Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T15:24:16.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Issue of Grammaticalization in Early German Second Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Carol W. Pfaff
Carol W. Pfaff
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper treats the development of the expression of grammatical categories in German in the early second language acquisition of Turkish and German children attending a bilingual day-care center in a multilingual speech community in Berlin. We examine case and gender marking on noun phrases and pronouns and tense/aspect and agreement marking on verb phrases. These are examined in light of the following general issues: (a) Do grammatical markers develop from independent lexical items in child language as well as in diachronic development? (b) Do the markers initially mark pragmatic categories before being grammaticalized as syntactic functors? (c) Do grammaticalizations of the first language influence the development of the second language?

We find no evidence that pragmatic precede syntactic categories; however, some evidence indicates that grammatical markers develop first as independent words—for example, pronominal use preceding definite article use of der, die, das, and main verb use preceding auxiliary use of sein (‘be’) and haben (‘have’). Some evidence that the categories of the first language (Turkish) play a role in the development of German second language is found in compound verb constructions.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 273 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. & Gleitmann, L. R. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1990). Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeschoten, H. (1990, 09). Asymmetrical code-switching in immigrant communities. Paper presented at the European Science Foundation Workshop on Language Contact and Codeswitching, London.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. V. (1979). Child morphology and morphophonemic change. Linguistics, 17, 182–186.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. V., & Slobin, D. I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58, 265–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1982). Spracherwerb in der Kindheit: Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax bei Kleinkindern. Tūbingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1984). Der Erwerb der Kasusmarkierungen in der deutschen Kindersprache. Linguistische Berichte 89, 1–31.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1986). Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics, 24, 79–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1989). The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research, 5, 1–29.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V., & Clark, H. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. (1956). India as a linguistic area. Language, 32, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerdes, U., & Spellerberg, G. (1983). Althochdeutsch-Mittelhochdeutsch: Grammatischer Grundkurs zur Einfūhrung und Textlektūre (5th ed.). Kōnigstein/Ts.: Athenāum.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1985). Function, structure and language acquisition. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Theoretical issues (pp. 1005–1028). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1989). Mind, code, and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Haider, H. (1985). The case of German. In Toman, J. (Ed.), Studies in German grammar 21 (pp. 65–102). Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. (1978). Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hūnnemeyer, F. (1991). From cognition to grammar–Evidence from African languages. In Traugott, E. C. & Heine, B. (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. 1, pp. 149–188). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., & Reh, M. (1984). Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1989). First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kardam, F., & Pfaff, C. (1992). Issues in educational policy and language development of bilingual children in Berlin. In Kroon, S. (Ed.), Multi-ethnische Gesellschaft und Schulen in Berlin. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Kardam, F., Temuçin, I., Çinar, S., & Pfaff, C. W. (1988, 05). Migrants from Turkey in West Berlin. Status, Legislation, Language rights and approaches to bilingual education. Paper presented at the Conference on Minority Rights and Minority Education, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kōpcke, K.-M., & Zubin, D. (1984). Sechs Prinzipien fūr die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natūrlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte, 93, 26–50.Google Scholar
Kuhberg, H. (1987). Der Erwerb der Temporalitāt des Deutschen durch zwei elfjāhriger Kinder mit Ausgangssprache Tūrkisch und Polnisch: Eine Longitudinaluntersuchung. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J. (1965). The evolution of grammatical categories. In Esquisses linguistiques II (pp. 38–54). Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1985). Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua E Stile, 20, 303–318.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1912). L'evolution des formes grammaticales. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale (pp. 130–148). Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (1986). Word order and case marking in early child language: Evidence from simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: French and German. Linguistics, 24, 123–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (1989). Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In Hyltenstam, K. & Obler, L. (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss (pp. 13–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (1990). Infl-ection: Subjects and subject–verb agreement. In Meisel, J. M. (Ed.), Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children (pp. 238–298). Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, A. (1986). The acquisition of gender: A study of English and German. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parodi, T. (1990). The acquisition of word order regularities and case morphology. In Meisel, J. M. (Ed.), Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children (pp. 157–190). Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, H., Moser, H., Schrōbler, I., & Grosse, S. (1982). Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik (22nd ed.). Tu¨bingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W. (1979). Constraints on language mixing: Intra-sentential codeswitching and borrowing in Spanish/English. Language, 55, 291–318. (Reprinted in J. Amastae & L. Elias Olivares, Eds., 1982, Spanish in the United States: Sociolinguistic aspects, pp. 264–298, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, C. W. (1984). Input and residual transfer effects in Turkish and Greek children's German. In Andersen, R. (Ed.), Second languages (pp. 271–298). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W. (1985). The problem of plurifunctionality in bilingual language acquisition. Papers on Research in Child Language Development, 24, 95–103.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W. (Ed.). (1987). Processes of first and second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W. (1990a). Connatural and abnatural change in an unnatural system: The case of case-marking in German. In Mūhlhāusler, P. et al. (Eds.), Development and diversity: Linguistic variation across time and space (pp. 547–586). Arlington, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W. (1990b). Mixing and linguistic convergence in migrant speech communities: Linguistic constraints, social conditions, and models of acquisition. Code-switching and language contact: Constraints, conditions and models (pp. 119–153). Strasbourg: European Scientific Networks.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W. (1991). Turkish in contact with German: Language maintenance and loss among immigrant children in West Berlin. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 90, 97–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, C. W., & Çakarcan, O. (1989, 03). Nominalreferenz in Erzāhlungen. Paper presented at the Tūrkisch-Deutsches Sprachwissenschaftliches Symposion, Ankara.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W., Çakarcan, O., Kardam, F., Savaş, T., & Thiel, M. (1990). Bilingualer Spracherwerb. DFG Projekt Arbeitsbericht IV.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W., Kardam, F., Voß, J., Çakarcan, O., MacKerron, H., Savaş, T., & Thiel, M. (1989). Bilingualer Spracherwerb. DFG Projekt Arbeitsbericht III.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W., Kardam, F., Voß, J., Freesemann, H., Savaş, T., & Thiel, M. (1987). Bilingualer Spracherwerb. DFG Projekt Arbeitsbericht I.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W., Kardam, F., Voß, J., Freesemann, H., Savaş, T., & Thiel, M. (1988). Bilingualer Spracherwerb. DFG Projekt Arbeitsbericht II.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W. & Portz, R. (1981). Foreign children's acquisition of German: Universals versus interference. In Dittmar, N. & Kōniger, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian–German Symposium on the Language of Immigrant Workers and Their Children (pp. 137–170). Berlin: Freie Universitāt.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W., & Savaş, T. (1988). Language development in a bilingual setting: The acquisition of Turkish in Germany. In Koç, S. (Ed.), Studies on Turkish linguistics (pp. 351–386). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W., Thiel, M., Kardam, F., Savaş, T., Schmidt, K., & Çakarcan, O. (1991a). Bilingualer Spracherwerb. DFG Projekt Arbeitsbericht V.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W., Thiel, M., Kardam, F., Savaş, T., Schmidt, K., & Çakarcan, O. (1991b, 10). Development of form and function of nominal inflections in the first and early second language acquisition of Tūrkish and German. Paper presented at the DFG Kolloquium, Crossing Boundaries. Tubingen.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1986). Small children's small clauses. Bangor Research Papers in Linguistics, 1, 1–36.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1989).Bilingualism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.), Studies in child language development (pp. 175–208). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1977). Language change in childhood and history. In Macnamara, J. (Ed.), Language learning and thought (pp. 185–221). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 2, pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1990). The development from child speaker to native speaker. In Stigler, J. W., Shweder, R. A., & Herdt, G. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 233–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, M. (forthcoming). Die Genusmarkierung im Erst-und frūhen Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen. Unpublished master's thesis, Freie Universitāt, Berlin.Google Scholar
Tracy, R. (1991). Sprachliche Strukturentwicklung: Linguistische und kognitionspsychologische Aspekte einer Theorie des Erstspracherwerbs. Tūbingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1982). From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (Eds.), Perspectives in historical linguistics (pp. 245–271). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Kōnig, E. (1991). The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott, E. C. & Heine, B. (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. 1, pp. 189–218). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volterra, V., & Taeschner, T. (1978). The acquisition and development of language by bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 5, 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. (1986). Temporalitāt in der Zweitsprache. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol-formation: An organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar