Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:21:53.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Auditory Implicit Semantic Priming in Spanish-Speaking Children withand without Specific Language Impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2014

Dolors Girbau*
Affiliation:
Universitat Jaume I (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this articleshould be addressed to Dolors Girbau. Department of Basic Psychology.Universitat Jaume I. Campus Riu Sec. 12071. Castelló (Spain). Phone:+34–964728000. E-mail address: [email protected]

Abstract

We analyzed whether Spanish-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment(SLI) showed deficits in lexical-semantic processing/organization, and whetherthese lexical measures correlated with standardized measures of languageabilities. Fourteen children with Typical Language Development (TLD) and 16age-matched children with SLI (8;0–9;11 years) participated. In aLexical Decision (LD) task with implicit semantic priming, children judgedwhether a given speech pair contained two words (semantically related/unrelated)or a word-pseudoword. Children received a comprehensive language and readingtest battery. Children with TLD exhibited significant semantic priming; theywere faster for semantically related word pairs than for unrelated(p < .001) and than for word-pseudoword pairs(p < .0002). The group with SLI did not exhibitsignificant semantic priming, despite showing more variability. Children withSLI made significantly slower LDs [F(1, 26) = 4.61,p < .05, partial η2= .15] and more errors [F(1, 26) = 4.16,p < .05, partial η2= .13] than children with TLD. Mean response time across all LDconditions and the receptive vocabulary (PPVT-III) were significantly negativitycorrelated for children with SLI (r =–.71, p = .004). Children with SLI,especially those with the poorest language scores, showed a semantic-lexicaldeficit and a weakness in lexical-semantic association networks. Theirperformance on the LD task was significantly slower and poorer than for childrenwith TLD. Increasing a child’s vocabulary may benefit lexicalaccess.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, M., Plante, E., & Creusere, M. (2004). Semantic features in fast-mapping: Performance of preschoolers with specific language impairment versus preschoolers with normal language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 407420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/033) Google Scholar
American National Standards Institute. (2004). Methods for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry (ANSI S3.21–2004). New York, NY: American National Standards Institute.Google Scholar
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (2000). TONI-2. Test de inteligencia no verbal: Apreciación de la habilidad cognitiva sin influencia del lenguaje [TONI-2. Test of Nonverbal Intelligence] . Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.82.6.407 Google Scholar
Crosbie, S. L., Howard, D., & Dodd, B. J. (2004). Auditory lexical decisions in children with specific language impairment. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 103121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151004772901131 Google Scholar
Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., & Arribas, D. (2007). PROLEC-R. Evaluación de los procesos lectores revisada [Revised Assessment of Reading Processes] . Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.93.3.283 Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2006). PPVT-III, Peabody Test de Vocabulario en Imágenes [Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, PPVT-III] . Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Edwards, J., & Lahey, M. (1996). Auditory lexical decisions of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 12631273.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2002). BAMBI: Battery for Assessment of Syntactic Abilities in Children. Tel Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Friston, K. J., Zarahn, E., Josephs, O., Henson, R. N. A., & Dale, A. M. (1999). Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 10, 607619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1999.0498 Google Scholar
Girbau, D., & Schwartz, R. G. (2007a). Non-word repetition in Spanish-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42, 5975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13682820600783210 Google Scholar
Girbau, D., & Schwartz, R. G. (2007b). Relative clauses comprehension in Spanish children with and without specific language impairment. In Proceedings of the 2007 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Annual Convention (p. 164). Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Girbau, D., & Schwartz, R. G. (2008). Phonological working memory in Spanish-English bilingual children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41, 124145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.07.001 Google Scholar
Girbau, D., & Schwartz, R. G. (2011). Implicit semantic priming in Spanish-speaking children and adults: An auditory lexical decision task. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 419. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, S. (2006). The relationship between phonological memory, receptive vocabulary, and fast mapping in young children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 955969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/069) Google Scholar
Hagoort, P. (1993). Impairments of lexical-semantic processing in aphasia: Evidence from the processing of lexical ambiguities. Brain and Language, 45, 189232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brln.1993.1043 Google Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Howell, D. C. (2010). Statistical methods for Psychology. Belmont, CA: Cengage Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Justicia, F. (1995). El desarrollo del vocabulario. Diccionario de frecuencias [Development of vocabulary. Dictionary of frequencies] . Granada, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Kail, R. (1994). A method for studying the generalized slowing hypothesis in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 418421.Google Scholar
Kirk, S. A., McCarthy, J. J., & Kirk, W. D. (2001). ITPA: Test Illinois de Aptitudes Psicolingüísticas [Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities] . Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B., Weismer, S. E., Miller, C. A., Francis, D. J., Tomblin, J. B., & Kail, R. V. (2007). Speed of processing, working memory, and language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 408428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/029) Google Scholar
Martínez, J. A., & García, E. (2004). Diccionario de frecuencias del castellano escrito de 6 a 12 años [Dictionary of frequencies of written Castilian from 6 to 12 years of age] . Salamanca, Spain: Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca.Google Scholar
McGhee, R. L., Ehrler, D. J., & DiSimoni, F. (2007). Test de Token para niños. TTFC-2. [The Token Test for Children] . Madrid, Spain: Psymtec.Google Scholar
McGregor, K. K. (2009). Semantics in child language disorders. In Schwartz, R. G.. (Ed.), The handbook of child language disorders (pp. 365387). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Mendoza, E., Carballo, G., Muñoz, J., & Fresneda, D. (2005). CEG, Test de Comprensión de Estructuras Gramaticales [Test of Grammatical Structures Understanding] . Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A., Kail, R. V., Leonard, L. B., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Speed of processing in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 416433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2001/034) Google Scholar
Miller, C. A., Leonard, L. B., Kail, R. V., Zhang, X., Tomblin, J. B., & Francis, D. J. (2006). Response time in 14-year-olds with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 712728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/052) Google Scholar
Nakamura, E., Ohta, K., Okita, Y., Ozaki, J., & Matsushima, E. (2006). Increased inhibition and decreased facilitation effect during a lexical decision task in children. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60, 232239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01491.x Google Scholar
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.106.3.226 Google Scholar
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 402407. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195588 Google Scholar
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizzioli, F., & Schelstraete, M. (2011). Lexico-semantic processing in children with specific language impairment: The overactivation hypothesis. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 7590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.07.004 Google Scholar
Plaut, D. C., & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107, 786823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.107.4.786 Google Scholar
Psychological Software Tools. (2002). E-Prime (Version 1.1). Computer software. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.Google Scholar
Radeau, M. (1983). Semantic priming between spoken words in adults and children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 547556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0080756 Google Scholar
Rice, M. L., Buhr, J. C., & Oetting, J. B. (1992). Specific-language-impaired children’s quick incidental learning of words: The effect of a pause. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 35, 10401048.Google Scholar
Rissman, J., Eliassen, J. C., & Blumstein, S. E. (2003). An event-related fMRI investigation of implicit semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 11601175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892903322598120 Google Scholar
Schwartz, R. G. (Ed.) (2009). Handbook of child language disorders. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Seiger-Gardner, L., & Schwartz, R. G. (2008). Lexical access in children with and without Specific Language Impairment: A cross-modal picture-word interference study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43, 528551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13682820701768581 Google Scholar
Sheng, L., & McGregor, K. K. (2010). Lexical-semantic organization in children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 53, 146159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0160) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syntrillium Software Corporation (2002). Cool Edit Pro. (Computer software: Digital audio editor, recorder, and mixer). Phoenix, AZ. Author.Google Scholar
Velez, M., & Schwartz, R. G. (2010). Spoken word recognition in school-age children with SLI: Semantic, phonological, and repetition priming. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 16161628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0042) Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2007). WISC-IV, Escala de Inteligencia de Wechsler para Niños-IV [Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children] . Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Weismer, S. E., & Hesketh, L. J. (1996). Lexical learning by children with specific language impairment: Effects of linguistic input presented at varying speaking rates. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 177190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar