Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2009
Long distance emigration of agriculture workers or farmers is usually associated with seasonal migration. Permanent migration of farmers on the other hand, is considered to be a non-European phenomenon and commonly linked to migration to the New World where capital costs were relatively low and institutional barriers limited. Interestingly, in the early modern period, in the wake of the mass migration from continental north-western Europe to the urban areas of the Dutch Republic, a contingent of German market gardeners and their descendants were slowly able to take over the production of farmed vegetable goods for the nation's capital, Amsterdam. In the middle of one of Europe's most densely populated areas, in a polder called Watergraafsmeer, a parish neighbouring, and subsequently part of, Amsterdam, Germans dominated the agricultural sector for over a century. This article will try to answer the question of how these German migrants were able to control a sector that is usually run by locally born producers, for such a long period of time.
2. The authors would like to thank Jan Lucassen and two anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions.
3. See, for instance, Moch, Leslie Page, Moving Europeans: Migration in Western Europe since 1650 (Bloomington, 2003)Google Scholar and van Lottum, Jelle, Across the North Sea. The Impact of the Dutch Republic on International Labour Migration, c. 1550–1850 (Amsterdam, 2007)Google Scholar.
4. Lucassen, Jan, ‘The Other Proletarians: Seasonal Labourers, Mercenaries and Miners’, International Review of Social History, 39 (1994), Supplement, 171–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lucassen, Jan, Migrant Labour in Europe, 1600–1900: The Drift to the North Sea (London, 1987)Google Scholar; Collings, E. J. T., ‘Migrant Labour in British Agriculture in the Nineteenth Century’, The Economic History Review, 29 (1976), 38–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also the Appendix of Lucassen, Migrant Labour for an extensive bibliography on this subject.
5. Lucassen, Migrant Labour, passim.
6. There are examples known where farmers were invited to set up farms hundreds of miles away from home. This was for instance the case in the sixteenth century, when 184 farmers and their families migrated from the Dutch island of Marken to the island of Amager near Copenhagen. However, this migration was exceptional in the sense that it was not the result of the normal migration process, the farmers involved were subsidised and received all kinds of privileges and had their own jurisdiction upon arrival. See, Johansen, Hans Christian, ‘Danish-Dutch Relations in the Late Eighteenth Century’, in Davids, C.A., Fritschy, W. and van der Valk, L.A. (eds.), Kapitaal, ondernemerschap en beleid. Studies over economie en politiek in Nederland, Europa en Azie van 1500 tot heden (Amsterdam, 1996), 197–207Google Scholar. Interestingly, immigrants also played an important role in the history of market gardening in England and Wales. It is known, for instance, that in the wake of the large scale migration of Protestants from the Continent to England in the sixteenth century, market gardeners and market gardeners' labourers set up gardens at Sandwich, Colchester, Norwich, Canterbury, Maidstone and London. In all these places, except for London, they were the first to set up market gardens. See Thirsk, Joan, ed., Agricultural Change: Policy and Practice, 1500–1750. Chapters from the Agrarian History of England and Wales, volume 3 (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 235–6Google Scholar.
7. de Vries, Jan, European Urbanization, 1500–1800 (London, 1984), pp. 219–20Google Scholar.
8. See especially Gjerde's excellent study on migration of Norwegians to the United States, Gjerde, Jon, From Peasants to Farmers: The Migration from Balestrand, Norway, to the Upper Middle West (Cambridge, 1985)Google Scholar. Moreover, a large body of (more general) literature exists concerning migration from (Western) Europe to the New World, see among others: Baines, Dudley, Migration in a Mature Economy: Emigration and Internal Migration in England and Wales 1861–1900 (Cambridge, 1985)Google Scholar; Baines, Dudley, Emigration from Europe 1815–1930 (Cambridge, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hvidt, Kristian, Flight to America: The Social Background of 300,000 Danish Emigrants (New York, 1985)Google Scholar; Lovoll, Odd S., The Promise of America: A History of the Norwegian-American People (Minneapolis, 1999)Google Scholar; Rundblom, Harald and Norman, Hans, eds, From Sweden to America: A History of the Migration (Minneapolis, 1976)Google Scholar. See also Bade's good overview of emigration to the New World: Bade, Klaus J., Migration in European History (Oxford, 2003), pp. 81–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9. This is not necessarily a rural phenomenon, and applies to setting up businesses in an urban environment as well. As Aldrich and Waldinger argue with regard to urban entrepreneurs, whether or not market conditions are favourable, immigrant entrepreneurs must gain access to businesses, which are almost always under control by locals: ‘Political factors may impede, or less frequently, enhance, the working of business markets.’ Aldrich, Howard. E. and Waldinger, Roger, ‘Ethnicity and Entrepreneurship’, Annual Review of Sociology, 16 (1990), 111–35, quotation at p. 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10. Van Lottum, Across the North Sea, pp. 85–92.
11. In a recent overview of Dutch agricultural history, market gardening has been labelled as one of the agricultural sectors in need of ‘a more modern study’. As such, this study also aims to fill a part of this lacuna. See: Bieleman, Jan, ‘Dutch Agricultural History c. 1500–1950: A State of Research’ in: Thoen, Erik and VanMolle, Leen (eds.), Rural History in the North-Sea Area. An Overview of Recent Research, Middle Ages – Twentieth Century (Turnhout, 2006), pp. 283–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quotation at p. 291.Older studies include W.J. Sangers' thorough, but dated study De ontwikkeling van de Nederlandse tuinbouw (tot het jaar 1930) (Zwolle, 1952) and Blink, H., ‘Nederland als tuinbouwland. Historisch en economisch-geografisch beschreven’ in Tijdschrift voor Economische Geographie, 7 (1916), 229–362Google Scholar.
12. Kruizinga, J.H., Watergraafsmeer. Eens een parel aan de kroon van Amsterdam (Amsterdam, 1948), p. 25Google Scholar; van Ollefen, L., De Nederlandsche stad- en dorpsbeschrijver III (Amsterdam, 1795), p. 5Google Scholar.
13. Kruizinga, J.H., 350 Jaar Watergraafsmeer (Amsterdam, 1979), pp. 43–5Google Scholar; Sangers, W.J., Gegevens betreffende de ontwikkeling van de Nederlandse tuinbouw (tot het jaar 1800) (Zwolle, 1953), p. 115Google Scholar; Van Ollefen, De Nederlandsche, p. 12.
14. Van Lottum, Across the North Sea, p. 101, table 3.1.
15. Cf. Bakker, Boudewijn, ‘De zichtbare stad 1578–1813’ in Frijhoff, Willem and Prak, Maarten (eds.), Geschiedenis van Amsterdam II-1, Centrum van de wereld (Amsterdam, 2004), pp. 95–7Google Scholar.
16. Kruizinga, Watergraafsmeer, p. 91.
17. Jansma, Klaas and Schroor, Meindert, eds, Tweehonderd jaar geschiedenis van de Nederlandse landbouw (Leeuwarden, 1987), p. 12Google Scholar; Van Ollefen, De Nederlandsche, p. 6.
18. de Vries, Jan and van der Woude, Ad, The First Modern Economy. Success, Failure, and Perseverance of the Dutch Economy, 1500–1815 (Cambridge, 1997), chapter 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19. ACA. Watergraafsmeer Notarial Archive (5076.WGM), inv.nr. 8, folio 11; inv.nr. 13a, f. 24, 58, 61.
20. Van Ollefen, De Nederlandsche, p. 12; Bouwman, J., ‘Landbouwkundige beschrijving van een gedeelte van Noord Holland (1839)’ in Kocks, G.H. and van der Poel, J.M.G., eds, Landbouwkundige beschrijvingen uit de negentiende eeuw II, Overige Provincies (Wageningen, 1981), p. 681Google Scholar.
21. Aerts, Remieg and de Rooy, Piet (eds.), Geschiedenis van Amsterdam, III, Hoofdstad in aanbouw (1813–1900) (Amsterdam, 2006), pp. 564–8Google Scholar.
22. Hendriksen, Alex, Watergraafsmeer. Binnenzee, polder, lustoord, stadsdeel (Amsterdam, 1998), p. 75, 86, 100Google Scholar; Kaal, Harm, Het hoofd van de stad. Amsterdam en zijn burgemeester tijdens het interbellum (Amsterdam, 2008), p. 52Google Scholar.
23. Amsterdam City Archive (ACA). Population Registers of the Incorporated Municipalities (5008). Inventory numbers 193, 195–201. Population Registers 1830–1880. Temporary inhabitants were not registered.
24. 1829 was the first year for which such a table can be constructed.
25. The average share of foreigners in the whole of the Netherlands in first half of the nineteenth century was only four per cent. See van Lottum, Jelle, ‘Nieuwkomers in Nederland in de eerste helft van de negentiende eeuw’, Tijdschrift voor Sociale Geschiedenis 29 (2003), 257–80, quotation at p. 258Google Scholar.
26. Lucassen, Jan and Penninx, Rinus, Newcomers. Immigrants and their Descendants in the Netherlands 1550–1995 (Amsterdam, 1995)Google Scholar; Lucassen, Jan, ‘Holland, een open gewest. Immigratie en bevolkingsontwikkeling’, in de Nijs, Thimo and Beukers, Eelco, eds, De geschiedenis van Holland II, 1572–1795 (Hilversum, 2002), 181–215Google Scholar; Van Lottum, Across the North Sea.
27. Van Lottum, Across the North Sea, pp. 41–3.
28. Van Lottum, Across the North Sea, p. 62.
29. Wrigley, E.A., ‘A Simple Model of London's Importance in Changing English Society and Economy 1650–1750’, Past and Present, 37 (1967), 44–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; De Vries, European Urbanization, pp. 179–82; Van Lottum, Across the North Sea, pp. 99–102.
30. Van Lottum, Across the North Sea, pp. 99–102.
31. Lucassen, Jan, ‘Immigranten in Holland, 1600–1800: een kwantitatieve benadering’, CGM Working Paper, 3 (Amsterdam, 2002), 24, table 5Google Scholar; Van Lottum, Across the North Sea, p. 65, Figure 2.5.
32. See Schrover, Marlou and van Lottum, Jelle, ‘Spatial Concentrations and Communities of Immigrants in the Netherlands, 1800–1900’, Continuity and Change, 22: 2 (2007), 215–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; van Lottum, Jelle, ‘Nieuwkomers in Nederland in de eerste helft van de negentiende eeuw’, Tijdschrift voor Sociale Geschiedenis, 29 (2003), 257–80Google Scholar; Lucassen, Leo, ‘Het einde van een migratieregime. Buitenlanders in Holland gedurende de negentiende eeuw’, Holland, 31 (2001), 190–210Google Scholar.
33. ACA, 5008, inv.nrs. 193, 195–201. Population Registers 1830–1880.
34. ACA. Watergraafsmeer Parish Archive (337). Confession Books (1710).
35. ACA, 5008, inv.nr. 193, 195–201. Population registers; ACA, 337. Personele Quotisatie (1744), Quotisatie van de 50e penning of Liberale gift (1747), Annual Reports (1830, 1848).
36. ACA, 5076.WGM, inv.nr. 3, f. 306.
37. University Library Amsterdam. Collection KNAG. Map by Jan Mol: Nieuwe Kaart van de Wydberoemde Koopstat Amsteldam met deszelfs Gebied. Beneevens alle de Plaisante Weegen en Paden buiten de Stat, Als naa Diemen, de geheele Diemer Meer, Als meede naa Slooterdyk en den Overtoom (1770); University Library Leyden. Collection Bodel-Nijenhuis. Map by Gerrit Drogenham: Het Watergraafs of Diemer-Meer; North Holland Provincial Archive (NHPA). Cadastral Maps 1821, A.
38. ACA, 337. Parish Council Minutes (1817–1851), folio 229 (1825).
39. ACA, 5008, inv.nr. 193, 195. Population Registers 1830–1840-1850.
40. See Sogner, Solvi and van Lottum, Jelle, ‘An Immigrant Community? Norwegian Sailors and their Wives in 17th-Century Amsterdam’, History of the Family, 12 (2007), 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
41. In early modern Netherlands, endogamy was the norm, although it was not only related to religion, but also to class. van Poppel, Frans, Trouwen in Nederland: Een historisch-demografische studie van de 19e en vroeg-20e eeuw (Wageningen, 1992), p. 577Google Scholar.
42. ACA, 337. Parish Council Minutes (1817–1851). Annual reports 1822, 1830, 1835, 1838, 1839, 1843; ACA, 5008, inv.nrs. 193, 195–201. Population registers 1830–1880.
43. ACA, 337. List of Enfranchised Inhabitants of Watergraafsmeer (1848). folio 55; Annual Reports 1830, 1848.
44. NHPA. Cadastral Maps 1821, A. Parcel numbers 70 – 72, 92, 99, 10–103, 119; Cf. Lucassen, Leo, ‘Herr Hagenbach en vele anderen. Migratie naar Holland na 1795’ in de Nijs, Thimo and Beukers, Eelco, eds, Geschiedenis van Holland 1795–2000 IIIa (Hilversum, 2003), 299–344Google Scholar, quotation at 300.
45. Lucassen, Jan, ‘Tijdelijke of permanente vestiging van Duitsers in Holland’, Holland, 27 (1995), 254–260, quotation at 256Google Scholar; ACA, 337. Patent Registers, 1806–1811.
46. In general the Netherlands were relatively open towards foreigners. Lourens, Piet and Lucassen, Jan, ‘Zunftlandschaften in den Niederlanden und im benachbarten Deutschland’, in Reininghaus, Wilfried, ed., Zunftlandschaften in Deutschland und den Niederlanden im Vergleich, Schriften der Historischen Kommission fűr Westfalen 17 (Muenster, 2000), 11–43, quotation at pp. 17–18Google Scholar.
47. Cottret, B.J., The Huguenots in England. Immigration and Settlement c.1550–1700 (Cambridge, 1992), p. 51Google Scholar. See also the discussion on this issue in Lex Heerma van Voss, Jelle van Lottum and Jan Lucassen, ‘National and International Labour Markets’, in Richard Unger, ed., Shipping Efficiency and Economic Growth 1350–1800 (forthcoming 2008).
