Examining the effect of smoking on suicidal ideation and attempts: triangulation of epidemiological approaches

Ruth Harrison; Marcus R. Munafò; George Davey Smith; Robyn E. Wootton

doi:10.1192/bjp.2020.68

Examining the effect of smoking on suicidal ideation and attempts: triangulation of epidemiological approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2020

Ruth Harrison ,

Marcus R. Munafò ,

George Davey Smith and

Robyn E. Wootton

Show author details

Ruth Harrison: Affiliation:
Avon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust; and Severn Postgraduate Medical Education School of Psychiatry, Health Education England, UK
Marcus R. Munafò: Affiliation:
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol; and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bristol, UK
George Davey Smith: Affiliation:
MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol; and Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK
Robyn E. Wootton*: Affiliation:
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol; and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, UK
*: Correspondence: Robyn E. Wootton. Email: [email protected]

Article contents

Abstract
Background
Aims
Method
Results
Conclusions
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

Background

Previous literature has demonstrated a strong association between cigarette smoking, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. This association has not previously been examined in a causal inference framework and could have important implications for suicide prevention strategies.

Aims

We aimed to examine the evidence for an association between smoking behaviours (initiation, smoking status, heaviness, lifetime smoking) and suicidal thoughts or attempts by triangulating across observational and Mendelian randomisation analyses.

Method

First, in the UK Biobank, we calculated observed associations between smoking behaviours and suicidal thoughts or attempts. Second, we used Mendelian randomisation to explore the relationship between smoking and suicide attempts and ideation, using genetic variants as instruments to reduce bias from residual confounding and reverse causation.

Results

Our observational analysis showed a relationship between smoking behaviour, suicidal ideation and attempts, particularly between smoking initiation and suicide attempts (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% CI 1.91–2.26; P < 0.001). The Mendelian randomisation analysis and single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis, however, did not support this (odds ratio for lifetime smoking on suicidal ideation, 0.050; 95% CI −0.027 to 0.127; odds ratio on suicide attempts, 0.053; 95% CI, −0.003 to 0.110). Despite past literature showing a positive dose-response relationship, our results showed no clear evidence for a causal effect of smoking on suicidal ideation or attempts.

Conclusions

This was the first Mendelian randomisation study to explore the effect of smoking on suicidal ideation and attempts. Our results suggest that, despite observed associations, there is no clear evidence for a causal effect.

Keywords

Suicide smoking epidemiology tobacco Mendelian randomisation

Type: Papers
Information: The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 217 , Issue 6 , December 2020 , pp. 701 - 707

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.68 [Opens in a new window]
Creative Commons: This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright: Copyright © The Authors 2020

There are more than 800 000 deaths from suicide each year,¹ and for each death, there are 10–40 unsuccessful attempts.^{Reference Miller, Azrael and Barber2} The World Health Organization has recognised this significant public health problem and the need for comprehensive suicide prevention strategies; however, at present, there is limited evidence of sustained reductions in suicides rates.¹ Observational studies, including case-control, cohort and cross-sectional designs, using population data^{Reference Balbuena and Tempier3–Reference Yaworski, Robinson, Sareen and Bolton13} and clinical samples,^{Reference Malone, Waternaux, Haas, Cooper, Li and Mann14} have demonstrated a strong association between current cigarette smoking and suicide-related behaviours characterised as ideation, plans, attempts and suicide-related death. The association remains in three meta-analyses of observational studies.^{Reference Li, Yang and Ge15–Reference Sankaranarayanan, Mancuso, Wilding, Ghuloum and Smoking17} These associations have been shown to have positive dose-response relationships^{Reference Evins, Korhonen and Kinnunen7,Reference Lucas, O'Reilly, Mirzaei, Okereke, Unger and Miller11,Reference Green, Turner and Sareen18} that remain after adjustment for potential confounding variables such as psychiatric symptoms,^{Reference Bronisch, Höfler and Lieb5} familial risk factors,^{Reference Scherrer, Grant and Agrawal12} socioeconomic characteristics^{Reference Davey Smith, Phillips and Neaton6} and alcohol consumption.^{Reference Schneider, Baumert, Schneider, Marten-Mittag, Meisinger and Erazo19} Smoking interventions such as imposing cigarette taxes and smoke-free air policies are reported to be protective against suicide-related outcomes.^{Reference Grucza, Plunk, Krauss, Cavazos-Rehg, Deak and Gebhardt8}

Possible causal pathways

A number of psychopathological and physiological hypotheses have been explored to determine whether this association is causal. A number of possible biological pathways have been explored,^{Reference Evins, Korhonen and Kinnunen7} including evidence that smoking lowers the levels of serotonin^{Reference Malone, Waternaux, Haas, Cooper, Li and Mann14} and monoamine oxidase A.^{Reference Fowler, Logan, Wang and Volkow20} Reduced levels of these neurotransmitters are related to depressive episodes and low levels of serotonin are also linked to increased impulsivity.^{Reference Malone, Waternaux, Haas, Cooper, Li and Mann14} Nicotine has been found to act as a potent activator of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and this has been linked to suicidal behaviour.^{Reference Mann, Currier, Stanley, Oquendo, Amsel and Ellis21} There is evidence to suggest that chronic cigarette smoking has long-term neurocognitive effects, which lead to increased impulsivity and difficulties with decision-making owing to impairments in cognitive flexibility.^{Reference Evins, Korhonen and Kinnunen7,Reference Sankaranarayanan, Mancuso, Wilding, Ghuloum and Smoking17} Alternatively, smoking causes physical health problems, including pain, sleep difficulties, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, cardiovascular disease and cancer, which in turn could lead to suicide-related behaviours.^{Reference Green, Turner and Sareen18}

However, even after controlling for specific confounding variables, residual confounding could still be biasing estimates;^{Reference Davey Smith, Phillips and Neaton6} for example, as a result of social deprivation, lower levels of education and higher levels of impulsivity.^{Reference Green, Turner and Sareen18,Reference Hughes22} A negative control analysis demonstrated that smoking behaviour predicted the risk of being murdered to the same extent as the risk of suicide, which supports the notion of residual confounding.^{Reference Davey Smith, Phillips and Neaton6} Another hypothesis is of reverse causation, namely that individuals with suicidal thoughts may be more likely to smoke, and in addition their suicidality could lead to reduced motivation for smoking cessation. There are several possible explanations for reverse causation, with the most common hypothesis being that individuals use nicotine to self-medicate.^{Reference Hughes22} Alternatively, individuals with mental illness might misattribute the relief of nicotine withdrawal as relieving psychological stress, and therefore continue to smoke.^{Reference Parrott23}

Applying causal inference techniques

A clear understanding of the relationship between smoking and suicide remains to be established. A recent study demonstrated a causal link between smoking and risk of depression, using a Mendelian randomisation approach.^{Reference Wootton, Richmond, Stuijfzand, Lawn, Sallis and Taylor24} Mendelian randomisation can be implemented as a type of instrumental variable analysis in which genetic variants known to be associated with the exposure (smoking) are used as an instrument to test for an effect on the outcome (suicidal ideation and suicide attempts). In this study, we apply Mendelian randomisation techniques, using genetic variants identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), to the relationship between smoking and suicide attempts and ideation. Previous observational research in this area could be biased by residual confounding and reverse causation, and Mendelian randomisation is one way to reduce bias from these sources.^{Reference Davey Smith and Ebrahim25} In our analysis, we looked at smoking initiation, smoking heaviness and lifetime smoking, using a genetic instrument that takes into account smoking status, duration, heaviness and cessation.^{Reference Wootton, Richmond, Stuijfzand, Lawn, Sallis and Taylor24}

Methods

Observational analysis

Sample

The UK Biobank is a research resource of health data collected on over 500 000 individuals from study centres located across the UK. Recruitment occurred between 2006 and 2010. Participants were aged from 39 to 70 years at recruitment (mean 56.91 years, s.d. 7.99 years) and 54% of the sample were female. Overall, 30% of the sample had ever smoked (8% current smokers and 22% former smokers). Further information is available elsewhere (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/).

Measure of suicidal ideation

In the UK Biobank, participants were asked as part of a questionnaire on depressive symptoms ‘Over the last 2 weeks, how often have you been bothered by any of the following problems? Thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way’ (field 20513). Participants could respond depending on frequency of thoughts either ‘not at all’, ‘several days’, ‘more than half the days’ or ‘nearly every day’. We recoded these into a binary variable in which those who responded ‘not at all’ were coded as 0 and everyone else was coded as 1. Individuals who responded ‘prefer not to answer’ were coded as missing.

Measure of attempted suicide

In the UK Biobank, participants were first asked ‘Have you deliberately harmed yourself, whether or not you meant to end your life?’ (field 20480). If they responded yes, then they were asked ‘Have you harmed yourself with the intention to end your life?’ (field 20483). We used both of these measures to derive one binary measure of suicide attempt in which participants were given a score of 0 if they responded negatively to either question, and a score of 1 if they responded affirmatively to both questions. Individuals who responded ‘prefer not to answer’ were coded as missing.

Measure of smoking behaviours

Participants in the UK Biobank self-reported their smoking status (field 20116). All ever smokers were asked to report their average number of cigarettes per day (fields 3456 and 2887). Participants who responded ‘do not know’ or ‘prefer not to answer’ were coded as missing.

Statistical analysis

After restricting to individuals of European ancestry with genetic data available (to make this analysis comparable with subsequent analyses), 337 053 individuals remained. We looked at the effect of four smoking behaviours on suicidal ideation and attempts. These were smoking status (ever versus never), smoking status (current versus former within ever smokers), cigarettes per day (within ever smokers) and lifetime smoking score. The latter is a combination of smoking duration, smoking cessation and smoking heaviness described in detail elsewhere.^{Reference Wootton, Richmond, Stuijfzand, Lawn, Sallis and Taylor24} The effect of each of these smoking behaviours on suicidal ideation and attempts was estimated by logistic regression, controlling for age, gender and socioeconomic position. All analyses were conducted with R software, version 3.5.1, for Mac OS X (https://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/).²⁶

Mendelian randomisation analysis with summary-level data

Smoking instrument

This Mendelian randomisation approach requires GWAS publicly released summary data from two independent samples. The GWAS of suicide attempt was conducted in the UK Biobank, therefore we were unable to use the lifetime smoking instrument because it was also constructed with the UK Biobank.^{Reference Wootton, Richmond, Stuijfzand, Lawn, Sallis and Taylor24} Instead, we used the smoking initiation (ever versus never) GWAS conducted by the GWAS and Sequencing Consortium of Alcohol and Nicotine use (GSCAN), taking beta values from the GWAS with UK Biobank removed.^{Reference Liu, Jiang, Wedow, Li, Brazel and Chen27} Because of data-sharing restrictions, 23andMe were also removed from the summary data used. GSCAN identified 378 conditionally independent, genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with smoking initiation, explaining 4% of the phenotypic variance.^{Reference Liu, Jiang, Wedow, Li, Brazel and Chen27}

Suicide attempt GWAS

The GWAS of suicide attempts was conducted in the UK Biobank, using the question and method outlined above, with 337 199 participants of which 2433 were cases.^{Reference Ruderfer, Walsh, Aguirre, Tanigawa, Ribeiro and Franklin28} The authors did not identify any genome-wide significant SNPs, but the summary statistics can be used as an outcome sample in summary-level Mendelian randomisation.

Statistical analysis

All analysis was conducted using the TwoSampleMR package^{Reference Hemani, Zheng, Elsworth, Wade, Haberland and Baird29} in R version 3.5.1, for Mac OS X (https://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/).²⁶ We used five different Mendelian randomisation methods: inverse-variance weighted, Mendelian randomisation (MR) Egger,^{Reference Bowden, Davey Smith and Burgess30} weighted median,^{Reference Bowden, Davey Smith, Haycock and Burgess31} weighted mode^{Reference Hartwig, Smith and Bowden32} and MR robust adjusted profile score (RAPS) (MR RAPS).^{Reference Zhao, Wang, Hemani, Bowden and Small33} Each method makes different assumptions and therefore a consistent effect across multiple methods strengthens causal evidence.^{Reference Lawlor, Tilling and Davey Smith34} If an SNP was unavailable in the outcome GWAS summary statistics, then proxy SNPs were searched for with a minimum linkage disequilibrium r ² = 0.8 and palindromic SNPs were aligned if minor allele frequency <0.3. We also performed Rucker's Q-test of heterogeneity and the MR Egger intercept test to estimate potential directional pleiotropy.^{Reference Bowden, Davey Smith and Burgess30} Finally, we performed Steiger filtering, which can indicate possible reverse causation.^{Reference Hemani, Tilling and Davey Smith35}

Mendelian randomisation analysis with individual-level data

Genotyping

UK Biobank participants provided blood samples at their initial assessment centre. Genotyping was performed with the Affymetrix UK BiLEVE Axiom array for 49 979 participants and the Affymetrix UK Biobank Axiom array for 438 398 participants. The two arrays share 95% coverage, but chip is adjusted for in all analyses because the UK BiLEVE sample is overrepresented for smokers. Imputation and initial quality control steps were performed by the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, resulting in over 90 million variants.^{Reference Bycroft, Freeman, Petkova, Band, Elliott and Sharp36}

Individuals were excluded if there were gender mismatches between reported and chromosomal gender or aneuploidy (N = 814). Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit filtering restricted the sample to individuals of European ancestry based on the first four principal components of population structure.^{Reference Mitchell, Hemani, Dudding and Paternoster37} After excluding individuals who had withdrawn consent, 463 033 participants remained.^{Reference Mitchell, Hemani, Dudding and Paternoster37} We restricted our analysis to autosomes only, and used stringent filtering thresholds for SNPs of minor allele frequency <0.01 and info >0.8.

Conducting the GWAS

Participants from the UK Biobank were randomly allocated to one of two split halves of the genetic data. We then generated lifetime smoking scores in sample one of these two samples, and ran a GWAS with the UK Biobank pipeline,^{Reference Elsworth, Mitchell, Raistrick, Paternoster, Hemani and Gaunt38} following the exact method as described elsewhere.^{Reference Wootton, Richmond, Stuijfzand, Lawn, Sallis and Taylor24}

Genetic instrument

From the GWAS, genome-wide significant variants (P < 5 × 10⁻⁸) were clumped for independence at 10 000 kb and r ² < 0.001.

Instrument validation

We tested the validity of this instrument by creating a polygenic score from these variants in the second sample from the UK Biobank. This was done with Plink version 1.9, in Linux (https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink/1.9/), and by weighting each allele by the effect size identified in the GWAS of sample one.^{Reference Purcell, Neale, Todd-Brown, Thomas, Ferreira and Bender39} This therefore provides an independent replication sample to check how much of the variance is explained in lifetime smoking. If this significantly predicts lifetime smoking in the independent second sample, then this can be used as an instrument in the individual-level Mendelian randomisation analysis.

Statistical analysis

We conducted individual-level Mendelian randomisation with instrumental variable regressions run in R version 3.5.1, for Mac OS X (https://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/),²⁶ with the ivreg command from the AER package. The instrument was the polygenic score from the GWAS in sample one. We controlled for age, gender and ten principal components of population structure in all analyses apart from when we ran the analysis separately in males and females (removing gender as a covariate).

Single SNP analysis

Statistical analysis

Best guess genotypes at the SNP rs1051730 were extracted with Plink version 1.9, in Linux (https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink/1.9/),^{Reference Purcell, Neale, Todd-Brown, Thomas, Ferreira and Bender39} in the UK Biobank full sample described above. This SNP in the gene cluster CHRNA5-A3-B4 is known to be strongly associated with heaviness of smoking.^{Reference Munafò, Timofeeva, Morris, Prieto-Merino, Sattar and Brennan40–Reference Ware, van den Bree and Munafò43} The variant affects the structure of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) such that nicotine is less able to bind. Individuals with risk alleles that produce nAChR deficiency are able to withstand higher nicotine levels because they are less sensitive to its aversive effects.^{Reference Fowler, Lu, Johnson, Marks and Kenny44} As a result, individuals smoke on average one more cigarette per day per risk allele.^{Reference Ware, van den Bree and Munafò43} We used logistic regression to test whether the number of effect alleles (A) of this SNP were associated with risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, again using the measures described above. We controlled for age and gender in all analyses. The logistic regressions were run in each category of smoking status separately (ever, current, former and never smokers). A causal effect of smoking on suicidal ideation or attempts would be characterised by an effect of rs1051730 in all categories of smoking status apart from never smoking, which provides a negative control.

Sensitivity analysis

Smoking and impulsivity

We wanted to ensure that any effects of smoking on suicide attempts were not the result of confounding from personality factors (e.g. impulsivity and risk-taking) rather than direct effects of smoking. Unfortunately, multivariable Mendelian randomisation was not possible because of sample overlap in our risk-taking and suicide attempt GWAS, which both used the UK Biobank. Therefore, we conducted a follow-up analysis, using bi-directional Mendelian randomisation of smoking initiation on risk-taking behaviour, with summary-level data. As the instrument for smoking initiation, we used the 378 SNPs from the GSCAN consortium GWAS and effect sizes with UK Biobank removed.^{Reference Liu, Jiang, Wedow, Li, Brazel and Chen27} For risk-taking behaviour, we used the Social Science Genetic Association Consortium GWAS meta-analysed across multiple cohorts of European ancestry,^{Reference Linnér, Biroli, Kong, Meddens, Wedow and Fontana45} which identified 124 SNPs associated with risk tolerance. These analyses followed the method described above for summary-level data.

Ethical approval

UK Biobank has received ethics approval from the UK National Health Service's National Research Ethics Service (reference 11/NW/0382) and this work is part of approved project 9142.

Results

Observational analysis

Of the 109 649 individuals who had responded to the question of suicidal ideation, 4515 (4%) had had suicidal thoughts. Of the 110 035 individuals who had responded to the questions of suicide attempts and self-harm, 2405 (2%) had ever attempted suicide. Using logistic regression, every smoking behaviour increased odds of suicidal attempts and ideation, with the greatest effect being of initiating smoking on odds of attempting suicide (Table 1).

Table 1. The observed association of smoking behaviour on suicidal ideation and suicide attempts controlling for age, gender and socioeconomic position

Mendelian randomisation analysis with summary-level data

Of the 378 conditionally independent SNPs associated with smoking initiation identified by the GSCAN consortium,^{Reference Liu, Jiang, Wedow, Li, Brazel and Chen27} 321 were available in the GWAS summary data for suicide attempt.^{Reference Ruderfer, Walsh, Aguirre, Tanigawa, Ribeiro and Franklin28} We first performed the Rucker's Q-test of heterogeneity, which did not provide evidence for heterogeneity (Supplementary Table 1 available at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.68). MR Egger analysis could not be conducted because the regression dilution $I_{GX}^2 $ was below 0.6 ($I_{GX\,{\rm unweighted}}^2 = 0.07$). All of the other four Mendelian randomisation methods showed the same direction of effect, with smoking initiation increasing the odds of attempting suicide (Table 2). The strongest evidence was from the inverse-variance weighted and MR RAPS methods. The evidence was weaker for the weighted median and weighted mode approaches, which make different assumptions about the nature of pleiotropy. However, the MR Egger intercept and Rucker's Q-tests showed no clear evidence of bias from directional pleiotropy (Supplementary Table 2). Steiger filtering estimated that over half of the genetic instruments explained more variance in the outcome than the exposure, suggesting that there might be reverse causation (Supplementary Table 3).

Table 2. Mendelian randomisation analyses using summary-level data of smoking initiation on risk of suicide attempt

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; RAPS, robust adjusted profile score.

Mendelian randomisation analysis with individual-level data

To conduct a Mendelian randomisation of lifetime smoking behaviour on risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt with individual-level data, we first had to conduct a GWAS of suicide attempt in half of the UK Biobank sample, using a random split. We identified 19 independent, genome-wide significant SNPs associated with lifetime smoking score. These were then extracted from the second half of the UK Biobank sample (with no sample overlap) and weighted by the effect size to create a polygenic score for each individual. The second half of the UK Biobank sample is 54% female, with mean age 56.88 years (s.d. 8.00 years). Mean lifetime smoking score in the second half of the sample was 0.342 (s.d. 0.679). A total of 4% of individuals had experienced suicidal thoughts (4% of females and 4% of males), and 2% of individuals had caused themselves harm with the aim to end their life (3% of females and 2% of males). We tested the association of lifetime smoking score and polygenic risk score on the baseline confounders of gender, age, socioeconomic position, alcohol consumption and educational attainment (Supplementary Table 4). For all confounders, the association was attenuated for the polygenic risk score compared with the observed association.

We validated that the score predicts smoking behaviour by conducting a linear regression of polygenic score on lifetime smoking behaviour in the second half of the UK Biobank. It explained 0.171% (P < 0.001) of the variance in lifetime smoking behaviour. Finally, we conducted the individual-level Mendelian randomisation analysis of lifetime smoking polygenic risk score on suicidal ideation and suicide attempt, controlling for age, gender and ten principal components of population structure (Table 3). There was no clear evidence for an effect of lifetime smoking on suicidal ideation or suicide attempt, but a trend toward increased risk in both analyses (Table 3).

Table 3. Mendelian randomisation analysis of lifetime smoking on suicidal ideation and attempt using individual-level data

Single SNP analysis

Finally, we extracted values for the SNP rs1051730 (A/G) from individuals in the UK Biobank. We first confirmed that an increased number of effect alleles (A) were associated with increased smoking behaviour (Supplementary Table 5), where we observed the anticipated increase of approximately one cigarette more per day per allele within ever smokers. We also showed that genotype at rs1051730 is not associated with smoking status or the baseline confounders of gender or alcohol consumption (Supplementary Table 5). However, there was some evidence to suggest that genotype at rs1051730 was associated with educational attainment and age (Supplementary Table 5). There was no clear evidence for an effect of rs1051730 genotype on suicide attempts or ideation controlling for age and gender (Fig. 1). There was weak evidence to suggest that the number of rs1051730 effect alleles might reduce risk of suicide attempts, with no effect in the never smokers and a small protective effect in the ever smokers (Fig. 1). If smoking is increasing risk of suicidal behaviour, we would still expect to see no association in never smokers and the opposite effect within ever smokers.

Fig. 1 Logistic regression results of genotype at rs1051730 on odds of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt by smoking status.

Smoking and impulsivity sensitivity analysis

We only saw evidence for smoking as a risk factor for suicide attempts when the instrument was smoking initiation. One trait associated with both smoking initiation and suicide attempts is impulsivity. Therefore, we conducted a bi-directional Mendelian randomisation of smoking initiation and risk-taking, using summary-level data, which have previously been shown to be genetically correlated.^{Reference Linnér, Biroli, Kong, Meddens, Wedow and Fontana45} There was strong evidence of a bi-directional causal relationship between smoking initiation and risk-taking behaviour, suggesting that the smoking initiation SNPs might be capturing an underlying impulsivity phenotype (Supplementary Table 6), which could explain why we only observed effects of smoking initiation on suicidal ideation and attempts and not for the other smoking phenotypes. Rucker's Q-tests showed some evidence of heterogeneity (Supplementary Table 1) and the MR Egger intercept showed weak evidence of bias by directional pleiotropy (Supplementary Table 2).

Discussion

The relationship between smoking and suicide-related behaviour is not clearly understood and has important clinical implications.^{1,Reference Miller, Azrael and Barber2} In this study, our observational analysis replicated previous observed associations between smoking behaviour and suicidal ideation and attempts, particularly between smoking initiation and suicide attempts. We went on to explore this association with a Mendelian randomisation approach to provide evidence about whether or not the association is causal. Overall, the Mendelian randomisation analyses, including the single SNP analysis, did not support a causal interpretation. Therefore, despite past literature showing a positive dose-response relationship, our results do not support a causal effect of smoking on suicide attempts or ideation. Our findings support those of a negative control analysis demonstrating that smoking behaviour predicted murder as strongly as it did suicide.^{Reference Davey Smith, Phillips and Neaton6}

Our Mendelian randomisation results show evidence of a relationship between smoking initiation and suicidal ideation, but little evidence of an effect of lifetime smoking on suicidal ideation. Taken together with weak evidence for a protective effect in the single SNP analysis, these triangulated results overall suggest that there is no clear evidence for an effect of smoking on increased risk of suicidal ideation or attempts.

The potential role of impulsivity

The only evidence for smoking as a risk factor was when smoking initiation was the genetic instrument. However, our follow-up analyses suggest this could be owing to the instrument capturing underlying impulsivity. Smoking initiation is a complicated instrument with both behavioural and biological components. This behavioural component is likely to be related to impulsivity in part. This is supported by high genetic correlations between the two phenotypes.^{Reference Linnér, Biroli, Kong, Meddens, Wedow and Fontana45} As there is a known correlation between impulsivity and suicidal behaviours, we were mindful of this association. Therefore, to examine the effect of impulsivity on our results, we undertook a bi-directional Mendelian randomisation of smoking initiation and risk-taking. We showed strong evidence of a bi-directional causal relationship between smoking initiation and risk-taking behaviour, suggesting that our results might be capturing impulsivity and not smoking. This is further supported by the fact that when we used other instruments of smoking behaviour (e.g. lifetime smoking and smoking heaviness), we did not see any evidence for an effect, and Steiger filtering suggested that many of the SNPs for smoking initiation were not valid.

Self-harm is the result of complex interactions of personality factors, including impulsivity, social factors and mental state.^{Reference de Cates, Catone, Bebbington and Broome46} It is well established that impulsivity is an important risk factor for suicide attempts.^{Reference Septier, Stordeur, Zhang, Delorme and Cortese47} It has been shown that impulsivity increases with exposure to nicotine, returns to a normal levels with abstinence and increases with re-challenge after abstinence.^{Reference Kayir, Semenova and Markou48,Reference Kolokotroni, Rodgers and Harrison49} The association with suicide attempts is not found in former smokers, and this therefore supports the link between smoking and impulsivity.^{Reference Evins, Korhonen and Kinnunen7,Reference Lucas, O'Reilly, Mirzaei, Okereke, Unger and Miller11,Reference Li, Yang and Ge15,Reference Iwasaki, Akechi, Uchitomi and Tsugane50} This interaction between impulsivity, smoking initiation and suicide attempts is complex and further research is required. For example, portioning the biological (response to nicotine) and the behavioural (personality factors and risk-taking) components of the smoking initiation instrument will aid future interpretation of Mendelian randomisation analyses using smoking initiation instruments.

Recent theoretical models of suicide (i.e. integrated motivational volitional model^{Reference O'Connor, Platt, O'Connor and Gordon51}) all fit with the ‘ideation to action’ framework, which posits that the development of suicidal ideation and progression from ideation to attempts are distinct processes with separate risk factors and explanations.^{Reference Mars, Heron, Klonsky, Moran, O'Connor and Tilling52} Clearly, this has important implications in clinical practice and risk management. Few studies have examined smoking within an ‘ideation to action’ framework. A cross-sectional study found suicide attempters were more likely than ideators to be current smokers.^{Reference King, Schwab-Stone, Flisher, Greenwald, Kramer and Goodman53} However, in the National Comorbidity Survey, early-onset nicotine dependence was prospectively associated with suicide plans, but not attempts, among those with ideation.^{Reference Kessler, Borges, Sampson, Miller and Nock10} Our single SNP analysis would support the idea of suicidal ideation and attempts being separate processes, differentially affected by smoking heaviness, and this differentiation is an important area that requires further research.

Strengths and limitations

This study has many strengths, as to our knowledge, it is the first to use the method of Mendelian randomisation to explore the association between smoking and suicide attempts and ideation. We triangulated across multiple methods, multiple smoking behaviours and multiple suicidal behaviours to improve causal inference. However, the power of these analyses was limited by sample size. For example, we used a split half in the Mendelian randomisation of lifetime smoking, reducing power, which could explain why we saw no clear evidence for an effect. Furthermore, the single SNP analysis, designed to test the effect of smoking heaviness on suicidal ideation and attempts, included small numbers of those experiencing suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts, and was therefore underpowered. However, if anything, the trend of association was in the opposite direction to what was hypothesised. It should also be noted that the sample includes only non-fatal suicide attempts, and therefore our definition of suicide attempts is narrow and the results do not necessarily generalise to those who completed suicide. We were also limited by the UK Biobank questions asked for suicidal ideation and attempt. Suicide attempt questions refer to lifetime attempts but suicidal ideation questions refer to symptoms. Another possible limitation is bias from reverse causation. As attempts were unsuccessful, a pathway from attempts to smoking initiation is possible. Furthermore, Steiger filtering estimated that over half of the smoking initiation genetic instruments explained more variance in suicide attempts than smoking initiation. As discussed, this could be because of the instruments capturing underlying impulsivity and risk-taking.

In conclusion, this was the first Mendelian randomisation study to explore the effect of smoking on suicidal ideation and attempts. Our results suggest that, despite observed associations, when we triangulated across multiple Mendelian randomisation methods, there was no clear evidence for a causal effect of smoking behaviour. This supports recent evidence suggesting that suicidal ideation and suicide attempts are different processes. Furthermore, this work has highlighted the complexity of unpicking the behavioural from the biological components of smoking behaviours.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.68

Data availability

For the summary-level Mendelian randomisation, we used publicly available summary statistics. For smoking initiation, we used summary data from the GWAS and Sequencing Consortium of Alcohol and Nicotine use GWAS.^{Reference Liu, Jiang, Wedow, Li, Brazel and Chen27} For suicide attempts, summary statistics from a GWAS conducted in the UK Biobank were used.^{Reference Ruderfer, Walsh, Aguirre, Tanigawa, Ribeiro and Franklin28} All other analyses were conducted with data from the UK Biobank. This data is available upon request to approved researchers. The current project was conducted with data from UK Biobank, application number 9142.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the participants of the UK Biobank and the individuals who contributed to each of the previous GWAS analyses conducted, as well as all the research staff who worked on the data collection. This paper used UK Biobank application number 9142.

Author contributions

G.D.S. and M.R.M. conceived the study. R.E.W. conducted the analysis. R.H. reviewed the literature and provided clinical expertise. R.E.W. and R.H. drafted the initial manuscript. G.D.S. and M.R.M. advised and guided all stages of analysis. All authors assisted with interpretation, commented on drafts of the manuscript and approved the final version. R.E.W. is the guarantor and attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

Funding

R.E.W., G.D.S. and M.R.M. are all members of the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, funded by the MRC (http://www.mrc.ac.uk; grants MC_UU_00011/1 and MC_UU_00011/7). This study was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Declaration of interests

None.

ICMJE forms are in the supplementary material, available online at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.68.

References

World Health Organization (WHO). Preventing Suicide: A Global Imperitive. WHO, 2014.Google Scholar

Miller, M, Azrael, D, Barber, C. Suicide mortality in the United States: the importance of attending to method in understanding population-level disparities in the burden of suicide. Annu Rev Public Health 2012; 33: 393–408.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Balbuena, L, Tempier, R. Independent association of chronic smoking and abstinence with suicide. Psychiatr Serv 2015; 66: 186–92.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bohnert, KM, Ilgen, MA, McCarthy, JF, Ignacio, RV, Blow, FC, Katz, IR. Tobacco use disorder and the risk of suicide mortality. Addiction 2014; 109: 155–62.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bronisch, T, Höfler, M, Lieb, R. Smoking predicts suicidality: findings from a prospective community study. J Affect Disord 2008; 108: 135–45.10.1016/j.jad.2007.10.010CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Davey Smith, G, Phillips, AN, Neaton, JD. Smoking as” independent” risk factor for suicide: illustration of an artifact from observational epidemiology? Lancet 1992; 340: 709–12.CrossRef Google Scholar

Evins, A, Korhonen, T, Kinnunen, T. Prospective association between tobacco smoking and death by suicide: a competing risks hazard analysis in a large twin cohort with 35-year follow-up. Psychol Med 2017; 47: 2143–54.10.1017/S0033291717000587CrossRef Google Scholar

Grucza, RA, Plunk, AD, Krauss, MJ, Cavazos-Rehg, PA, Deak, J, Gebhardt, K, et al. Probing the smoking–suicide association: do smoking policy interventions affect suicide risk? Nicotine Tob Res 2014; 16: 1487–94.10.1093/ntr/ntu106CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Han, B, Compton, WM, Blanco, C. Tobacco use and 12-month suicidality among adults in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res 2017; 19: 39–48.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kessler, RC, Borges, G, Sampson, N, Miller, M, Nock, MK. The association between smoking and subsequent suicide-related outcomes in the National Comorbidity Survey panel sample. Mol Psychiatry 2009; 14: 1132–42.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lucas, M, O'Reilly, EJ, Mirzaei, F, Okereke, OI, Unger, L, Miller, M, et al. Cigarette smoking and completed suicide: results from 3 prospective cohorts of American adults. J Affect Disord 2013; 151: 1053–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Scherrer, J, Grant, J, Agrawal, A. Suicidal behaviour, smoking and familial vulnerability. Nicotine Tob Res 2012; 14: 415–24.10.1093/ntr/ntr230CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yaworski, D, Robinson, J, Sareen, J, Bolton, JM. The relation between nicotine dependence and suicide attempts in the general population. Can J Psychiatry 2011; 56: 161–70.10.1177/070674371105600306CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Malone, KM, Waternaux, C, Haas, GL, Cooper, TB, Li, S, Mann, JJ. Cigarette smoking, suicidal behavior, and serotonin function in major psychiatric disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 773–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Li, D, Yang, X, Ge, Z. Cigarette smoking and risk of completed suicide: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Psychiatr Res 2012; 46: 1257–66.10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.03.013CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Poorolajal, J, Darvishi, N. Smoking and suicide: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0156348.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sankaranarayanan, A, Mancuso, S, Wilding, H, Ghuloum, S, Smoking, CD. Suicidality and psychosis: a systematic meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0138147.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Green, M, Turner, S, Sareen, J. Smoking and Suicide: Biological and Social Evidence and Causal Mechanisms. BMJ Publishing Group, 2017.Google Scholar PubMed

Schneider, B, Baumert, J, Schneider, A, Marten-Mittag, B, Meisinger, C, Erazo, N, et al. The effect of risky alcohol use and smoking on suicide risk: findings from the German MONICA/KORA-Augsburg cohort study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2011; 46: 1127–32.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fowler, JS, Logan, J, Wang, G-J, Volkow, ND. Monoamine oxidase and cigarette smoking. Neurotoxicology 2003; 24: 75–82.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mann, JJ, Currier, D, Stanley, B, Oquendo, MA, Amsel, LV, Ellis, SP. Can biological tests assist prediction of suicide in mood disorders? Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2006; 9: 465–74.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hughes, JR. Smoking and suicide: a brief overview. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 98: 169–78.10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.06.003CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Parrott, AC. Cigarette-derived nicotine is not a medicine. World J Biol Psychiatry 2003; 4: 49–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wootton, RE, Richmond, RC, Stuijfzand, BG, Lawn, RB, Sallis, HM, Taylor, GMJ, et al. Evidence for causal effects of lifetime smoking on risk for depression and schizophrenia: a Mendelian randomisation study. Psychol Med [Epub ahead of print] 6 Nov 2019. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/evidence-for-causal-effects-of-lifetime-smoking-on-risk-for-depression-and-schizophrenia-a-mendelian-randomisation-study/AA82945360EC59FEC4331A7A567309C9.Google Scholar

Davey Smith, G, Ebrahim, S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol 2003; 32: 1–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

R. Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013.Google Scholar

Liu, M, Jiang, Y, Wedow, R, Li, Y, Brazel, DM, Chen, F, et al. Association studies of up to 1.2 million individuals yield new insights into the genetic etiology of tobacco and alcohol use. Nat Genet 2019; 51: 237–44.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ruderfer, DM, Walsh, CG, Aguirre, MW, Tanigawa, Y, Ribeiro, JD, Franklin, JC, et al. Significant shared heritability underlies suicide attempt and clinically predicted probability of attempting suicide. Mol Psychiatry [Epub ahead of print] 4 Jan 2019. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-018-0326-8.Google Scholar PubMed

Hemani, G, Zheng, J, Elsworth, B, Wade, KH, Haberland, V, Baird, D, et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. eLife 2018; 7: e34408.10.7554/eLife.34408CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bowden, J, Davey Smith, G, Burgess, S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol 2015; 44: 512–25.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bowden, J, Davey Smith, G, Haycock, PC, Burgess, S. Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol 2016; 40: 304–14.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hartwig, FP, Smith, GD, Bowden, J. Robust inference in two-sample Mendelian randomisation via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46: 1985–98.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhao, Q, Wang, J, Hemani, G, Bowden, J, Small, DS. Statistical inference in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization using robust adjusted profile score. ArXiv [Preprint] 2018. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.09652 [cited July 2019].Google Scholar

Lawlor, DA, Tilling, K, Davey Smith, G. Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2016; 45: 1866–86.Google Scholar PubMed

Hemani, G, Tilling, K, Davey Smith, G. Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data. PLoS Genet 2017; 13: e1007081.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bycroft, C, Freeman, C, Petkova, D, Band, G, Elliott, LT, Sharp, K, et al. Genome-wide genetic data on ~500,000 UK Biobank participants. BioRxiv [Preprint] 2017. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/166298v1 [cited July 2019].Google Scholar

Mitchell, R, Hemani, G, Dudding, T, Paternoster, L. UK Biobank Genetic Data: MRC-IEU Quality Control, Version 1, [Updated Version at DOI: 10.5523/bris.1ovaau5sxunp2cv8rcy88688v]. University of Bristol, 2017 (https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/3074krb6t2frj29yh2b03x3wxj).Google Scholar

Elsworth, BL, Mitchell, R, Raistrick, CA, Paternoster, L, Hemani, G, Gaunt, T. MRC IEU UK Biobank GWAS Pipeline Version 1. University of Bristol, 2017 (https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/2fahpksont1zi26xosyamqo8rr).Google Scholar

Purcell, S, Neale, B, Todd-Brown, K, Thomas, L, Ferreira, MA, Bender, D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81: 559–75.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Munafò, MR, Timofeeva, MN, Morris, RW, Prieto-Merino, D, Sattar, N, Brennan, P, et al. Association between genetic variants on chromosome 15q25 locus and objective measures of tobacco exposure. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104: 740–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Thorgeirsson, TE, Geller, F, Sulem, P, Rafnar, T, Wiste, A, Magnusson, KP, et al. A variant associated with nicotine dependence, lung cancer and peripheral arterial disease. Nature 2008; 452: 638–42.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tobacco Consortium. Genome-wide meta-analyses identify multiple loci associated with smoking behavior. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 441–7.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ware, JJ, van den Bree, MB, Munafò, MR. Association of the CHRNA5-A3-B4 gene cluster with heaviness of smoking: a meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob Res 2011; 13: 1167–75.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fowler, CD, Lu, Q, Johnson, PM, Marks, MJ, Kenny, PJ. Habenular α5* nicotinic receptor signaling controls nicotine intake. Nature 2011; 471: 597–601.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Linnér, RK, Biroli, P, Kong, E, Meddens, SFW, Wedow, R, Fontana, MA, et al. Genome-wide association analyses of risk tolerance and risky behaviors in over 1 million individuals identify hundreds of loci and shared genetic influences. Nat Genet 2019; 51: 245.CrossRef Google Scholar

de Cates, AN, Catone, G, Bebbington, P, Broome, MR. Attempting to disentangle the relationship between impulsivity and longitudinal self-harm: epidemiological analysis of UK household survey data. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2019; 65: 114–22.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Septier, M, Stordeur, C, Zhang, J, Delorme, R, Cortese, S. Association between suicidal spectrum behaviors and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2019; 103: 109–18.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kayir, H, Semenova, S, Markou, A. Baseline impulsive choice predicts the effects of nicotine and nicotine withdrawal on impulsivity in rats. Prog NeuroPsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2014; 48: 6–13.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kolokotroni, KZ, Rodgers, RJ, Harrison, AA. Trait differences in response to chronic nicotine and nicotine withdrawal in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2014; 231: 567–80.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Iwasaki, M, Akechi, T, Uchitomi, Y, Tsugane, S. Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study on Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease (JPHC study) Group. Cigarette smoking and completed suicide among middle-aged men: a population-based cohort study in Japan. Ann Epidemiol 2005; 15: 286–92.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

O'Connor, R. Towards an integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behaviour. In International Handbook of Suicide Prevention: Research, Policy and Practice (eds Platt, S, O'Connor, RC, Gordon, J): 181–98. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mars, B, Heron, J, Klonsky, D, Moran, P, O'Connor, RC, Tilling, K, et al. What distinguishes adolescents with suicidal thoughts from those who have attempted suicide? A population-based birth cohort study. J Child Psychology Psychiatr 2019; 60: 91–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

King, RA, Schwab-Stone, M, Flisher, AJ, Greenwald, S, Kramer, RA, Goodman, SH, et al. Psychosocial and risk behaviour correlates of youth suicide attempts and suicidal ideation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001; 40: 837–46.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Table 1. The observed association of smoking behaviour on suicidal ideation and suicide attempts controlling for age, gender and socioeconomic position

Table 2. Mendelian randomisation analyses using summary-level data of smoking initiation on risk of suicide attempt

Table 3. Mendelian randomisation analysis of lifetime smoking on suicidal ideation and attempt using individual-level data

Fig. 1 Logistic regression results of genotype at rs1051730 on odds of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt by smoking status.

Harrison et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S7

File 38.1 KB

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Yuan, Shuai Yao, Honghui and Larsson, Susanna C. 2020. Associations of cigarette smoking with psychiatric disorders: evidence from a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, Issue. 1,

Vermeulen, Jentien M. and Bolhuis, Koen 2020. The co-occurrence of smoking and suicide. The British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 217, Issue. 6, p. 708.

Swann, Alan C. Graham, David P. Wilkinson, Anna V. and Kosten, Thomas R. 2021. Nicotine Inhalation and Suicide: Clinical Correlates and Behavioral Mechanisms . The American Journal on Addictions, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 316.

Treur, Jorien L. Munafò, Marcus R. Logtenberg, Emma Wiers, Reinout W. and Verweij, Karin J. H. 2021. Using Mendelian randomization analysis to better understand the relationship between mental health and substance use: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine, Vol. 51, Issue. 10, p. 1593.

Hammerton, Gemma and Munafò, Marcus R. 2021. Causal inference with observational data: the need for triangulation of evidence. Psychological Medicine, Vol. 51, Issue. 4, p. 563.

Lim, Kai Xiang Oginni, Olakunle Ayokunmi Rimfeld, Kaili Pingault, Jean-Baptiste and Rijsdijk, Frühling 2022. Investigating the causal risk factors for self-harm by integrating Mendelian randomisation within twin modelling. Behavior Genetics, Vol. 52, Issue. 6, p. 324.

Lozupone, Madia Donghia, Rossella Sardone, Rodolfo Mollica, Anita Berardino, Giuseppe Lampignano, Luisa Griseta, Chiara Zupo, Roberta Castellana, Fabio Bortone, Ilaria Dibello, Vittorio Resta, Emanuela Stallone, Roberta Seripa, Davide Daniele, Antonio Solfrizzi, Vincenzo Altamura, Mario Bellomo, Antonello and Panza, Francesco 2022. Apolipoprotein E genotype, inflammatory biomarkers, and non-psychiatric multimorbidity contribute to the suicidal ideation phenotype in older age. The Salus in Apulia Study. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 319, Issue. , p. 202.

Munafò, Marcus R 2022. Growing Evidence for a Causal Role for Smoking in Mental Health. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Vol. 24, Issue. 5, p. 631.

Haan, Elis Sallis, Hannah M. Zuccolo, Luisa Labrecque, Jeremy Ystrom, Eivind Reichborn‐Kjennerud, Ted Andreassen, Ole Havdahl, Alexandra and Munafò, Marcus R. 2022. Prenatal smoking, alcohol and caffeine exposure and maternal‐reported attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in childhood: triangulation of evidence using negative control and polygenic risk score analyses. Addiction, Vol. 117, Issue. 5, p. 1458.

Mullins, Niamh Kang, JooEun Campos, Adrian I. Coleman, Jonathan R.I. Edwards, Alexis C. Galfalvy, Hanga Levey, Daniel F. Lori, Adriana Shabalin, Andrey Starnawska, Anna Su, Mei-Hsin Watson, Hunna J. Adams, Mark Awasthi, Swapnil Gandal, Michael Hafferty, Jonathan D. Hishimoto, Akitoyo Kim, Minsoo Okazaki, Satoshi Otsuka, Ikuo Ripke, Stephan Ware, Erin B. Bergen, Andrew W. Berrettini, Wade H. Bohus, Martin Brandt, Harry Chang, Xiao Chen, Wei J. Chen, Hsi-Chung Crawford, Steven Crow, Scott DiBlasi, Emily Duriez, Philibert Fernández-Aranda, Fernando Fichter, Manfred M. Gallinger, Steven Glatt, Stephen J. Gorwood, Philip Guo, Yiran Hakonarson, Hakon Halmi, Katherine A. Hwu, Hai-Gwo Jain, Sonia Jamain, Stéphane Jiménez-Murcia, Susana Johnson, Craig Kaplan, Allan S. Kaye, Walter H. Keel, Pamela K. Kennedy, James L. Klump, Kelly L. Li, Dong Liao, Shih-Cheng Lieb, Klaus Lilenfeld, Lisa Liu, Chih-Min Magistretti, Pierre J. Marshall, Christian R. Mitchell, James E. Monson, Eric T. Myers, Richard M. Pinto, Dalila Powers, Abigail Ramoz, Nicolas Roepke, Stefan Rozanov, Vsevolod Scherer, Stephen W. Schmahl, Christian Sokolowski, Marcus Strober, Michael Thornton, Laura M. Treasure, Janet Tsuang, Ming T. Witt, Stephanie H. Woodside, D. Blake Yilmaz, Zeynep Zillich, Lea Adolfsson, Rolf Agartz, Ingrid Air, Tracy M. Alda, Martin Alfredsson, Lars Andreassen, Ole A. Anjorin, Adebayo Appadurai, Vivek Soler Artigas, María Van der Auwera, Sandra Azevedo, M. Helena Bass, Nicholas Bau, Claiton H.D. Baune, Bernhard T. Bellivier, Frank Berger, Klaus Biernacka, Joanna M. Bigdeli, Tim B. Binder, Elisabeth B. Boehnke, Michael Boks, Marco P. Bosch, Rosa Braff, David L. Bryant, Richard Budde, Monika Byrne, Enda M. Cahn, Wiepke Casas, Miguel Castelao, Enrique Cervilla, Jorge A. Chaumette, Boris Cichon, Sven Corvin, Aiden Craddock, Nicholas Craig, David Degenhardt, Franziska Djurovic, Srdjan Edenberg, Howard J. Fanous, Ayman H. Foo, Jerome C. Forstner, Andreas J. Frye, Mark Fullerton, Janice M. Gatt, Justine M. Gejman, Pablo V. Giegling, Ina Grabe, Hans J. Green, Melissa J. Grevet, Eugenio H. Grigoroiu-Serbanescu, Maria Gutierrez, Blanca Guzman-Parra, Jose Hamilton, Steven P. Hamshere, Marian L. Hartmann, Annette Hauser, Joanna Heilmann-Heimbach, Stefanie Hoffmann, Per Ising, Marcus Jones, Ian Jones, Lisa A. Jonsson, Lina Kahn, René S. Kelsoe, John R. Kendler, Kenneth S. Kloiber, Stefan Koenen, Karestan C. Kogevinas, Manolis Konte, Bettina Krebs, Marie-Odile Landén, Mikael Lawrence, Jacob Leboyer, Marion Lee, Phil H. Levinson, Douglas F. Liao, Calwing Lissowska, Jolanta Lucae, Susanne Mayoral, Fermin McElroy, Susan L. McGrath, Patrick McGuffin, Peter McQuillin, Andrew Medland, Sarah E. Mehta, Divya Melle, Ingrid Milaneschi, Yuri Mitchell, Philip B. Molina, Esther Morken, Gunnar Mortensen, Preben Bo Müller-Myhsok, Bertram Nievergelt, Caroline Nimgaonkar, Vishwajit Nöthen, Markus M. O’Donovan, Michael C. Ophoff, Roel A. Owen, Michael J. Pato, Carlos Pato, Michele T. Penninx, Brenda W.J.H. Pimm, Jonathan Pistis, Giorgio Potash, James B. Power, Robert A. Preisig, Martin Quested, Digby Ramos-Quiroga, Josep Antoni Reif, Andreas Ribasés, Marta Richarte, Vanesa Rietschel, Marcella Rivera, Margarita Roberts, Andrea Roberts, Gloria Rouleau, Guy A. Rovaris, Diego L. Rujescu, Dan Sánchez-Mora, Cristina Sanders, Alan R. Schofield, Peter R. Schulze, Thomas G. Scott, Laura J. Serretti, Alessandro Shi, Jianxin Shyn, Stanley I. Sirignano, Lea Sklar, Pamela Smeland, Olav B. Smoller, Jordan W. Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S. Spalletta, Gianfranco Strauss, John S. Świątkowska, Beata Trzaskowski, Maciej Turecki, Gustavo Vilar-Ribó, Laura Vincent, John B. Völzke, Henry Walters, James T.R. Shannon Weickert, Cynthia Weickert, Thomas W. Weissman, Myrna M. Williams, Leanne M. Wray, Naomi R. Zai, Clement C. Ashley-Koch, Allison E. Beckham, Jean C. Hauser, Elizabeth R. Hauser, Michael A. Kimbrel, Nathan A. Lindquist, Jennifer H. McMahon, Benjamin Oslin, David W. Qin, Xuejun Agerbo, Esben Børglum, Anders D. Breen, Gerome Erlangsen, Annette Esko, Tõnu Gelernter, Joel Hougaard, David M. Kessler, Ronald C. Kranzler, Henry R. Li, Qingqin S. Martin, Nicholas G. McIntosh, Andrew M. Mors, Ole Nordentoft, Merete Olsen, Catherine M. Porteous, David Ursano, Robert J. Wasserman, Danuta Werge, Thomas Whiteman, David C. Bulik, Cynthia M. Coon, Hilary Demontis, Ditte Docherty, Anna R. Kuo, Po-Hsiu Lewis, Cathryn M. Mann, J. John Rentería, Miguel E. Smith, Daniel J. Stahl, Eli A. Stein, Murray B. Streit, Fabian Willour, Virginia Ruderfer, Douglas M. Wray, Naomi R. Ripke, Stephan Mattheisen, Manuel Trzaskowski, Maciej Byrne, Enda M. Abdellaoui, Abdel Adams, Mark J. Agerbo, Esben Air, Tracy M. Andlauer, Till F.M. Bacanu, Silviu-Alin Bækvad-Hansen, Marie Beekman, Aartjan T.F. Bigdeli, Tim B. Binder, Elisabeth B. Bryois, Julien Buttenschøn, Henriette N. Bybjerg-Grauholm, Jonas Cai, Na Castelao, Enrique Christensen, Jane Hvarregaard Clarke, Toni-Kim Coleman, Jonathan R.I. Colodro-Conde, Lucía Couvy-Duchesne, Baptiste Craddock, Nick Crawford, Gregory E. Davies, Gail Degenhardt, Franziska Derks, Eske M. Direk, Nese Dolan, Conor V. Dunn, Erin C. Eley, Thalia C. Escott-Price, Valentina Hassan Kiadeh, Farnush Farhadi Finucane, Hilary K. Foo, Jerome C. Forstner, Andreas J. Frank, Josef Gaspar, Héléna A. Gill, Michael Goes, Fernando S. Gordon, Scott D. Weinsheimer, Shantel Marie Wellmann, Jürgen Willemsen, Gonneke Witt, Stephanie H. Wu, Yang Xi, Hualin S. Yang, Jian Zhang, Futao Arolt, Volker Baune, Bernhard T. Berger, Klaus Boomsma, Dorret I. Cichon, Sven Dannlowski, Udo de Geus, E.J.C. Depaulo, J. Raymond Domenici, Enrico Domschke, Katharina Esko, Tõnu Grabe, Hans J. Hamilton, Steven P. Grove, Jakob Hall, Lynsey S. Hansen, Christine Søholm Hansen, Thomas F. Herms, Stefan Hickie, Ian B. Hoffmann, Per Homuth, Georg Horn, Carsten Hottenga, Jouke-Jan Hougaard, David M. Howard, David M. Ising, Marcus Jansen, Rick Jones, Ian Jones, Lisa A. Jorgenson, Eric Knowles, James A. Kohane, Isaac S. Kraft, Julia Kretzschmar, Warren W. Kutalik, Zoltán Li, Yihan Lind, Penelope A. MacIntyre, Donald J. MacKinnon, Dean F. Maier, Robert M. Maier, Wolfgang Marchini, Jonathan Mbarek, Hamdi McGrath, Patrick McGuffin, Peter Medland, Sarah E. Mehta, Divya Middeldorp, Christel M. Mihailov, Evelin Milaneschi, Yuri Milani, Lili Mondimore, Francis M. Montgomery, Grant W. Mostafavi, Sara Mullins, Niamh Nauck, Matthias Ng, Bernard Nivard, Michel G. Nyholt, Dale R. O’Reilly, Paul F. Oskarsson, Hogni Hayward, Caroline Heath, Andrew C. Kendler, Kenneth S. Kloiber, Stefan Lewis, Glyn Li, Qingqin S. Lucae, Susanne Madden, Pamela A.F. Magnusson, Patrik K. Martin, Nicholas G. McIntosh, Andrew M. Metspalu, Andres Mors, Ole Mortensen, Preben Bo Müller-Myhsok, Bertram Nordentoft, Merete Nöthen, Markus M. O’Donovan, Michael C. Paciga, Sara A. Pedersen, Nancy L. Owen, Michael J. Painter, Jodie N. Pedersen, Carsten Bøcker Pedersen, Marianne Giørtz Peterson, Roseann E. Peyrot, Wouter J. Pistis, Giorgio Posthuma, Danielle Quiroz, Jorge A. Qvist, Per Rice, John P. Riley, Brien P. Rivera, Margarita Mirza, Saira Saeed Schoevers, Robert Schulte, Eva C. Shen, Ling Shi, Jianxin Shyn, Stanley I. Sigurdsson, Engilbert Sinnamon, Grant C.B. Smit, Johannes H. Smith, Daniel J. Stefansson, Hreinn Steinberg, Stacy Streit, Fabian Strohmaier, Jana Tansey, Katherine E. Teismann, Henning Teumer, Alexander Thompson, Wesley Thomson, Pippa A. Thorgeirsson, Thorgeir E. Traylor, Matthew Treutlein, Jens Trubetskoy, Vassily Uitterlinden, André G. Umbricht, Daniel der Auwera, Sandra Van van Hemert, Albert M. Viktorin, Alexander Visscher, Peter M. Wang, Yunpeng Webb, Bradley T. Penninx, Brenda W.J.H. Perlis, Roy H. Porteous, David J. Potash, James B. Preisig, Martin Rietschel, Marcella Schaefer, Catherine Schulze, Thomas G. Smoller, Jordan W. Stefansson, Kari Tiemeier, Henning Uher, Rudolf Völzke, Henry Weissman, Myrna M. Werge, Thomas Lewis, Cathryn M. Levinson, Douglas F. Breen, Gerome Børglum, Anders D. Sullivan, Patrick F. Mullins, Niamh Forstner, Andreas J. O’Connell, Kevin S. Coombes, Brandon Coleman, Jonathan R.I. Qiao, Zhen Als, Thomas D. Bigdeli, Tim B. Børte, Sigrid Bryois, Julien Charney, Alexander W. Drange, Ole Kristian Gandal, Michael J. Hagenaars, Saskia P. Ikeda, Masashi Kamitaki, Nolan Kim, Minsoo Krebs, Kristi Panagiotaropoulou, Georgia Schilder, Brian M. Sloofman, Laura G. Steinberg, Stacy Trubetskoy, Vassily Winsvold, Bendik S. Won, Hong-Hee Abramova, Liliya Adorjan, Kristina Agerbo, Esben Al Eissa, Mariam Albani, Diego Alliey-Rodriguez, Ney Anjorin, Adebayo Antilla, Verneri Antoniou, Anastasia Awasthi, Swapnil Baek, Ji Hyun Bækvad-Hansen, Marie Bass, Nicholas Bauer, Michael Beins, Eva C. Bergen, Sarah E. Birner, Armin Pedersen, Carsten Bøcker Bøen, Erlend Boks, Marco P. Bosch, Rosa Brum, Murielle Brumpton, Ben M. Brunkhorst-Kanaan, Nathalie Budde, Monika Bybjerg-Grauholm, Jonas Byerley, William Cairns, Murray Casas, Miquel Cervantes, Pablo Clarke, Toni-Kim Cruceanu, Cristiana Cuellar-Barboza, Alfredo Cunningham, Julie Curtis, David Czerski, Piotr M. Dale, Anders M. Dalkner, Nina David, Friederike S. Degenhardt, Franziska Djurovic, Srdjan Dobbyn, Amanda L. Douzenis, Athanassios Elvsåshagen, Torbjørn Escott-Price, Valentina Ferrier, I. Nicol Fiorentino, Alessia Foroud, Tatiana M. Forty, Liz Frank, Josef Frei, Oleksandr Freimer, Nelson B. Frisén, Louise Gade, Katrin Garnham, Julie Gelernter, Joel Pedersen, Marianne Giørtz Gizer, Ian R. Gordon, Scott D. Gordon-Smith, Katherine Greenwood, Tiffany A. Grove, Jakob Guzman-Parra, José Ha, Kyooseob Haraldsson, Magnus Hautzinger, Martin Heilbronner, Urs Hellgren, Dennis Herms, Stefan Hoffmann, Per Holmans, Peter A. Huckins, Laura Jamain, Stéphane Johnson, Jessica S. Kalman, Janos L. Kamatani, Yoichiro Kennedy, James L. Kittel-Schneider, Sarah Knowles, James A. Kogevinas, Manolis Koromina, Maria Kranz, Thorsten M. Kranzler, Henry R. Kubo, Michiaki Kupka, Ralph Kushner, Steven A. Lavebratt, Catharina Lawrence, Jacob Leber, Markus Lee, Heon-Jeong Lee, Phil H. Levy, Shawn E. Lewis, Catrin Liao, Calwing Lucae, Susanne Lundberg, Martin MacIntyre, Donald J. Magnusson, Sigurdur H. Maier, Wolfgang Maihofer, Adam Malaspina, Dolores Maratou, Eirini Martinsson, Lina Mattheisen, Manuel McGregor, Nathaniel W. McGuffin, Peter McKay, James D. Medeiros, Helena Medland, Sarah E. Millischer, Vincent Montgomery, Grant W. Moran, Jennifer L. Morris, Derek W. Mühleisen, Thomas W. O’Brien, Niamh O’Donovan, Claire Olde Loohuis, Loes M. Oruc, Lilijana Papiol, Sergi Pardiñas, Antonio F. Perry, Amy Pfennig, Andrea Porichi, Evgenia Potash, James B. Quested, Digby Raj, Towfique Rapaport, Mark H. DePaulo, J. Raymond Regeer, Eline J. Rice, John P. Rivas, Fabio Rivera, Margarita Roth, Julian Roussos, Panos Ruderfer, Douglas M. Sánchez-Mora, Cristina Schulte, Eva C. Senner, Fanny Sharp, Sally Shilling, Paul D. Sigurdsson, Engilbert Sirignano, Lea Slaney, Claire Smeland, Olav B. Smith, Daniel J. Sobell, Janet L. Hansen, Christine Søholm Artigas, Maria Soler Spijker, Anne T. Stein, Dan J. Strauss, John S. Świątkowska, Beata Terao, Chikashi Thorgeirsson, Thorgeir E. Toma, Claudio Tooney, Paul Tsermpini, Evangelia-Eirini Vawter, Marquis P. Vedder, Helmut Walters, James T.R. Witt, Stephanie H. Xi, Simon Xu, Wei Kay Yang, Jessica Mei Young, Allan H. Young, Hannah Zandi, Peter P. Zhou, Hang Zillich, Lea HUNT All-In Psychiatry Adolfsson, Rolf Agartz, Ingrid Alda, Martin Alfredsson, Lars Babadjanova, Gulja Backlund, Lena Baune, Bernhard T. Bellivier, Frank Bengesser, Susanne Berrettini, Wade H. Blackwood, Douglas H.R. Boehnke, Michael Børglum, Anders D. Breen, Gerome Carr, Vaughan J. Catts, Stanley Corvin, Aiden Craddock, Nicholas Dannlowski, Udo Dikeos, Dimitris Esko, Tõnu Etain, Bruno Ferentinos, Panagiotis Frye, Mark Fullerton, Janice M. Gawlik, Micha Gershon, Elliot S. Goes, Fernando S. Green, Melissa J. Grigoroiu-Serbanescu, Maria Hauser, Joanna Henskens, Frans Hillert, Jan Hong, Kyung Sue Hougaard, David M. Hultman, Christina M. Hveem, Kristian Iwata, Nakao Jablensky, Assen V. Jones, Ian Jones, Lisa A. Kahn, René S. Kelsoe, John R. Kirov, George Landén, Mikael Leboyer, Marion Lewis, Cathryn M. Li, Qingqin S. Lissowska, Jolanta Lochner, Christine Loughland, Carmel Martin, Nicholas G. Mathews, Carol A. Mayoral, Fermin McElroy, Susan L. McIntosh, Andrew M. McMahon, Francis J. Melle, Ingrid Michie, Patricia Milani, Lili Mitchell, Philip B. Morken, Gunnar Mors, Ole Mortensen, Preben Bo Mowry, Bryan Müller-Myhsok, Bertram Myers, Richard M. Neale, Benjamin M. Nievergelt, Caroline M. Nordentoft, Merete Nöthen, Markus M. O’Donovan, Michael C. Oedegaard, Ketil J. Olsson, Tomas Owen, Michael J. Paciga, Sara A. Pantelis, Chris Pato, Carlos Pato, Michele T. Patrinos, George P. Perlis, Roy H. Posthuma, Danielle Ramos-Quiroga, Josep Antoni Reif, Andreas Reininghaus, Eva Z. Ribasés, Marta Rietschel, Marcella Ripke, Stephan Rouleau, Guy A. Saito, Takeo Schall, Ulrich Schalling, Martin Schofield, Peter R. Schulze, Thomas G. Scott, Laura J. Scott, Rodney J. Serretti, Alessandro Weickert, Cynthia Shannon Smoller, Jordan W. Stefansson, Hreinn Stefansson, Kari Stordal, Eystein Streit, Fabian Sullivan, Patrick F. Turecki, Gustavo Vaaler, Arne E. Vieta, Eduard Vincent, John B. Waldman, Irwin D. Weickert, Thomas W. Werge, Thomas Wray, Naomi R. Zwart, John-Anker Biernacka, Joanna M. Nurnberger, John I. Cichon, Sven Edenberg, Howard J. Stahl, Eli A. McQuillin, Andrew Di Florio, Arianna Ophoff, Roel A. Andreassen, Ole A. Adan, Roger A.H. Alfredsson, Lars Ando, Tetsuya Andreassen, Ole A. Aschauer, Harald Baker, Jessica H. Bencko, Vladimir Bergen, Andrew W. Berrettini, Wade H. Birgegård, Andreas Boden, Joseph M. Boehm, Ilka Boni, Claudette Perica, Vesna Boraska Brandt, Harry Breen, Gerome Bryois, Julien Buehren, Katharina Bulik, Cynthia M. Burghardt, Roland Carlberg, Laura Cassina, Matteo Cichon, Sven Clementi, Maurizio Coleman, Jonathan R.I. Cone, Roger D. Courtet, Philippe Crawford, Steven Crow, Scott Crowley, James J. Danner, Unna N. Davis, Oliver S.P. de Zwaan, Martina Dedoussis, George Degortes, Daniela DeSocio, Janiece E. Dick, Danielle M. Dikeos, Dimitris Dina, Christian Dmitrzak-Weglarz, Monika Martinez, Elisa Docampo Duncan, Laramie E. Egberts, Karin Marshall, Christian R. Martin, Nicholas G. Mattheisen, Manuel Mattingsdal, Morten McDevitt, Sara McGuffin, Peter Medland, Sarah E. Metspalu, Andres Meulenbelt, Ingrid Micali, Nadia Mitchell, James Mitchell, Karen Monteleone, Palmiero Monteleone, Alessio Maria Montgomery, Grant W. Mortensen, Preben Bo Munn-Chernoff, Melissa A. Nacmias, Benedetta Navratilova, Marie Ntalla, Ioanna Olsen, Catherine M. Ophoff, Roel A. O’Toole, Julie K. Padyukov, Leonid Palotie, Aarno Pantel, Jacques Papezova, Hana Parker, Richard Pearson, John F. Pedersen, Nancy L. Ehrlich, Stefan Escaramís, Geòrgia Esko, Tõnu Espeseth, Thomas Estivill, Xavier Farmer, Anne Favaro, Angela Fernández-Aranda, Fernando Fichter, Manfred M. Fischer, Krista Floyd, James A.B. Föcker, Manuel Foretova, Lenka Forstner, Andreas J. Forzan, Monica Franklin, Christopher S. Gallinger, Steven Gambaro, Giovanni Gaspar, Héléna A. Giegling, Ina Giuranna, Johanna Giusti-Rodríquez, Paola Gonidakis, Fragiskos Gordon, Scott Gorwood, Philip Mayora, Monica Gratacos Grove, Jakob Guillaume, Sébastien Guo, Yiran Hakonarson, Hakon Halmi, Katherine A. Hanscombe, Ken B. Hatzikotoulas, Konstantinos Hauser, Joanna Hebebrand, Johannes Helder, Sietske G. Henders, Anjali K. Herms, Stefan Herpertz-Dahlmann, Beate Herzog, Wolfgang Hinney, Anke Horwood, L. John Hübel, Christopher Petersen, Liselotte V. Pinto, Dalila Purves, Kirstin L. Raevuori, Anu Ramoz, Nicolas Reichborn-Kjennerud, Ted Ricca, Valdo Ripatti, Samuli Ripke, Stephan Ritschel, Franziska Roberts, Marion Rujescu, Dan Rybakowski, Filip Santonastaso, Paolo Scherag, André Scherer, Stephen W. Schmidt, Ulrike Schork, Nicholas J. Schosser, Alexandra Seitz, Jochen Slachtova, Lenka Slagboom, P. Eline Slof-Op ‘t Landt, Margarita C.T. Slopien, Agnieszka Soranzo, Nicole Sorbi, Sandro Southam, Lorraine Steen, Vidar W. Strober, Michael Huckins, Laura M. Hudson, James I. Imgart, Hartmut Inoko, Hidetoshi Janout, Vladimir Jiménez-Murcia, Susana Johnson, Craig Jordan, Jennifer Julià, Antonio Kalsi, Gursharan Kaminská, Deborah Kaplan, Allan S. Kaprio, Jaakko Karhunen, Leila Karwautz, Andreas Kas, Martien J.H. Kaye, Walter H. Kennedy, James L. Kennedy, Martin A. Keski-Rahkonen, Anna Kiezebrink, Kirsty Kim, Youl-Ri Kirk, Katherine M. Klareskog, Lars Klump, Kelly L. Knudsen, Gun Peggy S. Landén, Mikael Larsen, Janne T. Le Hellard, Stephanie Leppä, Virpi M. Li, Dong Lichtenstein, Paul Lilenfeld, Lisa Lin, Bochao Danae Lissowska, Jolanta Lundervold, Astri Luykx, Jurjen Magistretti, Pierre J. Maj, Mario Mannik, Katrin Marsal, Sara Stuber, Garret D. Sullivan, Patrick F. Świątkowska, Beata Szatkiewicz, Jin P. Tachmazidou, Ioanna Tenconi, Elena Thornton, Laura M. Tortorella, Alfonso Tozzi, Federica Treasure, Janet Tsitsika, Artemis Tyszkiewicz-Nwafor, Marta Tziouvas, Konstantinos van Elburg, Annemarie A. van Furth, Eric F. Wade, Tracey D. Wagner, Gudrun Walton, Esther Watson, Hunna J. Werge, Thomas Whiteman, David C. Wichmann, H. Erich Widen, Elisabeth Woodside, D. Blake Yao, Shuyang Yilmaz, Zeynep Zeggini, Eleftheria Zerwas, Stephanie Zipfel, Stephan Witt, Stephanie H. Streit, Fabian Jungkunz, Martin Frank, Josef Awasthi, Swapnil Treutlein, Jens Dietl, Lydie Schwarze, Cornelia E. Dahmen, Norbert Schott, Björn H. Nöthen, Markus M. Ripke, Stephan Mobascher, Arian Rujescu, Dan Lieb, Klaus Roepke, Stefan Schmahl, Christian Bohus, Martin Rietschel, Marcella Crivelli, Silvia Dennis, Michelle F. Harvey, Phillip D. Carter, Bruce W. Huffman, Jennifer E. Jacobson, Daniel Madduri, Ravi Olsen, Maren K. Pestian, John Gaziano, J. Michael Muralidhar, Sumitra Ramoni, Rachel Beckham, Jean Chang, Kyong-Mi O’Donnell, Christopher J. Tsao, Philip S. Breeling, James Huang, Grant Romero, J.P. Casas Muralidhar, Sumitra Moser, Jennifer Whitbourne, Stacey B. Brewer, Jessica V. Aslan, Mihaela Connor, Todd Argyres, Dean P. Tsao, Philip S. Gaziano, J. Michael Stephens, Brady Brophy, Mary T. Humphries, Donald E. Selva, Luis E. Do, Nhan Shayan, Shahpoor Cho, Kelly O’Donnell, Christopher J. O’Donnell, Christopher J. Pyarajan, Saiju Tsao, Philip S. Cho, Kelly Pyarajan, Saiju Hauser, Elizabeth Sun, Yan Zhao, Hongyu Wilson, Peter McArdle, Rachel Dellitalia, Louis Mattocks, Kristin Harley, John Zablocki, Clement J. Whittle, Jeffrey Jacono, Frank Beckham, Jean Gutierrez, Salvador Gibson, Gretchen Hammer, Kimberly Kaminsky, Laurence Villareal, Gerardo Kinlay, Scott Xu, Junzhe Hamner, Mark Mathew, Roy Bhushan, Sujata Iruvanti, Pran Godschalk, Michael Ballas, Zuhair Ivins, Douglas Mastorides, Stephen Moorman, Jonathan Gappy, Saib Klein, Jon Ratcliffe, Nora Florez, Hermes Okusaga, Olaoluwa Murdoch, Maureen Sriram, Peruvemba Yeh, Shing Shing Tandon, Neeraj Jhala, Darshana Aguayo, Samuel Cohen, David Sharma, Satish Liangpunsakul, Suthat Oursler, Kris Ann Whooley, Mary Ahuja, Sunil Constans, Joseph Meyer, Paul Greco, Jennifer Rauchman, Michael Servatius, Richard Gaddy, Melinda Wallbom, Agnes Morgan, Timothy Stapley, Todd Sherman, Scott Ross, George Tsao, Philip Strollo, Patrick Boyko, Edward Meyer, Laurence Gupta, Samir Huq, Mostaqul Fayad, Joseph Hung, Adriana Lichy, Jack Hurley, Robin Robey, Brooks and Striker, Robert 2022. Dissecting the Shared Genetic Architecture of Suicide Attempt, Psychiatric Disorders, and Known Risk Factors. Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 91, Issue. 3, p. 313.

Jarman, Hannah K. McLean, Siân A. Griffiths, Scott Teague, Samantha J. Rodgers, Rachel F. Paxton, Susan J. Austen, Emma Harris, Emily Steward, Trevor Shatte, Adrian Khanh-Dao Le, Long Anwar, Tarique Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Parker, Alexandra G. Yager, Zali and Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew 2022. Critical measurement issues in the assessment of social media influence on body image. Body Image, Vol. 40, Issue. , p. 225.

Kukoyi, Olasumbo Orok, Edidiong Oluwafemi, Funmilayo Oni, Olawale Oluwadare, Tunrayo Ojo, Tolulope Bamitale, Toba Jaiyesimi, Boluwaji and Iyamu, Debbie 2023. Factors influencing suicidal ideation and self-harm among undergraduate students in a Nigerian private university. Middle East Current Psychiatry, Vol. 30, Issue. 1,

Brouillet, Julie Z. Boltri, Margherita Lengvenyte, Aiste Lajnef, Mohamed Richard, Jean-Romain Barrau, Caroline Strumila, Robertas Coyac, Manon Wu, Ching-Lien Boukouaci, Wahid Sugunasabesan, Sobika Bouassida, Jihène Guillaume, Sébastien Sénèque, Maude Olié, Emilie Leboyer, Marion Courtet, Philippe and Tamouza, Ryad 2023. Association of markers of inflammation and intestinal permeability in suicidal patients with major mood disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, Vol. 14, Issue. , p. 100624.

Li, Qingqin S. Shabalin, Andrey A. DiBlasi, Emily Gopal, Srihari Canuso, Carla M. Palotie, Aarno Drevets, Wayne C. Docherty, Anna R. and Coon, Hilary 2023. Genome-wide association study meta-analysis of suicide death and suicidal behavior. Molecular Psychiatry, Vol. 28, Issue. 2, p. 891.

Peprah, Prince Asare, Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Okwei, Reforce Agyemang-Duah, Williams Osafo, Joseph Kretchy, Irene A. and Gyasi, Razak M. 2023. A moderated mediation analysis of the association between smoking and suicide attempts among adolescents in 28 countries. Scientific Reports, Vol. 13, Issue. 1,

Underner, M. Perriot, J. de Chazeron, I. Brousse, G. Peiffer, G. Gherras, A. Harika-Germaneau, G. and Jaafari, N. 2023. Quelle est la part du tabagisme dans l’augmentation du risque suicidaire chez les jeunes fumeurs ? Revue systématique. L'Encéphale, Vol. 49, Issue. 1, p. 72.

Guo, Shuangshuang Jiao, Ting Ma, Ying Lewis, Stephen P. Ammerman, Brooke A. Chen, Ruoling Thomas, Erica Yu, Yizhen and Tang, Jie 2023. Association of Adverse Childhood Experiences with Non-Suicidal Self-Injury and Suicidality: Baseline Survey of the Chinese Adolescent Health Growth Cohort. Future, Vol. 1, Issue. 3, p. 76.

Labrecque, Jeremy A. and Swanson, Sonja A. 2023. Using Counterfactual Worlds to Triangulate Evidence in the Real World. Current Epidemiology Reports, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 44.

Chen, Shengnan Zhang, Weisong Zheng, Zhenquan Shao, Xiaolong Yang, Peng Yang, Xiaobin and Nan, Kai 2023. Unraveling genetic causality between type 2 diabetes and pulmonary tuberculosis on the basis of Mendelian randomization. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, Vol. 15, Issue. 1,

Narita, Z. Shinozaki, T. Goto, A. Hori, H. Kim, Y. Wilcox, H. C. Inoue, M. Tsugane, S. and Sawada, N. 2024. Time-varying living arrangements and suicide death in the general population sample: 14-year causal survival analysis via pooled logistic regression. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, Vol. 33, Issue. ,

Download full list

Article contents

Examining the effect of smoking on suicidal ideation and attempts: triangulation of epidemiological approaches

Abstract

Keywords

Possible causal pathways

Applying causal inference techniques

Methods

Observational analysis

Sample

Measure of suicidal ideation

Measure of attempted suicide

Measure of smoking behaviours

Statistical analysis

Mendelian randomisation analysis with summary-level data

Smoking instrument

Suicide attempt GWAS

Statistical analysis

Mendelian randomisation analysis with individual-level data

Genotyping

Conducting the GWAS

Genetic instrument

Instrument validation

Statistical analysis

Single SNP analysis

Statistical analysis

Sensitivity analysis

Smoking and impulsivity

Ethical approval

Results

Observational analysis

Mendelian randomisation analysis with summary-level data

Mendelian randomisation analysis with individual-level data

Single SNP analysis

Smoking and impulsivity sensitivity analysis

Discussion

The potential role of impulsivity

Strengths and limitations

Supplementary material

Data availability

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Funding

Declaration of interests

References

Harrison et al. supplementary material

Target article

Related commentaries (1)

eLetters

Linked content

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests