Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:55:28.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Broiler phosphorus intake versus broiler phosphorus output in the United States: nutrition or soil science?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

D.M. Miles  and
K.R. Sistani
D.M. Miles*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Research UnitP.O. Box 5367, Mississippi State, MS 39762-5367, USA
K.R. Sistani
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Waste Management and Forage Research Unit, P.O. Box 5367, Mississippi State, MS 39762-5367, USA
*
*Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is receiving considerable attention with regard to poultry litter in the United States. Litter, a combination of bedding material and excreta, contains valuable nutrients and has been historically applied as fertilizer on pasture and row crop lands. Compared to commercial fertilizers, broiler litter has a low nitrogen to phosphorus ratio. Poultry litter application rates have been based on the nitrogen needs of crops resulting in a gradual build-up of Pin the soil. Phosphorus runoff into nearby water bodies can be detrimental to aquatic life. Proper management of litter is critical to maintaining the farmer's environmental stewardship. Many researchers are investigating best management practices to alleviate potential problems related to over application of P. However, gaps exist among the researchers due to their specialty and training.

Communication across groups (nutritionists verses soil scientists) is the key for making progress. For example, the agronomist's plan for utilization of litter should coincide with the nutritionist's specifications for P requirements. This article identifies some of the more commonly used terms that define the forms of P in an effort to unite the different perspectives. The purpose is to convey the complexity of the xisting efforts for P analysis, identifying factors that influence changes in chemical forms such as dietary Plevel, Psource and characteristics, the use of dietary phytase in rearing conditions, subsequent litter handling, and conditions of litter application. The end result should create a “cause and effect” type thinking among the groups working on the broiler industry P issues.

Keywords

poultrybroilersphosphorusnutrientslittermanureresearch
Type
Reviews
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 493 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, G.M. (1994) Phosphorus forms in animal manure. Bioresource Technology 49: 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clesceri, L.S., Greenberg, A.E. and Eaton, A.D. (1998) Standard Methods or the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation.Google Scholar
Dixon, J.B. and Weed, S.B. (1989) Minerals in Soil Environments. Soil Science Society of America Book Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmisten, K.L., Mitchell, C.C., Wood, C.W. and Delaney, D.D. (1992) Questions and answers about fertilizing with poultry litter. Alabama Cooperative Extension System. Circular ANR-763. pp 1–6.Google Scholar
Edwards, H.M. Jr. (1993) Dietary 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol supplementation increases natural phytate phosphorus utilization in chickens. Journal of Nutrition 123: 567–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eghball, B. and Power, J.F. (1999) Composted and noncomposted manure application to conventional and no-tillage systems: Corn yield and nitrogen uptake. Agronomy Journal 91: 819–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farm Chemicals Handbook (2001) Section B, Fertilizer, Volume 87, Meister Publishing Company, Willoughby, OH.Google Scholar
Georgia Agricultural Statistics Service. (2000) Georgia poultry facts. Georgia Agricultural Statistics, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
Greaves, J., Hobbs, P., Chadwick, D. and Haygarth, P. (1999) Prospects for the recovery of phosphorus from animal manures: A review. Environmental Technology 20: 697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gburek, W.J., Sharpley, A.N., Heathwaite, L. and Folmar, GJ. (2000) Phosphorus management at the watershed scale: a modification of the phosphorus index. Journal of Environmental Quality, Jan/Feb, v. 29 (1): 130–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, W.E., Moore, P.A. Jr., Waldroup, P.W., Waldroup, A.L., Balog, J.L., Huff, G.R., Rath, N.C., Daniel, T.C. and Raboy, V. (1998) Effect of dietary phytase and high available phosphorus corn on broiler chicken performance. Poultry Science 77: 1899–1904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasim, A.B. and Edwards, H.M. Jr. (1998) The analysis for inositol phosphate forms in feed ingredients. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture 76: 1–9.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelling, K.A., Hero, D. and Rylant, K.E. (1995) Effectiveness of composted manure for supplying nutrients. Fertilizer; Aglime, and Pest Management Conference. Jan 17–18. pp 77–81.Google Scholar
Khasawneh, F.E., Sample, E.C. and Kamprath, E.J. (1980) The Role of Phosphorus in Agriculture. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Wisconsin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V., Gilkes, R.J., Armitage, T.M. and Bolland, M.D.A. (1994) Identification of residual P compounds in fertilized soils using density fractionation, X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Fertilizer Research 37: 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, F.R., Mendonca, C.X. Jr., Alvarez, J.C., Ratti, G., Lenharo, S.L.R., Kahn, H. and Garzillo, J.M.F. (1995) Chemical and Physical Evaluations of Commercial Dicalcium Phosphates as Sources of Phosphorus in Animal Nutrition. Poultry Science 74: 1659–1670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, P.A. Jr., Delaune, P.B., Garman, D.E., Daniel, T.C. and Sharpley, A.N. (2000) Development of a phosphorus index for pastures. 2000 National Poultry Waste Management Symposium. (Blake, J.P. and Patterson, P.H. Eds.) Auburn Press. pp 158–165.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. and Riley, J. P. (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytical Chemistry Acta 27: 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1994) Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th revised ed. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Nutrafacts (1999) Phytase and reduced phosphorus. Roche Animal Nutrition and Health USA. Parsippany, New Jersey. Vol 5, No 2, p 3.Google Scholar
Overcash, M.R., Hashimoto, A. B., Feddell, D. L. and Day, D. L. (1975) Evaluation of chemical analysis for animal wastes. Standardizing Properties and Analytical Methods Related to Animal Waste Research. ASAE SP-0275, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, pp. 335–355.Google Scholar
Petrucci, R.H. and Harwood, W.S. (1993) General Chemistry: Principles and Modern Applications. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. pp. 823–825.Google Scholar
Pierzynski, G.M. (ed) (2000) Methods of Phosphorus Analysis for Soils, Sediments, Residuals, and Waters. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 396, June.Google Scholar
Potter, L.M. (1988) Bioavailability of phosphorus from various phosphates based on body weight and toe ash measurements. Poultry Science 67: 96–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharpley, A.N., Daniel, T.C. and Edwards, D.R. (1993) Phosphorus movement in the landscape. Journal of Production Agriculture. Vol. 6, no. 4: 492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, K. (1999) Meat Factories, Sierra, Jan/Feb: pp. 28–35, 110–112.Google Scholar
Sistani, K.R., Miles, D.M., Rowe, D.E., Brink, G.E. and McGowen, S.L. (2001) Impact of Drying Method, Dietary Phosphorus Levels, and Methodology on Phosphorus Chemistry of Broiler Manure. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. Vol. 32 (17&18): 2783–2793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohail, S.S. and Roland, D.A. Sr. (1999) Influence of supplemental phytase on performance of broilers four to six weeks of age. Poultry Science 78: 550–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, F.J. (1986) Cycles of Soil: Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Micronutrients. John Wiley & Sons, INC. New York.Google Scholar
Van Der Klis, J.D., Versteegh, H.A.J., Simons, P.C.M. and Kies, A.K. (1997) The efficacy of phytase in corn-soybean meal-based diets for laying hens. Poultry Science 76: 1535–1542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dyne, D.L. and Gilbertson, C.B. (1978) Estimating U.S. livestock and poultry manure and nutrient production. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economics, Statistics, and Cooperative Services, ESCS-12 Springfield, Virginia. National Technical Information Service, March.Google Scholar
Waldroup, P.W. (1999) Nutritional approaches to reducing phosphorus excretion by poultry. Poultry Science 78: 683–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyss, M., Brugger, R., Kronenberger, A., Remy, R., Fimbel, R., Oesterhelt, G., Lehmann, M. and Van Loom, A.P.G.M. (1999) Biochemical characterization of fungal phytases (myoinositol hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolases): catalytic properties. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 65, no. 2: 367–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Z.B., Kornegay, E.T., Radcliffe, J.S., Denbow, D.M., Veit, H.P. and Larsen, C.T. (2000) Comparison of genetically engineered microbial and plant phytase for young broilers. Poultry Science 79: 709–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed