Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:13:01.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women Asylum Seekers and Refugees: Opportunities, Constraints and the Role of Agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

Lisa Hunt
Lisa Hunt*
Affiliation:
Salford Housing and Urban Studies Unit (SHUSU), School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is based on the findings of research undertaken towards a doctoral thesis funded by the University of Leeds. The research focuses upon the actions and experiences of women asylum seekers and refugees living in West Yorkshire. While acknowledging that the context in which women find themselves can present a number of barriers, this paper looks at their actions and practices at the individual and collective levels. It illustrates that some women are able to draw on the resources available, and are engaged in activities that not only assist their own settlement in the host society but also assist the development of support structures for future arrivals of asylum seekers and refugees.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 281 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, M.S. (1995), Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bergen, R.K. (1993), ‘Interviewing survivors of marital rape: doing feminist research on sensitive topics’, in Renzetti, C.M. and Lee, R.M. (eds), Researching Sensitive Topics, London: Sage, pp. 197–211.Google Scholar
Berghahn, M. (1995), ‘Women émigrés in England’, in Quack, S. (ed.), Between Sorrow and Strength: Women Refugees of the Nazi Period, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, A. (1999a), ‘Carrying out a survey of refugees: some methodological considerations and guidelines’, Journal of Refugees Studies, 12, 4, 367–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, A. (1999b), ‘Refugees in the job market: a case of unused skills in the British economy’, in Bloch, A. and Levy, C. (eds), Refugees, Citizenship and Social Policy in Europe, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, A., Galvin, T. and Harrell-Bond, B. (2000), ‘Refugee women in Europe: some aspects of the legal and policy dimensions’, International Migration, 38, 2, 169–88.Google Scholar
Camus-Jacques, G. (1989), ‘Refugee women: the forgotten majority’, in Loescher, G. and Monahan, L. (eds), Refugees and International Relations, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 141–57.Google Scholar
Carter, B. (2000), Realism and Racism: Concepts of Race in Sociological Theory, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (2002), Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and the Rockers, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crawley, H. (2001), Refugees and Gender: Law and Process, Bristol: Jordans.Google Scholar
Duke, K. (1996), ‘The resettlement experience of refugees in the UK: main findings from an interview study’, New Community, 22, 3, 461–78.Google Scholar
Dumper, H. (2002), Missed opportunities: A skills audit of refugee women in London from the teaching, nursing and medical professions, London: Greater London Authority in association with the Refugee Women's Association (RWA).Google Scholar
Dwyer, P. (2004), ‘Agency, “dependency” and welfare: beyond issues of claim and contribution’, in Dean, H. (ed.), The Ethics of Welfare: Human Rights, Dependency and Responsibility, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 135–54.Google Scholar
Dwyer, P. and Brown, D. (2005), ‘Meeting basic needs? Forced migrants and welfare’, Social Policy and Society, 4, 4, 369–80.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. (1998), ‘A critical examination of the use of interpreters in the qualitative research process’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24, 2, 197–208.Google Scholar
Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993), Negotiating Family Responsibilities, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franz, B. (2003), ‘Bosnian refugee women in (re)settlement: gender relations and social mobility’, Feminist Review, 73, 86–103.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, S. (2003), ‘A critical analysis of approaches to the concept of social identity in social policy’, Critical Social Policy, 23, 3, 322–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P.R. (1983), ‘Vietnamese refugees in the UK: the reception programme’, New Community, 5, 3, 444–53.Google Scholar
Kay, D. (1989), ‘The politics of gender in exile: Chileans in Glasgow’, in Joly, D. and Cohen, R. (eds), Reluctant Hosts: Europe and its Refugees, Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 104–24.Google Scholar
Lewis, H. (2007), Destitution in Leeds: The Experiences of People Seeking Asylum and Supporting Agencies, York: Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.Google Scholar
Lister, R. (2004), Poverty, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
The Maternity Alliance (2002a), Mothers in Exile: Maternity Experiences of Asylum Seekers in England, London: The Maternity Alliance.Google Scholar
The Maternity Alliance (2002b), A Crying Shame: Pregnant Asylum Seekers and Their Babies in Detention, London: The Maternity Alliance.Google Scholar
Refugee Council (2005), Making Women Visible – Strategies for a More Woman-Centred Asylum and Refugee Support System, London: Refugee Council.Google Scholar
Refugee Women's Legal Group (RWLG) (1998), Gender Guidelines for the Determination of Asylum Claims in the UK, London: RWLG.Google Scholar
Refugee Women's Resource Project (RWRP) (2003), Women Asylum Seekers in the UK: A Gender Perspective – Some Facts and Figures, London: RWRP Asylum Aid.Google Scholar
Robinson, V. (2002), ‘Doing research with refugees and asylum seekers’, Swansea Geographer, 37, 61–7.Google Scholar
Robinson, V. and Hale, S. (1989), ‘The geography of Vietnamese secondary migration in the UK’, Research Paper in Ethnic Relations No. 10, Centre for Research in Ethnic Relations, Coventry.Google Scholar
Robinson, V., Andersson, R. and Musterd, S. (2003), Spreading the ‘Burden’? A Review of Policies to Disperse Asylum Seekers and Refugees, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Sergeant, G., Damachi, D. and Long, D. (1999), Turning Refugees into Employees: Research into the Barriers to Employment Perceived by Women Refugees in London, London: The Industrial Society in association with Fair Play London.Google Scholar
Temple, B. and Edwards, R. (2002), ‘Interpreters/translators and cross-language research: Reflexivity and border crossings’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1, 2, Article 1, available at http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/english/engframeset.html, 4 December 2006.Google Scholar
Ui, S. (1991), ‘“Unlikely Heroes”: the evolution of female leadership in a Cambodian ethnic enclave’, in Buraway, M., Burton, A., Ferguson, A. Arnett, Fox, K. J., Gamson, J., Gartrell, N., Hurst, L., Kurtzman, C., Salzinger, L., Schiffman, J. and Ui, S. (eds), Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 161–77.Google Scholar
Williams, F. and Popay, J. (1999), ‘Balancing polarities: developing a new framework for welfare research’, in Williams, F., Popay, J. and Oakley, A. (eds), Welfare Research: A Critical Review, London: UCL Press, pp. 156–83.Google Scholar
Williams, F., Popay, J. and Oakley, A. (eds) (1999), Welfare Research: A Critical Review, London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. (2001), Dispersed: A Study of Services for Asylum Seekers in West Yorkshire December 1999–March 2001, York: Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (1995), ‘Gender Awareness in Migration Theory: Synthesizing Actor and Structure in Southern Africa’, Development and Change, 26, 771–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar