Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:36:20.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate translocation in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in response to ammonium sulfate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bryan G. Young ,
Andrew W. Knepp ,
Loyd M. Wax  and
Stephen E. Hart
Andrew W. Knepp
Affiliation:
Crop Sciences Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
Agriculture Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Crop Sciences Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Stephen E. Hart
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the response of common lambsquarters and velvetleaf to glyphosate applied alone or with 20 g L−1 of ammonium sulfate (AMS). Minimal response of common lambsquarters to glyphosate plus AMS was observed. The GR50 values for velvetleaf decreased dramatically from 451 to 92 g ha−1 for glyphosate applied alone and glyphosate plus AMS, respectively. The addition of AMS did not affect foliar absorption of 14C-glyphosate in common lambsquarters but increased absorption in velvetleaf. A twofold increase in translocation, as a percentage of total 14C-glyphosate absorbed, occurred in velvetleaf with the addition of AMS. Increased control of velvetleaf with glyphosate plus AMS may be partially explained by greater glyphosate absorption and translocation. Increased translocation of glyphosate applied with AMS in velvetleaf was an indirect effect of greater foliar uptake as well as greater partitioning of glyphosate out of the treated leaf.

Keywords

Glyphosatecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus ABUTHAdjuvantefficacyfoliar absorption
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 151 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beckett, T. H., Stoller, E. W., and Bode, L. E. 1992. Quizalofop and sethoxydim activity as affected by adjuvants and ammonium fertilizers. Weed Sci. 40:12–19.Google Scholar
Briggs, G. G., Rigitano, R.L.O., and Bromilow, R. H. 1987. Physio-chemical factors affecting uptake by roots and translocation to shoots of weak acids in barley. Pestic. Sci. 19:101–112.Google Scholar
Demarty, M., Morvan, C., and Thellier, M. 1984. Calcium and the cell wall. Plant Cell Environ. 7:441–448.Google Scholar
De Ruiter, H. and Meinen, E. 1996. Adjuvant-increased glyphosate uptake by protoplasts isolated from quackgrass Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski. Weed Sci. 44:38–45.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and foliar activity of clopyralid and chlorsulfuron in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis). Weed Sci. 33:524–530.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. 1988. Established foxtail barley, Hordeum jubatum, control with glyphosate plus ammonium sulfate. Weed Technol. 2:364–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durgan, B. R., Yenish, J. P., Daml, R. J., and Miller, D. W. 1997. Broadleaf weed control in hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) with F8426. Weed Technol. 11:489–495.Google Scholar
Fielding, R. J. and Stoller, E. W. 1990. Effects of additives on the efficacy, uptake, and translocation of the methyl ester of thifensulfuron. Weed Sci. 38:172–178.Google Scholar
Gronwald, J. W., Jourdan, S. W., Wyse, D. L., Somers, D. A., and Magnusson, M. U. 1993. Effect of ammonium sulfate on absorption of imazethapyr by quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) and maize (Zea mays) cell suspension cultures. Weed Sci. 41:325–334.Google Scholar
Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. 1985. The Herbicide Glyphosate. London: Butterworths, pp. 49–57.Google Scholar
Hall, G. J., Hart, C. A., and Jones, C. A. 2000. Plants as sources of cations antagonistic to glyphosate activity. Pest Manag. Sci. 56:351–358.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., and Corbin, F. T. 1989. Effect of ammonium sulfate and bentazon on sethoxydim absorption. Weed Technol. 3:674–677.Google Scholar
Kent, L. M., Wills, G. D., and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Effect of ammonium sulfate, imazapyr, and environment on the phytotoxicity of imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 5:202–205.Google Scholar
Kwon, C. S. and Penner, D. 1996. The effect of piperonyl butoxide and adjuvants on sulfonylurea herbicide activity. Weed Technol. 10:127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIsaac, S. A., Paul, R. N., and Devine, M. D. 1991. A scanning electron microscope study of glyphosate deposits in relation to foliar uptake. Pestic. Sci. 31:53–64.Google Scholar
Maschhoff, J. R., Hart, S. E., and Baldwin, J. L. 2000. Effect of ammonium sulfate on efficacy, absorption and translocation of glufosinate. Weed Sci. 48:2–6.Google Scholar
Moxness, K. D. and Lym, R. G. 1989. Environment and spray additive effects on picloram absorption and translocation in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Sci. 37:181–186.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Matysiak, R. 1992. Species differ in response to adjuvants with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 6:561–566.Google Scholar
Pline, W. A., Hatzios, K. K., and Hagood, E. S. 2000. Weed and herbicide-resistant soybean (Glycine max) response to glufosinate and glyphosate plus ammonium sulfate and pelargonic acid. Weed Technol. 14:667–674.Google Scholar
Pline, W. A., Wu, J., and Hatzios, K. K. 1999. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of glufosinate in five weed species as influenced by ammonium sulfate and pelargonic acid. Weed Sci. 47:636–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichers, D. E., Wax, L. M., Liebl, R. A., and Bush, D. R. 1994. Surfactantincreased glyphosate uptake into plasma membrane vesicles isolated from common lambsquarters leaves. Plant Physiol. 105:1419–1425.Google Scholar
Salisbury, C. D., Chandler, J. M., and Merkle, M. G. 1991. Ammonium sulfate enhancement of glyphosate and SC-0224 control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol. 5:18–21.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1980. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-glyphosate in several weed species. Weed Res. 20:195–200.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218–227.Google Scholar
Smith, A. M. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1992. Ammonium sulfate increases efficacy of sethoxydim through increased foliar absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 40:351–358.Google Scholar
Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Adsorption, action and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235–240.Google Scholar
Turner, D. J. and Loader, M.P.C. 1975. Further studies with additives: effects of phosphate, esters and ammonium salts on the activity of leaf-applied herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 6:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanamarta, G., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1993. Overcoming antagonistic effects of Na-bentazon on sethoxydim absorption. Weed Technol. 7:322–325.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:215–231.Google Scholar
Wiesbrook, M. L., Johnson, W. G., Hart, S. E., Bradley, P. R., and Wax, L. M. 2001. Comparison of weed management systems in narrow-row, glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, G. D. and McWhorter, C. G. 1985. Effect of inorganic salts on the toxicity and translocation of glyphosate and MSMA in purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus). Weed Sci. 33:755–761.Google Scholar
Wills, G. D. and McWhorter, C. G. 1987. Influence of inorganic salts and imazapyr on control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) with imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 1:328–331.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J. and Nishimoto, R. K. 1975a. Ammonium sulfate enhancement of picloram absorption by detached leaves. Weed Sci. 23:297–301.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J. and Nishimoto, R. K. 1975b. Ammonium sulfate enhancement of picloram activity and absorption. Weed Sci. 23:289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyrill, J. B. III and Burnside, O. C. 1976. Adsorption, translocation, and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in common milkweed and hemp dogbane. Weed Sci. 24:557–566.Google Scholar
York, A. C., Jordan, D. L., and Wilcut, J. W. 1990. Effects of (NH4)2SO4 and BCH 81508 S on efficacy of sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 4:76–80.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Young, J. M., Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., Wax, L. M., and Kapusta, G. 2001. Weed management in narrow- and wide-row glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar