Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:16:52.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flow Dimensions on Daily Activities with the Spanish Version of the Flow Scale (DFS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2014

Sergi Rufi ,
Federico Javaloy ,
Joan M. Batista-Foguet ,
Antonio Solanas  and
Darío Páez
Sergi Rufi*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
Federico Javaloy
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
Joan M. Batista-Foguet
Affiliation:
Universidad Ramon Llull (Spain)
Antonio Solanas
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
Darío Páez
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sergi Rufi. Department de Psicologia Social. Facultat de Psicologia. Universidad de Barcelona. Passeig de la Vall d’Hebron, 171. 08035. Barcelona (Spain). Phone: +34–933125076. Fax: +34–934021359. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A sample of 250 students of psychology with an average age of 20.37 years, answered the Flow Q questionnaire indicating their favorite flow activity, and the Spanish version of the Dispositional Flow Scale (DFS). A confirmatory factor analysis assessed the DFS construct validity of the flow model on daily activities. Both a hierarchical model of eight first order factors reflecting a second order global flow factor, and a model with eight formative first order flow dimensions, showed good fit and discriminant power. Most optimal activities were found to be individual and structured, such as studying, reading and certain forms of individual sports. Leisure activities turned out to be more rewarding than studying. Sports displayed more flow, clear goals, merging of action and awareness, and autotelic experience. Reading also showed more flow, balance of challenge and skills, feedback, merging of action and awareness, and loss of self-consciousness. On the other hand, studying displayed less flow, merging of action and awareness, and autotelic experience.

Keywords

flowflow dimensionsdaily optimal activitiesformative and reflective analysis models
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E30
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barret, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815–824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018 Google Scholar
Bisbe, J., Batista-Foguet, J. M., & Chenhall, R. (2007). Defining management accounting constructs: A methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 789–820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.010 Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In Triandis, H. C. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 137–164). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., & Nilan, M. S. (1999). Optimal experiences of web activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 585–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00038-2 Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975a). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975b). Play and intrinsic rewards. Humanistic Psychology, 15, 41–63.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1982). Toward a psychology of optimal experience. In Wheeler, L. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 13–35). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper&Row.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Materialism and the evolution of conscious-ness. In Kasser, T. & Kanner, A. D. (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world (pp. 91–106). Washington, DC: The APA Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1998). Experiencia óptima. Estudios psicológicos del flujo en la conciencia. [Optimal experience: Pyschological studies of flow in consciousness]. Bilbao, Spain: Desclée De Brouwer.Google Scholar
Dean, B. M. (2009). Optimal experience in relationships, activities, and beyond: Connecting flow with self-expansion. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana State University, IN, USA.Google Scholar
Delle Fave, A., & Bassi, M. (2009). Sharing optimal experiences and promoting good community life in a multicultural society. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 280–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760902933716 Google Scholar
Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2005). The investigation of optimal experience and apathy: Developmental and Psychosocial Implications. European Psychologist, 10, 264–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.95.3.542 Google Scholar
Doganis, G., Iosifidou, P., & Vlachopoulos, S. (2000). Factor structure and internal consistency of the Greek version of the Flow State Scale. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 91, 1231–1240. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.91.3f.1231 Google Scholar
Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 158–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4 Google Scholar
Fournier, J., Gaudreau, P., Dernontrond-Behr, P., Visiolic, J., Forest, J., & Jackson, S. (2007). French translation of the Flow State Scale-2: Factor structure, cross-cultural invariance, and associations with goal attainment. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 897–916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.07.007 Google Scholar
García-Calvo, T., Cervelló, E. M., Jiménez, R., Iglesias, D., & Santos-Rosa, F. J. (2005). La implicación motivacional de jugadores jóvenes de fútbol y su relación con el Estado de Flow y la satisfacción en competición. [Motivational involvement of young soccer players, and its relationship with the Flow state and satisfaction in competition]. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 14, 21–42.Google Scholar
García-Calvo, T., Cervelló, E. M., & Santos-Rosa, F. J. (2006). Flow y deporte. [Flow and Sport]. In Garcés de los Fayos, E. J., Olmedilla, A., & Jara, P. (Eds.), Psicología y deporte. [Psychology and Sport]. Murcia, Spain: Diego Marín.Google Scholar
García-Calvo, T., Jiménez, R., Santos-Rosa Ruano, F. J., Reina, R., & Cervelló, E. M. (2008). Psychometric Properties of the Spanish version of the Flow State Scale. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 660–669.Google Scholar
Gouveia, M. J., Pais-Ribeiro, J. L., Marques, M., & Carvalho, C. (2012). Measuring dispositional flow in exercise. Validity and reliability of a Portuguese version of the Dispositional Flow Scale-2 (DFS-2). Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 21, 81–88.Google Scholar
Han, S. (1988). The relationship between life satisfaction and flow in elderly Korean immigrants. In Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 138–149). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621956.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 133–150.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. A., Kimiecik, J. C., Ford, S., & Marsh, H. W. (1998). Psychological correlates of flow in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20, 358–378.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 17–35.Google Scholar
Kawabata, M., Mallett, C. J., & Jackson, S. A. (2008). The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2: Examination of factorial validity and reliability for Japanese adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 465–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.05.005 Google Scholar
Keller, J., & Landhäußer, A. (2012). The Flow model revisited. In Engesar, S. (Ed.), Advances in Flow Research (pp 51–64). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (3 rd Ed.). New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., & Jackson, S. A. (1999). Flow experience in sport: Construct validation of multidimensional, hierarchichal state and trait respones. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 343–371.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. (1964). Religions, values and peak-experiences. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. In Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 266–287). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621956.016 Google Scholar
Massimini, F., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Delle Fave, A. (1988). Flow and biocultural evolution. In Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 60–82). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621956.004 Google Scholar
Mesurado, B. (2008). Validez factorial y Fiabilidad del cuestionario de Experiencia Óptima (Flow) para niños y adolescentes. [Factor validity and reliability of the Optimal Experience questionnaire for children and adolescents]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 25, 159–178.Google Scholar
Mesurado, B. (2009a). Actividad estructurada vs actividad desestructurada, realizadas en solitario vs en compañía de otros y la experiencia óptima. [Structured vs unstructured activity, performed alone vs with other people, and optimal experience]. Anales de Psicología, 20, 308–315.Google Scholar
Mesurado, B. (2009b). Comparación de tres modelos teóricos explicativos del constructo experiencia óptima o flow. [Comparison of three theoretical models of the optimal experience or flow construct]. Interdisciplinaria, 26, 121–137.Google Scholar
Mesurado, B. (2010). La experiencia de Flow o Experiencia Óptima en el ámbito educativo. [Flow or Optimal Experience in education]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 42, 183–192.Google Scholar
Moneta, G. B. (2012). On the measurement and conceptualization of flow. In Engeser, S., (Ed.), Advances in Flow Research (pp 23–50). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. A., Cervelló Gimeno, E., & González-Cutre Coll, D. (2006). Motivación autodeterminada y flujo disposicional en el deporte. [Self-determined motivation and dispositional flow in sport]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 310–317.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. A., Conte Marín, L., Borges Silva, F., & González-Cutre Coll, D. (2008). Necesidades psicológicas básicas, motivación intrínseca y propensión a la experiencia autotélica en el ejercicio físico. [Basic psychological needs, intrinsic motivation and autotelic experience propensity in physical exercise]. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 25, 305–312.Google Scholar
Moreno, J., Noguera, F., Coll, D., Gimeno, E., & Pérez, L. (2009). Flow disposicional en salvamento deportivo: Una aproximación desde la teoría de la autodeterminación. [Dispositional flow in lifesaving sport: A Self Determination Theory approach]. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 18, 23–35.Google Scholar
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y-F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19, 22–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.1.22.15184 Google Scholar
Pearce, J. M., Ainley, M., & Howard, S. (2005). The ebb and flow of online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 745–771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.019 Google Scholar
Prada, E. (2005). Psicología positiva y emociones positivas. [Positive psychology and positive emotions]. Revista electrónica Psicología Positiva.com. Retrieved from http://www.psicologia-positiva.com/Psicologiapos.pdf Google Scholar
Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & Van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 561–582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203433 Google Scholar
Sato, I. (1998). Bosozoku: Flujo en las bandas japonesas motorizadas. [Bosozoku: Flow in Japanese motorcycle gangs]. In Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.), Experiencia Óptima. Estudios psicológicos del flujo en la conciencia. [Optimal experience: Pyschological studies of flow in consciousness]. (pp. 99–120). Bilbao, Spain: Desclée De Brouwer.Google Scholar
Sinnamon, S., Moran, A., & O’Connell, M. (2012). Flow among musicians: Measuring peak experiences of student. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 6–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022429411434931 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, G., Fogarty, G., & Jackson, S. (1999). The flow experience: A Rasch Analysis of Jackson’s Flow State Scale. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3, 278–294.Google Scholar
Walker, C. J. (2010). Experiencing flow: Is doing it together better than doing it alone? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 3–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760903271116 Google Scholar