48. Cf. Knotter, Ad and van Zanden, Jan Luiten, ‘Immigratie en arbeidsmarkt te Amsterdam in de 17e eeuw’, Tijdschrift voor Sociale Geschiedenis 13 (1987), 403–43Google Scholar and de Vries, Jan, ‘How did Pre-Industrial Labour Markets Function?’, in Grantham, George and MacKinnon, Mary, eds., Labour Market Evolution. The Economic History of Market Integration, Wage Flexibility and the Employment Relation (London, 1994), pp. 39–63Google Scholar.
49. Anti-German sentiments did exist elsewhere in the country. See Lucassen, Jan and Penninx, Rinus, Nieuwkomers, nakomelingen, Nederlanders. Immigranten in Nederland, 1550–1993 (Amsterdam 1994), pp. 118–22Google Scholar.
50. Earle, Carville, ‘Pioneers of Providence: The Anglo-American Experience, 1492–1792’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 8 (1992), 478–99, quotation at p. 485CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
51. Using Jan Luiten van Zanden's Dutch inflation calculator at the Prices and Wages Website: http://www.iisg.nl/hpw/calculate2.php; Kruizinga, Watergraafsmeer, p. 155.
52. ACA, 337. Parish Council Minutes (1831–1833). Annual Reports.
53. van den Hoek Ostende, J.H., ‘Poldermolens rond Amsterdam’ in Jaarboek Amstelodamum, 70 (1978), 360–92, quotation at p. 376Google Scholar.
54. ACA, 337. Parish Council Minutes (1831–1833). Annual Reports.
55. Van Lottum, Across the North Sea, p. 101, table 3.1.
56. ACA, 5008. Population Registers 1830–1840–1850–1860–1870–1880.
57. Cf. Waldinger, Roger, ‘The Making of an Immigrant Niche’, International Migration Review, 28 (1994), 2–30, quotation at p. 27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
58. On the difficulties of tracing back immigrants in the Netherlands in registers in their place of origin see Kuijpers, Erika, Migrantenstad. Immigranten en sociale verhoudingen in 17e eeuws Amsterdam (Hilversum, 2005), p. 115Google Scholar. Sogner, And Sølvi, ‘Young in Europe: Norwegian Sailors and Servant-Girls Seeking Employment in Amsterdam’, in Bardet, Jean-Pierre, Lebrun, François and Dupâquier, Jacques, eds., Mesurer et comprendre. Mélanges offerts a Jacques Dupâquier (Paris, 1993), pp. 515–32, quotation at p. 523Google Scholar.
59. Cf. Lucassen, ‘Tijdelijke of permanente vestiging’, p. 256.
60. (Silver) wage ratios (based on wages for building labourers) between the Western Netherlands and Western part of Germany at the beginning of the nineteenth century show that wages in the latter were almost half of that in the former. There is no reason to assume that farm wages will have shown a lesser divide. See van Bochove, Christiaan, The Economic Consequences of the Dutch: Economic Integration around the North Sea, 1500–1800 (Amsterdam, 2008), p. 71Google Scholar, Table 3.6.
61. Schrover, Marlou, Een kolonie van Duitsers. Groepsvorming onder Duitse immigranten in Utrecht in de negentiende eeuw (Amsterdam, 2002), pp. 262, 268CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
62. See Gjerde, From Peasants to Farmers, especially chapter 7.
63. Wegge, Simone A., ‘Chain Migration and Information Networks. Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Hesse-Cassel’, in The Journal of Economic History, 58 (1998), 957–86, quotation at pp. 957–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
64. Wegge, ‘Chain Migration’, p. 958.
65. See Hochstadt, Steve, Mobility and Modernity: Migration in Germany, 1820–1989 (Ann Arbor, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jackson, James H., Migration and Urbanization in the Ruhr Valley, 1821–1914 (Boston, 1997)Google Scholar; Van Lottum, Across the North Sea, pp. 177–8.
66. On the importance of the use of family labour on immigrant farms in the United States see Gjerde, From Peasants to Farmers, pp. 171–5.
67. ACA, 337. Parish Council Minutes (1817–1851), outgoing post nr. 94.
68. Verslag van de Commissie van Onderzoek naar de Toestand der Warmoezierderijen in de Omgeving van Amsterdam (Amsterdam, 1884).
69. ACA, 5008, inv.nr. 200–201. Population Register 1880.
70. Reijnders, Lucas, Het boerenbedrijf in de Lage Landen. Geschiedenis en toekomst (Amsterdam, 2002), pp. 137–8Google Scholar.
71. Schrover, Een kolonie van Duitsers, pp. 262, 268.