Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:57:50.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Internal waves and Rayleigh–Taylor instability in magnetized compressible strongly coupled dusty plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2024

Deepak Kumar  and
Ram Prasad Prajapati Open the ORCID record for Ram Prasad Prajapati [Opens in a new window]
Deepak Kumar
Affiliation:
School of Physical Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India
Ram Prasad Prajapati*
Affiliation:
School of Physical Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the influence of compressibility on the internal wave modes and the density gradient-driven Rayleigh–Taylor (R–T) instability in magnetized strongly coupled dusty plasmas. The dusty magnetohydrodynamic model is formulated for compressible fluids, accounting for the effects of weakly coupled electrons/ions and strongly coupled dust particles under the influence of the gravitational field. The effect of the magnetic field on the dust dynamics has been incorporated through the magnetic force on the electrons and ions in quasineutral dusty plasmas. A dispersion relation of the R–T instability has been derived which has been modified because of the compressibility effect, dust acoustic wave speed and viscoelastic coefficients. The shear Alfvén and compressional viscoelastic wave modes become coupled in the dispersion characteristics. The modified R–T instability criterion is derived in terms of the Alfvén speed, viscoelastic effects and dust grain parameters. The graphical illustrations show that the growth rate of R–T instability has been suppressed due to compressibility, viscoelastic coefficients and dust acoustic speed. The results are useful to discuss the development of R–T instability in magnetized astrophysical dusty plasmas.

Keywords

dusty plasmasplasma instabilitiesstrongly coupled plasmas
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 90 , Issue 4 , August 2024 , 905900412
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

The Rayleigh–Taylor (R–T) instability is a well-known hydrodynamic fluid instability that occurs at the interface between two fluids when a heavy fluid acts upon a light fluid in the presence of gravitational fields. The R–T instability plays a vital role in the structure formation in astrophysical and laboratory plasmas such as supernovae, white dwarfs, crab nebula, inertial confinement fusion (ICF), high-density matter, compact stars, etc. (Jun Reference Jun1998; Cabot & Cook Reference Cabot and Cook2006; Wang Reference Wang2011; Porth, Komissarov & Keppens Reference Porth, Komissarov and Keppens2014; Duffel & Kasen Reference Duffel and Kasen2017). It is also ubiquitous in many crucial phenomena of solar prominence (Hillier Reference Hillier2018), the astrophysical disc around black holes (Papadopoulos & Contopoulos Reference Papadopoulos and Contopoulos2018) and particle acceleration in supernova remnants (Fraschetti et al. Reference Fraschetti, Teyssier, Ballet and Decourchelle2010). Interestingly, the presence of charged dust particles in plasmas profoundly influences structures, wave propagation characteristics and instabilities (Rao, Shukla & Yu Reference Rao, Shukla and Yu1990; Rosenberg Reference Rosenberg2000). The existence of dust grains also affects the dispersion properties (D'Angelo Reference D'Angelo1993), the growth rates of the R–T instability (Sen, Fukuyama & Honary Reference Sen, Fukuyama and Honary2010) and the formation of nonlinear vortices (Veeresha, Das & Sen Reference Veeresha, Das and Sen2005) in dusty plasmas. Avinash & Sen (Reference Avinash and Sen2015) proposed the theoretical model of the R–T instability in incompressible dusty plasmas which has been experimentally examined by Pacha & Merlino (Reference Pacha and Merlino2020) and it has been shown that there is a possible connection between dust acoustic waves and the R–T instability at the interface between high- and low-density dust clouds.

In strongly coupled dusty plasmas (SCDP), the Coulomb coupling parameter $\varGamma _d$ ($=Z_d^2e^2/aT_d$, where $Z_d, e$, $a$ and $T_d$ are the dust charge state, the electron charge, the inter-particle distance and the temperatures of dust species, respectively) is notably high ($\varGamma _d \gg 1$) (Kaw & Sen Reference Kaw and Sen1998). Such types of plasma environments are observed in many astrophysical and laboratory systems. Fluid instabilities play a vital role in such systems consisting of strongly coupled plasmas. In this direction, Das & Kaw (Reference Das and Kaw2014) have investigated the suppression of the R–T instability in strongly coupled plasmas with applications in laser compression techniques in ICF. Garai (Reference Garai2016) observed that viscosity and shear flow stabilize R–T modes within SCDP. Dolai & Prajapati (Reference Dolai and Prajapati2018) have studied the effects of dust cloud rotation, shear velocity and intermediate magnetic fields, which stabilize the growth of the R–T instability. Most recently, Zhang & Duan (Reference Zhang and Duan2024) have investigated the disparity in R–T instability between dusty and general fluids.

In recent years, significant attention has been devoted to investigating the R–T instability under diverse physical conditions. Dharodi & Das (Reference Dharodi and Das2021) have performed a numerical simulation focusing on R–T and buoyancy-driven instabilities within SCDP, highlighting the suppression of R–T instability as the coupling strength increases. Wani et al. (Reference Wani, Mir, Batool and Tiwari2022) have performed molecular dynamic simulation on suppressing the R–T instability in strongly coupled plasmas. They found that the growth rate of the R–T instability in a strongly coupled plasma is higher than that of the hydrodynamic viscoelastic fluid. Recently, Sun et al. (Reference Sun, Gou, Cao, Wang and Zeng2023) have investigated the effects of horizontal magnetic field and electrical resistivity on R–T instability using the (magnetohydrodynamic) MHD fluid theory. Previous works on R–T instability are primarily focused on the incompressible limits of stratified unmagnetized dusty plasmas. However, the compressibility effects and magnetic fields also play an important role in the R–T instability in dusty plasmas, which has not been studied in previous work. Thus, owing to the astrophysical and laboratory significance, we have investigated the effects of compressibility on internal gravity waves and R–T instability in magnetized SCDP.

The remaining part of the paper is structured as follows: in § 2, we formulate the mathematical model equations describing the R–T instability in compressible magnetized SCDP. In § 3, the dispersion relation of the R–T instability is derived using the normal mode analysis. In § 4, the analytical dispersion relation is analysed in various cases to study the role of viscoelastic parameters, compressibility and dust acoustic wave. Finally, § 5 represents the summary of the present problem.

2. Governing fluid equations

Let us consider a three-component magnetized SCDP consisting of weakly coupled electrons and ions and strongly coupled negatively charged dust grains. The system is embedded under the influence of an external uniform magnetic field $\boldsymbol {B}=B_0 \hat {\boldsymbol {z}}$ (where $\hat {\boldsymbol {z}}$ is the unit vector along the direction of the magnetic field) and contributes to the elastic property of the system through tensile stress. The massive charged dust particles are under the influence of gravitational acceleration $\boldsymbol {g}=-g \hat {\boldsymbol {z}}$. The magnetic field's strength is such that the electron and ion gyro-radius are much less than the dimension of the dust cloud and, hence, they are magnetized. The electrons and ions are collisionless fluids and show local fluid-like behaviour when they are fully magnetized. The pressures of the Boltzmann distributed electron and ion fluids are balanced with the corresponding Lorentz forces.

Using the MHD fluid theory, let us describe the dynamics of the inertialess magnetized electron and ion fluids as follows:

(2.1)\begin{equation} 0={-}\boldsymbol{\nabla} p_e -en_e\left(\boldsymbol{E}+\boldsymbol{u}_e\times\boldsymbol{B}\right), \end{equation}

and

(2.2)\begin{equation} 0={-}\boldsymbol{\nabla} p_i+ e n_i\left(\boldsymbol{E}+\boldsymbol{u}_i\times\boldsymbol{B}\right), \end{equation}

where $n_{e,i}$ are the number density of the electron and ion fluids, $\boldsymbol {u}_{e{,}i}$ are the electron and ion fluid velocities, $p_{e, i}$ are the electron and ion pressures and $\boldsymbol {E}$ and $\boldsymbol {B}$ are the electric field and magnetic field vectors.

Equations (2.1) and (2.2) together with the quasineutrality condition $e n_i-en_e=eZ_d n_d$ (where $n_d$ is the dust number density), give the following equation:

(2.3)\begin{equation} eZ_d n_d \boldsymbol{E}=\boldsymbol{\nabla} (p_e+p_i)+e(n_e \boldsymbol{u}_e+n_i \boldsymbol{u}_i)\times \boldsymbol{B}. \end{equation}

Since the strongly coupled dust particles are massive $(m_d \gg m_{i,e})$, their gravitational effect is considered. The compressibility effects are considered through the dust pressure in the equation of motion and continuity equations. The generalized hydrodynamic (GH) model incorporating the viscoelastic coefficient is used to write the momentum transfer equation for a strongly coupled dusty fluid in the following form:

(2.4)\begin{align} & \left(1+\tau_m\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\right)\left[m_dn_d\frac{\partial\boldsymbol{u}_d}{\partial t} + eZ_dn_d(\boldsymbol{E}+\boldsymbol{u}_d \times \boldsymbol{B})+ \boldsymbol{\nabla} p_d - m_dn_d\boldsymbol{g} \right]\nonumber\\ & \quad=\eta\nabla^2\boldsymbol{u}_d+\left(\xi+\frac{\eta}{3}\right)\boldsymbol{\nabla}(\boldsymbol{\nabla} \boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{u}_d), \end{align}

where $\tau _m$, $\eta$ and $\xi$ are the relaxation parameter and the shear and bulk viscosity coefficients. Here, $m_d$, $\boldsymbol {u}_d(=u_{x}\boldsymbol {\hat {x}}+u_{y}\boldsymbol {\hat {y}}+u_{z}\boldsymbol {\hat {z}})$ and $p_d$ are the dust mass, the dust fluid velocity and the dust fluid pressure, respectively.

Substitution of (2.3) into (2.4) gives the total current density $\boldsymbol {J} =e( n_i\boldsymbol {u}_i-n_e\boldsymbol {u}_e-Z_d n_d\boldsymbol {u}_d)$, which is replaced in terms of the magnetic field vector using Ampere's law. Finally, we get the modified equation of motion as

(2.5)\begin{align} & \left(1+\tau_m\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\right)\left[\rho_d \frac{\partial\boldsymbol{u}_d}{\partial t}+ \boldsymbol{\nabla} p_d-\frac{1}{\mu_0} (\boldsymbol{\nabla} \times \boldsymbol{B})\times \boldsymbol{B}-\rho_d \boldsymbol{g} \right]\nonumber\\ & \quad=\eta\nabla^2\boldsymbol{u}_d+\left(\xi+\frac{\eta}{3}\right)\boldsymbol{\nabla}( \boldsymbol{\nabla}\boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{u}_d), \end{align}

where $\rho _d=m_d n_d$ is the dust fluid density and $p_d \approx p_e+p_i+p_d$ is the total plasma pressure. The effective dust thermal pressure is related to the compressibility effects such that $p_d=\mu _d k_B T_d n_d$ (where $\mu _d$ is the compressibility parameter).

The magnetic induction equation is given by

(2.6)\begin{equation} \frac{\partial \boldsymbol{B}}{\partial t} = \boldsymbol{\nabla}\times(\boldsymbol{u_d}\times \boldsymbol{B}). \end{equation}

The continuity equation for a dusty fluid is given by

(2.7)\begin{equation} \frac{\partial \rho_d}{\partial t}+\boldsymbol{\nabla}\boldsymbol{\cdot}(\rho_d \boldsymbol{u}_d)=0. \end{equation}

In this paper, we consider the compressibility effect on the R–T instability in SCDP. The dusty fluid is assumed to be compressible and, hence, it can be divergence free ($\boldsymbol {\nabla } \boldsymbol {\cdot }\boldsymbol {u}_d\neq 0$). The compressibility effects play a crucial role in understanding the complex dynamics of SCDP. The equation of state for SCDP is given by (Garai et al. Reference Garai, Banerjee, Janaki and Chakrabarti2014)

(2.8)\begin{equation} \boldsymbol{\nabla} p_d=\left(\frac{Z_d^2n_{d0}T_eT_i}{m_d(T_en_{i0}+T_in_{e0})}+\frac{\gamma_d\mu_dT_d}{m_d}\right) \boldsymbol{\nabla}\rho_d=c_d^2\boldsymbol{\nabla}\rho_d. \end{equation}

In this equation, the two coupled terms in the brackets have the dimension of squared velocity. This is designated as the squared characteristic speed or dust acoustic wave speed in SCDP and represented by $c_d^2$. Equations (2.5)–(2.7) represent the basic governing fluid equations for the considered R–T configuration in magnetized compressible SCDP.

3. Dispersion relation of R–T instability

The hydrodynamic equilibrium of the present configuration is studied by balancing net plasma pressure with the force produced due to gravitational acceleration and the magnetic force. The static equilibrium condition demands that $\boldsymbol {u}_d=0$ and $\partial /\partial t=0$. This gives the following equilibrium arrangement:

(3.1)\begin{equation} -\boldsymbol{\nabla}\left(p_{d0}+\frac{B^2}{2\mu_0}\right)+\frac{1}{\mu_0}(\boldsymbol{B}_0\boldsymbol{\cdot} \boldsymbol{\nabla}) \boldsymbol{B}_0+\rho_{d0} \boldsymbol{g}=0. \end{equation}

Following the magnetostatic condition $(\boldsymbol {\nabla }\boldsymbol {\cdot }\boldsymbol {B}_0=0)$, the magnetic field terms drop out in the case of a uniform magnetic field, and the equilibrium condition becomes ${\rm d}p_{d0}/{\rm d}z=-\rho _{d0}g$.

Let us now discuss the R–T stability/instability of the magnetized SCDP in the compressible limits. We are working in a basic Cartesian coordinate system. For simplicity, we assume that spatial variations occur only in the $x\unicode{x2013}z$ plane, with the equilibrium global fluid density being a function of $z$ alone, denoted $\rho _{d0} = \rho _{d0}(z)$. In order to conduct a local stability analysis, we express each physical quantity as a sum of its equilibrium component $f_0$ and a small perturbed component $f_1$ (where $f_1\ll f_0$). To linearize the basic equations, let us employ the method of the Fourier transform in time and the $x$–$z$ spatial coordinates. Accordingly, the perturbed quantities vary as $f_1 \propto \overline {f_1}\exp ({\rm i}k_x x + {\rm i}k_z z + {\rm i}\omega t)$, where $\overline {f_1}$ is the amplitude. Here, $k^2 = k_x^2 + k_z^2$ signifies the squared perturbation wavenumber and $\omega$ is the frequency of harmonic perturbations.

Now, we linearize the governing equations (2.5)–(2.8) of the considered system and employ the perturbations as defined above.

The perturbed form of the continuity equation (2.7) is expressed as

(3.2)\begin{equation} {\rm i}\omega\rho_{d1}+u_{z1}\frac{{\rm d}\rho_{d0}}{{\rm d}z}+\rho_{d0}({\rm i}k_xu_{x1}+{\rm i}k_zu_{z1})=0. \end{equation}

The $\hat {\boldsymbol {x}}$-component of the momentum transfer equation (2.5) using (2.6) and (3.2) is obtained as

(3.3)\begin{align} & (1+{\rm i}\omega\tau_m)\left[(-\omega^2 + k_x^2c_d^2 + V_A^2k^2)u_{x1} - {\rm i}k_xc_d^2(\alpha+{\rm i}k_z)u_{z1}\right] \nonumber\\ & \quad ={-}\frac{{\rm i}\omega}{\rho_{d0}}\left(\xi+\frac{4\eta}{3}\right)k^2u_{x1}. \end{align}

The $\hat {\boldsymbol {z}}$-component of the momentum transfer equation (2.5) using (2.6) and (3.2) is obtained as

(3.4)\begin{align} & (1+{\rm i}\omega\tau_m)\left[-\{\omega^2+ (g+{\rm i}k_zc_d^2)(\alpha+{\rm i}k_z)\}u_{z1}- {\rm i}(g+{\rm i}k_zc_d^2)k_xu_{x1}\right] \nonumber\\ & \quad ={-}\frac{{\rm i}\omega}{\rho_{d0}}\left(\xi+\frac{4\eta}{3}\right)k^2u_{z1}, \end{align}

where $V_A = {B_0}/\sqrt {\mu _0\rho _{d0}}$ is the dust Alfvén speed and $\alpha =({1}/{\rho _{d0}})({{\rm d}\rho _{d0}}/{{\rm d}z})$ is the inverse density-gradient scale length, which indicates the characteristic length over which significant density variations occur in the system.

To get the dispersion relation of the R–T instability in compressible SCDP, we simplify (3.3) and (3.4), which gives the following equation:

(3.5)\begin{align} & \omega^4 -2{\rm i}\omega^3\frac{\left(\xi+\dfrac{4\eta}{3}\right)k^2}{\rho_{d0}(1+{\rm i}\omega\tau_m)} + \omega^2\left[\vphantom{\left(\frac{\left(\xi+\dfrac{4\eta}{3}\right)k^2}{\rho_{d0}(1+{\rm i}\omega\tau_m)}\right)^2}{\rm i}gk_z -\left(1 + \frac{{\rm i}k_zc_d^2}{g}\right)\omega_{cl}^2 - (c_d^2 + V_A^2)k^2 \right. \nonumber\\ & \quad \left. -\left(\frac{\left(\xi+\dfrac{4\eta}{3}\right)k^2}{\rho_{d0}(1+{\rm i}\omega\tau_m)}\right)^2\right] - {\rm i}\omega\frac{\left(\xi+\dfrac{4\eta}{3}\right)k^2}{\rho_{d0}(1+{\rm i}\omega\tau_m)} \left[{\rm i}gk_z -\left(1 + \frac{{\rm i}k_zc_d^2}{g}\right)\omega_{cl}^2 - (c_d^2 + V_A^2)k^2 \right] \nonumber\\ & \quad - V_A^2k^2(g+{\rm i}k_zc_d^2)(\alpha+{\rm i}k_z) = 0. \end{align}

This fourth-order polynomial equation represents the general dispersion relation of the R–T instability in compressible SCDP. The term $\omega _{cl}^2 = -\alpha g >0$ is the classical frequency associated with internal waves. We can see that the dispersion relation of the R–T instability has been modified due to the strong coupling effect in the compressible limit. The compressional viscoelastic modes in the dusty plasma have been coupled with the internal wave mode and Alfvén wave mode. In the absence of corrections due to dust particles (e.g. dust acoustic speed), the above dispersion relation reduces to that of Lu & Qiu (Reference Lu and Qiu2011) and Dolai & Prajapati (Reference Dolai and Prajapati2017), neglecting quantum corrections in those cases. Their results are useful for analysing the R–T instability in strongly coupled degenerate white dwarfs. On the other hand, the present work is applicable to examining the R–T instability in SCDP environments in laboratory and astrophysical systems. This dispersion relation is very complex, and it can be discussed in some cases that limit our interests.

4. Results and discussions

The analysis of the dispersion relation governing the R–T instability involves the interpretation of the relationship between the growth rate of the instability and wavenumbers across various considered physical parameters. This includes viscoelastic coefficients and compressibility effects in the term representing the viscoelastic compressional wave speed ($V_c$). We now discuss the above dispersion relation (3.5) in the kinetic limit $\omega \tau _m\gg 1$, which gives

(4.1)\begin{align} & \omega^4 - 2\omega^2V_c^2k^2 + (\omega^2 - V_c^2k^2)\left[{\rm i}gk_z - \left(1+\frac{{\rm i}k_zc_d^2}{g}\right) \omega_{cl}^2 - (c_d^2 + V_A^2)k^2\right] \nonumber\\ & \quad - V_A^2k^2[(g+{\rm i}k_zc_d^2)(\alpha+{\rm i}k_z)] + V_c^4k^4 = 0, \end{align}

where $V_c^2=(\xi +{4\eta }/{3})/\rho _{d0}\tau _m$ represents the squared wave speed of the compressional viscoelastic mode in dusty plasmas.

We assume that all the perturbations are sensitive in the horizontal $x$-direction, i.e. we put $k_z=0$ and $k_x=k$ and get the modified dispersion relation of R–T instability as follows:

(4.2)\begin{equation} \omega^4 - \omega^2\left[(2V_c^2 + c_d^2 + V_A^2)k^2 + \omega_{cl}^2\right] + (V_A^2 + V_c^2)k^2\omega_{cl}^2 + V_c^2k^4(c_d^2 + V_A^2 + V_c^2) = 0. \end{equation}

From the constant term of (4.2), the R–T instability criterion is derived as

(4.3)\begin{equation} k < k_c = \sqrt{\frac{\left(\dfrac{g}{\rho_{d0}}\right)\dfrac{{\rm d} \rho_{d0}}{{\rm d} z}(V_c^2 + V_A^2)}{V_c^2(c_d^2 + V_A^2 + V_c^2)}}. \end{equation}

The above condition suggests that the R–T mode is unstable for all perturbation wavenumbers $k < k_c$. If the wavenumber is greater than $k_c$, then no R–T instability will be observed, and the wave will behave like an internal propagating wave. This critical wavenumber depends on various physical parameters such as the compressional wave speed $(V_c)$, Alfvèn wave speed $(V_A)$, density gradient (${\rm d}\rho _{d0}/{\rm d}z$) and the dust acoustic speed $(c_d)$. The compressibility effects and Coulomb coupling parameter exist in the expression of $c_d$, which determines the value of the critical wavenumber required to excite the R–T instability in SCDP. If a change occurs in the viscoelastic coefficients and compressibility, then a decrease in $k_c$ will show stabilizing effects on the growth rate of R–T instability.

The dispersion relation (4.2) highlights the significant modification of dispersion properties in transverse propagation induced by magnetic fields. In the case of unmagnetized dusty plasmas ($V_A=0$), the dispersion relation (4.2) simplifies to

(4.4)\begin{equation} (\omega^2 - V_c^2k^2)(\omega^2 - V_c^2k^2 - \omega_{cl}^2 - k^2c_d^2)= 0. \end{equation}

Equation (4.4) has two factors of which the first factor gives the purely compressional viscoelastic wave mode with phase speed $\omega /k=V_c$.

The second factor gives

(4.5)\begin{equation} \omega^2 = \omega_{cl}^2 + V_c^2k^2 + c_d^2k^2. \end{equation}

The above dispersion relation represents the transverse wave propagation, including the classical frequency associated with the internal waves, viscoelastic compressional wave speed and dust acoustic wave speed. The roots of the above equation will be imaginary and R–T instability observed for all the perturbation wavenumbers less than the critical values, as given by

(4.6)\begin{equation} k< k_{c1} = \sqrt{\frac{\left(\dfrac{g}{\rho_{d0}}\right)\dfrac{{\rm d} \rho_{d0}}{{\rm d} z}}{(V_c^2 + c_d^2)}}. \end{equation}

This condition shows the modified criterion for the R–T instability in an unmagnetized SCDP medium. This condition is different from that of the condition derived by Das & Kaw (Reference Das and Kaw2014) due to the consideration of compressibility and dusty plasma parameters. The dust acoustic speed and compressional wave speed have been coupled together to decrease the critical wavenumber, showing their stabilizing influences on the growth rate of the R–T instability. The R–T instability in SCDP is observed when the dominance of $\omega _{cl}^2$ occurs, which includes the density-gradient term. The nature of R–T instability significantly depends upon the magnetic field and properties of the dust grains. In the case of an unmagnetized, compressible viscoelastic fluid ignoring the contribution of the dust acoustic speed, the R–T instability criterion (4.6) reduces to $k< k_{c2}=\sqrt {(g/\rho _{d0})({\rm d}\rho _{d0}/{\rm d}z)}/V_c$. This expression shows that the critical wavenumber $k_{c2}$ is inversely proportional to $V_c$. Consequently, increased compressibility reduces the critical wavenumber and suppresses the R–T instability.

The modified dispersion relation (4.2) depends upon both the dust acoustic speed ($c_d$) and the compressional wave speed ($V_c$). In order to visualize the influence of various considered parameters graphically, we introduce dimensionless parameters as follows:

(4.7a–e)\begin{equation} \hat{\omega} = \frac{\omega}{\sqrt{\alpha g}},\quad \hat{k}=\frac{k}{\alpha},\quad \hat{V}_c=V_c\sqrt{\frac{\alpha}{g}}, \quad\hat{c}_d=c_d\sqrt{\frac{\alpha}{g}}, \quad\text{and} \quad\hat{V}_A=V_A\sqrt{\frac{\alpha}{g}}. \end{equation}

This transformation enables us to formulate the dispersion relation in a dimensionless framework. By putting ($\hat {\gamma }={\rm i}\hat {\omega }$) we get the dimensionless form of the dispersion relation (4.2) as

(4.8)\begin{equation} \hat{\gamma}^4 + \hat{\gamma}^2(2\hat{V}_c^2 + \hat{c}_d^2 + \hat{V}_A^2 - 1/\hat{k}^2)\hat{k}^2 - (\hat{V}_A^2 + \hat{V}_c^2)\hat{k}^2 + \hat{V}_c^2\hat{k}^4(\hat{c}_d^2 + \hat{V}_A^2 + \hat{V}_c^2) = 0. \end{equation}

The fourth-order polynomial under consideration exhibits four distinct roots: two real roots (one positive and one negative) and two complex roots. Out of these four roots, the real positive root, provides the R–T instability in the framework of the considered exponential perturbations, which is the main purpose of studying this problem. Thus, we concentrate on the real roots obtained from (4.8) for analysing the role of the compressibility and strong coupling effects on the R–T instability in magnetized SCDP. In figure 1, we have depicted the relationship between the normalized growth rate (${\rm Re}\,\hat {\gamma })$ and the normalized wavenumber ($\hat {k}$) across varying values of compressional wave speed $\hat {V}_c$, with fixed values of $\hat {V}_A=0.5$ and $\hat {c}_d=0.5$. The curves demonstrate distinct behaviours depending on the magnitude of $\hat {V}_c$. Notably, it is observed that the compressional wave speed ($\hat {V}_c$) plays a crucial role in stabilizing the R–T instability within the SCDP system. When viscoelastic effects are absent in the system, i.e. ($\hat {V}_c=0$), the growth rate experiences a gradual decrease, indicating the inherent instability of the system. After a certain value of the wavenumber, the growth rate becomes almost constant. However, a notable change occurs with the introduction of the compressional wave speed ($\hat {V}_c$) in the system. The growth rate undergoes a significant decline, particularly around specific normalized wavenumbers, approximately $k_c\sim 1.75$, and at $3.75$ it becomes zero. Thus, the viscoelastic effects play a significant role in suppressing the growth rate of the R–T instability in magnetized compressible SCDP.

Figure 1. Normalized growth rate (${\rm Re}\,\hat {\gamma })$ is plotted vs normalized wavenumber $(\hat {k})$ for different values of compressional wave speed $\hat {V}_c=0.0$, 0.2 and 0.5.

In the expression of $c_d$, the dust compressibility parameter exists thus, by varying the values of $c_d$, one can directly observe the role of compressibility in the growth rate of the R–T instability. In figure 2, we explore the influence of compressibility in terms of the impact of the dust acoustic speed ($\hat {c}_d$) on the normalized growth rate (${\rm Re}\,\hat {\gamma }$), while maintaining constant values of $\hat {V}_A=\hat {V}_c=0.2$. This figure also represents the effects of dust temperature and dust density parameters (which are present in the expression of $c_d$) on the growth rate of the R–T instability. The plotted curves exhibit distinct trends as $\hat {c}_d$ varies across different magnitudes, giving insights into its impact on the R–T instability within the system. As the dust acoustic speed ($\hat {c}_d$) increases, we observe a systematic decrease in the growth rate. This inverse relationship between $\hat {c}_d$ and the growth rate suggests that higher values of dust acoustic speed lead to greater stability within the system. In the absence of $\hat {c}_d$, the growth rate is notably larger, indicating a less stable state of the system. This stabilizing influence of dust acoustic speed and compressibility on the growth rate of R–T instability shows that $\hat {c}_d$ acts as a dampening factor, restraining the growth of instability and promoting the system's stability.

Figure 2. Effect of compressibility on the growth rate (${\rm Re}\,\hat {\gamma }$) is plotted vs normalized wavenumber ($\hat {k}$) for different values of dust acoustic wave speed $\hat {c}_d=0.0$, 0.1 and 0.2.

The dust acoustic speed ${c}_d$ is influenced by the density fluctuation, which also includes the effect of the finite temperature of the dust, ions and electrons ($T_d$, $T_i$ and $T_e$) and dust number density $n_d$. Higher temperatures will lead to increased thermal motion of the particles. As a result, variations in the temperature of electrons and ions will directly affect the dust acoustic wave speed. Also, the increases in the dust temperature and compressibility enhance the value of the dust acoustic speed. Similarly, the adiabatic index ($\gamma _d$) influences the speed of the acoustic mode within the dusty plasma. The higher values of dust temperature and adiabatic index will correspond to higher dust acoustic speed, which stabilizes the growth rate of R–T instability. These physical conditions are relevant in laboratory and astrophysical plasmas consisting of charged dust grains in a strongly coupled state. Hence, the present results are useful to explore the possibility of R–T instability in such strongly coupled dusty plasma environments.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we have investigated the influence of compressibility and the presence of dust particles on the R–T instability in magnetized SCDP. We have considered the equation of state for a system consisting of strongly correlated dust grains and weakly coupled electrons and ions. Our study involved the formulation of the GH model for the considered configuration, incorporating the behaviour of strongly correlated dust particles along with weakly coupled ions and electrons. Using normal mode analysis, we have analytically derived the dispersion relation governing the R–T instability. Our investigations revealed that both compressibility and dust-driven acoustic modes significantly alter the dispersion properties of internal waves and onset criteria for the R–T instability. Specifically, we found that the compressional viscoelastic wave speed and the dust acoustic speed stabilize the growth rate of the R–T instability. The increase in compressibility and dust temperature parameters increases the dust acoustic speed, suppressing the R–T instability's growth rate.

The present work represents a comprehensive study of the internal wave propagation and the R–T instability within SCDP systems. The compressibility effect significantly influences the stability of dusty plasma systems, particularly under the influence of gravitational fields. The presence of a magnetic field induces the Alfvén modes, which are modified due to the viscoelastic and dust acoustic speeds. These results contribute to a broad understanding of the complex dynamics inherent in magnetized SCDP systems, shedding light on the impact of the interplay between compressibility, dust particles and gravitational acceleration on the behaviour of the R–T instability.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the reviewers for helpful comments to improve the manuscript.

Editor Edward Thomas, Jr. thanks the referees for their advice in evaluating this article.

Funding

This work is financially supported by the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) Bengaluru under ISRO-RESPOND grant No. ISRO/RES/2/427/23-24.

Declaration of interests

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

Avinash, K. & Sen, A. 2015 Rayleigh–Taylor instability in dusty plasma experiment. Phys. Plasmas 22, 083707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabot, W.H. & Cook, A.W. 2006 Reynolds number effects on Rayleigh–Taylor instability with possible implications for Type-Ia supernovae. Nat. Phys. 2, 562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Angelo, N. 1993 The Rayleigh–Taylor instability in dusty plasmas. Planet. Space Sci. 41 (6), 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, A. & Kaw, P. 2014 Suppression of Rayleigh–Taylor instability in strongly coupled plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 21, 062102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dharodi, V.S. & Das, A. 2021 A numerical study of gravity-driven instability in strongly coupled dusty plasma. Part 1. Rayleigh–Taylor instability and buoyancy-driven instability. J. Plasma Phys. 87, 905870216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolai, B. & Prajapati, R.P. 2017 Rayleigh–Taylor instability and internal waves in strongly coupled quantum plasma. Phys. Plasmas 24 (11), 112101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolai, B. & Prajapati, R.P. 2018 The rotating Rayleigh–Taylor instability in a strongly coupled dusty plasma. Phys. Plasmas 25 (8), 083708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffel, P.C. & Kasen, D. 2017 Rayleigh–Taylor instability in interacting supernovae: implications for synchrotron magnetic fields. Astrophys. J. 842 (1), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraschetti, F., Teyssier, R., Ballet, J. & Decourchelle, A. 2010 Simulation of the growth of the 3D Rayleigh–Taylor instability in supernova remnants using an expanding reference frame. Astron. Astrophys. 515, A104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garai, S. 2016 Stability characteristics of Rayleigh–Taylor instability in a strongly coupled incompressible dust fluid with finite shear flow. Phys. Plasmas 23 (11), 113706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garai, S., Banerjee, D., Janaki, M.S. & Chakrabarti, N. 2014 Velocity shear effect on the longitudinal wave in a strongly coupled dusty plasma. Astrophys. Space Sci. 349, 789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillier, A. 2018 The magnetic Rayleigh–Taylor instability in solar prominences. Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 2, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, B.I. 1998 Interaction of a pulsar wind with the expanding supernova remnant. Astrophys. J. 499, 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaw, P.K. & Sen, A. 1998 Low frequency modes in strongly coupled dusty plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 5 (10), 3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, H.L. & Qiu, X.M. 2011 The internal wave and Rayleigh–Taylor instability in compressible quantum plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 18, 104508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacha, K.A. & Merlino, R.L. 2020 Further developments on observations of the Taylor instability in a dusty plasma. Phys. Plasmas 27, 084501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, D.B. & Contopoulos, I. 2018 The magnetic Rayleigh–Taylor instability around astrophysical black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483 (2), 2325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porth, O., Komissarov, S.S. & Keppens, R. 2014 Rayleigh–Taylor instability in magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the Crab nebula. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 443 (1), 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, N.N., Shukla, P.K. & Yu, M.Y. 1990 Dust-acoustic waves in dusty plasmas. Planet. Space Sci. 38 (4), 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. 2000 Waves and instabilities in weakly and strongly correlated dusty plasmas. In APS Meeting Abstracts, vol. 42.Google Scholar
Sen, S., Fukuyama, A. & Honary, F. 2010 Rayleigh–Taylor instability in a dusty plasma. J. Atmos. Solar Terr. Phys. 72, 938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y.B., Gou, J.N., Cao, C.Y., Wang, C. & Zeng, R.H. 2023 Rayleigh–Taylor instability in magnetohydrodynamics with finite resistivity in a horizontal magnetic field. Phys. Rev. E 108, 065208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veeresha, B.M., Das, A. & Sen, A. 2005 Rayleigh–Taylor instability driven nonlinear vortices in dusty plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 12, 044506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C.Y. 2011 Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities in Type Ia supernova remnants undergoing cosmic ray particle acceleration – low adiabatic index solutions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 415, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wani, R., Mir, A., Batool, F. & Tiwari, S.K. 2022 Rayleigh–Taylor instability in strongly coupled plasma. Sci. Rep. 12, 11557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W. & Duan, W. 2024 Rayleigh–Taylor instability in an interface of a dusty plasma. Braz. J. Phys. 54, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Normalized growth rate (${\rm Re}\,\hat {\gamma })$ is plotted vs normalized wavenumber $(\hat {k})$ for different values of compressional wave speed $\hat {V}_c=0.0$, 0.2 and 0.5.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Effect of compressibility on the growth rate (${\rm Re}\,\hat {\gamma }$) is plotted vs normalized wavenumber ($\hat {k}$) for different values of dust acoustic wave speed $\hat {c}_d=0.0$, 0.1 and 0.2.