Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T20:24:14.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A RESPONSE TO LAW AND MCBRAYER ON HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2014

Jack Mulder Jr.
Get access

Abstract

This short paper argues that two attempts in this journal to argue for the moral permissibility of homosexual activity do not succeed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Think , Volume 13 , Issue 38 , Autumn 2014 , pp. 39 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Dei Verbum, 10. See http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651118_dei-verbum_en.html.

2 See Dulles, Avery Cardinal, Magisterium: Teacher and Guardian of the Faith (Naples, FL: Ave Maria University Press, 2007), 4Google Scholar.

3 See canon 1061.1 of the Code of Canon Law at: http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P3V.HTM.

4 See http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/reproductive-technology/upload/Reproductive-Technology-Evaluation-Treatment-of-Infertility-Guidelines.pdf.

5 See Wojtyla, Love and Responsibility, trans. Willetts, H.T. (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1993)Google Scholar.