This study aims to identify fathers’ profiles integrating food parenting practices (FPP) and physical activity parenting practices (PAPP).

We analyzed cross-sectional data. The fathers completed the reduced FPP and PAPP item banks and sociodemographic and family dynamics (co-parenting and household responsibility) questionnaires. We identified fathers’ profiles via latent profile analysis. We explored the influence of social determinants, child characteristics, and family dynamics on fathers’ profiles using multinomial logistic regression.

Online survey in the US.

Fathers of 5-11-year-old children.

We analyzed data from 606 fathers (age=38±8.0; Hispanic=37.5%). Most fathers self-identified as White (57.9%) or Black (17.7%); overweight (41.1%) or obese (34.8%); attended college (70%); earned >$47,000 (62.7%); worked 40 hrs/week (63.4%); and were biological fathers (90.1%). Most children (boys=55.5%) were 5-8 years old (65.2%). We identified five fathers’ profiles combining FPP and PAPP: 1) Engaged Supporter Father (n=94 [15.5%]); 2) Leveled Father (n=160 [26.4%]); 3) Autonomy-Focused Father (n=117 [19.3%]); 4) Uninvolved Father (n=113 [18.6%]); 5) Control-Focused Father (n=122 [20.1%]). We observed significant associations with race, ethnicity, child characteristics, co-parenting, and household responsibility, but not with education level, annual income, or employment status. We observed significant pairwise differences between profiles in co-parenting and household responsibility, with the Engaged Supporter Father presenting higher scores in both measures.

Understanding how fathers’ FPP and PAPP interact can enhance assessments for a comprehensive understanding of fathers’ influences on children’s health. Recognizing the characteristics and differences among fathers’ profiles may enable tailored interventions, potentially improving children’s health trajectories.