Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:02:26.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Case No. UNCT/14/2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2017

Veronica Clamens*
Affiliation:
Writes in a personal capacity

Extract

On 16 March 2017, an International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) tribunal chaired by Professor Albert Jan van den Berg, with co-arbitrators Gary Born (Claimant's appointee) and Sir Daniel Bethlehem (Respondent's appointee), issued its award in Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada (Award). The Award dismissed all of Eli Lilly's claims and ordered it to pay the arbitration costs and 75% of Canada's legal costs and expenses.

Type
Case Summaries
Copyright
Copyright © Veronica Clamens 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Case Summaries: International Investment Law

The following summary provides a brief factual background and describes the key findings of a recent case settling a dispute about international investment.

References

1 Award, para. 101.

2 Award, para. 224.

3 Ibid.

4 Award, para. 307.

5 Award, paras. 181–185.

6 Award, para. 227.

7 Award, para. 235.

8 Award, para. 324. See, generally, Award, paras. 314–325.

9 Award, paras. 326–337.

10 Award, paras. 338–350.

11 Award, para. 351.

12 Award, para. 388.

13 Award, para. 386.

14 Award, para. 390–396.

15 Award, para. 397.

16 Award, para. 410–415.

17 Award, paras. 389, 416.

18 Award, para. 430.

19 Award, para. 421.

20 Award, para. 440.

21 Award, para. 441.