Article contents
Eugenics and public health in Britain, 1900–40: scenes from provincial life
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2009
Abstract
Historians have attempted to assess the impact of eugenics on public health provision in a number of fields including mental health, birth control, voluntary sterilization and housing. However, most of this work has concentrated on debates at the national level, and we know much less about the ways in which eugenics may have helped shape health services in provincial cities. It has been suggested that Leicester was a city in which eugenicists were particularly prominent, and this article examines the impact of eugenics on three aspects of public health between 1900 and 1940; mental health, birth control and housing. It concludes that while eugenics did have a practical outcome in mental health and birth control, its influence on housing policy was more elusive, and 1935 marked a turning-point after which eugenics was less significant in health policy and intellectual life.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997
Footnotes
The research for this article was supported by the Wellcome Trust (project grant 038059/Z/93) and, while they bear no responsibility for its remaining faults, I would like to thank Patricia Garside and David Reeder for their helpful comments.
References
1 Mackenzie, D., ‘Eugenics in Britain’, Social Studies of Science, 6 (1976), 499–532CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Freeden, M., ‘Eugenics and progressive thought’, Historical Journal, XXII (1979), 645–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Searle, G.R., ‘Eugenics and politics in Britain in the 1930s’, Annals of Science, 36 (1979), 159–69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; idem, ‘Eugenics and class’, in Webster, C. (ed.), Biology, Medicine and Society, 1840–1940 (Cambridge, 1981), 217–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, G., ‘Eugenics and social policy between the wars’, Historical Journal, XXV (1982), 717–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Social Hygiene in Twentieth Century Britain (London, 1986)Google Scholar; Macnicol, J., ‘Eugenics and the campaign for voluntary sterilisation in Britain between the wars’, Social History of Medicine, 2, 2 (1989), 147–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Soloway, R.A., Democracy and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth Century Britain (Chapel Hill, 1990)Google Scholar; Jones, G., ‘Eugenics in Ireland: the Belfast Eugenics Society, 1911–15’, Irish Historical Studies, XXVIII (1992), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Clinical Sciences Library, University of Leicester, Leicester Medical Society minutes, 6/12/05 and 7/10/08.
3 Jones, , Social Hygiene, 55Google Scholar; Nash, D. and Reeder, D. (eds), Leicester in the Twentieth Century (Stroud, 1993), 126.Google Scholar See also Buchanan, E.E., ‘Aspects of the life and times of Dr Charles Killick Millard, Medical Officer of Health for Leicester, 1901–1934’ (unpublished University of Leicester MA thesis, 1995).Google Scholar
4 Leicestershire Record Office (hereafter LRO): DE 3107/140, After-Care subcommittee minutes, 2/4/03.
5 Ibid., 10/3/04; PP 1908, XXVI (Cd. 4216), Minutes of. Evidence Taken Before the Royal Commission on the Care and Control of the Feeble-Minded, 423–30Google Scholar, questions 18442–18504.
6 LRO DE 3107/168: After-Care Committee, Annual Report for 1908 (Leicester, 1909), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 LRO DE 3107/140: After-Care subcommittee minutes, 14/12/11, 26/11/12, 5/3/15. See also Woodhouse, J., ‘Eugenics and the feeble-minded: the Parliamentary debates of 1912–14’, History of Education, 11, 2 (1982), 127–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Macnicol, J., ‘Eugenics, medicine and mental deficiency: ari introduction’, Oxford Review of Education, 9, 3 (1983), 177–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Potts, P., ‘Medicine, morals, and mental deficiency: the contribution of doctors to the development of special education in England’Google Scholar, Ibid., 181–96; and Barker, D., ‘How to curb the fertility of the unfit: the feeble-minded in Edwardian Britain’Google Scholar, Ibid., 197–211.
8 Leicester Education Committee, Annual Report of the SMO, 1924 (Leicester, 1925), 6–7.Google Scholar
9 Leicester Education Committee, Annual Report of the SMO, 3927 (Leicester, 1928), 52–5.Google Scholar
10 Leicester Education Committee, Annual Report of the SMO, 1932 (Leicester, 1933), 10.Google Scholar
11 Board of Education and Board of Control, Report of the Mental Deficiency Committee (London, 1929), part I, iii–iv, part lu, 96–102.Google Scholar
12 Ibid., part II, 83.
13 Ibid., part III, 79–82.
14 Leicester Corporation, Annual Report of the Mental Deficiency Committee, 1929–30 (Leicester, 1930), 19–20.Google Scholar
15 Contemporary Medical Archives Centre, The Wellcome Institute, London (hereafter CMAC), SA/EUG, C32, II, C.J. Bond, ‘Are our children to-day as good as their grandfathers?’, 20/9/33,2.
16 CMAC SA/EUG, N42, cutting from the Journal of State Medicine, 1/31; Society of Medical Officers of Health Association Archive, The Wellcome Unit, Oxford (hereafter SMOH), B2/1: minutes of meeting 9/3/33.
17 Cattell, R.B., The Fight for Our National Intelligence (London, 1937), vii–xvii, 108, 164.Google Scholar
18 Leicester Sanitary Committee, Report of the MOH, 1902 (Leicester, 1903), 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; LRO, MS Millard, DE 3139/18, C.K. Millard, ‘The role of the “anti”: an apology and an appeal’, 9/10/02,10.
19 Leicester Sanitary Committee, Report of the MOH, 1904 (Leicester, 1905), 84.Google Scholar
20 Leicester Sanitary Committee, Report of the MOH, 1909 (Leicester, 1910), 24–5.Google Scholar
21 Leicester Sanitary Committee, Report of the MOH, 1911 (Leicester, 1912), 15.Google Scholar
22 Eugenics Review, V (1913–1914), 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Walker, J.B., ‘Charles John Bond of Leicester (1856–1939)’, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 77 (1984), 316–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 LRO, Leicester Sanitary Committee minutes, 23/2/17; Leicester Sanitary Committee, Report of the MOH, 1917 (Leicester, 1918), 12–21Google Scholar; Leicester Sanitary Committee, Report of the MOH, 1918 (Leicester, 1919), iv.Google Scholar
24 Millard, C.K., Population and Birth Control (Leicester, 1917), 5, 7, 24, 37, 44–5Google Scholar; Eugenics Review, X (1918–1920), 52.Google Scholar See also Fryer, P., The Birth Controllers (London, 1965), 247Google Scholar; Leathard, A., The Fight for Family Planning: The Development of Family Planning Services in Britain 1921–74 (London, 1980), 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Soloway, R.A., Birth Control and the Population Question in England, 1877–1930 (Chapel Hill, 1982), 130–2.Google Scholar
25 Millard, C.K., ‘The problem of birth control with special reference to the public health aspect’, Journal of State Medicine, XXVI (1918), 321–8, 337.Google Scholar
26 MS Millard, DE 3139/11/2, C.K. Mfflard to the archbishops and bishops of the Anglican communion, 5/4/20; Ibid., DE 3139/11/1, C.K. Millard, ‘Responsible parenthood and birth control’, 4/20,1,4,8; MS Slopes, The British Library, London, Add. MSS 58564, C.K. Millard to M. Slopes, 3/5/20; Soloway, , Birth Control and the Population Question, 233–7.Google Scholar
27 MS Slopes, C.K. MiUard to M. Stopes, 3/1/19, 29/0/19,12/11/19; Leathard, , Fight for Family Planning, 11–12.Google Scholar
28 MS Slopes, C.K. Millard to M. Slopes, 13/7/20; Eugenics Review, XII (1920–1922), 291–5Google Scholar; Soloway, , Democracy and Degeneration, 176–7.Google Scholar
30 MS Stopes, C.K. Millard to M. Stopes, 26/7/21, 15/12/22; Hall, R., Marie Stapes: A Biography (London, 1977), 211.Google Scholar
31 Ledbetter, R., A History of the Malthusian League 1877–1927 (Columbus, 1976), 220–1, 224–6Google Scholar; Leathard, , Fight for family Planning, 31–2Google Scholar; Soloway, , Democracy and Degeneration, 177–84.Google Scholar
32 CMAC, SA/EUG, C232, box 19, C.K. Millard to C.B.S. Hodson, 1/4/27.
33 Leathard, , Fight for Family Planning, 38, 40–3.Google Scholar
34 MS Stopes, C.K. Millard to M. Stopes, 17/6/30; Soloway, , Birth Control and the Population Question, 256–60.Google Scholar
35 SMOH, B2/1, minutes of meeting 6/11/30; CMAC, SA/EUG, N42, cutting from the Journal of State Medicine, 1/31, 46–54.Google Scholar
36 Ministry of Health, On the State of the Public Health, 1929 (London, 1930), 31–2Google Scholar; Leathard, , Fight for Family Planning, 48–50.Google Scholar
37 LRO, CM 21/4, Health Committee minutes, 20/6/30, Leicester Mercury, 23/6/30, 15; LRO, CM, 1/62, Council minutes, 29/7/30.
38 Leicester Health Committee, Annual Report of the MOH, 1929 (Leicester, 1930), 50–1.Google Scholar
39 LRO, CM 1/62, Council minutes, 30/9/30; CMAC, SA/FPA, All/24, box 311, cutting from the Birmingham Post, 1/10/30.
40 LRO, CM 21/4, Maternity and Child Welfare subcommittee minutes, 3/12/30; CMAC, SA/FPA, All/24, C.K. Millard to M.A. Pyke, 28/3/31; Ibid., J. Turnbull to C.K. Millard, 12/5/31; Leathard, , Fight for Family Planning, 48–50, 54–5.Google Scholar
41 LRO CM 1/63, Council minutes, 2/6/31 and 28/7/31; Leicester Evening Mail, 29/7/31, 10.
42 Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH, 1930 (Leicester, 1931), 39Google Scholar; CMAC, SA/FPA, All/24, cutting from the Leicester Evening Mail, 20/7/31; CMAC, SA/EUG, N42, cutting from the Medical Officer, 29/8/31.
43 Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH, 1932 (Leicester, 1933), 39, 105–8Google Scholar; Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH, 1933 (Leicester, 1934), 123–6–Google Scholar; Leathard, , Fight for Family Planning, 55.Google Scholar
44 CMAC, SA/FPA, All/24, C.K. Millard, ‘Memo on Ministry of Health's Circular 1408’; Ministry of Health, On the State of the Public Health, 1933 (London, 1934), 94–5Google Scholar; Leathard, , Fight for Family Planning, 55.Google Scholar
45 Leicester Sanitary Committee, Report of the MOH, 1907 (Leicester, 1908), 52–3.Google Scholar
46 Leicester Sanitary Committee, Report of the MOH, 1916 (Leicester, 1917), 26.Google Scholar See also Garside, P.L., ‘“Unhealthy areas”: town planning, eugenics and the slums, 1890–1945’, Planning Perspectives, 3 (1988), 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 LRO, CM 21/2, Health Committee minutes 5/3/26 and 19/11/26, C.K. Millard, ‘Van dwellers at Aylestone’, 11/26,4–6.
48 Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH, 1927 (Leicester, 1928), 63–4.Google Scholar
49 Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH, 1928 (Leicester, 1929), 41–4.Google Scholar
50 LRO, CM 21/3, Health Committee minutes, 13/12/29, 7/3/30, 28/3/30,11/4/30; LRO CM 1/62, Council minutes, 27/5/30; Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH,1929 (Leicester, 1930), 44–5.Google Scholar
51 Burnett, J., A Social History of Housing 1815–1970, 2nd ed. (Newton Abbot, 1980; 1st pub. 1978), 234–8.Google Scholar
52 LRO, CM 21/4, Health Committee minutes, 19/12/30; Nash and Reeder, Leicester in the Twentieth Century, 136–7Google Scholar; Newitt, N., ‘From slums to semis: housing the people of Leicester 1900–39’ (unpublished University of Leicester M.Phil, thesis, 1993), 111–12.Google Scholar
53 Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH, 1930 (Leicester, 1931), 27–34.Google Scholar
54 Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH, 1932 (Leicester, 1933), 5.Google Scholar
55 Millard, C.K., ‘Healthy housing for the poor: the present impasse and a way out’, Medical Officer, 49 (1933), 105–7Google Scholar; idem, ‘“Verminous” houses’, Medical Officer, 50 (1933), 151–2.Google Scholar
56 Leicester Evening Mail, 19/9/33, 1.Google Scholar
57 LRO, CM 21/5, Town Clerk to the Health Committee, ‘Slum clearance’, 14/9/33; Newitt, , ‘From slums to semis’, 115–16.Google Scholar
58 LRO, CM 1/65, Council minutes, 26/9/33; Newitt, ‘From slums to semis’, 117.
59 LRO, CM 21/5, Health Committee minutes, 13/10/33, MOH, ‘City of Leicester. Slum clearance: five years' programme’, 11/10/33,1–7; Leicester Evening Mail, 14/10/33, 9.Google Scholar
61 Ibid., Health Committee minutes, 1/6/34.
62 Leicester Evening Mail, 6/6/34, 1, 10.Google Scholar
63 LRO, CM 21/6, Health Committee minutes, 15/6/34; Ibid., Slum Clearance and Property Inspection subcommittee minutes, 13/7/34.
64 LRO, CM 21/7, Health Committee minutes, 18/1/35, MOH, ‘Slum clearance: five years' programme: suggested second instalment’, 4/1/35.
65 Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH, 1933 (Leicester, 1934), 36.Google Scholar
66 Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH, 1934 (Leicester, 1935), 31–5.Google Scholar
67 CMAC, SA/EUG, C31, C.P. Blacker to C.J. Bond, 21/5/30.
68 Ibid., C.J. Bond to C.P. Blacker, 5/7/31.
69 SMOH, B2/1, minutes of meeting 24/11/32, 39; Leicester Medical Society minutes, 13/11/34.
70 Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH, 1933 (Leicester, 1934), 28–9Google Scholar; CMAC, SA/EUG, C232, box 19, C.K. Millard to C.P. Blacker, 21 and 24/5/35.
71 CMAC, SA/EUG, C32, II, C.J. Bond to C.P. Blacker, 2/7/36; Ibid., C.J. Bond, ‘The present position of the birth control movement’, 16/11/37; Soloway, , Democracy and Degeneration, 225.Google Scholar
72 Eugenics Review, XXXI (1939–1941), 215–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73 CMAC, SA/EUG, C32, II, E.K. Macdonald to C.P. Blacker, 9/3/36; Ibid., C.P. Blacker to C.J. Bond, 13/3/36. See also Freeden, , ‘Eugenics and progressive thought’, 670–1Google Scholar; Searle, , ‘Eugenics and politics in Britain in the 1930s’, 162–9Google Scholar; idem, ‘Eugenics and class’, 235–7Google Scholar; Jones, , ‘Eugenics and social policy’, 728.Google Scholar
74 Ministry of Health, Housing Act, 1935: Report on the Overcrowding Survey in England and Wales (London, 1936), xviii, table IX.Google Scholar
75 Leicester Health Committee, Report of the MOH, 1936 (Leicester, 1937), 60.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by