Article contents
Intra-regional assortative sociality may be better explained by social network dynamics rather than pathogen risk avoidance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2012
Abstract
Fincher & Thornhill's (F&T's) model is not entirely supported by common patterns of affect behaviors among people who live under varying climatic conditions and among people who endorse varying levels of (Western) religiosity and conservative political ideals. The authors' model is also unable to account for intra-regional heterogeneity in assortative sociality, which, we argue, can be better explained by a framework that emphasizes the differential expression of fundamental social cues for maintaining distinct social network structures.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
References
- 2
- Cited by
Target article
Intra-regional assortative sociality may be better explained by social network dynamics rather than pathogen risk avoidance
Related commentaries (1)
Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity