Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:30:40.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Differences in Emotions, Forgiveness and Tolerance in Relation to Political Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2014

Susana Conejero ,
Itziar Etxebarria  and
Ignacio Montero
Susana Conejero*
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (Spain)
Itziar Etxebarria
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (Spain)
Ignacio Montero
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Susana Conejero. Departamento de Procesos Psicológicos Básicos y su Desarrollo. Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea. San Sebastián (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study, which forms part of a broader research project, analyzes gender differences in: the intensity of diverse emotions, the justification of violence, attitudes towards the terrorist group ETA, forgiveness and tolerance. Participants comprised 728 people (45.5% men and 54.5% women) resident in either Basque Country or Navarra (Spain), representative of all national identities and political ideologies existing in this context. An ad hoc questionnaire was designed and administered between November 2005 and February 2006, a short time before ETA declared a ceasefire. Women reported more intensity in fear for political reasons and scored higher in two of the six measures of empathy included in the study (empathy with prisoners and empathy with those who suffer and think like oneself). Men scored higher in positive emotionality, indifference and Schadenfreude. Women perceived apology and forgiveness as more necessary elements for achieving peace than men. These results suggest that it may be beneficial for women to play a more prominent role in relation to the resolution of intergroup conflicts such as the one existing in the Basque Country.

Keywords

gender differencesemotionspolitical violenceforgivenesstolerance
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E9
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145–1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0003-066X.38.11.1145 Google Scholar
Avery, P. G. (1988). Political tolerance among adolescents. Theory and Research in Social Education, 16, 183–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1988.10505564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In Worthington, E. L. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness. Psychological research and theological perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 79–104). Radnor, PA: Templeton.Google Scholar
Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2001). The subtlety of emotions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2004). Collective guilt. International perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brebner, J. (2003). Gender and emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 387–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00059-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In Lewis, M. & Haviland, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 447–460). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2000). Gender, emotion, and expression. In Lewis, M. & Haviland-Jones, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 338–349). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2008). Gender and emotion in context. In Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Feldman Barrett, L. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 395–408). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cehajic, S., Brown, R., & Castano, E. (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29, 351–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00634.x Google Scholar
Collins, A., & Frankenhaeuser, M. (1978). Stress responses in males and female engineering students. Journal of Human Stress, 4, 43–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1978.9934986 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, N. R., Werner, N. E., Casas, J. F., O’Brien, K. M., Nelson, D. A., Grotpeter, J. K., & Markon, C. (1999). Childhood aggression and gender: A new look at an old problem. In Bernstein, D. (Ed.), Gender and motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. (Vol. 45, pp. 75–141). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Cundiff, N. L., & Komarraju, M. (2008). Gender differences in ethnocultural empathy and attitudes toward men and women in authority. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15, 5–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1548051808318000 Google Scholar
David, C. F., & Kistner, J. A. (2000). Do positive self-perceptions have a “dark side”? Examination of the link between perceptual bias and aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 327–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005164925300 Google Scholar
de Rivera, J. (1992). Emotional climate: Social structure and emotional dynamics. In Strongman, K. T. (Ed.), International review of studies on emotion. (Vol. 2, pp. 197–218). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.309 Google Scholar
Enright, R. D., & the Human Development Study Group (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In Kurtines, W. & Gerwitz, J. (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development. (Vol. 1, pp. 123–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Etxebarria, I., Apodaca, P., Eceiza, A., Fuentes, M. J., & Ortiz, M. J. (2003). Diferencias de género en emociones y en conducta social en la edad escolar [Gender differences in emotions and social behavior in school children]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 26, 147–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021037003321827759 Google Scholar
Etxebarria, I., Ortiz, M. J., Conejero, S., & Pascual, A. (2009). Intensity of habitual guilt in men and women and differences in interpersonal sensitivity and the tendency towards anxious-aggressive guilt. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 540–554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600001918 Google Scholar
Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894–914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019993 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, T. J., & Eyre, H. L. (2000). Engendering gender differences in shame and guilt: Stereotypes, socialization, and situational pressures. In Fischer, A. H. (Ed.), Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives (pp. 254–276). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2011). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. H., Rodríguez-Mosquera, P. M., van Vianen, A. E. M., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). Gender and culture differences in emotion. Emotion, 4, 87–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F1528-3542.4.1.87 Google Scholar
Golebiowska, E. A. (1999). Gender gap in political tolerance. Political Behavior, 21, 43–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023396429500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., McLernon, F., Niens, U., & Noor, M. (2004). Intergroup forgiveness and guilt in Northern Ireland. In Branscombe, N. R. & Doosje, B. (Eds.), Collective guilt. International perspectives (pp. 193–215). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1989). Sex-differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10, 194–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.2.194 Google Scholar
Iqbal, N., & Ahmad, H. (1993). Gender differences and birth order in expressed and suppressed anger. Journal of Personality and Clinical Studies, 9, 73–77.Google Scholar
Konstam, V., Chernoff, M., & Deveney, S. (2001). Toward forgiveness: The role of shame, guilt, anger, and empathy. Counseling and Values, 46, 26–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fj.2161-007X.2001.tb00204.x Google Scholar
Kring, A. M. (2000). Gender and anger. In Fischer, A. H. (Ed.), Gender and emotion. Social psychological perspectives (pp. 211–231). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lennon, R., & Eisenberg, N. (1992). Diferencias de sexo y edad en empatía y simpatía [Gender and age differences in empathy and sympathy]. In Eisenberg, N. & Strayer, J. (Eds.), La empatía y su desarrollo [Empathy and its development] (pp. 215–239). Bilbao, Spain: Descleé de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Lozano, A., & Etxebarria, I. (2007). La tolerancia a la diversidad en los adolescentes y su relación con la autoestima, la empatía y el concepto del ser humano [Tolerance of diversity in adolescents and its relationship with self-esteem, empathy and the human concept]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 30, 109–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021037007779849673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutwak, N., Ferrari, J. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1998). Shame, guilt, and identity in men and women: The role of identity orientation and processing style in moral affects. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 1027–1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00067-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaskill, A., Maltby, J., & Day, L. (2002). Forgiveness of self and others and emotional empathy. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 663–665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603925 Google Scholar
Mackie, D. M., Silver, L. A., & Smith, E. R. (2004). Intergroup emotions. Emotion as an intergroup phenomenon. In Tiedens, L. Z. & Leach, C. W. (Eds.), Studies in emotion and social interaction. The social life of emotions (pp. 227–245). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2002). From prejudice to intergroup’s emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. Philadelphia, PE: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
McGarty, C., Pedersen, A., Leach, C. W., Mansell, T., Waller, J., & Bliuc, A. M. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 659–680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466604X18974 Google Scholar
Miller, A. J., Worthington, E. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). Gender and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 843–876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2008.27.8.843 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeschberger, S. L., Dixon, D. N., Niens, U., & Cairns, E. (2005). Forgiveness in Northern Ireland: A model for peace in the midst of the “Troubles”. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11, 199–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327949pac1102_5 Google Scholar
Nellis, A. M. (2009). Gender differences in fear of terrorism. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 25, 322–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1043986209335012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormazabal, S. (2003). Un mapa (inacabado) del sufrimiento [An (unfinished) map of suffering]. Bilbao, Spain: Fundación Manu Robles-Arangiz Institutua.Google Scholar
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Páez, D., Ruiz, J. I., Gailly, O., Kornblit, A. L., Wiesenfeld, E., & Vidal, C. M. (1997). Clima emocional: Su concepto y medición mediante una investigación transcultural [Emotional climate: Its concept and mediation through cross-cultural research]. Revista de Psicología Social, 12, 79–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174%2F021347497320892045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueckert, L., & Naybar, N. (2008). Gender differences in empathy: The role of the right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 67, 162–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.bandc.2008.01.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saket, K. H. (2005). Relational aggression: A review and conceptualization. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. The Sciences and Engineering, 63(3–B), 1735.Google Scholar
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2010). Why women apologize more than men: Gender differences in thresholds for perceiving offensive behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 1649–1655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384150 Google Scholar
Sotelo, M. J. (2000). Individual differences in political tolerance among adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 185–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2000.28.2.185 Google Scholar
Spears, R., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Intergroup Schadenfreude. Conditions and consequences. In Tiedens, L. Z. & Leach, C. W. (Eds.), Studies in emotion and social interaction. The social life of emotions (pp. 336–355). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Tauch, N., Maio, G., & Kenworthy, J. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1368430207071345 Google Scholar
Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Gender and morality. In Masling, J. M. & Bornstein, R. F. (Eds.), The psychodynamics of gender and gender role (pp. 251–269). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiedens, L. Z., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Studies in emotion and social interaction. The social life of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar