Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:05:17.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DICKENS, DINOSAURS, AND DESIGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2016

Gowan Dawson
Gowan Dawson*
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Charles Dickens's novels only occasionally feature images of prehistoric creatures. There is, of course, the famous “elephantine lizard. . .waddling. . .up Holborn Hill” in the opening scenes of Bleak House (1852–53), which, as is brilliantly captured in Tom Gauld's recent cartoon “Fragments of Dickens's Lost Novel ‘A Megalosaur's Progress’” (2011), has become a kind of icon of Dickens's entire fictional oeuvre (Figure 1). But beyond Bleak House’s iconic megalosaurus “forty feet long or so,” Dickens's panoramic representations of urban landscapes, which Adelene Buckland has shown to abound with quasi-geological ruins, are usually populated only by their more diminutive modern inhabitants (1; ch. 1). Even when the changing cityscape of “carcases. . .and fragments” of “giant forms” seems, as in Dombey and Son (1847–48), to suggest the presence of colossal fossilized skeletons thrown up by a “great earthquake,” they remain lifeless and merely augment the pervading atmosphere of urban upheaval (46; ch. 6). Animate extinct animals instead appear more commonly in novels by contemporaries such as William Makepeace Thackeray or, later in the century, Henry James. In their fiction, creatures such as the megatherium, a large edentate from the Pliocene epoch, not only afford apposite metaphors for gargantuan manifestations of industrial modernity, as in the former's Mrs. Perkins's Ball (1846) and the latter's The Bostonians (1885–86). More significantly, they also provide a model for the complex structures of serialized novels, whether commendatory, as in Thackeray's The Newcomes (1853–55), or otherwise, as in the famous epithet “large loose baggy monsters” that James coined in the preface to the New York edition of The Tragic Muse (1908) (1:x).

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 761 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Adrian, Arthur A. Mark Lemon: First Editor of “Punch.” London: Oxford UP, 1966.Google Scholar
Altick, Richard D. The Presence of the Present: Topics of the Day in the Victorian Novel. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Axton, William. “‘Keystone’ Structure in Dickens’ Serial Novels.” University of Toronto Quarterly 37 (1967): 31–50.Google Scholar
Battestin, Martin C. The Providence of Wit: Aspects of Form in Augustan Literature and the Arts. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1974.Google Scholar
Best, Samuel. After Thoughts on Reading Dr. Buckland's Bridgewater Treatise. London: J. Hatchard, 1837.Google Scholar
Bissell, Champion. “Serials and Continuations.” Sartain's Union Magazine 8 (1851): 278–79.Google Scholar
Boehm, Katharina. Charles Dickens and the Sciences of Childhood: Popular Medicine, Child Health and Victorian Culture. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Nicola. “What the Alligator Didn't Know: Natural Selection and Love in Our Mutual Friend .” 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 10 (2010). Web. 11 April 2015.Google Scholar
Bradbury, Nicola. “Dickens and the Form of the Novel.” The Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens. Ed. Jordan, John O.. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. 152–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Broderip, William John]. “Leaves From the Note-Book of a Naturalist.” Fraser's Magazine 42 (1850): 187–202.Google Scholar
Brooke, John Hedley. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Buckland, Adelene. “‘The Poetry of Science’: Charles Dickens, Geology, and Visual and Material Culture in Victorian London.” Victorian Literature and Culture 35 (2007): 679–94.Google Scholar
Buckland, William. “Notice on the Megalosaurus or Great Fossil Lizard of Stonesfield.” Transactions of the Geological Society 1 n.s. (1824): 390–96.Google Scholar
Colledge, Gary. Dickens, Christianity and “The Life of Our Lord”: Humble Veneration, Profound Conviction. London: Continuum: 2009.Google Scholar
Cotsell, Michael. “Mr. Venus Rises From the Counter: Dickens's Taxidermist and His Contribution to Our Mutual Friend .” Dickensian 80 (1984): 105–13.Google Scholar
Cribb, T. J. “The Letters of Charles Dickens.” Review of English Studies 52 n.s. (2001): 238–43.Google Scholar
Dawson, Gowan. “‘By a Comparison of Incidents and Dialogue’: Richard Owen, Comparative Anatomy and Victorian Serial Fiction.” 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth-Century 11 (2010). Web. 11 April 2015.Google Scholar
Dawson, Gowan. “Literary Megatheriums and Loose Baggy Monsters: Paleontology and the Victorian Novel.” Victorian Studies 53 (2011): 203–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Gowan. “Paleontology in Parts: Richard Owen, William John Broderip, and the Serialization of Science in Early Victorian Britain.” Isis 103 (2012): 637–67.Google Scholar
Dawson, Gowan. Show Me the Bone: Reconstructing Prehistoric Monsters in Nineteenth-Century Britain and America. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, Adrian J. The Hot-Blooded Dinosaurs: A Revolution in Palaeontology. London: Blond & Briggs, 1975.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Bleak House. London: Bradbury and Evans, 1852–53.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Chimes. London: Chapman and Hall, 1844.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Life and Adventures of Martin Chuzzlewit. London: Chapman and Hall, 1843–44.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby. 2 vols. London: Chapman and Hall, 1838–39.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Little Dorrit. London: Bradbury and Evans, 1856–57.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. “On an Amateur Beat.” All the Year Round 1 n.s. (1869): 300–03.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Our Mutual Friend. 2 vols. London: Chapman and Hall, 1864–65.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. “The Poetry of Science.” Examiner (1848): 787–88.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club. 2 vols. London: Chapman and Hall, 1836–37.Google Scholar
[Dickens, Charles, and Morley, Henry]. “H. W.” Household Words 7 (1853): 145–49.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. “The Eighteenth-Century Legacy.” A Companion to Charles Dickens. Ed. Paroissien, David. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008. 65–88.Google Scholar
[Forster, John]. “Nicholas Nickleby.” Examiner (1839): 677–78.Google Scholar
Fulweiler, Howard W. “‘A Dismal Swamp’: Darwin, Design, and Evolution in Our Mutual Friend .” Nineteenth-Century Literature 49 (1994): 50–74.Google Scholar
Grass, Sean. Charles Dickens's “Our Mutual Friend”: A Publishing History. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
“Great Expectations.” Sharpe's London Magazine 20 (1861): 218–20.Google Scholar
House, Madeline, Storey, Graham, and Tillotson, Kathleen, eds. The Letters of Charles Dickens. 12 vols. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1965–2002.Google Scholar
Howe, S. R., Sharpe, T., and Torrens, H. S.. Ichthyosaurs: A History of Fossil “Sea-Dragons.” Cardiff: National Museum of Wales, 1981.Google Scholar
[Hunt, Frederick Knight]. “The Hunterian Museum.” Household Words 2 (1850): 277–82.Google Scholar
Hunter, Albert D. “Dismemberment and Articulation in Our Mutual Friend .” Dickens Studies Annual 11 (1983): 135–76.Google Scholar
Hunter, John. Essays and Observations on Natural History, Anatomy, Physiology, Psychology, and Geology. Ed. Owen, Richard. 2 vols. London: John Van Voorst, 1861.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Tragic Muse. 2 vols. New York ed. New York: Charles Scribner, 1908.Google Scholar
Kent, Charles. Charles Dickens as a Reader. London: Chapman and Hall, 1872.Google Scholar
Lang, Cecil Y., and Shannon, Edgar F., eds. The Letters of Alfred Lord Tennyson. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1982–90.Google Scholar
Ledger, Sally. “Dickens, Natural History, and Our Mutual Friend .” Partial Answers 9 (2011): 363–78.Google Scholar
Levine, George. Darwin and the Novelists: Patterns of Science in Victorian Fiction. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1988.Google Scholar
[Lister, Thomas Henry]. “Dickens's Tales.” Edinburgh Review 48 (1838): 75–96.Google Scholar
McMaster, Juliet. Dickens the Designer. London: Macmillan, 1987.Google Scholar
[Morley, Henry, and Wills, William Henry]. “ A Flight with the Birds.” Household Words 5 (1852): 381–84.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Ralph. The Earth on Show: Fossils and the Poetics of Popular Science, 1802–1856. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2007.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Ralph. “Victorian Saurians: The Linguistic Prehistory of the Modern Dinosaur.” Journal of Victorian Culture 17 (2012): 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, Richard. Geology and Inhabitants of the Ancient World. London: Bradbury and Evans, 1854.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard. Lectures on the Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Vertebrate Animals. Part I. – “Fishes.” London: Longman, 1846.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard. Letter to John Forster. 14 Nov. 1872. MS. Frances Hirtzel Collection of Richard Owen Papers, Temple University Lib., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard. Letter to John Forster. 3 April 1874. MS. Frances Hirtzel Collection of Richard Owen Papers, Temple University Lib., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard. Memoir on the Megatherium. London: Williams and Norgate, 1861.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard. Monograph on the Fossil Reptilia of the London Clay. Part II. – “Crocodilia, Ophidia.” London: Palæontographical Society, 1850.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard. Monograph on the Fossil Reptilia of the Wealden Formation. Part II. – “Dinosauria.” London: Palæontographical Society, 1854.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard. Palæontology. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black, 1860.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard. “Report on British Fossil Reptiles: I.” Report of the Ninth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. London: John Murray, 1840. 43–126.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard. “Report on British Fossil Reptiles: II.” Report of the Eleventh Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. London: John Murray, 1842. 60–204.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard S. The Life of Richard Owen. 2 vols. London: John Murray, 1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, Robert L. Charles Dickens and His Publishers. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1978.Google Scholar
[Poe, Edgar Allan]. “Barnaby Rudge.” Graham's Lady's and Gentleman's Magazine 20 (1842): 124–29.Google Scholar
“Popular Osteology.” Punch 16 (1849): 251.Google Scholar
Royal Literary Fund Annual Reports 6 (1844). TS. Royal Literary Fund Archive, Loan 96, British Lib., London.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S. Georges Cuvier, Fossil Bones, and Geographical Catastrophes: New Translations and Interpretations of the Primary Texts. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1997.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S. The Meaning of Fossils: Episodes in the History of Paleontology. 2nd ed. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar
Rupke, Nicolaas A. Richard Owen: Victorian Naturalist. New Haven: Yale UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Sage, Victor. “Dickens and Professor Owen: Portrait of a Friendship.” Le portrait. Ed. Arnaud, Pierre. Paris: P de l'U de Paris-Sorbonne, 1999. 87–101.Google Scholar
Sage, Victor. “Negative Homogeneity: Our Mutual Friend, Richard Owen, and the ‘New Worlds’ of Victorian Biology.” Dickens, Europe and the New Worlds. Ed. Sadrin, Anny. Houndmills: Palgrave, 1999. 212–26.Google Scholar
[Simms, William Gilmore]. “Writings of Cornelius Mathews.” Southern Quarterly Review 6 (1844): 307–42.Google Scholar
Smith, Jonathan. “Heat and Modern Thought: The Forces of Nature in Our Mutual Friend .” Victorian Literature and Culture 23 (1995): 37–69.Google Scholar
Stone, Harry, ed. Dickens’ Working Notes for His Novels. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.Google Scholar
Sutherland, John. “Dickens's Serializing Imitators.” Victorian Fiction: Writers, Publishers, Readers. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. 86–113.Google Scholar
Tennyson, Hallam. Alfred, Lord Tennyson: A Memoir. 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1897.Google Scholar
Thackeray, W. M. The Newcomes. 2 vols. London: Bradbury and Evans, 1854–55.Google Scholar
“The Royal Institute of British Architects.” Civil Engineer and Architect's Journal 26 (1863): 119.Google Scholar
Topham, Jonathan R. “‘An Infinite Variety of Arguments’: The Bridgewater Treatises and British Natural Theology in the 1830s.” Diss. U of Lancaster, 1993.Google Scholar
Torrens, Hugh. “The Dinosaurs and Dinomania Over 150 Years.” Vertebrate Fossils and the Evolution of Scientific Concepts. Ed. Sarjeant, William A. S.. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach, 1995. 255–84.Google Scholar
Yanni, Carla. “On Nature and Nomenclature: William Whewell and the Production of Architectural Knowledge in Early Victorian Britain.” Architectural History 40 (1997): 204–21.Google Scholar