Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:17:31.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic Reconnection on the Sun

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

E R Priest
E R Priest*
Affiliation:
Mathematical Sciences Dept The University St Andrews KY16 9SS Scotland, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Magnetic reconnection is a fundamental process in astrophysics which plays many different roles on the Sun. The classical theory of fast steady reconnection due to Sweet, Parker, Petschek and Sonnerup has been unified in a theory which possesses many new regimes that depend on the boundary conditions at large distances. For example, the flux pile-up regime possesses diverging flows, a long central diffusion region and a reconnection rate that is much larger than the Petschek value. Recent numerical experiments however, often possess three features that are not present in the earlier theoretical models, namely highly curved inflow field lines, separatrix jets and reversed current spikes, and so an attempt is described to include these features in a new theoretical model.

Several solar phenomena where reconnection is believed to be operating are described. Cancelling magnetic features in photospheric magnetograms are probably evidence of reconnection submergence. Most prominences are of inverse polarity and have upflows driven by reconnection below them. Coronal heating may well be due to reconnection in many small current sheets. In solar flares reconnection may be driven below an eruptiing active-region prominence and hence power the high-temperature flare loops and chromospheric ribbons.

Type
VII. Magnetic Reconnection and Coronal Evolution
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 142: Basic Plasma Processes on the Sun , 1990 , pp. 271 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1990 

References

Ahmad, I and Webb, D (1978) Solar Phys. 58, 323.Google Scholar
Biskamp, D (1986) Phys. Fluids 29, 1520.Google Scholar
Biskamp, D and Welter, H (1989) Solar Phys. 120 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T G (1989), submitted.Google Scholar
Forbes, T G and Priest, E R (1982) Solar Phys. 81, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T G and Priest, E R (1987) Rev. Geophys. 25, 1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T G, Malherbe, J M and Priest, E R (1989) Solar Phys. 120, 285.Google Scholar
Gratton, F, Heyn, F, Biernat, H, Rijnbeek, R and Gnavi, G (1988) J. Geophys. Res. 93, 7318.Google Scholar
Holt, R and Mullan, D (1986) Solar Phys. 107, 63.Google Scholar
Jardine, M and Priest, E R (1988) J. Plasma Phys. 40, 143.Google Scholar
Martin, S F, Livi, S H B and Wang, J (1985) Aust. J. Phys. 38, 929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, S F (1986) in Coronal and Prominence Plasmas (ed Poland, A), NASA CP 2442, p.73.Google Scholar
Malherbe, J M and Priest, E R (1983) Astron. Astrophys. 123, 80.Google Scholar
Mikic, Z, Barnes, D C and Schnack, D D (1988) Astrophys. J. 328, 830.Google Scholar
Parker, E N (1958) Astrophys. J. 128, 664.Google Scholar
Petschek, H E (1964) AAS-NASA Symp. on Phys. of Solar Flares, NASA SP-50, p.425.Google Scholar
Priest, E R (1987) in The Role of Fine-Scale Magnetic Fields on the Structure of the Solar Atmosphere (ed Schroter, E, Vazquez, M, Wyller, A), Cambridge Univ. Press, p.297.Google Scholar
Priest, E R and Forbes, T G (1986) J. Geophys. Res. 91, 5579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, E R, Hood, A W and Anzer, U (1989) Astrophys. J. 344, 1010.Google Scholar
Priest, E R and Lee, L C (1990) J. Plasma Phys. , submitted.Google Scholar
Sonnerup, B U O (1970) J. Plasma Phys. 4, 161.Google Scholar
Sonnerup, B U O and Priest, E R (1975) J. Plasma Phys. 14, 283.Google Scholar
Sweet, P A (1958) Nuovo Cimento 8, 188.Google Scholar
Van Ballegooijen, A and Martens, P (1989) Astrophys. J. 343, 971.Google Scholar
Vasyliunas, V M (1975) Rev. Geophys. 13, 303.Google Scholar