I have what I consider to be a healthy scepticism regarding
new assessment instruments. Many of these are announced
with great enthusiasm but fairly rapidly disappear or are
used mainly by those who have developed them and by
their associates.
Although the tone of the paper by Gowers et al. (2000)
seems rather strong on enthusiasm and perhaps a little
lacking in its critical view, I do have great respect for
colleagues associated with development of HoNOSCA
and other respected colleagues talk well of it. Clearly, it
deserves careful scrutiny. For me relevant questions
include: ‘Is it easy to use?’, ‘Is it useful in terms of
describing a patient population?’ and ‘Is it useful in
looking at outcome?’