Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:43:07.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON TRUTH-FUNCTIONALITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2010

DANIEL J. HILL*
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
STEPHEN K. McLEOD*
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
*
*DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL, 7 ABERCROMBY SQUARE, LIVERPOOL L69 7WY, UNITED KINGDOM. E-mail:[email protected], [email protected]
*DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL, 7 ABERCROMBY SQUARE, LIVERPOOL L69 7WY, UNITED KINGDOM. E-mail:[email protected], [email protected]

Abstract

Benjamin Schnieder has argued that several traditional definitions of truth-functionality fail to capture a central intuition informal characterizations of the notion often capture. The intuition is that the truth-value of a sentence that employs a truth-functional operator depends upon the truth-values of the sentences upon which the operator operates. Schnieder proposes an alternative definition of truth-functionality that is designed to accommodate this intuition. We argue that one traditional definition of ‘truth-functionality’ is immune from the counterexamples that Schnieder proposes and is preferable to Schnieder’s alternative.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Edgington, D. (1995). On conditionals. Mind, 104, 235329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, G. (1994). Modern Logic. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1982). Methods of Logic (fourth edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schnieder, B. (2008). Truth-functionality. Review of Symbolic Logic, 1(1), 6472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomassi, P. (1999). Logic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar