Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:15:48.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The progression of coeliac disease: its neurological and psychiatric implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2016

Giovanna Campagna
Affiliation:
Medicine and Health Science School, Università “G. d’Annunzio”, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti CH, Italy
Mirko Pesce*
Affiliation:
Medicine and Health Science School, Università “G. d’Annunzio”, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti CH, Italy
Raffaella Tatangelo
Affiliation:
Medicine and Health Science School, Università “G. d’Annunzio”, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti CH, Italy
Alessia Rizzuto
Affiliation:
Medicine and Health Science School, Università “G. d’Annunzio”, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti CH, Italy
Irene La Fratta
Affiliation:
Medicine and Health Science School, Università “G. d’Annunzio”, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti CH, Italy
Alfredo Grilli
Affiliation:
Medicine and Health Science School, Università “G. d’Annunzio”, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti CH, Italy
*
*Corresponding author: Mirko Pesce, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to show the various neurological and psychiatric symptoms in coeliac disease (CD). CD is a T cell-mediated, tissue-specific autoimmune disease which affects genetically susceptible individuals after dietary exposure to proline- and glutamine-rich proteins contained in certain cereal grains. Genetics, environmental factors and different immune systems, together with the presence of auto-antigens, are taken into account when identifying the pathogenesis of CD. CD pathogenesis is related to immune dysregulation, which involves the gastrointestinal system, and the extra-intestinal systems such as the nervous system, whose neurological symptoms are evidenced in CD patients. A gluten-free diet (GFD) could avoid cerebellar ataxia, epilepsy, neuropathies, migraine and mild cognitive impairment. Furthermore, untreated CD patients have more symptoms and psychiatric co-morbidities than those treated with a GFD. Common psychiatric symptoms in untreated CD adult patients include depression, apathy, anxiety, and irritability and schizophrenia is also common in untreated CD. Several studies show improvement in psychiatric symptoms after the start of a GFD. The present review discusses the state of the art regarding neurological and psychiatric complications in CD and highlights the evidence supporting a role for GFD in reducing neurological and psychiatric complications.

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016

Introduction

A new definition of coeliac disease (CD) has recently been presented by The European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, describing it as ‘… an immune-mediated systemic disorder elicited by gluten and related prolamines in genetically susceptible individuals and characterized by a variable combination of gluten-dependent manifestations, CD-specific antibodies, HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 haplotypes, and enteropathy’( Reference Husby, Koletzko and Korponay-Szabó 1 ). Transglutaminase (tTG), a multifunctional enzyme tissue, has been widely reported to be a major auto-antigen in CD. The identification of IgA auto-antibodies directed towards this self-protein is crucial in the diagnosis of CD. The CD pathogenesis has also been reported to strongly involve tTG through the deamidation of gluten peptides that, once modified, are more easily presented to the immune system via human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 or via DQ8 molecules. Gluten peptides reach the lamina propria and are presented to the T cells. Subsequently, several biological processes are triggered, leading to an increased T cell influx, crypt hyperplasia, and villous shortening in the proximal small intestine. As far as the prevalence of CD is concerned, many investigations are in accordance in evidencing that this disease is becoming more frequent in several geographical areas. Nowadays, CD epidemiology is characterised not only by an increase in the cases reported in Northern Europe and the USA (historical areas of the spreading of CD), but also by its manifestation in different and new regions, such as Asian countries. This could be explained by the significant changes in the eating habits of these populations, who have increased the use of gluten especially during their childhood( Reference Catassi 2 ). The way in which the disease changes and its clinical manifestations have been reported over time. Diarrhoea and malabsorption are not as frequent as they used to be in the initial stage of CD, among both adults and children. On the other hand, there has been an increase in non-specific signs and atypical manifestations( Reference Miranda, Lasa and Bustamante 3 ). Furthermore, CD signs and symptoms are no longer limited only to the gastrointestinal tract, as reported in the past, but more than half of adult patients show extra-intestinal manifestations that are also expected to be improved by a gluten-free diet (GFD)( Reference Castillo, Theethira and Leffler 4 ). To date, the only treatment for CD with complete remission of symptoms is a lifetime diet with the total elimination of gluten. Even the ingestion of small amounts of gluten can cause major disruptions; therefore following a gluten-free regimen can lead to the relief of the symptoms, the normalisation of histological and laboratory findings and a decrease in the risk of CD’s associative complications. For this reason, CD should be considered as a complex disease as well as a multifactorial pathogenesis to be investigated from a genetic, biological and environmental point of view also considering the nervous system and its implications. This review aims to describe the detailed research on CD, highlighting its findings in different domains (genetics, environmental triggers and immune pathogenesis), focusing on more recent areas of investigation connected with neurological complications, cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders and the impact of quality of life (QOL) in coeliac patients. Research undertaken demonstrates that good adherence to a GFD may also be extremely beneficial to both neurological and psychiatric symptoms.

Notably, the role of the GFD in subclinical neurological abnormalities has not been assessed and the impact on histological course needs further investigation. It is well established that the GFD represents the most important aspect of the management of CD patients and it is the only treatment that allows the prevention of several associated malignant and non-malignant complications, including neurological and psychiatric diseases.

Pathogenesis

Genetics

Recent studies in CD show that the disease is the interaction between genetic, environmental and immunological factors. The strongest and best-characterised genetic susceptibility factors in CD are HLA, especially the so-called DQ genes. The evidence of a genetic component in CD is best illustrated by the strong dependence on the presence of the HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotypes( Reference Di Sabatino and Corazza 5 Reference Denham and Hill 7 ), most probably due to their physiochemical properties( Reference Kim, Quarsten and Bergseng 8 , Reference Hovhannisyan, Weiss and Martin 9 ) and binding of specific peptides dominated by tissue tTG2. A Europe-wide collaborative study reported that only 0·4 % of CD patients were neither DQ2 (including the half heterodimer) nor DQ8 carriers( Reference Karell, Louka and Moodie 10 ). Two additional studies carried out in the USA and Italy supported these findings by reporting a prevalence of DQ2/8 negativity in CD ranging from 0·16 to 0·9%( Reference Megiorni, Mora and Bonamico 11 , Reference Pietzak, Schofield and McGinniss 12 ). When clinical suspicions are strong and supported by serological and histological findings in small samples of patients, CD can be diagnosed in the absence of HLA-DQ2 or -DQ8. Recently, genome-wide association studies have been able to identify several common non-HLA genetic factors associated with CD that account for a small amount of the overall risk. These genes have been reported to also be involved in adaptive and innate immune responses.

It should be noted that each of these non-HLA genes, taken separately, is not expected to play a major role in CD( Reference Kupfer and Jabri 6 , Reference Denham and Hill 7 ). A study has also reported an association between HLA-G gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to CD development, suggesting the involvement of the HLA-G molecule in the pathogenesis of the disease( Reference Catamo, Zupin and Segat 13 ).

Environment

It is clear that environmental factors play an important role in CD pathogenesis. The major environmental trigger is the intake of gluten. The problem lies in the high content of glutamine and proline concentrated in these proteins that make them impossible to be completely digested by humans( Reference Kupfer and Jabri 6 ). Individuals genetically predisposed to CD undergo a process by which the partially residual digested peptides set off an innate and adaptive immune response, thus considering a GFD to be the only effective treatment for CD to date. There may be other trigger factors in the development of the disease that could account for the considerable variability in the age of onset and in the clinical manifestations of the disease. Current studies have focused on these other factors such as the gut microbiome and its role in contributing to disease onset( Reference Di Cagno, De Angelis and De Pasquale 14 ), or the lack of breast-feeding( Reference Guandalini 15 ). As far as the latter is concerned, several researchers have identified a relationship between breast-feeding and the development of CD( Reference Guandalini 15 , Reference Akobeng, Ramanan and Buchan 16 ). Both the duration of breast-feeding and the delay until gluten is introduced have been associated with a decrease in the risk of developing CD, though its cause still remains unknown. Nevertheless, other studies do not support this hypothesis. Indeed, A study of Italian children with a familial risk of CD( Reference Lionetti, Castellaneta and Francavilla 17 ) showed that neither the delayed introduction of gluten nor breast-feeding modified the risk of CD development among infants at risk, although the introduction of gluten at a later time is associated with a delayed initiation of the disease. Another study showed no effect of the timing of gluten being introduced on the incidence of CD in children at risk( Reference Chmielewska, Pieścik-Lech and Szajewska 18 ).

Furthermore, studies report differences in the microbiota of breast-fed and formula-fed infants( Reference Harmsen, Wildeboer-Veloo and Raangs 19 ). It has been reported that the microbiota, as well as nutritional and immune system-supporting factors in breast milk, could contribute to a decrease in gastrointestinal illnesses. Interestingly, infections by a variety of pathogens (for example, adenovirus 12 and hepatitis C virus (HCV)), have been associated with CD( Reference Plot and Amital 20 ). Moreover, the risk rate for CD diagnosis and the age of onset seemed to increase in children with CD-associated HLA genes after one or more rotavirus infections( Reference Stene, Honeyman and Hoffenberg 21 , Reference Pavone, Nicolini and Taibi 22 ). In addition, epidemiological studies report that individuals with CD were likely to be born during the summer period, meaning that the introduction of solid food, which occurs around 6 months of age, is concurrent with the seasonal peak of gastrointestinal illnesses in the winter period( Reference Ivarsson, Hernell and Nystrom 23 , Reference Lewy, Meirson and Laron 24 ). There is no clear evidence of a direct relationship between infections and the onset of CD, but it has been suggested that rotaviruses and other intestinal pathogens can create a pro-inflammatory environment and increase intestinal permeability( Reference Camilleri, Nullens and Nelsen 25 ), thus enhancing the immune response to dietary antigens. In response to viral infections, there is a production of interferon (IFN)-α that enhances the activation of the Th1 response to anti-CD3 in the small intestine, leading to an increase in crypt hyperplasia( Reference Monteleone, Pender and Wathen 26 ). Studies report numerous cases of patients with HCV who, after being treated with IFN-α therapy, developed CD, thus supporting a possible role played by type I IFN in the induction of the disease( Reference Cammarota, Cuoco and Cianci 27 , Reference Hernandez, Johnson and Naiyer 28 ).

Immunopathogenesis

Immune dysregulation has been the core feature examined over the last few decades. Before addressing the issue of immunopathogenesis, an explanation of the amino acid composition of gluten is necessary. Gluten is comprised of two different protein types, gliadins and glutenins, which trigger the disease( Reference Wieser 29 , Reference Kontogiorgos 30 ). Peptides in barley and rye, hordeins and secalins are also capable of activating CD while oats, with its more distantly related peptides called avenins, rarely trigger CD( Reference Vader, Stepniak and Bunnik 31 ). Due to their high content of prolines and glutamines, gliadins, glutenins, hordein and secalins are resistant to the degradation of gastric acid, pancreatic and brush-border enzymes, due to the lack in prolyl endopeptidase activity( Reference Hausch, Shan and Santiago 32 ). Undegraded peptide fragments can be transported across the epithelium primarily by transcellular pathways, such as tight junctions, which contribute to the balance between tolerance and immune responses to non-self antigens( Reference De, Caggiari and Tabuso 33 ). Zonulin, an endogenous modulator of epithelial tight junctions, triggers the paracellular trafficking of macromolecules. An increase in the secretion of zonulin is produced by gliadin, altering intestinal permeability and facilitating the transport of gluten, and triggering an inflammatory process. At the initial stage of the disease, exposure to gliadin induces directly the opening of tight junctions secondary to zonulin up-regulation and produces an increase in the paracellular passage of antigens in the gut submucosa( Reference Fasano 34 ). Peptide fragments from wheat, rye and barley that are not digested are transported to the lamina propria, where they undergo the process of deamidation by tTG2 resulting in the conversion of glutamine into glutamate which in turn introduces negative charges with a stronger binding affinity for HLA-DQ2 and -DQ8 on antigen-presenting cells( Reference Schuppan, Junker and Barisani 35 , Reference Comerford, Coates and Byrne 36 ). It is worth noting that gluten peptides that can be modified through deamidation are numerous, thus broadening and amplifying the gluten-specific T-cell response in the lamina propria( Reference Hana, Newell and Glanvilled 37 ). It has been demonstrated that CD4+ T cells produce most of the CD features( Reference Korneychuk, Ramiro-Puig and Ettersperger 38 ), recognising the gluten peptides bound to HLA-DQ2·5 or HLA-DQ8( Reference Sollid, Qiao and Anderson 39 ), and amplifying the T-cell response through tTG2. Bodd et al. ( Reference Bodd, Ráki and Tollefsen 40 ) have reported that T cells reacting against translutaminase deamidated gliadin are IFN-γ-secreting cells. IFN-γ induces the production of matrix metalloproteases( Reference Patruno, Pesce and Marrone 41 , Reference Ciccocioppo, Di Sabatino and Bauer 42 ) leading to the alteration of the epithelial barrier function( Reference Miranda, Lasa and Bustamante 3 ). Moreover, both IFN-γ and TNF-α are reported to increase intestinal permeability by the disruption of tight junctions( Reference Bruewer, Luegering and Kucharzik 43 ). On the other hand, antigen-presenting cells generate IL-12 and IL-15, which are responsible for the promotion of the Th1 differentiation, survival and proliferation of gluten-specific CD4+ T cells( Reference Lahdenperä 44 ). CD4+ T cells respond with the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines controlling local inflammation, such as IFN-γ, IL-2 and IL-21( Reference Bodd, Ráki and Tollefsen 40 , Reference Tollefsen, Rentz-Hansen and Fleckenstein 45 ). These cytokines act not only at a local level, but they also cross the basement membrane and bind receptors on the intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) and intra-epithelial lymphocytes (IEL)( Reference Denham and Hill 7 ). In the epithelium, IFN-γ promotes IEC death and possibly IL-15 production by IEC( Reference Muller, Waldmann and Kruhlak 46 ). In vitro studies have shown that IL-15 can activate T-cell receptor αβ (TCRαβ) IEL, leading to an increase in surface levels and activity of NKG2D (natural killer (NK) group 2D), the receptor for MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A (MICA)( Reference Mention, Ben Ahmed and Bègue 47 ) which can be found on the membrane of the CD8+ αβ T cells, γδ T cells and most NK cells( Reference Hourigan 48 ), resulting in death. It is noted that CD patients who suffer from CD have an increase in both the expression and function of NKG2D in TCRαβ IEL( Reference Meresse, Chen and Ciszewski 49 ). It is suggested that, following NKG2D–MICA interaction, the TCRαβ IEL become activated, and kill the IEC, thus contributing to epithelial pathology because the IEL are reprogrammed to become NK cells( Reference Hourigan 48 ). Furthermore, it has been shown that the expression of epithelial cell surface ligands, including MICA, is increased by IL-15, thus contributing to epithelial changes and other pathological processes associated with CD, which include the refractory CD type 2 and enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma( Reference Malamut, El Machhour and Montcuquet 50 , Reference Woodward 51 ). The interaction between IL-15 and the CD4+ T cells is a necessary and sufficient condition to activate the CD8+ T cells and damage the small intestine( Reference Korneychuk, Ramiro-Puig and Ettersperger 38 ). Usually acting as an autocrine growth factor, IL-21 has shown to have several functions. In the epithelium, the IEC are stimulated to produce CCL20, a T-cell chemoattractant, and enhance the cytotoxicity of the IEL. In the lamina propria, it is associated with the production of matrix metalloproteases by fibroblasts( Reference Monteleone, Caruso and Fina 52 ), supporting the growth and differentiation of B cells. IL-21 also supports B cells in the production of IgA antibodies, specific for TG2 or deamidated gliadin( Reference Caruso, Fina and Peluso 53 ). Finally, IEC produce IL-7 and IL-15 which promote the activation and survival of IEL( Reference De Paolo, Abadie and Tang 54 ). The activated IEL, in turn, have the ability to kill IEC. Furthermore, the activation and clonal expansion of B cells is driven by the activated CD4+ T cells, through the production of Th-2 cytokines, so that B cells differentiate into plasma cells and produce antigliadin and anti-tTG antibodies( Reference Hamer 55 ). These processes are thought to contribute to several features of CD pathology such as increased IEL numbers, villous atrophy, 1and the production of disease-specific antibodies, with the effect of producing inflammation, malabsorption and numerous secondary symptoms( Reference Dewar, Pereira and Ciclitira 56 ).

Neurological complications and cognitive impairment in coeliac disease

CD is primarily an intestinal disorder characterised histologically by intraepithelial lymphocytosis, crypt hyperplasia and villous atrophy. This broader view of the disease seen as an inflammatory disease is supported by clinical observations of extra-intestinal manifestations such as dermatological, hepatic, osteological, endocrine and neurological signs( Reference Uygur-Bayramicli and Melih Özel 57 ). The most severe neurological symptoms are dementia, amnesia, ataxia, acalculia, epilepsy, chronic neuropathies, confusion, personality changes( Reference Hu, Murray and Greenaway 58 ), cognitive deficits( Reference Arnone and Conti 59 ), multifocal encephalopathy, neuromyelitis optica, muscular hypotonia, delayed motor development( Reference Vieira, Jatobá and Matos 60 ) and headaches( Reference Parisi, Pietropaoli and Ferretti 61 , Reference Lerner, Makhoul and Eliakim 62 ), some of which could improve with GFD treatment( Reference Parisi, Pietropaoli and Ferretti 61 , Reference Neto, Costa and Magalhaes 63 ).

Due to high levels of antigliadin antibodies, CD is seen as the common cause of neurological syndromes, particularly cerebellar ataxia, whose origin remains unknown. There is an increasingly wider spectrum of neurological syndromes identified both as complications of prediagnosed CD and as an initial manifestation of CD( Reference Zelnik, Pacht and Obeid 64 ). Studies show that the nervous system is compromised and acts as a complication in the pre-diagnosis of CD. Many studies have reported the involvement of the nervous system mainly as a complication of prediagnosed CD( Reference Parisi, Pietropaoli and Ferretti 61 , Reference Bushara 65 ). Several studies have investigated the prevalence of neuronal hyper-excitability and electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities in asymptomatic children and adolescents with newly diagnosed CD before the introduction of a GFD, and in particular any changes following the introduction of a diet. A recent study evaluated the role of a GFD on neurological symptoms, EEG characteristics and sleep breathing disorders (SBD) in children with CD( Reference Parisi, Pietropaoli and Ferretti 61 ). The authors enrolled nineteen children with a new biopsy CD diagnosis. At the diagnosis of CD, 37% of the patients complained of headaches and other neurological disorders that affected their daily activities and 32% of the patients were positive for SBD. The EEG tests revealed abnormal findings in 48% of children. After 6 months of a GFD, headaches and EEG abnormalities disappeared in most of the children in turn, resulting in them being negative for SBD. Asymptomatic children and adolescents manifested hyper-excitability and EEG abnormalities before a GFD. Adherence to a GFD has been shown to result in lighter headache symptoms reported by CD patients( Reference Lerner, Makhoul and Eliakim 62 ). Results of functional imaging studies such as single photon emission computed tomography were in favour of migraines, and a GFD could lead to an improvement of migraine in these patients( Reference Gabrielli, Cremonini and Fiore 66 ). Functional imaging studies revealed migraines present through single photon computed tomography with the result that a GFD could lead to an improvement. However, an association between CD and migraine headaches was not established when compared with the general population( Reference Shahriar 67 ).

Other common neurological symptoms of CD are ataxia and epilepsy. Cerebellar ataxia is one of the first symptoms( Reference Cooke and Smith 68 ), and one of the most frequently recognised neurological disturbances in CD( Reference Fasano 69 ). Its predominant clinical manifestations include dysarthria, dysphonia, pyramidal signs, abnormal movements of eyes and progressive ataxia of gait. Ataxia related to CD is not often associated with typical gastrointestinal symptoms or malabsorption signs. Ataxic symptom relief has been reported with the adherence to a GFD( Reference Hadjivassiliou, Mäki and Sanders 70 ). Regarding epilepsy, several studies have demonstrated a relationship between epilepsy and CD, with prevalence rates ranging from 3·5 to 7·2%( Reference Zelnik, Pacht and Obeid 64 , Reference Fasano 69 ). However, although epilepsy is considered in international studies as a condition associated with CD or an extra-intestinal manifestation of this disease, a recent study has not confirmed this association( Reference Vieira, Jatobá and Matos 60 ).

Recent data are less consistent and vary below these figures( Reference Ludvigsson, Zingone and Tomson 71 ). Peripheral neuropathy is the second most frequent neurological complication in CD patients and has been reported in up to 50% of cases( Reference Parisi, Pietropaoli and Ferretti 61 , Reference Hadjivassiliou, Grünewald and Davies-Jones 72 ). Neuropathy may precede a diagnosis of CD( Reference Chin, Sander and Brannagan 73 ). Research findings regarding the effect of a GFD on peripheral neuropathy have been mixed, with some reports indicating positive outcomes and others reporting no significant changes( Reference Neto, Costa and Magalhaes 63 , Reference Luostarinen, Himanen and Luostarinen 74 ).

A study which investigated neurological damage and gluten-free foods showed that neurological peripheral disorders, and autonomic dysfunctions with anti-neuronal antibodies in adults with CD did not disappear with a GFD( Reference Tursi, Giorgetti and Iani 75 ). On the contrary, important evidence comes from a case report of a 14-year-old patient with rare neurological symptoms( Reference Uzma, Imdad and Beg 76 ). The patient presented headaches and blurred vision for 1 year; she was diagnosed with papilledaema after an ophthalmic examination showing increased cerebrospinal fluid putting pressure on the backbone and was further diagnosed with pseudotumor cerebri. However, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with duodenal biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of CD. The patient was put on a GFD, resolving the gastrointestinal symptoms and also reaching almost complete resolution of the pseudotumour cerebri symptoms.

Neurological signs are rare in children but as many as 36% of adult patients present neurological changes( Reference Chaudhry and Ravich 77 ). Other neurological manifestations are tremor, myelopathy, brainstem encephalitis, progressive leukoencephalopathy, vasculitis, occipital calcification and myoclonic syndrome. A myoclonic syndrome, often accompanied by ataxia, may occur in CD. Myoclonus may be present as focal, multifocal or generalised convulsions. They also include neuromuscular manifestation such as peripheral polyneuropathy, mono-neuropathy multiplex, dermatomyositis, polymyositis and inclusion body myositis( Reference Shahriar 67 ). Additionally, one study showed that there is no significant difference between the laboratory data of the coeliac patients with and without neurological manifestations( Reference Işikay and Kocamaz 78 ). The neurological symptoms are headaches, epilepsy, migraines, mental retardation, breath-holding spells, ataxia, cerebral palsy, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Down’s syndrome and Turner syndrome in order of frequency. Moreover, the 3a biopsy type was statistically more common among patients without neurological manifestations, while the 3b biopsy type was statistically and more common among patients with neurological manifestations. It is important to keep in mind that in the clinical course of CD, different neurological manifestations may be reported.

Although a range of neurological disorders are widely reported to be associated with coeliac patients, their pathogenesis remains unclear. Such disorders are believed to be secondary to vitamin deficiency due to malabsorption, and others to immune mechanisms. A further detailed study confirmed the role of hyperhomocysteinaemia for neurological features associated with CD( Reference Ferretti, Parisi and Villa 79 ).

Neurological conditions have been researched in detail as opposed to cognitive functioning. CD adult patients reported milder forms of cognitive impairment known as ‘brain fog’, a symptom which disappears after GFD treatment but re-presents itself again after inadvertent gluten exposure( Reference Lichtwark, Newnham and Robinson 80 ). Brain fog is characterised by the difficulty in concentrating, problems with attentiveness, short-term memory lapses, difficulties in word-finding, temporary loss in mental acuity and creativity as well as confusion and/or disorientation( Reference Theoharides, Stewart and Hatziagelaki 81 ).

A retrospective study on patients with a CD diagnosis after the age of 60 years presented evidence supporting the likelihood of such a link. Two patients out of seven presented a cognitive decline, initially attributed to Alzheimer’s disease, but they showed an improvement in their symptoms after the initiation of a GFD. A third of the patients suffered from a peripheral neuropathy, and completely recovered following a gluten-free regimen( Reference Lurie, Landau and Pfeffer 82 ). The level of cognitive function was believed to have improved together with mucosal healing, an hypothesis proposed by Lichtwark et al. ( Reference Lichtwark, Newnham and Robinson 80 ) in their longitudinal pilot study which investigated the relationships between cognitive function and mucosal healing in individuals diagnosed with CD starting a GFD. The study tested eleven patients (eight females, three males), mean age 30 (range 22–39) years, on a battery of cognitive tests at 0, 12 and 52 weeks. The items under examination were information, processing efficacy, memory, visual–spatial ability, motoric function and attention. Researchers also collected small bowel biopsies via routine gastroscopy at 12 and 52 weeks so that cognitive performance could be compared with serum concentrations of tTG antibodies, with biopsy outcomes and with other biological markers. The results of the paper showed that tTG antibody concentrations decreased from a mean of 58·4 at baseline to 16·8 U/ml at the 52nd week, while four of the cognitive tests assessing verbal fluency, attention and motoric function reported significant improvement over the 12 weeks, besides confirming that improvement in cognitive performance was parallel to mucosal healing. The study reported an excellent adherence to the diet by all patients.

In addition, a study by Casella et al. ( Reference Casella, Zanini and Lanzarotto 83 ) evaluated the functional and cognitive performance in CD patients diagnosed at the age of 65 years or older, compared with age- and sex-matched control patients using psychometric tests to obtain comprehensive information on functional performance, and general or more specific cognitive functions. The results evidenced how cognitive performance is worse in the elderly than in control patients, despite a longer time on a GFD( Reference Casella, Zanini and Lanzarotto 83 ).

Several studies have investigated the relationship between dementia and CD( Reference Arnone and Conti 59 ). Dementia develops as acalculia, confusion, amnesia and personality disorder( Reference Lurie, Landau and Pfeffer 82 ). However, the aetiology and specific treatment of this complication are not clearly known( Reference Shahriar 67 ). Collin et al. ( Reference Collin, Pirttilä and Nurmikko 84 ) reported five cases of patients with CD who developed dementia before the age of 60 years. Four patients suffered intellectual deterioration ranging from moderate to severe. In addition to intellectual deterioration, one patient showed deficit in both verbal and visual memory. One had slow psychomotor functions, and the other showed severe memory deficit, constructional deficit and apraxia. The fifth patient had deficits in digit span, visual memory, and visual–motor constructional difficulties. Brain computed tomography revealed diffused cerebral or cerebellar atrophy in all patients( Reference Collin, Pirttilä and Nurmikko 84 ). Other studies have reported a link between dementia in individuals diagnosed with CD after the age of 60 years. A retrospective study in Israel examined seven patients diagnosed with CD after the age of 60 years. Of the seven, two female patients were initially diagnosed with dementia of the Alzheimer type due to a progressive cognitive decline. Compliance to a GFD ameliorated the cognitive decline in both patients( Reference Lurie, Landau and Pfeffer 82 ). However, in another study, adherence to a GFD resulted in no change in neurological symptoms in patients with CD who presented mild memory impairment( Reference Luostarinen, Pirttilä and Collin 85 ).

Psychiatric disorders and quality of life of coeliac disease patients

The association of CD with psychiatric disorders, including depression, has been identified for a long time. Several psychiatric symptoms have been reported as common complications in many patients suffering from CD, though the effects of diet on one’s mood and psychiatric symptoms remain largely unknown( Reference Cicarelli, Della Rocca and Amboni 86 ). Psychiatric symptoms usually described in CD patients include depressive symptoms, apathy, excessive anxiety, irritability( Reference Bushara 65 ), eating disorders( Reference Karwautz, Wagner and Berger 87 ), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder( Reference Niederhofer and Pittschieler 88 ) and autism( Reference Barcia, Posar, Santucci and Parmeggiani 89 ) as well as sleep disorders which are also common in CD. Sleep disorders are related to depression, anxiety and fatigue, and inversely related to QOL( Reference Zingone, Siniscalchi and Capone 90 ).

Carta et al. ( Reference Carta, Hardoy and Boi 91 ) suggests that the possible causative factors are malabsorption and nutritional deficiencies (especially of vitamin B6 and tryptophan) and the association with other autoimmune diseases such as thyroid disease. A study on untreated CD patients reported decreased plasma levels of tryptophan and other monoamine precursors and decreased cerebrospinal fluid levels of serotonin, dopamine and noradrenaline metabolites (5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, homovanillic acid and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol, respectively)(92). A cross-sectional, case–control study enrolling thirty-six CD patients used the Composite International Diagnostic Interview to assess lifetime psychopathology. The findings showed that the risks of major depression (41·7%), dysthymic disorder (8·3%), adjustment disorders (30·5%) and panic disorder (13·9%) are higher in CD( Reference Carta, Hardoy and Boi 91 ).

A meta-analysis on anxiety and depression in CD found that depression is more common and more severe in adults with CD compared with normal controls. However, depression in adults with CD did not differ from adults who had other physical illnesses and no differences in anxiety were found( Reference Smith and Gerdes 93 ). Additional studies have also found increased rates of depressive and anxiety symptoms in CD patients on a GFD( Reference Addolorato, Mirijello and D’Angelo 94 , Reference Addolorato, Mirijello and D’Angelo 95 ), though the prevalence of depressive symptoms in CD patients varies widely across studies ranging from 6 to 69% as shown by another large longitudinal population-based cohort study( Reference Ludvigsson, Reutfors and Osby 96 ), where CD patients were also reported to have an 80% increased risk of depression compared with controls. This variability in prevalence could be accounted for by differences in personal characteristics, cultural background and study design. The increased risk of depressive symptoms in CD patients could be explained by several mechanisms.

The first mechanism could be dietary non-compliance and sustained malabsorption, which could lead to sustained nutritional deficiencies (for example, vitamin B6, vitamin B12 and folic acid) producing the risk of depression( Reference Hallert, Svensson and Tholstrup 97 ). Second, a restrictive GFD could cause nutritional deficiencies. Even though these nutritional deficiencies contribute to the risks of depression, it is not established to date( Reference Thompson, Dennis and Higgins 98 ). Depression could also be induced by reductions in brain monoamine availability and metabolism( Reference Fera, Cascio and Angelini 92 ) and regional cerebral hypoperfusion( Reference Häuser, Stallmach and Caspary 99 ) in patients suffering from CD. Delgado et al. ( Reference Delgado, Price and Miller 100 ) suggested excessive cytokine secretion due to chronic immune system activation as a fundamental pathology underlying depressive symptoms. Furthermore, there is an increased hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis hyperactivity due to the cytokine activation associated with major depression( Reference Kronfol and Remick 101 ). Another reason can be found in the fact that, due to the strict dietary regimen, CD patients may avoid social situations involving food experiences. They may have higher levels of psychological distress because of daily difficulties, negative responses to the diet due to social surroundings and continuous worrying about dietary mistakes and negative results which could all lead to depression( Reference Addolorato, Capristo and Ghittoni 102 ). Finally, depression in CD patients may be a secondary condition resulting from the association between CD and other auto-immune diseases with a high risk of depression, such as thyroid disease and diabetes mellitus( Reference Garud, Leffler and Dennis 103 ).

Relationships between CD and psychiatric disorders such as anxiety and depression have been described especially when CD starts after 60 years of age( Reference Shahriar 67 ). It has been shown that children and adolescents with CD may have emotional and behavioural problems( Reference Mazzone, Reale and Spina 104 ). Most CD patients showed significantly higher scores of anxiety, harm avoidance, separation panic and somatic complaints, even after the introduction of dietary regimens. The introduction of a GFD results in a radical change in eating habits and lifestyle of CD children, and can be difficult to accept and stressful to follow. This induces a high level of anxiety, which may be evidenced in a different way according to gender susceptibility, resulting in depression in females and aggression and irritability in males. The acceptance of a GFD also depends on age. For example, adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years find it particularly difficult to adapt to their new dietary regimen. This is due to the fact that this age bracket already has to manage with social interactions with their peers and adults. Overall, reports highlight the fact of having a chronic condition during childhood and adolescence could prove difficult to manage. In this context, a strict food regimen can be considered a negative influence on their social life. On the whole, all these reports indicate that the impact of a chronic condition during childhood and adolescence may be difficult to manage( Reference Mazzone, Reale and Spina 104 ). On the other hand, another study demonstrated an association of increased depression and disruptive behavioural disorders in adolescents with untreated CD. This is evidence supporting the improvement in psychiatric symptoms after the initiation of a GFD( Reference Pynnönen, Isometsä and Aronen 105 ). A case-report also suggests that CD should be taken into consideration in children with psychiatric disorders, particularly if they are not responsive to psychotropic medication( Reference Sharma, Kline and Shreeve 106 ). Given that unrecognised CD may predispose the sufferer to serious psychiatric disorders and behavioural problems, it should be considered as a differential diagnosis in all age groups. A recent study aimed to establish whether long-term adherence to a GFD can be related to depressive symptoms in CD patients, given that lifetime depressive symptoms may be present in at least one-third of CD patients on a GFD. The results of a recent study on long-term adherence to a GFD (5 years) evidenced a decrease in depressive symptoms producing relief of the symptoms as opposed to a short-term diet of less than 2 years( Reference van Hees, van der Does and Giltay 107 ). It is worth noting that the elimination of gluten in the case of a patient suffering from chronic treatment-resistant symptoms of depression and anxiety showed significant improvement in the mental state and in routine activities. When anxiety and depressive symptoms persist even after an unsatisfactory reaction to pharmacological treatment, it indicates the need to identify the somatic reasons for the underlying condition( Reference Urban-Kowalczyk, Œmigielski and Gmitrowicz 108 ). Interestingly, a reduced QOL was highlighted in CD patients as compared with healthy control participants( Reference Lee and Newman 109 ).

Recent epidemiological data highlight the association between schizophrenia (SCZ) and several autoimmune diseases( Reference Eaton, Byrne and Ewald 110 , Reference Chen, Chao and Chen 111 ), CD being one found to be in association with SCZ since the 1950s( Reference Singh and Kay 112 ). Studies on the effects of the elimination of gluten from the diet of SCZ patients have further strengthened the existence of an association between gluten and SCZ. In fact, SCZ patients whose symptoms improved after the introduction of a cereal- and milk-free diet showed an interruption or reversal of clinical improvement towards wheat( Reference Kalaydjian, Eaton and Cascella 113 , Reference Jackson, Eaton and Cascella 114 ). A few studies have suggested that SCZ and CD may be associated with similar or adjacent genes( Reference Zhong, McCombs and Olson 115 , Reference Straub, MacLean and O’Neill 116 ). It has been reported that genetic susceptibility in SCZ lies in the HLA DQ, similarly to autoimmune disorders such as CD( Reference Li, Underhill and Liu 117 ). By contrast, a recent study showed no such HLA association in SCZ( Reference Samaroo, Dickerson and Kasarda 118 ).

The subsequent observations provided contrasting results. Epidemiological studies, for example the National Danish Register( Reference Eaton, Mortensen and Agerbo 119 ), found that CD occurred before the onset of SCZ and that antibody-based diagnosis (above all anti-gliadin) was a risk factor for SCZ( Reference Samaroo, Dickerson and Kasarda 118 , Reference Karlsson, Blomström and Wicks 120 ). A study observed that anti-gliadin antibodies have a role in the aetiopathogenesis of SCZ( Reference Samaroo, Dickerson and Kasarda 118 ). An increasing number of studies suggest that the immune mechanisms are partially responsible for SCZ. Similarly to CD, an aberrant Th1 immune reaction has been connected with the development of SCZ. The study suggests a causal link between CD and SCZ: the risk for SCZ in CD patients may be dependent on the interplay between IFN-γ and the transcription factor STAT1 (signal transducer and activator 1)( Reference Mormile 121 ).

A recent study showed that bacterial compositions could explain the inefficient gluten digestion and how in certain situations can be a risk factor for SCZ because the gut microbiota contributes to digestion, inflammation, gut permeability and behaviour( Reference Severance, Yolken and Eaton 122 ). It is also significantly recognised that bidirectional communication exists between the brain and the gut that uses neural, hormonal and immunological routes. An increased incidence of gastrointestinal barrier dysfunction, food antigen sensitivity, inflammation and the metabolic syndrome is seen in SCZ( Reference Nemani, Hosseini Ghomi and McCormick 123 ). As demonstrated, these symptoms can be influenced by the composition of the gut microbiota.

Another theoretical framework suggests that inappropriate oestrogen exposure occurring in the brain could also be occurring in the colon so that an association of CD or some other inflammation and SCZ may be observable not from a genetic link, but rather from a transgenerational effect of prenatal oestrogen exposure( Reference Karlsson, Blomström and Wicks 120 ).

There have been studies and case reports of a dramatic recovery from SCZ associated with the implementation of a GFD. A case report shows that there is a improvement in psychotic symptoms after a GFD in a young man with complex autoimmune illness( Reference Eaton, Chen and Dohan 124 ). The remission of psychotic symptoms in this patient was associated with the adherence to the diet. Regardless of the exact mechanism involved, the marked improvement in this patient’s SCZ symptoms after the implementation of a GFD highlights the need for further research on the role of the diet in SCZ.

Another research group reported a case of brain perfusion abnormalities, assessed by single photon emission computed tomography examination, in a 33-year-old CD patient with SCZ, with the regression of both cerebral hypoperfusion and SCZ symptoms observed after 6 months of a GFD( Reference Cakir, Tosun and Polat 125 ). These findings may have potential implications for the treatment of these subjects given that a GFD can contribute to the improvement of their symptoms. In another case report, the symptoms of SCZ were improved in a coeliac patient after the introduction of a GFD( Reference De Santis, Addolorato and Romito 126 ).

To date, CD adversely affects the QOL of individuals because of several factors such as its chronic nature, the impact on health, psychological distress, social and family connotations, and the need for lifelong treatment. While these factors are important for QOL, one area that has received less attention are the psychological symptoms and how to cope, despite the higher rates of psychological symptoms within CD patients compared with the general population.

There is proven evidence showing that when one suffers from CD it affects the general perception of their QOL and well-being and a GFD generates difficulties and limitations in the life of patients under treatment( Reference Casellas, Rodrigo and López Vivancos 127 ). Even in the case of a considerable improvement in the symptoms, adhering to a GFD can be difficult for many individuals because of poor palatability and poor availability of GF products, thus resulting in a condition that can have serious repercussions on the QOL( Reference Khoshbaten, Rostami Nejad and Sharifi 128 ). Casellas et al. ( Reference Casellas, Rodrigo and Lucendo 129 ) have recently reported that good adherence to a GFD resulted in an improved QOL using CD-QOL compared with patients with the intention of not complying. It could be affirmed that it is only with a complete adherence to a GFD that brings significant benefits for the health and QOL of coeliac patients in order that its drawbacks can be counterbalanced. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that most coeliac patients who followed a GFD correctly showed a better QOL, measured by a specific instrument for coeliac patients and this was also associated with a good control of the symptoms( Reference Casellas, Rodrigo and Lucendo 129 ). It has been demonstrated that there is a direct link between the severity of gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms in coeliac patients and how their symptoms both have an impact on QOL( Reference Sainsbury, Mullan and Sharpe 130 ). This research is the first which investigates the medical impact of the disease and its psychological effects and how adherence to a GFD has effects on the QOL in CD. This study shows how poor adherence to a GFD reduces the QOL which in turn increases the psychological symptoms as well as severe gastrointestinal symptoms and difficulty in coping. These results represent major threats in achieving an adequate QOL. Early diagnosis and treatment of this disease could alleviate the symptoms which in turn could lead to a better QOL.

Potential link between the intestine and the brain: the role of a gluten-free diet

Mental disorders that accompany digestive diseases constitute an interdisciplinary aspect to date not fully recognised and considered a diagnostic and therapeutic problem. The most recognised is CD in which patients suffer from a wide range of neuropsychiatric symptoms. It has not been fully explained how the pathogenic mechanism of CD affects the patient’s mental health, but one hypothesis suggests that it is due to serotonin imbalance or opioid neurotransmission caused by the effect of gluten and gluten metabolites on the central nervous system (CNS)( Reference Kukla 131 ).

Given that the gastrointestinal tract is connected to the CNS means that the communication involves neural pathways and immune and endocrine mechanisms. The intestinal barrier prevents toxins, pathogens and antigens in altering the various neuroactive compounds( Reference González-Arancibia, Escobar-Luna and Barrera-Bugueño 132 ).

The existence of a rich gut-to-brain communication raises the possibility that intestinal barrier alterations may take part in the pathophysiology of CNS disorders and determine neuropsychiatric symptoms( Reference Julio-Pieper, Bravo and Aliaga 133 ). To date there have been neurophysiological studies aiming to evaluate the gut–microbiota–brain axis( Reference Petra, Panagiotidou and Hatziagelaki 134 , Reference Liu, Cao and Zhang 135 ) but these unfortunately have not yet involved coeliac patients. A study suggests that modulation of the gut microbiota may provide a novel therapeutic target for the treatment and/or prevention of mood and anxiety disorders( Reference Slyepchenko, Carvalho and Cha 136 ). Alterations in gut microbial composition is associated with marked changes in behaviours relevant to mood, anxiety and cognition, establishing the critical importance of the bi-directional pathway of communication between the microbiota and the brain in health and disease. Dysfunction of the gut–microbiota–brain axis has been implicated in stress-related disorders such as depression, anxiety and neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and SCZ( Reference Sherwin, Sandhu and Dinan 137 ).

Although communication between gut microbiota and the CNS are not fully elucidated, neural, hormonal, immune and metabolic pathways have been suggested. The concept of a gut–microbiota–brain axis is emerging, suggesting that microbiota-modulating strategies may be a tractable therapeutic approach for developing new treatments for CNS disorders and for neurological and psychiatric symptoms( Reference Moos, Faller and Harpp 138 ). Several studies have reported the effect of a GFD on the composition of the gut microbiome in CD patients( Reference Collado, Donat and Ribes-Koninckx 139 , Reference Nistal, Caminero and Vivas 140 ), Patients with CD have a reduction in beneficial species and an increase in those potentially pathogenic as compared with healthy subjects( Reference Marasco, Di Biase and Schiumerini 141 ). Gut microbes can produce hormones and neurotransmitters and the bacterial receptors for these hormones influence microbial growth and pathogenicity. Gut bacteria directly stimulate afferent neurons of the enteric nervous system, sending signals to the brain via the vagus nerve( Reference Carabotti, Scirocco and Maselli 142 ). Through these varied mechanisms, gut microbes induced reactivity of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis which influence memory, mood and cognition and are clinically and therapeutically relevant to a range of disorders. In order to alter the gut microbiome therapeutically, changes in diet, probiotics and prebiotics are necessary( Reference Galland 143 ). Some reports show that in autism disorders, the use of diets such as gluten-free and casein-free diets may contribute to the improvement in behavioural symptoms following these dietary regimens( Reference Julio-Pieper, Bravo and Aliaga 133 ). In patients under a GFD, a global increase in cortical excitability was observed in one study, suggesting a glutamate-mediated functional reorganisation compensating for the progression of the disease( Reference Bella, Lanza and Cantone 144 ). It was hypothesised that glutamate receptor activation, probably triggered by CD related to immune system dysregulation, might result in a long-lasting motor cortex hyperexcitability with increased excitatory post-synaptic potentials, probably related to the phenomena of long-term plasticity. In this study, a certain degree of improvement of depressive symptoms was also observed, supporting the role of a GFD in the amelioration of psychiatric CD-related disorders. Another study reports that immune system dysregulation in patients with CD may play a central role in triggering changes in motor cortex excitability resulting in the manifestation of the symptoms( Reference Pennisi, Lanza and Giuffrida 145 ). This study suggested that cross-reaction between anti-gliadin antibodies and neuronal antigens, as well as altered levels of ions related to transglutaminase deposition 6-immunoglobulin, could affect the normal balance between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic excitability. To emphasise the importance of these links, psychiatric or neurological patients may benefit from starting a GFD stressing the importance that there is a two-way communication between the brain and the gut that uses neural, hormonal and immunological pathways. In the future, scientific researches could prove that there is a link between the intestine and the brain, and that GFD could exert a role for the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Conclusions

Based on current evidence, the present review proposes a comprehensive view of the pathogenesis of CD and explains the progression of its development and of its complications. From a genetic basis, the immunopathogenesis and above all the neurological or psychiatric implications of recent scientific studies where CD is becoming more complicated is discussed. The purpose of the present review was to investigate and illustrate the neurological and psychiatric complications in CD and the importance of a GFD given the symptoms. While some of these symptoms can improve with a GFD, our advice is to try to diagnose CD as early as possible, given that delays in the diagnosis may cause severe implications in the nervous system. The importance of early diagnosis is fundamental and the only treatment available is a GFD to be followed for a lifetime. It is therefore essential to follow nutritional therapy to avoid this kind of complication. Mental disorders accompanying digestive system diseases are interdisciplinary although poorly acknowledged. One of the most recognised examples is CD in which patients suffer from a wide range of psychopathological symptoms, which must be taken into consideration from both a diagnostic and therapeutic point of view. The above studies show that neuropsychiatric symptoms may represent an atypical manifestation of CD occurring before the gastroenterological diagnosis and the introduction of the diet causes a significant improvement in mental status. Bearing in mind these considerations, our review also claims that a GFD is effective in the treatment of depression, anxiety and neurological complications associated with CD( Reference Pynnönen, Isometsä and Aronen 105 , Reference van Hees, van der Does and Giltay 107 ).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms Filomena Natarelli for the editing of the manuscript.

The present review received no grant from sponsors or from commercial or non-profit organisations.

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Husby, S, Koletzko, S, Korponay-Szabó, IR, et al. (2012) European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 54, 136160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Catassi, C (2014) The new epidemiology of celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 59, Suppl. 1, S7S9.Google Scholar
3. Miranda, J, Lasa, A, Bustamante, MA, et al. (2014) Nutritional differences between a gluten-free diet and a diet containing equivalent products with gluten. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 69, 182187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Castillo, NE, Theethira, TG & Leffler, DA (2015) The present and the future in the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterol Rep 3, 311.Google Scholar
5. Di Sabatino, A & Corazza, GR (2009) Coeliac disease. Lancet 373, 14801493.Google Scholar
6. Kupfer, SS & Jabri, B (2012) Celiac disease pathophysiology. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 22, 639660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Denham, JM & Hill, ID (2013) Celiac disease and autoimmunity: review and controversies. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 13, 347353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Kim, CY, Quarsten, H, Bergseng, E, et al. (2004) Structural basis for HLA-DQ2-mediated presentation of gluten epitopes in celiac disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 41754179.Google Scholar
9. Hovhannisyan, Z, Weiss, A, Martin, A, et al. (2008) The role of HLA-DQ8 β57 polymorphism in the anti-gluten T-cell response in coeliac disease. Nature 456, 534538.Google Scholar
10. Karell, K, Louka, AS, Moodie, SJ, et al. (2003) HLA types in celiac disease patients not carrying the DQA1*05-DQB1*02 (DQ2) heterodimer: results from the European Genetics Cluster on Celiac Disease. Hum Immunol 64, 469477.Google Scholar
11. Megiorni, F, Mora, B, Bonamico, M, et al. (2009) HLA-DQ and risk gradient for celiac disease. Hum Immunol 70, 5559.Google Scholar
12. Pietzak, MM, Schofield, TC, McGinniss, MJ, et al. (2009) Stratifying risk for celiac disease in a large at-risk United States population by using HLA alleles. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7, 966971.Google Scholar
13. Catamo, E, Zupin, L, Segat, L, et al. (2015) HLA-G and susceptibility to develop celiac disease. Hum Immunol 76, 3641.Google Scholar
14. Di Cagno, R, De Angelis, M, De Pasquale, I, et al. (2011) Duodenal and faecal microbiota of celiac children: molecular, phenotype and metabolome characterization. BMC Microbiol 11, 219.Google Scholar
15. Guandalini, S (2007) The influence of gluten: weaning recommendations for healthy children and children at risk for celiac disease. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program 60, 139155.Google Scholar
16. Akobeng, AK, Ramanan, AV, Buchan, I, et al. (2006) Effect of breast feeding on risk of coeliac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Arch Dis Child 91, 3943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Lionetti, E, Castellaneta, S, Francavilla, R, et al. (2014) Introduction of gluten, HLA status, and the risk of celiac disease in children. N Engl J Med 371, 12951303.Google Scholar
18. Chmielewska, A, Pieścik-Lech, M, Szajewska, H, et al. (2015) Primary prevention of celiac disease: environmental factors with a focus on early nutrition. Ann Nutr Metab 67, 4350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Harmsen, HJ, Wildeboer-Veloo, AC, Raangs, GC, et al. (2000) Analysis of intestinal flora development in breast-fed and formula-fed infants by using molecular identification and detection methods. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 30, 6167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Plot, L & Amital, H (2009) Infectious associations of celiac disease. Autoimmun Rev 8, 316319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Stene, LC, Honeyman, MC, Hoffenberg, EJ, et al. (2006) Rotavirus infection frequency and risk of celiac disease autoimmunity in early childhood: a longitudinal study. Am J Gastroenterol 101, 23332340.Google Scholar
22. Pavone, P, Nicolini, E, Taibi, R, et al. (2007) Rotavirus and celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 102, 18311831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Ivarsson, A, Hernell, O, Nystrom, L, et al. (2003) Children born in the summer have increased risk for coeliac disease. J Epidemiol Community Health 57, 3639.Google Scholar
24. Lewy, H, Meirson, H & Laron, Z (2009) Seasonality of birth month of children with celiac disease differs from that in the general population and between sexes and is linked to family history and environmental factors. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 48, 181185.Google Scholar
25. Camilleri, M, Nullens, S & Nelsen, T (2012) Enteroendocrine and neuronal mechanisms in pathophysiology of acute infectious diarrhea. Dig Dis Sci 57, 1927.Google Scholar
26. Monteleone, G, Pender, SL, Wathen, NC, et al. (2001) Interferon-α drives T cell-mediated immunopathology in the intestine. Eur J Immunol 31, 22472255.Google Scholar
27. Cammarota, G, Cuoco, L, Cianci, R, et al. (2000) Onset of coeliac disease during treatment with interferon for chronic hepatitis C. Lancet 356, 14941495.Google Scholar
28. Hernandez, L, Johnson, TC, Naiyer, AJ, et al. (2008) Chronic hepatitis C virus and celiac disease, is there an association? Dig Dis Sci 53, 256261.Google Scholar
29. Wieser, H (2007) Chemistry of gluten proteins. Food Microbiol 24, 115119.Google Scholar
30. Kontogiorgos, V (2011) Microstructure of hydrated gluten network. Food Res Int 44, 25822586.Google Scholar
31. Vader, LW, Stepniak, DT, Bunnik, EM, et al. (2003) Characterization of cereal toxicity for celiac disease patients based on protein homology in grains. Gastroenterology 125, 11051113.Google Scholar
32. Hausch, F, Shan, L, Santiago, NA, et al. (2002) Intestinal digestive resistance of immunodominant gliadin peptides. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 283, G996G1003.Google Scholar
33. De, Re V, Caggiari, L, Tabuso, M, et al. (2013) The versatile role of gliadin peptides in celiac disease. Clin Biochem 46, 552560.Google Scholar
34. Fasano, A (2012) Intestinal permeability and its regulation by zonulin: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10, 10961100.Google Scholar
35. Schuppan, D, Junker, Y & Barisani, D (2009) Celiac disease: from pathogenesis to novel therapies. Gastroenterology 137, 19121933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Comerford, R, Coates, C, Byrne, G, et al. (2014) Characterisation of tissue transglutaminase-reactive T cells from patients with coeliac disease and healthy controls. Clin Immunol 154, 155163.Google Scholar
37. Hana, A, Newell, EW, Glanvilled, J, et al. (2013) Dietary gluten triggers concomitant activation of CD4+ and CD8+ αβ T cells and γδ T cells in celiac disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 32, 1307313078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Korneychuk, N, Ramiro-Puig, E, Ettersperger, J, et al. (2014) Interleukin 15 and CD4D T cells cooperate to promote small intestinal enteropathy in response to dietary antigen. Gastroenterology 146, 10171027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Sollid, LM, Qiao, SW, Anderson, RP, et al. (2012) Nomenclature and listing of celiac disease relevant gluten T-cell epitopes restricted by HLA-DQ molecules. Immunogenetics 64, 455460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Bodd, M, Ráki, M, Tollefsen, S, et al. (2010) HLA-DQ2-restricted gluten-reactive T cells produce IL-21 but not IL-17 or IL-22. Mucosal Immunol 3, 594601.Google Scholar
41. Patruno, A, Pesce, M, Marrone, A, et al. (2012) Activity of matrix metallo proteinases (MMPs) and the tissue inhibitor of MMP (TIMP)-1 in electromagnetic field-exposed THP-1 cells. J Cell Physiol 227, 27672774.Google Scholar
42. Ciccocioppo, R, Di Sabatino, A, Bauer, M, et al. (2005) Matrix metalloproteinase pattern in celiac duodenal mucosa. Lab Invest 85, 397407.Google Scholar
43. Bruewer, M, Luegering, A, Kucharzik, T, et al. (2003) Proinflammatory cytokines disrupt epithelial barrier function by apoptosis-independent mechanisms. J Immunol 171, 61646172.Google Scholar
44. Lahdenperä, A (2011) The effect of gluten-free diet on Th1–Th2–Th3-associated intestinal immune responses in celiac disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 46, 538549.Google Scholar
45. Tollefsen, S, Rentz-Hansen, H, Fleckenstein, B, et al. (2006) HLADQ2 and -DQ8 signatures of gluten T cell epitopes in celiac disease. J Clin Invest 116, 22262236.Google Scholar
46. Muller, JR, Waldmann, TA, Kruhlak, MJ, et al. (2012) Paracrine and transpresentation functions of IL-15 are mediated by diverse splice versions of IL-15Rα in human monocytes and dendritic cells. J Biol Chem 287, 4032840338.Google Scholar
47. Mention, JJ, Ben Ahmed, M, Bègue, B, et al. (2003) Interleukin 15: a key to disrupted intraepithelial lymphocyte homeostasis and lymphomagenesis in celiac disease. Gastroenterology 125, 730745.Google Scholar
48. Hourigan, CS (2006) The molecular basis of coeliac disease. Clin Exp Med 6, 5359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Meresse, B, Chen, Z, Ciszewski, C, et al. (2004) Coordinated induction by IL15 of a TCR-independent NKG2D signaling pathway converts CTL into lymphokine-activated killer cells in celiac disease. Immunity 21, 357366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50. Malamut, G, El Machhour, R, Montcuquet, N, et al. (2010) IL-15 triggers an antiapoptotic pathway in human intraepithelial lymphocytes that is a potential new target in celiac disease-associated inflammation and lymphomagenesis. J Clin Invest 120, 21312143.Google Scholar
51. Woodward, J (2011) Coeliac disease. Medicine 39, 173177.Google Scholar
52. Monteleone, G, Caruso, R, Fina, D, et al. (2006) Control of matrix metalloproteinase production in human intestinal fibroblasts by interleukin 21. Gut 55, 17741780.Google Scholar
53. Caruso, R, Fina, D, Peluso, I, et al. (2007) A functional role for interleukin-21 in promoting the synthesis of the T-cell chemoattractant, MIP-3α, by gut epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 132, 166175.Google Scholar
54. De Paolo, RW, Abadie, V, Tang, F, et al. (2011) Co-adjuvant effects of retinoic acid and IL-15 induce inflammatory immunity to dietary antigens. Nature 471, 220224.Google Scholar
55. Hamer, RJ (2005) Coeliac disease: background and biochemical aspects. Biotechnol Adv 23, 401408.Google Scholar
56. Dewar, D, Pereira, SP & Ciclitira, PJ (2004) The pathogenesis of coeliac disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36, 1724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. Uygur-Bayramicli, O & Melih Özel, A (2011) Celiac disease is associated with neurological syndromes. Dig Dis Sci 56, 15871588.Google Scholar
58. Hu, WT, Murray, JA, Greenaway, MC, et al. (2006) Cognitive impairment and celiac disease. Arch Neurol 63, 14401446.Google Scholar
59. Arnone, JM & Conti, RP (2015) Neuropsychiatric features of celiac disease. Int J Celiac Dis 3, 7783.Google Scholar
60. Vieira, C, Jatobá, I, Matos, M, et al. (2013) Prevalence of celiac disease in children with epilepsy. Arq Gastroenterol 50, 290296.Google Scholar
61. Parisi, P, Pietropaoli, N, Ferretti, A, et al. (2015) Role of the gluten-free diet on neurological-EEG findings and sleep disordered breathing in children with celiac disease. Seizure 25, 181183.Google Scholar
62. Lerner, A, Makhoul, BF, Eliakim, R, et al. (2012) Neurological manifestations of celiac disease in children and adults. Eur Neurol J 4, 1520.Google Scholar
63. Neto, J, Costa, A, Magalhaes, FG, et al. (2004) Neurological manifestations of celiacs disease. Arq Neuropsiquiatri 62, 969972.Google Scholar
64. Zelnik, N, Pacht, A, Obeid, R, et al. (2004) Range of neurologic disorders in patients with celiac disease. Pediatrics 113, 16721676.Google Scholar
65. Bushara, KO (2005) Neurologic presentation of celiac disease. Gastroenterology 128, S92S97.Google Scholar
66. Gabrielli, M, Cremonini, F, Fiore, G, et al. (2003) Association between migraine and celiac disease: results from a preliminary case–control and therapeutic study. Am J Gastroenterol 98, 625629.Google Scholar
67. Shahriar, N (2012) Neurological manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of celiac disease: a comprehensive review. Iran J Neurol 11, 5964.Google Scholar
68. Cooke, WT & Smith, WT (1966) Neurological disorders associated with adult celiac disease. Brain 89, 68226837.Google Scholar
69. Fasano, A (2003) Celiac disease: how to handle a clinical chameleon. New Engl J Med 348, 25682570.Google Scholar
70. Hadjivassiliou, M, Mäki, M, Sanders, DS, et al. (2006) Autoantibody targeting of brain and intestinal transglutaminase in gluten ataxia. Neurology 66, 373377.Google Scholar
71. Ludvigsson, JF, Zingone, F, Tomson, T, et al. (2012) Increased risk of epilepsy in biopsy-verified celiac disease: a population-based cohort study. Neurology 78, 14011407.Google Scholar
72. Hadjivassiliou, M, Grünewald, RA & Davies-Jones, GA (2002) Gluten sensitivity as a neurological illness. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72, 560563.Google Scholar
73. Chin, RL, Sander, HW, Brannagan, TH, et al. (2003) Celiac neuropathy. Neurology 60, 15811585.Google Scholar
74. Luostarinen, L, Himanen, SL, Luostarinen, M, et al. (2003) Neuromuscular and sensory disturbances in patients with well treated coeliac disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74, 490494.Google Scholar
75. Tursi, A, Giorgetti, GM, Iani, C, et al. (2006) Peripheral neurological disturbances, autonomic dysfunction, and antineuronal antibodies in adult celiac disease before and after a gluten-free diet. Dig Dis Sci 51, 18691874.Google Scholar
76. Uzma, R, Imdad, A & Beg, M (2015) Rare neurological manifestation of celiac disease. Case Rep Gastroenterol 9, 200205.Google Scholar
77. Chaudhry, V & Ravich, WJ (2001) Other neurological disorders associated with gastrointestinal, liver, or pancreatic diseases. Neurol Gen Med 3, 283284.Google Scholar
78. Işikay, S & Kocamaz, H (2015) The neurological face of celiac disease. Arq Gastroenterol 52, 167170.Google Scholar
79. Ferretti, A, Parisi, P & Villa, MP (2013) The role of hyperhomocysteinemia in neurological features associated with coeliac disease. Med Hypotheses 81, 524531.Google Scholar
80. Lichtwark, IT, Newnham, ED, Robinson, SR, et al. (2014) Cognitive impairment in coeliac disease improves on a gluten-free diet and correlates with histological and serological indices of disease severity. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 40, 160170.Google Scholar
81. Theoharides, C, Stewart, JM, Hatziagelaki, E, et al. (2015) Brain “fog,” inflammation and obesity: key aspects of neuropsychiatric disorders improved by luteolin. Front Neurosci 9, 225.Google Scholar
82. Lurie, Y, Landau, DA, Pfeffer, J, et al. (2008) Celiac disease diagnosed in the elderly. J Clin Gastroenterol 42, 5961.Google Scholar
83. Casella, S, Zanini, B, Lanzarotto, F, et al. (2012) Cognitive performance is impaired in coeliac patients on gluten free diet: a case–control study in patients older than 65 years of age. Dig Liver Dis 44, 729735.Google Scholar
84. Collin, P, Pirttilä, T, Nurmikko, T, et al. (1991) Celiac disease, brain atrophy, and dementia. Neurology 4, 372375.Google Scholar
85. Luostarinen, L, Pirttilä, T & Collin, P (1999) Coeliac disease presenting with neurological disorders. Eur Neurol 42, 132135.Google Scholar
86. Cicarelli, G, Della Rocca, G, Amboni, M, et al. (2003) Clinical and neurological abnormalities in adult celiac disease. Neurol Sci 24, 311317.Google Scholar
87. Karwautz, A, Wagner, G, Berger, G, et al. (2008) Eating pathology in adolescents with celiac disease. Psychosomatics 49, 399406.Google Scholar
88. Niederhofer, H & Pittschieler, K (2006) A preliminary investigation of ADHD symptoms in persons with celiac disease. J Atten Disord 10, 200204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
89. Barcia, G, Posar, A, Santucci, M & Parmeggiani, A (2008) Autism and coeliac disease. J Autism Dev Disord 38, 407408.Google Scholar
90. Zingone, F, Siniscalchi, M, Capone, P, et al. (2010) The quality of sleep in patients with coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 32, 10311036.Google Scholar
91. Carta, MG, Hardoy, MC, Boi, MF, et al. (2002) Association between panic disorder, major depressive disorder and celiac disease: a possible role of thyroid autoimmunity. J Psychosom Res 53, 789793.Google Scholar
92. Fera, T, Cascio, B, Angelini, G, et al. (2003) Affective disorders and quality of life in adult coeliac disease patients on a gluten-free diet. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15, 12871292.Google Scholar
93. Smith, DF & Gerdes, LU (2012) Meta-analysis on anxiety and depression in adult celiac disease. Acta Psychiatr Scand 125, 189193.Google Scholar
94. Addolorato, G, Mirijello, A, D’Angelo, C, et al. (2008) State and trait anxiety and depression in patients affected by gastrointestinal diseases: psychometric evaluation of 1641 patients referred to an internal medicine outpatient setting. Int J Clin Pract 62, 10631069.Google Scholar
95. Addolorato, G, Mirijello, A, D’Angelo, C, et al. (2008) Social phobia in coeliac disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 43, 410415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
96. Ludvigsson, JF, Reutfors, J, Osby, U, et al. (2007) Coeliac disease and risk of mood disorders – a general population-based cohort study. J Affect Disord 99, 117126.Google Scholar
97. Hallert, C, Svensson, M, Tholstrup, J, et al. (2009) Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 29, 811816.Google Scholar
98. Thompson, T, Dennis, M, Higgins, LA, et al. (2005) Gluten-free diet survey: are Americans with coeliac disease consuming recommended amounts of fibre, iron, calcium and grain foods? J Hum Nutr Diet 18, 163169.Google Scholar
99. Häuser, W, Stallmach, A, Caspary, WF, et al. (2007) Predictors of reduced health-related quality of life in adults with coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25, 569578.Google Scholar
100. Delgado, P, Price, LH, Miller, HL, et al. (1994) Serotonin and the neurobiology of depression: effects of tryptophan depletion in drug-free depressed patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51, 865874.Google Scholar
101. Kronfol, Z & Remick, DG (2000) Cytokines and the brain: implications for clinical psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 157, 683694.Google Scholar
102. Addolorato, G, Capristo, E, Ghittoni, G, et al. (2001) Anxiety but not depression decreases in coeliac patients after one-year gluten-free diet: a longitudinal study. Scand J Gastroenterol 36, 502506.Google Scholar
103. Garud, S, Leffler, D, Dennis, M, et al. (2009) Interaction between psychiatric and autoimmune disorders in coeliac disease patients in the Northeastern United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 29, 898905.Google Scholar
104. Mazzone, L, Reale, L, Spina, M, et al. (2011) Compliant gluten-free children with celiac disease: an evaluation of psychological distress. BMC Pediatrics 2011, 114116.Google Scholar
105. Pynnönen, PA, Isometsä, ET, Aronen, ET, et al. (2004) Mental disorders in adolescents with celiac disease. Psychosomatics 45, 325335.Google Scholar
106. Sharma, TR, Kline, DB, Shreeve, DF, et al. (2011) Psychiatric comorbidities in patients with celiac disease: is there any concrete biological association? Asian J Psychiatr 4, 150151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
107. van Hees, NJM, van der Does, W & Giltay, EJ (2013) Coeliac disease, diet adherence and depressive symptoms. J Psychosom Res 74, 155160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
108. Urban-Kowalczyk, M, Œmigielski, J, Gmitrowicz, A, et al. (2014) Neuropsychiatric symptoms and celiac disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 10, 19611964.Google Scholar
109. Lee, A & Newman, JM (2003) Celiac diet: its impact on quality of life. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 15331535.Google Scholar
110. Eaton, WW, Byrne, M, Ewald, H, et al. (2006) Association of schizophrenia and autoimmune diseases: linkage of Danish national registers. Am J Psychiatry 163, 521528.Google Scholar
111. Chen, SJ, Chao, TL, Chen, CY, et al. (2012) Prevalence of autoimmune diseases in in-patients with schizophrenia: nationwide population-based study. Br J Psychiatry 200, 374380.Google Scholar
112. Singh, MM & Kay, S (1976) Wheat gluten as a pathogenic factor in schizophrenia. Science 191, 401402.Google Scholar
113. Kalaydjian, AE, Eaton, W, Cascella, N, et al. (2006) The gluten connection: the association between schizophrenia and celiac disease. Acta Psychiatr Scand 113, 8290.Google Scholar
114. Jackson, T, Eaton, W, Cascella, N, et al. (2012) A gluten-free diet in people with schizophrenia and anti-tissue transglutaminase or anti-gliadin antibodies. Schizophr Res 140, 262263.Google Scholar
115. Zhong, F, McCombs, CC, Olson, JM, et al. (1996) An autosomal screen for genes that predispose to celiac disease in the western counties of Ireland. Nat Genet 14, 329333.Google Scholar
116. Straub, RE, MacLean, CJ, O’Neill, FA, et al. (1995) A potential vulnerability locus for schizophrenia on chromosome 6p24–22: evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Nat Genet 11, 287293.Google Scholar
117. Li, T, Underhill, J, Liu, XH, et al. (2001) Transmission disequilibrium analysis of HLA class II DRB1, DQA1, DQB1 and DPB1 polymorphisms in schizophrenia using family trios from a Han Chinese population. Schizophr Res 49, 7378.Google Scholar
118. Samaroo, D, Dickerson, F, Kasarda, DD, et al. (2010) Novel immune response to gluten in individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 118, 248255.Google Scholar
119. Eaton, WW, Mortensen, PB, Agerbo, E, et al. (2004) Coeliac disease and schizophrenia: population based case control study with linkage of Danish national registers. BMJ 328, 438439.Google Scholar
120. Karlsson, H, Blomström, A, Wicks, S, et al. (2012) Maternal antibodies to dietary antigens and risk for nonaffective psychosis in offspring. Am J Psychiatry 169, 625632.Google Scholar
121. Mormile, R (2016) Schizophrenia in celiac disease: a myth or reality? Int J Colorectal Dis 31, 1085.Google Scholar
122. Severance, EG, Yolken, RH & Eaton, WW (2016) Autoimmune diseases, gastrointestinal disorders and the microbiome in schizophrenia: more than a gut feeling. Schizophr Res 176, 2335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
123. Nemani, K, Hosseini Ghomi, R, McCormick, B, et al. (2015) Schizophrenia and the gut–brain axis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 56, 155160.Google Scholar
124. Eaton, WW, Chen, LY, Dohan, FC Jr, et al. (2015) Improvement in psychotic symptoms after a gluten-free diet in a boy with complex autoimmune illness. Am J Psychiatry 172, 219221.Google Scholar
125. Cakir, D, Tosun, A, Polat, M, et al. (2007) Subclinical neurological abnormalities in children with celiac disease receiving a gluten-free diet. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 45, 366369.Google Scholar
126. De Santis, A, Addolorato, G, Romito, A, et al. (1997) Schizophrenic symptoms and SPECT abnormalities in a coeliac patient: regression after a gluten-free diet. J Intern Med 242, 421423.Google Scholar
127. Casellas, F, Rodrigo, L, López Vivancos, J, et al. (2008) Factors that impact health-related quality of life in adults with celiac disease: a multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol 14, 4652.Google Scholar
128. Khoshbaten, M, Rostami Nejad, M, Sharifi, N, et al. (2012) Celiac disease in patients with chronic psychiatric disorders. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 5, 9093.Google Scholar
129. Casellas, F, Rodrigo, L, Lucendo, AJ, et al. (2015) Benefit on health-related quality of life of adherence to gluten-free diet in adult patients with celiac disease. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 107, 196201.Google Scholar
130. Sainsbury, K, Mullan, B & Sharpe, L (2013) Reduced quality of life in coeliac disease is more strongly associated with depression than gastrointestinal symptoms. J Psychosom Res 75, 135141.Google Scholar
131. Kukla, U (2015) Mental disorders in digestive system diseases – internist’s and psychiatrist’s insight. Pol Merkur Lekarski 38, 245249.Google Scholar
132. González-Arancibia, C, Escobar-Luna, J & Barrera-Bugueño, C (2016) What goes around comes around: novel pharmacological targets in the gut–brain axis. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 9, 339353.Google Scholar
133. Julio-Pieper, M, Bravo, JA, Aliaga, E, et al. (2014) Intestinal barrier dysfunction and central nervous system disorders – a controversial association. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 40, 11871201.Google Scholar
134. Petra, A, Panagiotidou, S, Hatziagelaki, E, et al. (2015) Gut–microbiota–brain axis and its effect on neuropsychiatric disorders with suspected immune dysregulation. Clin Ther 37, 984995.Google Scholar
135. Liu, X, Cao, S & Zhang, X (2015) Modulation of gut microbiota–brain axis by probiotics, prebiotics, and diet. J Agric Food Chem 63, 78857895.Google Scholar
136. Slyepchenko, A, Carvalho, AF, Cha, DS, et al. (2014) Gut emotions – mechanisms of action of probiotics as novel therapeutic targets for depression and anxiety disorders. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 13, 17701786.Google Scholar
137. Sherwin, E, Sandhu, KV, Dinan, TG, et al. (2016) May the force be with you: the light and dark sides of the microbiota–gut–brain axis in neuropsychiatry. CNS Drugs 30, 10191041.Google Scholar
138. Moos, WH, Faller, DV, Harpp, DN, et al. (2016) Microbiota and neurological disorders: a gut feeling. Biores Open Access 5, 137145.Google Scholar
139. Collado, MC, Donat, E, Ribes-Koninckx, C, et al. (2009) Specific duodenal and faecal bacterial groups associated with paediatric coeliac disease. J Clin Pathol 62, 264269.Google Scholar
140. Nistal, E, Caminero, A, Vivas, S, et al. (2012) Differences in faecal bacteria populations and faecal bacteria metabolism in healthy adults and celiac disease patients. Biochimie 94, 17241729.Google Scholar
141. Marasco, G, Di Biase, AR, Schiumerini, R, et al. (2016) Gut microbiota and celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci 61, 14611472.Google Scholar
142. Carabotti, C, Scirocco, A, Maselli, MA, et al. (2015) The gut–brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann Gastroenterol 28, 203209.Google Scholar
143. Galland, L (2014) The gut microbiome and the brain. J Med Food 17, 12611272.Google Scholar
144. Bella, R, Lanza, G, Cantone, M, et al. (2015) Effect of a gluten-free diet on cortical excitability in adults with celiac disease. PLOS ONE 10, e0129218.Google Scholar
145. Pennisi, G, Lanza, G, Giuffrida, S, et al. (2014) Excitability of the motor cortex in de novo patients with celiac disease. PLOS ONE 9, e102790.Google Scholar