Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:57:42.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Timing of Herbicide Applications for Control of Larkspurs (Delphinium spp.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael H. Ralphs
Affiliation:
USDA, Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric. Poisonous Plant Res. Lab., 1150 E. 1400 N., Logan, UT 84321
John O. Evans
Affiliation:
Plant Sci., Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322
Steven A. Dewey
Affiliation:
Plant Sci., Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322

Abstract

Timing and application rates of herbicides were evaluated for control of duncecap and tall larkspur on mountain rangelands. Picloram, triclopyr, glyphosate, and metsulfuron were applied at three rates during three growth stages (vegetative, bud, and flower) to evaluate the rate by growth stage interaction. Picloram was equally effective over all growth stages when applied at 1.1 or 2.2 kg ae ha−1. Metsulfuron was most effective when applied in the vegetative stage; 0.035 kg ai ha−1 killed 95% of duncecap larkspur, but 0.14 kg ha−1 was required to kill the same percentage of tall larkspur. Glyphosate at ≤ 2.2 kg ai ha−1 was least effective when applied in the flower stage compared to earlier growth stages. Triclopyr showed variable control at rates from 1.1 to 4.5 kg ae ha−1.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Cook, C. W., and Stubbendieck, J. 1986. Range Research: Basic Problems and Techniques. Pages 5759. Soc. Range Manage., Denver, CO.Google Scholar
2. Cronin, E. H. 1974. Evaluation of some herbicide treatments for controlling tall larkspur. J. Range Manage. 27:219222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Cronin, E. H., Bowns, J. E., and Johnson, A. E. 1979. Herbicides, nitrogen and control of tall larkspur under aspen trees. J. Range Manage. 30:420422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cronin, E. H. and Nielsen, D. B. 1972. Controlling tall larkspur on snowdrift areas in the subalpine zone. J. Range Manage. 25:213216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cronin, E. H. and Nielsen, D. B. 1979. The ecology and control of range land larkspur. Utah Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 499. 34 p.Google Scholar
6. Mickelsen, L. V., Ralphs, M. H., Evans, J. O., and Turner, D. L. 1990. Herbicide control of duncecap larkspur (Delphinium occidentale). Weed Sci. 38:153157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Nielsen, D. B. and Cronin, E. H. 1977. Economics of tall larkspur control. J. Range Manage. 30:434438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ralphs, M. H., and Turner, D. L. 1989. Difficulty in controlling duncecap larkspur (Delphinium occidentale). Weed Technol. 3:335339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ralphs, M. H., Turner, D. L., Mickelsen, L. V., Evans, J. O., and Dewey, S. A. 1991. Herbicides for control of tall larkspur. Weed Sci. 38:573577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ralphs, M. H., Mickelsen, L. V., Evans, J. D., and Dewey, S. A. 1991. Selective application of glyphosate for control of larkspur. Weed Technol. 5:229231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. SAS. 1990. Pages 175230 in SAS Technical Report P-200. Release 6.04. SAS Inst, Inc. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
12. Torell, P. J. and Haas, R. H. 1963. Herbicidal control of tall larkspur. Weeds. 11:1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Turner, D.L., Ralphs, M. H., and Evans, J. O. 1992. Logistic analysis for monitoring and assessing herbicide efficacy. Weed Technol. 6:424430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Whitson, T. D. and Fink, G. E. 1990. Tall larkspur (Delphinium occidentale) control with various herbicides. Pages 3335 in Res. Prog. Rep., West. Soc. Weed Sci. Google Scholar