumagi, Akao and Ohta2012; Eamsobhana et al., Reference Eamsobhana, Lim and Yong2015; Chan et al., Reference Chan, Chaisiri, Morand, Saralamba and Thaenkham2020). The following primers were used: COI_Paracap_F 5′-AGTRTTTGGTCCTTTRGG-3′ and COI_Paracap_R 5′- GAWGCAT TAGAAAGAGA-3′ for the COI gene, and 1096F 5′-GGTAATTCTGGAGCTAATAC-3′ and 1916R 5′-GGTAATTCTGGAGCTAATAC-3′ for the 18S rRNA gene. The amplifications were carried out using a T100 thermocycler (Bio-Rad, California, USA). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reaction mixture consisted of a final volume of 30 μL containing 15 μL of 2× i-Taq master mix (Biotechnology, Gyeonggi, South Korea), 10 μm of each primer and 1 ng μL−1 of DNA. For the COI primers, the thermocycling profile was as follows: an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 52 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 45 s. The reaction concluded with a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. Regarding the 18S rRNA primers, the thermocycling profile consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 5 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 45 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 70 s, and 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 70 s. The reaction concluded with a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min, as described by Holterman et al. (Reference Holterman, van der Wurff, van den Elsen, van Megen, Bongers, Holovachov, Bakker and Helder2006). To visualize the PCR amplicons, a 1% agarose gel stained with SYBR safe (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) was used. Subsequently, the PCR products were subjected to sequencing using Barcode Taq sequencing, which does not require primer walking (Celemics, Seoul, South Korea). The nucleotide sequences of the parasites obtained from this study were deposited in the NCBI database, and the corresponding GenBank accession numbers can be found in Figs 3 and 4.
The partial sequences of the 2 target genes were verified through manual inspection of electropherograms. The complementary strands were compared and adjusted using BioEdit version 7.2.5. (Hall, Reference Hall1999). To analyse the phylogenetic relationships, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the obtained sequences and additional sequences from parasites of Capillariidae, Trichuridae and Trichinellidae retrieved as outgroups from GenBank. The alignment of the data matrix was performed using ClustalX 2.1 (Hall, Reference Hall1999; Thompson et al., Reference Thompson, Gibson and Higgins2003), and the aligned sequences were visually analysed using BioEdit. The aligned sequences were verified before conducting the phylogenetic analysis using maximum likelihood (ML) in MEGA-X. The best-fit nucleotide substitution model was determined, and the analysis was performed with 1000 bootstrap replicates (Tamura et al., Reference Tamura, Stecher, Peterson, Filipski and Kumar2013). A bootstrap value of over 70% is generally considered a strong level of support (Hillis and Bull, Reference Hillis and Bull1993). The phylogenetic trees were constructed using the ML method, with the Kimura 2-parameter (K) model with a gamma distribution for 18S rRNA and the Tamura 3-parameter (T92) model with a gamma distribution and evolutionarily invariable sites for COI.
Results
Family: Capillariidae Railliet, 1915
Genus: Paracapillaria Mendonça, 1963
Subgenus: Ophidiocapillaria Moravec, 2001
Species: Paracapillaria (Ophidiocapillaria) najae De, Reference De1998 (Table 1, Figs 1 and 2)
Host
Naja kaouthia Lesson, 1831.
The micrometre (μm) is a unit of measurement.
Collection date
10 November 2020 to 2 February 2022.
Site of infection
Oesophagus
New locality
Suburbs of Bangkok (e.g. Don Mueang and Prawet districts) and adjacent provinces, including Samut Prakan, Pathum Thani, Nonthaburi and Nakhon Pathom, in Thailand. Coordinates were not recorded.
Redescription
Medium-sized filiform nematodes; body long and slender with a finely transversely striated cuticle (Fig. 2A and B). A bacillary band with button-like bacillary cells present dorso-laterally (Fig. 2C), extending between 2/5 of body length and cloaca (Fig. 2C–F). Males shorter and thinner than gravid females. Head rounded; mouth elevated (Figs 1A and 2A). Oesophagus with muscular part followed by stichosome; stichosome consisting of single row of 31–44 stichocytes; anterior stichocytes short; middle and posterior stichocytes long and subannulated with large nuclei (Fig. 1B). Nerve ring encircling muscular oesophagus 3/10 of its length. Two large cells present at oesophago-intestinal junction (Fig. 1D).
Male (n = 21): Body length 11 579–25 592; maximum width 56–123. Whole oesophagus, 4855–9344 long; muscular oesophagus and stichosome, 210–374 and 4635–9015, respectively. Ratio anterior:posterior (the distance from the head to the beginning of intestine:the distance from the beginning of intestine to the tip of the tail), 1:1.2–1:2.5. Tail 14–38 long. Spicule 1437–2715 long (8–11% of body length) and slender (Fig. 1F and G); proximal end of spicule spatula-like (Fig. 1H). Spicular sheath non-spinous (Figs 1I, 1J, 2G and 2H). Posterior end of body broad and with 2 membranous lateral rays (Figs 1K and 2G). Two post-cloacal papillae present (Fig. 1K).
Gravid female (n = 20): Body length 16 532–31 485; maximum width 101–180. Whole oesophagus 5868–9249 long; muscular oesophagus and stichosome 148–436 and 5719–8581, respectively. Ratio anterior:posterior, 1:1.4–1:3. Tail, 12–25 long (Fig. 1C). Vulva with no elevated lips (Figs 1D and 2F) situated at 46–107 from oesophagus end; vagina directed posteriorly from vulva, and uterus containing 127–545 eggs. Eggs elongate with slightly protruding polar plugs (Fig. 1E) and uncleaved content, 60–71 long and 28–34 wide; egg wall thick with 2 layers: an inner hyaline layer and a thicker outer layer with fine longitudinal sculpture (Fig. 1E).
Remarks
The morphology of specimens examined in this study using SEM expands upon the traditional description of P. najae provided by De (Reference De1998). SEM shows that the cephalic region displayed lips projecting out the oral opening (Fig. 2A). The body's midsection featured transverse striations on the ventral side (Fig. 2B and F). Unlike the 2 lateral bacillary bands described by De (Reference De1998) that extend between the nerve ring and cloaca, the SEM specimens examined in this study featured a dorso-laterally covered bacillary band extending from the middle of the body to the cloaca (Fig. 2F). This bacillary band was observed to contain scattered bacillary cells (Fig. 2C).
De (Reference De1998) examined a single host specimen without conducting any studies on the parasite–host relationship. In the present work, P. (O.) najae exhibited a significant degree of morphometric variation among the cobra specimens (see Table S1). For example, the longest average body length of the parasite (20 738–30 483 μm, n = 8) was observed in a cobra (sample no. SN017) with a 109.5 cm snout-vent length (SVL), while the smaller nematodes (11 579–17 167 μm, n = 8) were found in a larger cobra (SN007: 134.5 cm SVL). On the other hand, the largest snake (SN055: 147.8 cm SVL) has larger parasites compared to the smaller snake (SN013: 136.0 cm SVL) (see Table S1). The result suggests that no apparent relationship exists between host and parasite size. Other morphometric characteristics, including body width, oesophagus length, anterior part length and tail length, also displayed varying levels of variation with unclear patterns.
De's (Reference De1998) study showed no difference in body length between males and females. However, a difference was evident in all specimens from monocled cobras. Statistical analysis confirmed that female individuals typically exhibit a greater body length (U = 122.0, P = 0.022), width (U = 25.0, P ⩽ 0.001), tail length (U = 132.0, P = 0.042) and posterior length (U = 128.0, P = 0.032) compared with males (see also Table S3).
Molecular characterization and phylogenetic position
The molecular characterization of P. (O.) najae involved amplifying and sequencing the nuclear 18S rDNA and the mitochondrial COI genes, resulting in amplicon lengths of 800 and 288 bp, respectively. The phylogenetic analysis outcomes clearly revealed that P. najae is a distinct species within the taxonomic classification of Capillariidae. It was found to be closely related to capillariids such as Aonchotheca, Baruscapillaria, Pseudocapillaria and Pearsomena, which also possess a spicular sheath without spines (Figs 3 and 4). The genetic difference between P. najae and other capillariids ranged 2–14% (for 18S) and 16–26% (for COI), respectively. The closest genetic distances were observed between P. najae and members of Aonchotheca, 2–3% for 18S rRNA and 17–18% for COI.
Discussion
The diagnostic morphology of the parasites discovered in the monocled cobra N. kaouthia in central Thailand aligns with that of P. (O.) najae by De (Reference De1998) in the Indian cobra N. naja. This includes the presence of a spatula-like spicule, a broad caudal end with 2 membranous lateral rays, a non-spinous spicular sheath with transverse striation in males, a vulva opening without elevated lips in females and other characteristics. These findings confirm the taxonomic identification of the examined specimens as P. najae (sensu De, Reference De1998).
However, morphological discrepancies were found when comparing the descriptions examined by De (Reference De1998) to variations of P. najae observed among hosts which were not previously noted. The notable difference pertained to the presence of a dorso-lateral bacillary band with scattered bacillary cells extending from approximately 2/5 of the total body length, which contradicted De's (Reference De1998) findings of 2 lateral bacillary bands. This feature appears to be delicate, requiring examination beyond the capabilities of a light microscope. It is possible that De (Reference De1998) examined specimens of P. najae without using SEM or cross-section technique, which may have contributed to the lack of clarity regarding this particular character.
Additionally, several measurement-related characters, particularly body length and width, exhibited broader ranges in this present study compared to De's (Reference De1998) study, where only 1 host specimen was examined. The inclusion of a larger number of cobra host specimens in this study allowed for a more comprehensive range of measurements, enabling a more accurate assessment of morphological proportions and facilitating identification for the species.
Moreover, a high degree of morphological variation was observed among P. najae specimens found in different cobra hosts, with minimal overlap (Table S1). The underlying factors responsible for this variation remain unclear, and a more extensive sampling of both hosts and parasites is necessary to gain a deeper understanding of this pattern. Intraspecific variation, including a range of intrinsic characteristics and extrinsic factors (Thompson and Lymbery, Reference Thompson and Lymbery1990; Benesh and Kalbe, Reference Benesh and Kalbe2016), such as foraging abilities (Barber, Reference Barber2005), duration of parasitic infection (Gems, Reference Gems2000) or host body temperature (Benesh et al., Reference Benesh, Parker and Chubb2021), may contribute to this variation.
Interestingly, a juvenile snake examined in the present work was infected with larger parasites on average than many adult snakes. While previous studies have reported a decrease in nematode length with host age/stage (Chylinski et al., Reference Chylinski, Boag, Stear and Cattadori2009), contradicting findings were observed with P. najae specimens in the recent work on the monocled cobra. Further investigations are needed to determine the underlying causes of these variations. However, these results emphasized the importance of examining large sample sizes for the measurable traits used to identify the species accurately.
Sexual dimorphism in the morphometric measurements of P. najae was evident within the same snake hosts, with females being larger than males. This contradicted De's (Reference De1998) study, which reported little difference in body length between females and males. Sexual size dimorphism resulting from differences in fecundity (Poulin, Reference Poulin1997), food and metabolic expenditure (So et al., Reference So, Garan, Miyahara and Ohshima2012) and/or larval life histories (Benesh and Valtonen, Reference Benesh and Valtonen2007) is known to be common in parasitic nematodes such as Ascaris spp. (Wang, Reference Wang2021), Enterobius spp. (Hugot et al., Reference Hugot, Gardner and Morand1996) and Oxyurid nematodes (Morand and Hugot, Reference Morand and Hugot1998).
In addition to morphological data, the genetic information derived from 18S rDNA and mt COI markers provided valuable insights into the systematics of P. (O.) najae. This analysis confirmed that the genetic distinctiveness of P. najae from other parasite species belongs to different genera. This molecular characterization represents the first of its kind for P. najae. However, further genetic sequences from other paracapillariid species, particularly closely related within the subgenus Ophidiocapillaria, are necessary to establish the species status and elucidate its evolutionary relationships. Currently, the available data in GenBank on Paracapillaria species are limited, with only data on Paracapillaria philippinensis and its 18S rDNA sequence. However, the genetic data for P. philippinensis are insufficient for conducting comprehensive phylogenetic analyses, primarily due to the 18S rDNA's short length sequence (170–235 bp), which is a slowly evolving nuclear gene (Mallatt et al., Reference Mallatt, Garey and Shultz2004).
Based on the phylogenetic trees constructed using both nuclear and mitochondrial genes in the present study, the evolution of capillariids can be divided into 2 clades. Paracapillaria najae was grouped in the first clade (clade A) along with species from the genus Pearsomena, Pseudocapillaria, Baruscapillaria and Aonchotheca, characterized by a specular sheath without spines. The second clade (clade B) includes species from the genera Capillaria, Eucoleus and Paratrichosoma, characterized by a specular sheath with spines. Paracapillaria najae and other capillariid members have diverged evolutionarily and infect a variety of vertebrate hosts (Moravec, Reference Moravec1986; Moravec and Justine, Reference Moravec and Justine2020).
While P. najae (revealed in the present study) and P. sonsinoi have the ability to infect multiple host species, most paracapillariid species display host specificity. This supports the notion of a coevolutionary relationship between host and parasite species (Buckingham and Ashby, Reference Buckingham and Ashby2022). On the other hand, the ability of P. najae to infect multiple hosts remains poorly studied, although such infections in other parasite species have been proposed to be influenced by parasite transmission patterns and virulence (Rigaud et al., Reference Rigaud, Perrot-Minnot and Brown2010). Paracapillaria najae infects both N. naja and N. kaouthia, 2 cobra species obtained from geographically distant regions. It is plausible that the parasite is transmitted through shared prey consumed by both cobra species, such as rodents, chicks, amphibians or other reptiles (Cox et al., Reference Cox, Hoover, Chanhome and Thirakhupt2012; Kalki et al., Reference Kalki, Cherukuri and Adhikari2022). To confirm the multi-host infection capability of P. najae, investigating other generalist snakes, such as rat snakes (Ptyas spp.) and the Siamese spitting cobra (Naja siamensis), which have similar prey preferences as the monocled and Indian cobras (Cox et al., Reference Cox, Hoover, Chanhome and Thirakhupt2012) is suggested.
In Oriental regions, there is a wide distribution of P. najae within overlapping host species. De (Reference De1998) collected a sample from the Indian cobra from West Bengal, India, while the infected monocled cobra was found in Bangkok, Thailand, a region more than 1700 km away. Nonetheless, the distribution of the monocled cobra overlaps with that of the Indian cobra in eastern India (Leviton et al., Reference Leviton, Wogan, Koo, Zug, Lucas and Vindum2003; Cox et al., Reference Cox, Hoover, Chanhome and Thirakhupt2012; Captain and Whitaker, Reference Captain and Whitaker2016). Therefore, the coevolutionary relationship between host and parasite likely reflects the parasite's existence in the same areas (Best et al., Reference Best, White, Kisdi, Antonovics, Brockhurst and Boots2010; Rigaud et al., Reference Rigaud, Perrot-Minnot and Brown2010; Ebert and Fields, Reference Ebert and Fields2020). Paracapillaria sonsinoi, another Paracapillaria species, also exhibits multiple hosts and a wide distribution, and its hosts include the green whip snake Hierophis viridiflavus in Italy (Skryabin et al., Reference Skryabin, Shikhobalova and Orlov1957), the diamondback water snake Nerodia rhombifera in the USA and the viperine water snake Natrix maura in France (Moravec, Reference Moravec1986). Given that monocled cobras exhibit population divergence between different geographical regions (Ratnarathorn et al., Reference Ratnarathorn, Harnyuttanakorn, Chanhome, Evans and Day2019, Reference Ratnarathorn, Nadolski, Sumontha, Hauser, Suntrarachun, Khunsap, Laoungbua, Radcliffe, Vasaruchapong, Tawan and Chanhome2023; Shi et al., Reference Shi, Vogel, Ding, Rao, Liu, Zhang, Wu and Chen2022), exploring whether the parasite demonstrates similar clustering patterns that reflect its hosts' divergence would be intriguing. The broad distribution of P. najae in Oriental regions and its association with multiple host species, including the Indian cobra and the monocled cobra, emphasizes the importance of understanding coevolutionary host–parasite relationships. Investigating whether the parasite displays the same clustering pattern as its hosts could provide valuable insights into the evolutionary history and ecology of P. najae.
However, it is important to acknowledge the limitation of this study, which is the relatively small host sample size. Increasing the sample size may improve the robustness and reliability of the conclusion within the context of the species and regions studied. Additionally, the lack of DNA sequence information for P. najae collected from the Indian cobra in West Bangor, India, hindered a more comprehensive genetic comparison.
In conclusion, the morphological redescription, illustrations and molecular characterization of P. najae support its species identification. The study extends our knowledge of P. najae infection and distribution in snake hosts, highlighting its potential as a multi-host parasite with different host species in Oriental regions. The variation in P. najae specimens observed across different snake hosts suggests the need for further research to unravel the complexities of its life cycle and host–parasite interactions. Understanding the coevolutionary relationship between hosts and parasites contributes to understanding snake distribution and the diversity of parasitic nematodes. Examining additional snake species and their prey, along with the genetic clustering patterns of P. najae, could provide valuable insights into the parasite's evolutionary history and ecology. This work provides valuable insights into the evolutionary and ecological processes shaping parasite diversity and distribution.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182023000707
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the first and corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgements
We thank Suzanne Leech, PhD, from Edanz (www.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript. We also thank all supporting staffs from the Snake Farm, Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute, the Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, and the Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University for facilitating working spaces and conveyances.
Author contributions
V. C. as a principal investigator performed data investigation, formal analyses, data curation and contributed to methodology, visualization and writing the article (original draft). K. C., N. R. and U. T. contributed to research conceptualization, methodology, visualization, data analyses and validation, and writing and editing the article. P. L., T. V., L. C. and T. T. contributed to specimen preparation and processing, resources and recommendations. S. A. contributed to visualization, methodology and writing the article (original draft).
Financial support
This project is funded by the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) and Mahidol University (Contact ID: N42A660912).
Competing interests
None.
Ethical standards
All procedures performed by researchers, snake handlers and veterinarians in handling snakes were approved by the Safety Committee of Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute (Document No. SN001). The authors confirm that the field studies did not involve endangered or protected species. The study was also approved by the Ethics Committee of Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute (Approval Protocol Number: QSMI-ACUC-11-2021).