Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:05:55.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Béla Bartók's Evolutionary Model of Folk Music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2016

JAMES BENNETT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his ethnomusicological writings and lectures, Béla Bartók describes folk music as ‘a natural product, just like the various forms of animal and vegetable life’ and elaborates this view, going on to describe a collection of developmental processes modelled explicitly on biological evolution. In this article, I characterize Bartók's evolutionary model by laying bare the taxonomies and genealogies inherent in his classificatory system. Then, through an analysis of the fifth of his Eight Improvisations on Hungarian Folk Songs (1920), I suggest the outlines of a method for interpreting and analysing Bartók's music engendered from this evolutionary model, a method that involves the elaboration of two ideas: (1) a conceptual shift from a relatively historically static major/minor tonality to a multivalent, ‘evolving’ tonality, and (2) the reconception of motives or themes as having no single original forms, but rather as being related genetically, as somehow evolving in their own right.

Type
Articles
Information
Twentieth-Century Music , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , September 2016 , pp. 291 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor. Philosophy of New Music (1949), trans. Hullot-Kentor, Robert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. ‘The Aging of the New Music’ (1955), trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor and Frederic Will, in Essays on Music, ed. Leppert, Richard. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. 181–202.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. ‘Criteria of New Music,’ in Sound Figures (1959), trans. Rodney Livingstone. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999. 145–96.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. ‘Difficulties’ (1966), trans. Susan H. Gillespie, in Essays on Music, ed. Leppert, Richard. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. 644–80.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. The Century (2005), trans. Alberto Toscano. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. ‘Comparative Music Folklore’ (1912), in Béla Bartók Essays, ed. Suchoff, Benjamin. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993. 155–8. Originally published as ‘Az összehasonlító zenefolklór’ (1912), in Bartók Béla Összegyűjtött Írásai, ed. András Szőllősy. Budapest: Zeneműkiadó Vállalat, 1966. 567–70.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. The Hungarian Folk Song (1924), trans. M. D. Calvocoressi, ed. Bartók, Peter. Homosassa: Bartók Records, 2002. Originally published as ‘A Magyar Népdal’ (1924), in Bartók Béla Összegyűjtött Írásai, ed. András Szőllősy. Budapest: Zeneműkiadó Vállalat, 1966. 101–350.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. ‘U źródeł muzyki ludowej’, Muzyka 2/6 (1925), 230–3.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. ‘The Folk Songs of Hungary’ (1928), in Béla Bartók Essays, ed. Suchoff, Benjamin. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993. 331–9.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. ‘The Relation of Folk Song to the Development of the Art Music of Our Time’ (1931), in Béla Bartók Essays, ed. Suchoff, Benjamin. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993. 320–30.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. ‘What is Folk Music?’ (1931), in Béla Bartók Essays, ed. Suchoff, Benjamin. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993. 5–8. Originally published as ‘Mi a népzene?’ (1931), in Bartók Béla Összegyűjtött Írásai, ed. András Szőllősy. Budapest: Zeneműkiadó Vállalat, 1966. 672–3.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. ‘Hungarian Folk Music’ (1933), in Béla Bartók Essays, ed. Suchoff, Benjamin. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993. 71–9.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. ‘Hungarian Peasant Music’ (1933), in Béla Bartók Essays, ed. Suchoff, Benjamin. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993. 80–102.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. ‘Why and How Do We Collect Folk Music?’ (1936), in Béla Bartók Essays, ed. Suchoff, Benjamin. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993. 9–24. Originally published as ‘Miért és hogyan gyűjtsünk népzenét?’ (1936), in Bartók Béla Összegyűjtött Írásai, ed. András Szőllősy. Budapest: Zeneműkiadó Vállalat, 1966. 581–96.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. ‘Harvard Lectures’ (1943), in Béla Bartók Essays, ed. Suchoff, Benjamin. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993. 354–92.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. ‘Introduction to Béla Bartók Masterpieces for the Piano’ (1945), in Béla Bartók Essays, ed. Suchoff, Benjamin. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993. 432–3.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. Bartók Béla Levelei, ed. Demény, János. Budapest: Művelt Nép Könyvkiadó, 1951.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. Serbo-Croatian Folk Songs (1941–2), trans. Albert B. Lord. New York: Columbia University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla. Béla Bartók Letters, trans. Péter Balabán and István Farkas, ed. Demény, János. New York: St Martin's Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Bartók, Béla Jr.. ‘The Private Man’, in The Bartók Companion, ed. Gillies, Malcolm. Portland: Amadeus Press, 1994. 18–29.Google Scholar
Bartók, Peter. My Father. Homosassa: Bartók Records, 2002.Google Scholar
Bennett, James N. ‘Explosions of Diversity: Béla Bartók's Evolutionary Model of Folk Music’. PhD diss., University of Wisconsin–Madison, 2015.Google Scholar
Bücher, Karl. Arbeit und Rhythmus. Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1896.Google Scholar
Cone, Edward T. ‘On Derivation: Syntax and Rhetoric’, Music Analysis 6/3 (1987), 237–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassett, Agatha. Béla Bartók's American Years. Cambridge: Riverside Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Gollin, Edward. ‘Multi-Aggregate Cycles and Multi-Aggregate Serial Techniques in the Music of Béla Bartók’, Music Theory Spectrum 29/2 (2007), 143–76.Google Scholar
Gollin, Edward. ‘On Bartók's Comparative Musicology as a Resource for Bartókian Analysis’, Integral 22 (2008), 59–79.Google Scholar
Gould, Steven Jay. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hanninen, Dora. ‘Species Concepts in Biology and Perspectives on Association in Music Analysis’, Perspectives of New Music 47/1 (2009), 5–68.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, Mortiz. Die Natur der Harmonik und der Metrik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1853.Google Scholar
Kárpáti, János. ‘Perfect and Mistuned Structures in Bartók's Music’, Studia Musicologica 36/3 (1995), 365–80.Google Scholar
Kovács, Sándor. ‘The Bartók System of Hungarian Folk Music’, in Bartók, Béla, Hungarian Folk Songs: Complete Collection, vol. 1, trans. Ria Julian and Hajnalka Csatorday, ed. Kovács, Sándor and Sebő, Ferenc. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1993.Google Scholar
Lendvai, Ernő. Bartók's Style (1955), trans. Paul Merrick. Budapest: Akkord, 1999.Google Scholar
Lendvai, Ernő. The Workshop of Bartók and Kodály. Budapest: Editio Musica, 1983.Google Scholar
Lewin, David. Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Roeder, John. ‘Constructing Transformational Signification: Gesture and Agency in Bartók's Scherzo, Op. 14, No. 2, measures 1–32’, Music Theory Online 15/1 (2009).Google Scholar
Sipos, János. In the Wake of Bartók in Anatolia. Budapest: European Folklore Institute, 2000.Google Scholar
Stevens, Halsey. The Life and Music of Béla Bartók, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Bence. ‘Mensch und Natur in Bartóks Geisteswelt’, Studia Musicologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 5 (1963), 525–39.Google Scholar
Vargyas, Lajos. Folk Music of the Hungarians (2002), trans. Judit Pokoly. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 2005.Google Scholar