Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:41:31.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NO REVERSAL OF FORTUNE IN THE LONG RUN: GEOGRAPHY AND SPATIAL PERSISTENCE OF PROSPERITY IN COLOMBIA, 1500-2005*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2015

Adolfo Meisel
Adolfo Meisel*
Affiliation:
Banco de la República
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the non-reversal of fortune thesis proposed by Acemoglu et al. (2002) in the light of the Colombian experience over the last 500 years. Using a total of fourteen national population censuses and the record of tributary Indians in 1559, it is found that the population density of Colombian regions presented a high degree of persistence through time. Thus, the evidence indicates that those places that were prosperous circa 1500 remain so today, and vice versa. These results indicate that the long-run influences of geography on regional economic disparities within a country are not negligible.

Resumen

Este trabajo examina la tesis de la no reversión de la fortuna propuesta por Acemoglu, Johnson y Robinson en el contexto de la experiencia de Colombia durante los últimos 500 años. Utilizando un total de 14 censos nacionales y un recuento de los indígenas que pagaban impuestos en 1559, se demuestra que la densidad de población de las regiones colombianas ha sido muy persistente a través del tiempo. Por lo tanto, los sitios que eran prósperos en 1500 tienden a ser los mismos en la actualidad y viceversa. Estos resultados sugieren que el papel de la geografía en las disparidades regionales al interior de un país no es despreciable.

Keywords

comparative economic historydemographic economicsLatin AmericaN16J10N36historia económica comparadademografía económicaAmérica Latina
Type
Articles/Artículos
Information
Revista de Historia Economica - Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , December 2014 , pp. 411 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Instituto Figuerola de Historia y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Paper presented at the 9th BETA Workshop in Historical Economics, New Data, Methods, and Theories in Cliometrics, Strasbourg, 3-4 May 2013. The research assistance of Simon Chaves and Yuri Reina and comments by the members of CEER, Banco de la República, Cartagena, Colombia, Felipe Valencia Caicedo, Maria Teresa Ramirez, Haroldo Calvo, Enrique Lopez, and Juliana Jaramillo, are acknowledged. The opinions expressed in this paper do not reflect the point of view of the Banco de la República or its Board of Directors.

a

Carrera 7 #14-78, Bogotá, Colombia. [email protected]

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, D.; Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. (2002): «Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution». Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4), pp. 1231-1294.Google Scholar
Austin, G. (2008): «The «Reversal of Fortune» Thesis and the Compression of History: Perspectives from African and Comparative Economic History». Journal of International Development 20 (8), pp. 996-1027.Google Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, S., and Green, E. (2011): «The Reversal of Fortune Thesis Reconsidered». Journal of Development Studies, 48 (7), pp. 817-831.Google Scholar
Cepeda, L., and Meisel, A. (2013): «¿Habrá una segunda oportunidad sobre la tierra? Instituciones coloniales y disparidades económicas regionales en Colombia», Documentos de trabajo sobre economía regional, CEER, Banco de la Republica, Cartagena, No. 183.Google Scholar
Flórez, C. (2000): Las transformaciones sociodemográficas en Colombia durante el siglo XX. Bogotá: Banco de la República-TM Editores.Google Scholar
Livi-Bacci, M. (2006): «The Depopulation of Hispanic America after the Conquest». Population and Development Review 32 (2), pp. 199-232.Google Scholar
Maloney, W., and Valencia Caicedo, F. (2012): «The Persistence of (Subnational) Fortune: Geography, Agglomeration, and Institutions in the New World», Documento CEDE, No. 2, Bogotá.Google Scholar
Meisel, Roca A. (1980): «Esclavitud, mestizaje y haciendas en la Provincia de Cartagena, 1533-1851», Desarrollo y sociedad, No. 4, CEDE, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá.Google Scholar
Melo, J. (1987): «La conquista de Antioquia , 1500-1800». Available at htpp//jorgeorlandomelo.com.Google Scholar
Melo, J. (1977): Historia de Colombia, El Establecimiento de la dominación española, Tomo I. Medellín: Editorial La Carreta.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (2004): Geography vs. Institutions Revisited: Were Fortunes Reversed? Department of Politics: New York University, New York.Google Scholar
Tovar, H. (1988): No hay caciques ni señores, Relaciones y visitas a los naturales de América, Siglo XVI. Barcelona: Sendai Ediciones.Google Scholar