Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:29:15.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Distribution of Planetary Nebula Nuclei in the log L-log T Plane: Inferences from Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

R. A. Shaw
R. A. Shaw*
Affiliation:
Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The expected distribution of planetary nebula nuclei (PNNs) on the log L-log T plane is calculated based upon modern stellar evolutionary theory, the initial mass function (IMF), and various assumptions concerning mass loss during post-main sequence evolution. The distribution is found to be insensitive to the assumed range of main-sequence progenitor mass, and to reasonable variations in the age and the star forming history of the galactic disk. Rather, the distribution is determined primarily by the heavy dependence of the evolution rate upon core mass, and secondarily upon the steepness of the IMF and other factors. The distribution is rather different than any found from observations, and probably reveals strong observational selection effects.

Type
VI. Evolution
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 131: Planetary Nebulae , 1989 , pp. 473 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1989 

References

Becker, S. A., and Iben, I. Jr. 1979, Ap. J., 232, 831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, S. A., and Iben, I. Jr. 1980, Ap. J., 237, 111.Google Scholar
Daub, C. T. 1982, Ap. J., 260, 612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, and Seaton, M. 1964, Ap. J., 140, 824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, S. R., and Augensen, H. J. 1987, Ap. J., 313, 268.Google Scholar
Iben, I. Jr. 1984, Ap. J., 277, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iben, I. Jr. 1982, Ap. J., 260, 821.Google Scholar
Iben, I. Jr., Kaler, J. B., Truran, J. W., and Renzini, A. 1983, Ap. J., 264, 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iben, I. Jr., and Renzini, A. 1983, Ann. Rev. Astr. Ap., 21, 271 (IR83).Google Scholar
Iben, I. Jr., and Truran, J. W. 1978, Ap. J., 220, 980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaler, J. B. 1986, Am. Scientist, 74, 244.Google Scholar
Kaler, J. B. 1985, Ann. Rev. Astr. Ap., 23, 89.Google Scholar
Kaler, J. B. 1983, Ap. J., 271, 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maciel, W. J., and Pottasch, S. R. 1980, Astr. Ap., 88, 1.Google Scholar
Miller, G. E., and Scalo, J. M. 1979, Ap. J. Suppl, 41, 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dell, C. R. 1962, Ap. J., 135, 371.Google Scholar
O'Dell, C. R. 1963, Ap. J., 138, 67.Google Scholar
Paczyński, B. 1971, Acta Astr., 21, 417 (PZ).Google Scholar
Reimers, D. 1975, Mem. Soc. R. Sci. Liege, 6 e Ser. 8, 369.Google Scholar
Schönberner, D. 1983, Ap. J., 272, 708.Google Scholar
Schönberner, D. 1981, Astr. Ap., 103, 119.Google Scholar
Schönberner, D. 1979, Astr. Ap., 79, 108.Google Scholar
Seaton, M. J. 1966, M.N.R.A.S., 132, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, R. A. 1985, , Univ. of Illinois.Google Scholar
Shaw, R. A., and Kaler, J. B. 1985, Ap. J., 295, 537.Google Scholar
Shaw, R. A., Truran, J. W., and Kaler, J. B. 1984, Bull. A. A. S., 16, 530.Google Scholar
Wood, P. R., and Faulkner, D. J. 1986, Ap. J., 307, 659.Google Scholar