Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:07:52.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth, reproduction, and photosynthesis of ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

D. K. Pandey ,
L. M. S. Palni  and
S. C. Joshi
L. M. S. Palni
Affiliation:
G. B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora (UP) 263643, India
S. C. Joshi
Affiliation:
G. B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora (UP) 263643, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Growth and reproductive potential with respect to season and photosynthetic gas exchange behavior under elevated (short-term) CO2 at varying temperature, relative humidity (RH), and irradiance levels were investigated in ragweed parthenium (also known as carrot grass and congress grass), a noxious weed in India. Lower values of biomass, relative growth rate, net assimilation rate, crop growth rate, leaf area duration, leaf area index, and numbers of flowers and seeds in winter compared with summer stands showed that ragweed parthenium is greatly suppressed by low temperatures during winter. This was due to constrained vegetative growth, seedling emergence, and seed to flower ratio. The species showed maximum photosynthetic response to temperature at 25 to 35 C, and the net photosynthetic rate was reduced considerably at a low temperature (7 C). These temperatures approximately corresponded to the normal temperatures experienced by summer (25–35 C) and winter (7 C) stands of ragweed parthenium. Elevated CO2 enhanced leaf net photosynthetic efficiency, maximum photosynthetic rate, and water use efficiency (WUE) but decreased the light compensation point for net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate. The interactive effects of elevated CO2 and temperature resulted in a decrease in light-limited and light-saturated net photosynthetic rates and WUE. The interactive effects also reduced an elevated CO2-induced decrease in light compensation point relative to elevated CO2 alone. Stomatal conductance was insensitive to photosynthetic photon flux but was greatly influenced by RH. Leaves of the species may show increasing rates of net photosynthesis with a rise in CO2 and temperature. However, excessive increase in transpiration with temperature, especially at 47 C (noon temperature during summer in the plains of northern India), appears to be disadvantageous for the leaves when conservation of water is of prime importance.

Keywords

Ragweed parthenium, Parthenium hysterophorus L. PTNHYElevated CO2growth and reproductive potentialhumidityirradiancetemperaturenet photosynthesiswater use efficiency
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 191 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adams, R. M., Rosenzweig, C., Peart, R. M., et al. 1990. Global climate change and US agriculture. Nature 345:219–224.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. D., Donnelly, J. R., and Shane, J. B. 1995. Photosynthesis and transpirational responses of red spruce under story trees to light and temperature. Tree Physiol. 15:393–398.Google Scholar
Aneja, R. K., Dhawan, S. R., and Sharma, A. B. 1991. Deadly weed, Parthenium hysterophorus L. and its distribution. Indian J. Weed Sci. 23:14–18.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1997. Weed attack. India Today May 31:96.Google Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A. 1990. The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21:167–196.Google Scholar
Beadle, C. L. 1993. Growth analysis. Pages 36–46 In Bolhar-Nordenkampf, H. R., Leegod, R. C. and Long, S. P., eds. Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment: A Field and Laboratory Manual. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Beale, C. V., Bint, D. A., and Long, S. P. 1996. Leaf photosynthesis in the C4-grass Miscanthus giganteus growing in the cool temperate climate of southern England. J. Exp. Bot. 47:267–273.Google Scholar
Berry, J. A. and Bjorkman, O. 1990. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31:491–543.Google Scholar
Bolhar-Nordenkampf, H. R. and Draxler, G. 1993. Functional leaf anatomy. Pages 91–112 In Bolhar-Nordenkampf, H. R., Leegod, R. C. and Long, S. P., eds. Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment: A Field and Laboratory Manual. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Bolin, B., Doos, B. R., Jager, J., and Warrick, R. A. 1986. The Greenhouse Effect: Climatic Change and Ecosystems. SCOPE Volume 29. London: J. Wiley. 541 p.Google Scholar
Bowes, G. 1993. Facing the inevitable: plants and increasing atmospheric CO2 . Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44:309–323.Google Scholar
Brown, R. H. 1982. Response of terrestrial plants to light quality, light intensity, temperature, CO2 and O2 . Pages 185–212 In Mitsui, A. and Black, C. C., eds. Handbook of Biosolar Resources, Volume 1. Basic Principles. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Carter, T. R. 1996. Developing scenarios of atmosphere, weather and climate for northern regions. Agric. Food Sci. Finland 5:235–249.Google Scholar
Ceulemans, R. and Mousseau, M. 1994. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on woody plants. New Phytol. 127:425–446.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. 1957. Experimental Designs. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Comstock, J. P. and Ehleringer, J. R. 1993. Stomatal response to humidity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): implications for maximum transpiration rate, water use efficiency, and productivity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 20:669–691.Google Scholar
Cure, J. D. and Acock, B. 1986. Crop responses to CO2 doubling: a literature survey. Agric. For. Meteorol. 38:127–145.Google Scholar
Curtis, P. S. 1996. A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 19:127–137.Google Scholar
Das, B. and Das, R. 1995. Chemical investigation in Parthenium hysterophorus L.—an allelopathic plant. Allelopathy J. 2:99–104.Google Scholar
Drake, B. G., Gongzalec-Meler, M. A., and Long, S. P. 1997. More efficient plants? A consequence of rising atmospheric CO2 . Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:607–637.Google Scholar
Eamus, D. and Jarvis, P. G. 1989. The direct effects of increase in the global atmospheric CO2 concentration on natural and commercial temperate trees and forests. Adv. Ecol. Res. 19:1–55.Google Scholar
Ehleringer, J. R. and Cerling, T. E. 1995. Atmospheric CO2 and the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentrations in plants. Tree Physiol. 15:105–111.Google Scholar
Einhellig, F. A., Leather, G. R., and Hobbs, L. L. 1985. Use of Lemna minor L. as a bioassay in allelopathy. J. Chem. Ecol. 11:65–72.Google Scholar
Field, C. B., Jackson, R. B., and Mooney, H. A. 1995. Stomatal responses to increased CO2 implications from the plant to the global scale. Plant Cell Environ. 18:1214–1225.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1946. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 10th ed, Chapters VII and VIII. Edinburgh, Great Britain: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Green, D. H., Laing, W. A., and Campbell, B. D. 1995. Photosynthetic responses of thirteen pasture species to elevated CO2 and temperature. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22:713–722.Google Scholar
Kalina, J. and Ceulemans, R. 1997. Clonal differences in the response of dark and light reactions of photosynthesis to elevated atmospheric CO2 in poplar. Photosynthetica 33:51–61.Google Scholar
Kanchan, S. D. and Jayachandra, . 1980. Allelopathic effects of Parthenium hysterophorus L. IV. Identification of inhibitors. Plant Soil 55:67–75.Google Scholar
Kimball, B. A. 1983. Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: an assemblage and analysis of 430 prior observations. Agron. J. 75:779–788.Google Scholar
Lambers, H. and Poorter, H. 1992. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants—a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv. Ecol. Res. 23:187–271.Google Scholar
Lawlor, D. W. and Keys, A. J. 1993. Understanding photosynthetic adaptation to changing climate. Pages 85–106 In Fowden, L., Stoddart, J., and Mansfield, T. A., eds. Plant Adaptation to Environmental Stress. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Lee, H.S.J. and Jarvis, P. G. 1995. Trees differ from crops and from each other in their responses to increases in CO2 concentration. J. Biogeogr. 22:323–330.Google Scholar
Long, S. P. 1991. Modification of the response of photosynthetic productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2 concentrations: has its importance been underestimated. Plant Cell Environ. 14:729–739.Google Scholar
Mackowiak, C. L. and Wheeler, T. M. 1996. Growth and stomatal behaviour of hydroponically cultured potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at elevated and superoptimal CO2 . J. Plant Physiol. 149:205–210.Google Scholar
