Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T22:46:28.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ankle and hip strategies for balance recovery of a biped subjected to an impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

Dragomir N. Nenchev  and
Akinori Nishio
Dragomir N. Nenchev*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Musashi Institute of Technology, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan
Akinori Nishio
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Musashi Institute of Technology, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A humanoid robot should be able to keep balance even in the presence of disturbing forces. Studies of human body reaction patterns to sudden external forces (impacts) are useful for developing balance control strategies. In this paper, we show how to implement two such reaction patterns, called ankle and hip strategy, using a small humanoid robot. Simple dynamical models in the sagittal plane are employed. The decision for invoking one of the reaction patterns is based on acceleration data measured during the impact. The experiments confirm that the robot is able to react swiftly, similar to a human.

Keywords

biped robotexternal disturbancebalance recoveryreaction null-space method
Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , September 2008 , pp. 643 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Fujiwara, K., Kanehiro, F., Kajita, S., Kaneko, K., Yokoi, K. and Hirukawa, K. H., “UKEMI: Falling Motion Control to Minimize Damage to Biped Humanoid Robot,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland (Oct. 2002) pp. 2521–2526.Google Scholar
2.Kajita, S., Kanehiro, F., Kaneko, K., Fujiwara, K., Harada, K., Yokoi, K. and Hirukawa, K. H., “Biped Walking Pattern Generation by using Preview Control of Zero–Moment Point,” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, Sep. 14–19, (2003) pp. 1620–1626.Google Scholar
3.Sugihara, T., Nakamura, Y. and Inoue, H., “Realtime Humanoid Motion Generation through ZMP Manipulation based on Inverted Pendulum Control,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington DC, USA, (May 2002) pp. 1404–1409.Google Scholar
4.Harada, K., Hirukawa, H., Kanehiro, F., Fujiwara, K., Kaneko, K., Kajita, S. and Nakamura, M., “Dynamical Balance of a Humanoid Robot Grasping an Environment,” Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sendai, Japan, (Sept.–Oct., 2004) pp. 1167–1173.Google Scholar
5.Harada, K., Kajita, S., Saito, H., Morisawa, M., Kanehiro, F., Fujiwara, K., Kaneko, K. and Hirukawa, H., “A Humanoid Robot Carrying a Heavy Object,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, (April 2005) pp. 1712–1717.Google Scholar
6.Gutmann, J. S., Fukuchi, M. and Fujita, M., “Stair Climbing for Humanoid Robots Using Stereo Vision” Procedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sendai, Japan, (Sept.–Oct., 2004) pp. 1407–1413.Google Scholar
7.Kajita, S., Morisawa, M., Harada, K., Kaneko, K., Kanehiro, F., Fujiwara, K. and Hirukawa, H., “Biped Walking Pattern Generator allowing Auxiliary ZMP Control,” Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, (Oct. 2006) pp. 2993–2999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Morisawa, M., Kaneko, K., Kanehiro, F., Kajita, S., Fujiwara, K., Harada, K. and Hirukawa, H., “Motion Planning of Emergency Stop for Humanoid Robot by State Space Approach,” Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, (Oct. 2006) pp. 2986–2992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Tanaka, T., Takubo, T., Inoue, K. and Arai, T., “Emergent stop for Humanoid Robots,” Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, (Oct. 2006) pp. 3970–3975.Google Scholar
10.Kaneko, K., Kanehiro, F., Kajita, S., Morisawa, M., Fujiwara, K., Harada, K. and Hirukawa, H., “Motion Suspension System for Humanoids in case of Emergency – Real-time Motion Generation and Judgment to suspend Humanoid –,” Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, (Oct. 2006) pp. 5496– 5503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Gorce, P., “Dynamic postural control method for biped in unknown environment,” IEEE Trans. SMC, Part A: Syst. Hum. 29(6), 616–626 (Nov. 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Nashner, L. M. and McCollum, G., “The organization of human postural movements: A formal basis and experimental hypothesis,” Behav. Brain Sci. 8, 135–172 (1985).Google Scholar
13.Horak, F. B. and Nashner, L. M., “Central programming of postural movements: Adaptation to altered support surface configurations,” J. Neurophysiol. 55(6), 1369–1381 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Shumway–Cook, A. and Horak, F. B., “Vestibular rehabilitation: An exercise approach to managing symptoms of vestibular dysfunction,” Seminars in Hearing, 10(2), 196–209 (1989).Google Scholar
15.Kuo, A. D., “An optimal control model for analyzing human postural balance,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 42(1), 87–101 (1995).Google Scholar
16.Guihard, M. and Gorce, P., “Dynamic Control of Bipeds Using Ankle and Hip Strategies,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, (Oct. 2002) pp. 2587– 2592.Google Scholar
17.Azevedo, C., Poignet, P. and Espiau, B., “Artificial locomotion control: From human to robots,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 47(4), 203–223 (2004).Google Scholar
18.Abdallah, M. and Goswami, A., “A Biomechanically Motivated Two-Phase Strategy for Biped Upright Balance Control,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, (April 2005) pp. 1996–2001.Google Scholar
19.Nishio, A., Takahashi, K. and Nenchev, D. N., “Balance Control of a Humanoid Robot Based on the Reaction Null Space Method,” Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, (Oct. 2006) pp. 1996–2001.Google Scholar
20.Nenchev, D. N. and Yoshida, K., “Impact analysis and post-impact motion control issues of a free–floating space robot subject to a force impulse,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15(3), 548–557 (June 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Nenchev, D. N., Yoshida, K., Vichitkulsawat, P. and Uchiyama, M., “Reaction null–space control of flexible structure mounted manipulator systems,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15(6), 1011–1023 (Dec. 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Miniature Humanoid Robot [HOAP-2] Manual, 1st ed., Fujitsu Automation Co., Ltd, Dec. 2004 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
23.Vafa, Z., The Kinematics, Dynamics and Control of Space Manipulators: The Virtual Manipulator concept Ph.D. Thesis (Dept. of Mech. Eng. MIT, 1987).Google Scholar
24.Torres, M. A. and Dubowsky, S., “Path-planning in elastically constrained space manipulator systems,” in Proceedings IEEE International Conference Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA, (1993) pp. 812–817.Google Scholar
25.Nenchev, D. N., Umetani, Y. and Yoshida, K., “Analysis of a redundant free-flying spacecraft/manipulator system,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 8(1), 1–6 (Feb. 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar