Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:18:53.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A review of geodetic parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

William M. Kaula
William M. Kaula*
Affiliation:
Goddard Space Flight Center, N. A. S. A., Greenbelt, Maryland, U. S. A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is recommended that the parametric values which are currently most used in orbital computation be adopted as provisional standards rather than those which may be the best available and from which they differ only slightly. It is remarked that the most serious geodetic errors affecting astronomy are tracking station positions. Standard methods of describing positions are suggested.

Résumé. — L'auteur recommande qu'on choisisse comme valeurs conventionnelles provisoires des paramètres, celles qui sont le plus utilisées dans les calculs d'orbites, plutôt que les meilleures possibles, dont elles diffèrent d'ailleurs peu. Il remarque que les erreurs les plus importantes d'origine géodésique affectant les constantes astronomiques portent sur les positions des stations d'observation. Il propose des méthodes types pour décrire les positions de ces stations.

Zusammenfassung. — Es wird empfohlen, die Werte der Parameter vorläufig anzunehmen, die in der Bahnrechnung am häufigsten verwendet werden, und nicht diejenigen Werte, die gerade als die besten bekannt sind, zumal sie von diesen nur wenig abweichen. Ferner wird erwähnt, dass die geodätischen Fehler, welche sich auf die astronomischen Ergebnisse am stärksten auswirken, diejenigen in den Örtern der Beobachtungsstationen sind. Zur Angabe dieser Örter werden verbindliche Methoden vorgeschlagen.

Резюме. — Автор рекомендует выбирать в качество предварительных условных значений параметров, не возможно наилучшие значения, а предпочтительно те, которые чаще всего употребляются в вычислениях орбит. К тому-же эти значения мало отличаются друг от друга. Автор отмечает, что самые значительные ошибки геодезического происхождения, которые влияют на астрономические постоянные, являются положения станций где ведутся наблюдения. Он предлагает стандартные методы для определения этих положений.

Type
Research Article
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 21: The System of Astronomical Constants , 1965 , pp. 21 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © CNRS 1965 

References

[1] Hagihara, Y., Recommendations on Notation of the Earth Potential (Astron. J., vol. 67, No. 1, February 1962, p. 108).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Lambert, W. D., The Gravity Field of an Ellipsoid of Revolution as a Level Surface ( Ann. Acad. Sc. Fenn. , Ser. A-III, No. 57, 1961); Reprinted in Ohio State Univ., Inst. of Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, Publ. No. 14, 1961).Google Scholar
[3] Cook, A. H., The External Gravity Field of a Rotating Spheroid to the Order of e 3 ( Geophys. J. , vol. 2, No. 3, September 1909, p. 199–214).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Hirvonen, R. A., New Theory of the Gravimetric Geodesy ( Ann. Acad. Sc. Fenn., Ser. A-III, No. 56, 1960; Reprinted in Ohio State Univ., Inst. of Geodesy, Photo grammetry and Cartography, Publ. No. 9, 1960).Google Scholar
[5] Kaula, W. M., Tesseral Harmonics of the Gravitational Field and Geodetic Datum Shifts Derived from Camera Observations of Satellites ( J. Geophys. Res. , vol. 68, No. 2, January 15, 1963, p. 473–484).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Clarke, V. C., Constants and Related Data Used in Trajectory Calculations at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Calif. Inst. Tech., Jet Propulsion Lab., Tech. Rept. 32–273, May 1, 1962).Google Scholar
[7] Kozai, Y., Numerical Results from Orbits (Smithsonian Inst., Astrophys. Observ. Spec. Rept. No. 101, July 31, 1962).Google Scholar
[8] Herrick, S., Baker, R. M. L. Jr. and Hilton, C. G., Gravitational and Related Constants for Accurate Space Navigation in Proc. 8th Internat. Astronaut. Cong., Barcelona, 1957, ed. by Hecht, F., Vienna: Springer-Verlag, 1968, p. 197–235.Google Scholar
[9] Makemson, M. W., Baker, R. M. L. Jr. and Westrom, G. B., Analysis and Standardization of Astrodynamic Constants ( J. Astronaut. Sc. , vol. 8, No. 1, 1961, p. 1–13).Google Scholar
[10] Fischer, I., An Astrogeodetic World Datum from Geoidal Heights Based on the Flattening f = 1/298.3 ( J. Geophys. Res. , vol. 65, No. 7, July 1960, p. 2067–2076).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Kaula, W. M., A Geoid and World Geodetic System Based on a Combination of Gravimetric, Astrogeodetic, and Satellite Data ( J. Geophys. Res. , vol. 66, No. 6, June 1961, p. 1799–1811).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Rice, D. A., Compte rendu des reunions de la Section IV-Gravimétrie ( Bull. Géodés. , No. 60, June 1, 1961, p. 109).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Cook, A. H., Report on Absolute Measurements of Gravity ( Bull. Géodés. , No. 60, June 1, 1961, p. 131–139).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Uotila, U. A., Corrections to Gravity Formula from Direct Observations and Anomalies Expressed in Lower Degree Spherical Harmonics (Ohio State Univ., Inst. of Geodesy, Photo grammetry and Cartography , Publ. No. 23, 1962).Google Scholar
[15] Allan, T. D. and Dehlinger, P. et al., Comparison of Graf-Askania and Lacoste-Romberg Surface-Ship Gravity Meters ( J. Geophys. Res. , vol. 67, No. 13, December 1962, p. 5157–5162).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Harrison, J. C., The measurement of Gravity ( Proc. I. R. E. , vol. 50, No. 11, November 1962, p. 2302–2312).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] O'Keefe, J. A., Eckels, A. and Squires, R. K., The Gravitational Field of the Earth ( Astron. J. , vol. 64, No. 7, September 1959, p. 245–253).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Yaplee, B. S., Knowles, S. H., Shapiro, A., Crain, K. J. and Brouwer, D., The Mean Distance of the Moon as determined by Radar (presented at the I. A. U. Symposium No. 21, System Astron. Const., Paris, May 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Baldwin, R. B., The face of the Moon (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1949).Google Scholar
[20] Schrutka-Rechtenstamm, G., Neureduktion der 150 Mondpunkte der Breslauer Messungen von J. Franz ( Sitzungsberichte der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abt. II, No. 167, 1908, p. 71–123).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Baldwin, R. B., A Lunar Contour Map (Sky and Telescope, vol. 21, pt. 2, February 1961, 1, p. 84–85).Google Scholar
[22] Brown, E. W., Theory of the motion of the Moon. Part. 4 ( Mem. Roy. Astron. Soc. , vol. 57, No. 51, 1908, p. 145).Google Scholar
[23] Hamilton, T. W., Cain, D. L., Sjogren, W. L. and Null, G., Earth-Moon System Constants (Jet Propulsion Lab., Informal Communication, 1963).Google Scholar
[24] Rabe, E., Derivation of Fundamental Astronomical Constants from the Observations of Eros during 1926–1945 ( Astron. J. , vol. 55, No. 4, May 1950, p. 112–126).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Delano, E., The Lunar equation from observations of Eros, 1930–1981 ( Astron. J. , vol. 55, No. 5, August 1950, p. 129–132).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Fischer, I., Parallax of the Moon in terms of the World Geodetic System (Astron. J., vol. 67, No. 6, August 1962, p. 373–378).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Anderle, R. J. and Oesterwinter, C., A Preliminary Potential for the Earth from Doppler observations on satellites (presented at the 4th COSPAR Space Sci. Sym., Warsaw, 1963).Google Scholar
[28] Kaula, W. M., Improved Geodetic Results from Camera Observations of Satellites ( J. Geophys. Res. , vol. 68, No. 18, Sept. 15, 1963, p. 5183–5190).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29] King-Hele, D. G., Cook, G. E. and Rees, J. M., Determination of the Even Harmonics in the Earth's Gravitational Potential ( Geophys. J. , vol. 8, Sept. 1963, p. 119–145).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30] Izsak, I. G., Tesseral Harmonics in the Geoptential (Nature, vol. 199, July 13, 1963, p. 137–139).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31] Hamilton, T. W., Applications of Celestial Mechanics to Spacecraft Flight (in Proc. of the N. A. S. A.-University Conf. on the Sci. and Tech. of Space Exploration , Chicago, November 1962, N. A. S. A.-SP-11, December 1962, vol. 1, p. 253–260).Google Scholar
[32] Veis, G., The Positions of the Baker-Nunn Camera Stations (Smithsonian Inst., Astrophys. Observ. Spec. Rept. No. 59, March 3, 1961).Google Scholar