Madson, E. 1974. Effect of CO2 concentration on growth and fruit production of tomato plants. Acta Agric. Scand. 24:242–246.Google Scholar
Mersie, W. and Singh, M. 1988. Effect of phenolic acids and ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) extracts on tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) growth and nutrient and chlorophyll content. Weed Sci. 36:278–281.Google Scholar
Mikola, P. 1952. On the recent development of coniferous forests in the timberline region of northern Finland. Commun. Inst. Finland. 40:1–35.Google Scholar
Mooney, H. A., Drake, B. G., Luxmore, R. J., Oechel, W. C., and Pitelka, L. F. 1991. Predicting ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 concentrations. Biosciences 41:96–104.Google Scholar
Morison, J.I.L. 1998. Stomatal response to increased CO2 concentration. J. Exp. Bot. 49:443–452.Google Scholar
Mousseau, M. and Saugier, B. 1992. The direct effect of increased CO2 on gas exchange and growth of forest tree species. J. Exp. Bot. 43:1121–1130.Google Scholar
Oechel, W. C. and Strain, B. R. 1985. Native species responses to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. Pages 117–154 In Strain, B. R. and Cure, J. D., eds. Direct Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide on Vegetation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Pandey, D. K. 1996. Phytotoxicity of sesquiterpene lactone parthenin on aquatic weeds. J. Chem. Ecol. 22:151–160.Google Scholar
Parry, M. 1990. Climate Change and World Agriculture. International Institute for Environment and Development. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Picman, J. and Picman, A. K. 1984. Autotoxicity in Parthenium hysterophorus L. and its possible role in control in germination. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 12:287–292.Google Scholar
Rajendrudu, G. and Rama Das, V. S. 1990. C3-like carbon isotope discrimination in C3-C4 intermediate Alternenthera and Parthenium species. Curr. Sci. 59:377–379.Google Scholar
Rao, R. S. 1956. Parthenium hysterophorus Linn.—a new record for India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 54:218–220.Google Scholar
Rawat, A. S. and Purohit, A. N. 1991. CO2 and water vapour exchange in four alpine herbs at two altitudes and under varying light and temperature conditions. Photosynth. Res. 28:99–108.Google Scholar
Reddy, A. R., Reddy, K. R., and Hodges, H. F. 1998. Interactive effects of elevated carbon dioxide and growth temperature on photosynthesis in cotton leaves. Plant Growth Regul. 26:33–40.Google Scholar
Renburg, L. V. and Kruger, G.H.J. 1993. Comparative analysis of differential drought stress-induced suppression of and recovery in carbon dioxide fixation: stomatal and non-stomatal limitation in Nicotiana tabacum L. J. Plant Physiol. 142:296–306.Google Scholar
Reuveni, J. and Bugbee, B. 1997. Very high CO2 reduces photosynthesis, dark respiration and yield in wheat. Ann. Bot. 80:539–546.Google Scholar
Rhode, H. 1990. A comparison of the contribution of various gases to the greenhouse effect. Science 248:1217–1219.Google Scholar
Sage, R. F. 1994. Acclimation of photosynthesis to increasing atmospheric CO2: the gas exchange perspective. Photosynth. Res. 39:351–368.Google Scholar
Sage, R. F., Sharkey, T. D., and Seemann, J. R. 1989. Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 in five C3 species. Plant Physiol. 89:590–596.Google Scholar
Sharkey, T. D. and Raschke, K. 1981. Separation and measurement of direct and indirect effects of light on stomata. Plant Physiol. 68:33–40.Google Scholar
Towers, G.H.N., Mitchell, J. C., Rodriguez, E., Bennett, F. D., and Subbarao, P. V. 1977. Biology and chemistry of Parthenium hysterophorus L., a problem weed in India. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 36:672–684.Google Scholar
Von Caemmerer, S. and Farquhar, G. D. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153:376–387.Google Scholar
Watson, R. T., Rodhe, H., Oescheger, H., and Siegenthaler, U. 1990. Greenhouse gases and aerosols. Pages 1–40 In Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., and Ephraums, G. J., eds. Climate Change. The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, S. C., Cowan, I. R., and Farquhar, G. D. 1978. Leaf conductance in relation to assimilation in Eucalyptus pauciflora Seib. ex Spreng. Plant Physiol. 62:670–674.Google Scholar