Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:38:13.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Culture of Technology: An Alternative View of the Industrial Revolution in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Thomas C. Cochran
Thomas C. Cochran
Affiliation:
Department of History (Professor Emeritus)University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is revisionist on two counts: first, that the American colonies and early United States republic kept pace with Great Britain in reaching a relatively advanced stage of industrialization by the early nineteenth century and second, that the Middle Atlantic States shared equally with New England the innovative role in creating America's industrial revolution. In both cases the industrial leaders achieved their preeminence by different routes. By concentrating on the importance of the sources of machine power as the defining characteristic of industrialism, scholars have overlooked alternative paths to industrial change. In Britain steam power and the textile industry were the foundations of an industrial revolution. But in American colonies the use of water power and the growth of industries such as woodworking and building led to an equally revolutionary change in the production of machine-made products. Benign geography in colonial America provided abundant wood and water power and an excellent transportation system based on navigable rivers and a hospitable coastline. But the crucial factors were cultural: the compelling urge to do things with less human work, the open reception to new immigration, a younger and more venturesome population, a favorable legal and fiscal environment for enterpreneurs. In the American context the tendency of scholars to emphasize the leadership of New England was largely a result of the greater local availability of manufacturing records. But recent research has demonstrated that Philadelphia, the largest port of entry in the eighteenth century, was quite naturally a center of innovation in construction materials, woodworking machinery and shipbuilding to meet the needs of the expanding agricultural hinterland and the coastal trade. In sum, the values of an expanding, youthful, skilled population replenished by fresh and venturesome sources from abroad helped shape cultural values that were particularly favorable in the geographic environment of North America for alternative paths of rapid industrial growth.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Summer 1995 , pp. 325 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailyn, Bernard. 1986. Voyagers to the West. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Bining, Arthur Cecil. 1973. Pennsylvania Iron Manufacture in the Eighteenth Century, 2nd edition. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission.Google Scholar
Brewington, Marion V. 1937. “Maritime Philadelphia, 1609–1837.” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 63 (April): 109.Google Scholar
Carter, Edward C II. 1970. “Naturalization in Philadephia 1789–1806,” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 94:333 ff.Google Scholar
Clarke, V. 1929. History of Manufactures in the U.S.: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Cole, Arthur H. 1926. The American Wool Manufacture, 2 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Arthur H., and Harold, F Williams. 1941. The American Carpet Manufacture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Joseph S. 1917. Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations, 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Deane, Phylis, and Cole, W. A.. “British Economic Growth, 1688–1959.”Google Scholar
Defebaugh, James Elliot. 1907. History of the Lumber Industry of America, 2 vols. Chicago: American Lumberman.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Eugene S. 1975. The Americanness of American Technology. Wilmington: Hagley.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Eugene S., and Oliver, Evans. 1980. Inventive Genius of the American Industrial Revolution. Greenville, Del.: Hagely Museum.Google Scholar
Fitch, John. 1976. Autobiography, edited by Prager, Frank D.. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Flexner, James. 1944. Steamboats Come True. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Freedley, Edwin T. 1956. Leading Pursuits and Leading Men: A Treatise on the Principle Trades and Manufactures of the United States. Philadelphia: Edward Young.Google Scholar
Grauman-Wolf, Stephanie. 1977. “Artisans and the Occupational Structure of an Industrial Town: Eighteenth Century Germantown, Pa.” Working Papers from the Regional Economic History Research Center, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 46–89.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. 1982. “British Industrialism before 1841: Evidence of Slower Growth during the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Economic History 42:267–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawke, David Freeman. 1988. Every Life in America. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Henretta, James. 1973. The Evolution of American Society, 1700–1815. Lexington, Mass.:Google Scholar
Jones, Alice H. 1984. “Wealth and Growth of the Thirteen Colonies.” Journal of Economic History 44: 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindert, Peter H. 1983. “Remodeling British History: A Review Article.” Journal of Economic History 43 (December): 486–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milward, Alan S., and Saul, S. B.. 1973. The Economic Development of Continental Europe, 1780–1870. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Paskoff, Paul F. 1983. Industrial Revolution: Organization, Structure and Growth of the Pennsylvania Iron Industry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, Edwin J. 1980. The Economy of Colonial America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Charles (ed). Building in Early America; Contributions Toward a History of a Great Industry.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1975. “America's Rise to Woodworking Leadership.” In Brooke Hindle(ed.), America's Wooden Age. Tarrytown, N.Y.: Sleepy Hollow Restoration.Google Scholar
Shelton, Cynthia. n.d. “Textile Production and the Urban Laborer: The Proto-Industrialization Experience of Philadephia, 1787–1820.” Working Papers from the Regional Economic History Research Center, vol. 5, no. 4.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. The Wealth of Nations. London: Cannon Edition.Google Scholar
Thompson, Allen. 1973. Dynamics of the Industrial Revolution. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, David B. 1958. The American Clyde: A History of Iron and Steel Shipbuilding in the Delaware River from 1840 to World War I. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Uselding, Paul. “Studies of Technology in Economic History.” In Research in Economic History Supplement, edited by Gallman, Robert. Greenwich, Conn.Google Scholar
Vogel, Robert M. 1976 “Building in the Age of Steam.” Radnor, Penn.: Chilton.Google Scholar
Wallace, Anthony F. C. 1962. Culture and Personality. New York.Google Scholar
Ware, Caroline F. 1931. The Early New England Cotton Manufacture. Boston.Google Scholar