Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:40:48.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poultry welfare – problems and research to solve them

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2009

Rose-Marie Wegner
Rose-Marie Wegner
Affiliation:
Institute für Kleintierzucht, Dörnbergstrasse 25–27, Postfach 280, D-3100 Celle, FRG
Get access

Abstract

In Western Europe public awareness of ethical problems associated with farm animal production began to be seriously aroused in 1964 by the publication of Ruth Harrison's book Animal Machines. Although the restriction imposed by the battery cage system on laying hens was seen as a major cause for concern, it was not until the mid-1970s that applied research into improved or alternative production systems for laying hens began. Following initial smallscale trials in the UK on what became known as the ‘get-away cage’ the concept was developed, especially in Germany. Investigations were initiated into other alternatives, including aviaries, percheries and combinations of raised wire floors, and these continue in Denmark, the FRG, the Netherlands, the UK, Sweden and Switzerland. It has yet to be seen how far the benefits of such systems, chiefly the enhanced range of behaviours observed in the birds, can outweigh the disadvantages, especially the higher costs and some disbenefits, including feather pecking and cannibalism. Except where legislation forces the issue, as in Sweden and Switzerland particularly, the adoption of alternative egg production systems will depend on the willingness of consumers to pay a higher price for the product. Reference is also made to welfare problems associated with other classes of poultry.

Keywords

Animal welfarecagesethicshistorylaying fowlpoultrysystems
Type
Reviews
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 19 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleby, M.C. (1985) Developmental aspects of nest site selection. Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on Poultry WelfareCelle, FRG pp. 137–143Google Scholar
Appleby, M.C., Duncan, I.J.H. and McRae, Helen E. (1988) Perching and floor laying by domestic hens: experimental results and their commercial application. British Poultry Science 29: 351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleby, M.C. and Hughes, B.O. (1989) Cages modified with perches and nest sites for the improvement of bird welfare, World's Poultry Science Journal 46: 38–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, A.J. (1988) Alternatives? Proceedings of the Cambridge Poultry Conference ‘Cages for the future’, pp. 22–41Google Scholar
Brambell, F.W.R. (1965) Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals Kept under Intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
Brantas, G.C. and Corstiaensen, C.J. (1977) Raumstrukturbezug bei Hühnern in Mehrstockkäfigen, Spelderholt Rapport, 0477PGoogle Scholar
Council Directive 86/113/EEC (1986) Welfare of battery hens. Official Journal of European Communities (L95) 29: 45–49Google Scholar
Craig, J.V. and Adams, A.W. (1984) Behaviour and well-being of hens (Gallus domesticus) in alternative housing environments. World's Poultry Science Journal 40: 221–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, D.L. (1987) Applying behavioural research to the management of pullets. Poultry Digest 46(546): 372Google Scholar
Duncan, I.J.H., Sleed, G.S., Kettlewell, P., Berry, P. and Carlisle, A.J. (1986) Comparison of the stressfulness of harvesting broiler chickens by machine and by hand. British Poultry Science 27: 109–110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehlhardt, D.A. (1988) Alternative systems in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the CEC-Seminar Beekbergen, NL, in pressGoogle Scholar
Elson, H.A. (1987) Poultry management-systems – looking to the future. Zootechnica International 3: 46–50Google Scholar
Elson, H.A. (1988) Making the best cage decisions. Proceedings of the Cambridge Poultry Conference ‘Cages for the future’, pp. 70–76Google Scholar
Elson, H.A. (1990) Recent developments in laying cages designed to improve bird welfare. World's Poultry Science Journal 46: 34–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, J.M. (1986) Questions about welfare. Why not ask the chicken? Proceedings of the 7th European Poultry ConferenceParis, pp. 1088–1092Google Scholar
Heil, G. (1984) Genetic variation of the restlessness before oviposition of laying hens in single cages. Proceedings of the International Congress of Applied Ethology in Farm AnimalsKiel, pp. 52–55Google Scholar
Heil, G. (1988) On the repeatability of pre-laying behaviour of hens in single cages. Proceedings of the International Congress of Applied Ethology in Farm AnimalsSkara, pp. 231–233Google Scholar
Hurnik, J.F and Lehmann, H. (1985) The philosophy of farm animal welfare: a contribution to the assessment of farm animal well-being. Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on Poultry WelfareCelle, pp. 255–266Google Scholar
Mench, J.A. and Van Tienhoven, A. (1986) Farm animal welfare. American Scientist 74: 598–602Google Scholar
Mills, A.D. and Wood-Gush, D.G.M. (1985) Pre-laying behaviour in battery cages. British Poultry Science 26: 247–252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicol, C. (1990) Behavioral requirements within a cage environment, World's Poultry Science Journal 46: 31–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nørgaard-Nielsen, G. (1988) Alternative systems in Scandinavia. Proceedings of CEC SeminarBeekbergenNL, in pressGoogle Scholar
Oester, H. (1988) Alternative systems in Switzerland, Proceedings of the CEC SeminarBeekbergenNL, in pressGoogle Scholar
Rauch, H.-W (1988) Productivity and floor eggs in alternative housing systems. Proceedings of the CEC SeminarBeekbergenNL, in pressGoogle Scholar
Siegel, P.B. (1984) The role of behaviour in poultry production: a review of research. Applied Animal Ethology 11: 299–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauson, R. (1988) Effects of redesign. Proceedings of the Cambridge Poultry Conference ‘Cages for the future’, pp. 42–69Google Scholar
UEP (United Egg Producers) (1982) Recommended Guidelines of Husbandry Practices for Laying Chickens, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Webster, A.J.F. and Nicol, C.J. (1988) The case for welfare. Proceedings of the Cambridge Poultry Conference ‘Cages for the future’, pp. 11–21Google Scholar
Wegner, R.-M and Rauch, H.-W. (1986) Alternative systems for laying hens – investigations in Europe. Proceedings of the 7th European Poultry Conference Paris, Vol. 2, pp. 1064–1071Google Scholar
Wegner, R.-M (1988) Alternative systems in West Germany. Proceedings of the CEC SeminarBeekbergenNL, in pressGoogle Scholar
Wood-Gush, D.G.M. (1988) History and development of poultry ethology. Poultry 4(3): 8–9Google Scholar