Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:28:31.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Broadening the definition of resilience and “reappraising” the use of appetitive motivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

Melissa Soenke ,
Mary-Frances O'Connor  and
Jeff Greenberg
Melissa Soenke
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY [email protected]
Mary-Frances O'Connor
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. [email protected]@email.arizona.edu
Jeff Greenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. [email protected]@email.arizona.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kalisch et al.'s PASTOR model synthesizes current knowledge of resilience, focusing on mechanisms as a common pathway to outcomes and highlighting neuroscience as a method for exploring this. We propose the model broaden its definition of resiliency to include positive indices of recovery, include positive affect as a mechanism, and approach motivation as distinct from overcoming aversive motivation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e121
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonanno, G. A., Colak, D. M., Keltner, D., Shiota, M. N., Papa, A., Noll, J. G., Putnam, F. W. & Trickett, P. K. (2007) Context matters: The benefits and costs of expressing positive emotion among survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Emotion 7(4):824–37.Google Scholar
Frazier, P., Tennen, H., Gavian, M., Park, C., Tomich, P. & Tashiro, T. (2009) Does self-reported posttraumatic growth reflect genuine positive change? Psychological Science 20:912–19.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998) What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology 2:300–19.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist 56:218–26.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. & Branigan, C. A. (2005) Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion 19:313–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredrickson, B. L. & Joiner, T. (2002) Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science 12:172–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A. & Nowicki, G. P. (1987) Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(6):1122–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, M.-F., Wellisch, D. K., Stanton, A. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Irwin, M. R. & Lieberman, M. D. (2008) Craving love? Complicated grief activates brain's reward center. NeuroImage 42:969–72.Google Scholar
Oveis, C., Cohen, A. B., Gruber, J., Shiota, M. N., Haidt, J. & Keltner, D. (2009) Resting respiratory sinus arrhythmia is associated with tonic positive emotionality. Emotion 2:265–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soenke, M., Greenberg, J. & O'Connor, M. F. (under review) Using positive emotion eliciting activities to cope with sadness: Perceptions and reality.Google Scholar
Tugade, M. M. & Frederickson, B. L. (2004) Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86:320–33. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320.Google Scholar