Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:08:38.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rasch-Master’s Partial Credit Model in the Assessment of Children’s Creativity in Drawings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2014

Tatiana de Cássia Nakano  and
Ricardo Primi
Tatiana de Cássia Nakano*
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidade Católica de Campinas (Brazil)
Ricardo Primi
Affiliation:
Universidade São Francisco (Brazil)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Tatiana Nakano. Psychology Post-graduation Department of PUC-Campinas. Avenida John Boyd Dunlop, s/n. Jardim Ipaussurama – Campinas / SP. CEP 13060–904. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to use the Partial Credit Model to study the factors of the Test of Creativity in Children and identify which characteristics of the creative person would be more effective to differentiate subjects according to their ability level. A sample of 1426 students from first to eighth grades answered the instrument. The Partial Credits model was used to estimate the ability of the subjects and item difficulties on a common scale for each of the four factors, indicating which items required a higher level of creativity to be scored and will differentiate the more creative individuals. The results demonstrated that the greater part of the characteristics showed good fit indices, with values between 0.80 and 1.30 both infit and outfit, indicating a response pattern consistent with the model. The characteristics of Unusual Perspective, Expression of Emotion and Originality have been identified as better predictors of creative performance because requires greater ability level (usually above two standard deviation). These results may be used in the future development of an instrument’s reduced form or simplification of the current correction model.

Keywords

creativityPartial Credits ModelItem Response Theory
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E35
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, L. S., Prieto, L. P., Ferrando, M., Oliveira, E., & Ferrándiz, C. (2008). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: The question of its construct validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 53–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003 Google Scholar
Baer, J. (2011). Four (more) arguments against the Torrance Tests. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 5, 316–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025211 Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. (1996) Dimensions of creativity. Massachusetts, IL: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001) Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Candeias, A. A. (2008). Criatividade: Perspectiva integrativa sobre o conceito e sua avaliação [Creativity: An integrative perspective on the concept and its evaluation]. In Morais, M. F. & Bahia, S. (Eds.), Criatividade: Conceito, necessidades e intervenção [Creativity: Concept, needss and intervention] (pp. 41–64). Braga, Portugal: Psiquilíbrios.Google Scholar
Clapham, M. M. (1998). Structure of figural forms A and B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 275–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058002010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La Torre, S. (1991). Evaluacion de la creatividad [Creativity assessment]. Madrid, Spain: Editorial Escuela Española.Google Scholar
Embretson, S. E. (2006). The continued search for nonarbitrary metrics in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 50–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.50 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0040755 Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1960). The structure of the intellect model: Its use and implications. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hambleton, H. K., & Swaminatham, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2006). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analysis of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 251–259.Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2008). Commentary: The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking already overcome many of the perceived weakness that Silvia et al.’s (2008) methods are intended to correct. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 2, 97–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.97 Google Scholar
Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & Bandalos, D. L. (2006). The latent structure and measurement invariance of scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking–Figural. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 459–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282456 Google Scholar
Linacre, J. M. (1997). Test Validity and Rasch Measurement: Construct, Content, etc. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 18, 970–971.Google Scholar
Linacre, J. M. (2004). KR-20 or Rasch reliability: Which tells the “truth”? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 11, 580–581.Google Scholar
Linacre, J. M. (2009). Winsteps® (Version 3.69.0) [Computer Software]. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.com.Google Scholar
Nakano, T. C., & Primi, R. (2012). A estrutura fatorial do Teste de Criatividade Figural Infantil [The factor structure of the Test of of Children’s Figural Creativity] Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa, 28, 91–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722012000300003 Google Scholar
Nakano, T. C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2006a). Teste Brasileiro de Criatividade Figural: Proposta de instrumento [Test of the Children’s Figural Creativity: instrument proposal]. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia, 40, 103–110.Google Scholar
Nakano, T. C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2006b). Teste Brasileiro de Criatividade Figural: Proposta de instrumento [The factor structure of the Test of the Children’s Figural Creativity]. Avaliação Psicológica, 5, 159–170.Google Scholar
Nakano, T. C., Wechsler, S. M., & Primi, R. (2011). Teste de Criatividade Figural Infantil [Test of the Children’s Figural Creativity]. São Paulo, Brasil: Editora Vetor.Google Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are creativity and intelligence really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45.Google Scholar
Pasquali, L., & Primi, R. (2003). Fundamentos da Teoria da Resposta ao Item: TRI [Fundamentals of Item Response Theory: IRT]. Avaliação Psicológica, 2, 99–110.Google Scholar
Pereira, M. (2001). Inteligência e criatividade: Duas trajetórias alternativas para as crianças sobredotadas? [Intelligence and creativity: Two alternative trajectories for gifted children?]. Psicologia: Teoria, Investigação e Prática, 6, 171–188.Google Scholar
Plucker, J., & Zabelina, D. (2009). Creativity and interdisciplinarity: One creativity or many creativities?. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 5–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0155-3 Google Scholar
Primi, R. (2004). Avanços na interpretação de escalas com a aplicação da teoria de resposta ao item. [Advances in scale interpretation with the application of Item Response Theory]. Avaliação Psicológica, 3, 53–58.Google Scholar
Primi, R., Carvalho, L. F., Miguel, F. K., Muniz, M., & Nunes, C. H. S. (2009). Normatização da BFP por meio da teoria de resposta ao item: Interpretação referenciada nos itens [Standardization of BFP by item response theory: Interpreting the referenced items]. In Nunes., C. H. S., Hutz, C. S., & Nunes, M. F. O.. Bateria Fatorial de Personalidade: Manual técnico [Battery for Factor Personality: Technical Manual ] (pp. 153–170). São Paulo, Brasil: Casa do Psicólogo.Google Scholar
Romo, M. (2008). Creatividad en los domínios artístico y cientifico y sus correlatos educativos. [Creativity in artistic and scientific dominios and educational correlates.]. In Morais, M. F. & Bahia, S.. Criatividade: Conceito, necessidades e intervenção [Creativity: Concepts, needs and intervention] (pp. 65–90). Minho, Portugal: Psiquilibrios.Google Scholar
Rosas, A. (1984). A construção de um teste de aptidão criativa [The construction of a test of creative ability]. Revista de Psicologia, 2, 1–14.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2008a). Another look at creativity and intelligence: Exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1012–1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.027 Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2008b). Creativity and intelligence revisited: A latent variable analysis of Wallach and Kogan (1965). Creativity Research Journal, 20, 34–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400410701841807 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 19–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024071 Google Scholar
Smith, E. V. (2004). Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using the fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. In Smith, E. V. & Smith, R. M.. Introduction to Rasch measurement: Theory, models and applications (pp. 575–600). Minnesota, MN: JAM Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R. M. (1996) Polytomous mean-square fit statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10, 516–517.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Identifying the creative personality. In Torrance, E. P.. Guiding creative talent (pp. 65–83). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (2000). Research review for the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking figural and verbal forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., & Ball, O. E. (1980). Fourth revision: streamlined scoring and norms for figural form A. ITCT. Athens, GA: Georgia Studies of Creative Behavior.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., & Ball, O. E. (1990). Streamlined scoring and interpretation guide and norms manual verbal and figural form B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., & Safter, H. T. (1999). Making the creative leap beyond. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.Google Scholar
Van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wallack, M., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Wechsler, S. M. (2004). Avaliação da criatividade por figuras e palavras: Testes de Torrance - versão brasileira [Assessment of creativity by pictures and words: Torrance Tests - Brazilian version] (2nd Ed. Rev.). Campinas, Brasil: Lamp/Impressão Digital do Brasil.Google Scholar
Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V. Jr.. (2007). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch Models: Part I – Instrument development tools. In Smith, E. V. Jr. & Smith, R. M. (Eds.). Rasch Measurement: Advanced and specialized applications (pp. 202–242). Minnesota, MN: Maple Grove.Google Scholar
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.Google Scholar
Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, CA: MESA.Google Scholar
Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 24–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.545713 Google Scholar