Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:30:44.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inner speech as a forward model?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2013

Gary M. Oppenheim
Gary M. Oppenheim*
Affiliation:
Center for Research in Language, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0526. [email protected]://crl.ucsd.edu/~goppenheim/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pickering & Garrod (P&G) consider the possibility that inner speech might be a product of forward production models. Here I consider the idea of inner speech as a forward model in light of empirical work from the past few decades, concluding that, while forward models could contribute to it, inner speech nonetheless requires activity from the implementers.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 369 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Corley, M., Brocklehurst, P. H. & Moat, H. S. (2011) Error biases in inner and overt speech: Evidence from tongue twisters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37(1):162–75. DOI:10.1037/a0021321.Google ScholarPubMed
Dell, G. S. (1978) Slips of the mind. In: The fourth Lacus forum, ed. Paradis, M., pp. 69–75. Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
Dell, G. S. & Repka, R. J. (1992) Errors in inner speech. In: Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition, ed. Baars, B. J., pp. 237–62. Plenum.Google Scholar
Geva, S., Bennett, S., Warburton, E. a. & Patterson, K. (2011) Discrepancy between inner and overt speech: Implications for post-stroke aphasia and normal language processing. Aphasiology 25(3):323–43. DOI:10.1080/02687038.2010.511236.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1967) Where the tongue slips, there slip I. In: To honor Roman Jakobson, pp. 910–36. Mouton.Google Scholar
Kan, I. P. & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2004) Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 4(1):43–57.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1983) Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14:41–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. & Meyer, A. S. (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(1):1–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, D. G. (1981) The problem of rehearsal or mental practice. Journal of Motor Behavior 13(4):274–85.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. G. (1992) Constraints on theories of inner speech. In: Auditory imagery, ed. Reisberg, D., pp. 121–49. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meringer, R. & Meyer, K. (1895) Versprechen und verlesen. Behrs Verlag.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S. G. (1969) The tongue slips into patterns. In: Leyden studies in linguistics and phonetics, ed. Sciarone, A. G., van Essen, A. J. & van Raad, A. A., pp. 114–32. Mouton.Google Scholar
Nozari, N., Dell, G. S. & Schwartz, M. F. (2011) Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production. Cognitive Psychology 63(1):1–33. DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.05.001.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, G. M. (2012) The case for subphonemic attenuation in inner speech: Comment on Corley, Brocklehurst, and Moat (2011). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38(3):502–12. DOI:10.1037/a0025257.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, G. M. & Dell, G. S. (2008) Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition 106(1):528–37. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.006.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, G. M. & Dell, G. S. (2010) Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech. Memory & cognition 38(8):1147–60. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.006.Google Scholar
Postma, A. & Noordanus, C. (1996) Production and detection of speech errors in silent, mouthed, noise-masked, and normal auditory feedback speech. Language and Speech 39(4):375–92.Google Scholar
Rauschecker, A. M., Pringle, A. & Watkins, K. E. (2008) Changes in neural activity associated with learning to articulate novel auditory pseudowords by covert repetition. Human brain mapping 29(11):1231–42. DOI:10.1002/hbm.20460.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962) Thought and language (Hanfmann, E. & Vakar, G., trans.). MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar