Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:17:16.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Change and Involvement at the Workplace: Evidence from the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Roy Green
Roy Green*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Newcastle
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The April national wage decision doubted whether Australia’s industrial relations parties as yet possessed the “maturity” to conduct enterprise bargaining. This view is consistent with the traditional role of the Industrial Relations Commission and with the conclusions of the 1985 Hancock Report, which provided the rationale for a permanent regime of centralised wage-fixing in Australia. It is also supported to some degree by the results of the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey, which show that, despite the accumulating pressure for change, most workplaces currently lack the necessary ‘infrastructure’ for bargaining and consultation at enterprise level. In particular, the failure of Australian management to involve workers and unions in change may be seen as a major impediment to further workplace reform. The fundamental question which arises for industrial relations policy is whether to accept the situation as it is and hope for progress through the slow but steady implementation of award restructuring, or whether to provide an external impetus for the development of a workplace infrastructure through the establishment of a new framework for enterprise bargaining combined with legislation to promote information-sharing and consultation at the workplace. The central thrust of this article is that the latter approach will more effectively foster a ‘strategic bargaining’ culture in Australia.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , June 1991 , pp. 72 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1991

References

ACTU/CAI (1988) Joint Statement On Participative Practices, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Australian Government (1986) Industrial Democracy And Employee Participation, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Government (1989) Award Restructuring: Federal Government Initiatives. AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Government (1991) Building a Competitive Australia. AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) (1991) National Wage Decision, Commonwealth Government, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Australian Manufacturing Council (1990) The Global Challenge: Australian Manufacturing In The 1990s Pappas Carter Evans & Koop/Telesis, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Bamber, G, Lansbury, R (1989) New Technology: International Perspectives on Human Resources and Industrial Relations. Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Business Council Of Australia (1989) Enterprise-Based Bargaining: A Better Way of Working. BCA, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Business Council Of Australia (1991) Developing Australia’s National Competitiveness, BCA, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Callus, R, et al (1991) Industrial Relations At Work: The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey. AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Cooke, W (1989) ‘Improving Productivity And Quality Through Collaboration.’ Industrial Relations, 28/2.Google Scholar
Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J (1991) ‘The Impact On Economic Performance Of A Transformation In Workplace Relations’ Industrial And Labor Relations Review, 44/2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department Of Industrial Relations (1990) Report On The Operation Of The Restructuring And Efficiency Principle. AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Economic Planning Advisory Council (1991) Improving Australia’s International Competitiveness. AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
European Community (1989) Charter Of The Fundamental Social Rights Of Workers, EC, Brussels.Google Scholar
Green, R, Wilson, A (1986a) ‘The ALP/ACTU Accord And Wages Policy’, in Fanning, M (ed), Australia: An Economy In Crisis? Institute Of Commonwealth Studies, London.Google Scholar
Green, R (1986b) ‘Freedom And Fairness At Work’, in Coates, K (ed), Freedom And Fairness: Empowering People At Work, Spokesman, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Green, R (1990a) ‘The Impact Of Product And Labour Markets On Workplace Industrial Relations’ AWIRS Seminar Series, Paper No 2.Google Scholar
Green, R (1990b) The Right To Strike: Options For Industrial Relations Legislation. Evatt Foundation, Sydney.Google Scholar
Hancock, K J (1985) Australian Industrial Relations Law And Systems: Report Of The Committee Of Review, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Isaac, J E (1958) ‘The Prospects For Collective Bargaining In Australia’, in Isaac, J E, Ford, G W (eds), Australian Labour Relations: Readings, Sun Books, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Kochan, T, et al (1986) The Transformation Of American Industrial Relations, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Koike, K (1988) Understanding Industrial Relations In Modern Japan. Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchington, M (1987) ‘A Review And Critique Of Research On Developments In Joint Consultation’, British Journal Of Industrial Relations, XXV.Google Scholar
Oliver, N, Wilkinson, B (1989) ‘Japanese Manufacturing Techniques And Personnel And Industrial Relations Practice In Britain: Evidence And Implications’ British Journal Of Industrial Relations, XXVII.Google Scholar
Poret, P (1991) ‘The ‘puzzle’ Of Wage Moderation In The 1980s’, OECD Working Paper No 87.Google Scholar
Rowthorn, R (1989) ‘The Thatcher Revolution’ Australian Economic Papers, 8/2.Google Scholar
Schuller, T (1985) Democracy At Work. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wedderbum, W (1990) The Social Charter, European Company And Employment Rights: An Outline Agenda, Institute Of Employment Rights, London.Google Scholar