Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T03:49:26.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

School districts and their local food supply chains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2017

Libby O. Christensen ,
Becca B. R. Jablonski  and
Jeffrey K. O'Hara
Libby O. Christensen*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Becca B. R. Jablonski
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Jeffrey K. O'Hara
Affiliation:
Agricultural Marketing Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 20250, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Libby O. Christensen, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 2015 Farm to School Census reports that during the 2013–2014 school year there were over 5200 farm to school (FTS) programs in the USA that involved 39,000 schools and 24.1 million children. These FTS programs are intended, in part, to increase market access and therefore the viability of farms and ranches. Accordingly, the majority of FTS programs involve local food procurement directly from farmers, from non-traditional suppliers that market locally branded food products such as ‘food hubs’, or from traditional suppliers such distributors and food service management companies. Yet, there is reason to believe that transaction costs vary based on the supply chain that schools use to procure local food. Moreover, that the supply chain that schools use to procure local food has a relationship with school's expenditures on local food. We use the 2015 Farm to School Census to estimate the relationship between school district's local food expenditures per student and supply chain structure. We analyzed data using ordinary least squares regressions, controlling for the region of the USA, the type of local food products purchased, and other school-specific characteristics. Importantly, we find a negative and significant relationship between school district's non-milk local food expenditure per student, and purchases directly from the farm and from non-traditional suppliers. This implies that schools that purchase local food from traditional distributors are likely to have higher on average expenditures per student compared with schools that purchase local food directly from farmers or non-traditional distributors. Results point to the need for additional research in determining the efficacy of policies to support direct and non-traditional FTS marketing arrangements.

Keywords

Farm to schoolfood hubsfarm viabilityintermediated salessupply chains
Type
Themed Content: Intermediated Marketing Channels in Regional Food Systems
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 34 , Special Issue 3: Themed Content: Intermediated Marketing Channels in Regional Food Systems , June 2019 , pp. 207 - 215
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bauman, A and Thilmany McFadden, D (2017) Exploring localized economic dynamics: Methods-driven case studies of transformation and growth in agricultural and food markets. Economic Development Quarterly 31(3), 244–254.Google Scholar
Becot, F, Kolodinsky, JM, Roche, E, Zipparo, AE, Berlin, L, Buckwalter, E and Mclaughlin, J (2017) Do farm-to-school programs create local economic impacts? Choices 32(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Botkins, ER and Roe, B (2015) Understanding Participation in the USDA's Farm to School Program: Results Integrating Information From the Farm to School Census and the Census of Agriculture. San Francisco, CA: AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, 27 July.Google Scholar
Dimitri, C, Hanson, J and Oberholtzer, L (2012) Local food in Maryland schools: a real possibility or wishful thinking? Journal of Food Distribution Research 43(2), 112–128.Google Scholar
DeLind, L (2010) Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars? Agriculture and Human Values 28(2), 273–283.Google Scholar
Feenstra, G and Ohmart, J (2012) The evolution of the school food and farm to school movement in the United States: connecting childhood health, farms, and communities. Childhood Obesity (Formerly Obesity and Weight Management) 8(4), 280–289.Google Scholar
Fischer, M, Pirog, R and Hamm, M (2015) Food hubs: definitions, expectations, and realities. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 10(1), 92–99.Google Scholar
Gunter, AL (2011) Rebuilding Local Food Systems: Marketing and Economic Implications for Communities. M.S. thesis. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University.Google Scholar
Gunter, A and Thilmany, D (2012) Economic Implications of Farm to School for Rural Colorado Community. Rural Connections. Logan, UT: Western Rural Development Center.Google Scholar
Hardesty, SD and Leff, P (2010) Determining marketing costs and returns in alternative marketing channels. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25(1), 24–34.Google Scholar
Hardy, J, Hamm, M, Pirog, R, Fisk, J, Farbman, J and Fischer, M (2016) Findings of the 2015 National Food Hub Survey. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Center for Regional Food Systems & The Wallace Center at Winrock International. Available at http://foodsystems.msu.edu/activities/food-hub-survey (Accessed 22 August 2017).Google Scholar
Haynes, M (2010) Farm-to-school in Central Minnesota - Applied Economic Analysis. Minneapolis, MN: Region Five Development Commission, CURA Community-Based Research Programs, University of Minnesota Central Regional Sustainable Development Partnership, University of Minnesota Twin Cities Applied Economics Department.Google Scholar
Izumi, BT, Wright, DW and Hamm, MW (2010) Farm to school programs: exploring the role of regionally-based food distributors in alternative agrifood networks. Agriculture and Human Values 27(3), 335–350.Google Scholar
Jablonski, BBR, Perez-Burgos, J and Gómez, MI (2011) Food value chain development in central New York: CNY bounty. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 1(4), 129–141.Google Scholar
Jablonski, BBR, Schmit, TM and Kay, D (2016) Assessing the economic impacts of food hubs on regional economies: A framework that includes opportunity cost. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 45(1), 143–172.Google Scholar
Joshi, A and Beery, M (2007) A Growing Movement: A Decade of Farm to School in California. Los Angeles, CA: The Urban and Environmental Policy Institute Occidental College.Google Scholar
Joshi, A, Azuma, AM and Feenstra, G (2008) Do farm-to-school programs make a difference? Findings and future research needs. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 3(2–3), 229–246.Google Scholar
Kane, D, Kruse, S, Ratcliffe, MM, Sobell, SA and Tessman, N (2011) The Impact of Seven Cents. Portland, OR: Ecotrust.Google Scholar
King, R, Hand, M, Digiacomo, G, Clancy, K, Gomez, M, Hardesty, S, Lev, LMclaughlin, E (2010) Comparing the Structure, Size, and Performance of Local and Mainstream Food Supply Chains. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
Kluson, R.A. (2012) Regional and Local Economic Impacts of the Sarasota County Farm to School Program. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
LeRoux, MN, Schmit, TM, Roth, M and Streeter, DH (2010) Evaluating marketing channel options for small-scale fruit and vegetable producers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25(1), 16–23.Google Scholar
Low, S, Adalja, A, Beaulieu, E, Key, N, Martinez, S, Melton, A, Perez, A, Ralston, K, Stewart, H and Suttles, S (2015) Trends in US Local and Regional Food Systems. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
Lyson, HC (2016) National policy and state dynamics: A state-level analysis of the factors influencing the prevalence of farm to school programs in the United States. Food Policy 63, 23–35.Google Scholar
McCarthy, AC, Steiner, AS and Houser, RF (2017) Do state farm-to-school–related laws increase participation in farm-to-school programs? Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 1–15. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19320248.2017.1284026Google Scholar
Matts, C, Conner, DS, Fisher, C, Tyler, S and Hamm, MW (2016) Farmer perspectives of farm to institution in Michigan: 2012 survey results of vegetable farmers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 31(1), 60–71.Google Scholar
Mirtcheva, DM and Powell, LM (2009) Participation in the national school lunch program: importance of school-level and neighborhood contextual factors. Journal of School Health 79(10), 485–494.Google Scholar
Motta, V and Sharma, A (2016) Benefits and transaction costs of purchasing local foods in school districts. International Journal of Hospitality Management 55, 81–87.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (2015) 2013–2014 Local Education Agency Universe Survey Data. Washington, DC. Available at https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubagency.asp (Accessed 30 May 2017).Google Scholar
O'Hara, J and Benson, M (2017) Local food production and farm to school expenditures. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Conference. Mobile, AL: 13 January.Google Scholar
O'Hara, JK and Low, SA (2016) The influence of metropolitan statistical areas on direct-to-consumer agricultural sales of local food in the Northeast. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 45(3), 539–562.Google Scholar
Ohmart, J (2002) Direct Marketing to Schools - A new Opportunity for Family Farmers. Davis, CA: UC Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program.Google Scholar
Pesch, R (2014) Assessing the Potential of Farm-to-Institution Market in Central and Northeast Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Extension. Available at https://www.extension.umn.edu/community/research/reports/docs/2014-Asessing-the-Potential-Farm-to-Institution-Market.pdf (Accessed 20 May 2017).Google Scholar
Ralston, K, Beaulieu Beaulieu, E, Hyman, , Hyman, J., Benson, M. and Smith, MD (2017) Daily Access to Local Foods for School Meals: Key Drivers. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
Roche, E, Conner, D and Kolondinsky, J (2015) Increasing local procurement in farm-to-school programs: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 5(2), 81–90.Google Scholar
Schmidt, MC, Kolodinsky, JM, Desisto, TP and Conte, FC (2011) Increasing farm income and local food access: A case study of a collaborative aggregation, marketing, and distribution strategy that links farmers to markets. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 1(4), 157–175.Google Scholar
School Nutrition Association (SNA) (2016) School Meal Trends and Stats. Available at https://schoolnutrition.org/AboutSchoolMeals/SchoolMealTrendsStats/ (Accessed 30 May 2017).Google Scholar
Thompson, OM, Twomey, MP, Hemphill, MA, Keene, K, Seibert, N, Harrison, DJ and Stewart, KB (2014) Farm to school program participation: An emerging market for small or limited-resource farmers? Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 9(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
Tuck, B, Haynes, M, King, R and Pesch, R (2010) The Economic Impact of Farm-to-School Lunch Programs: A Central Minnesota Example. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Extension Center for Community Vitality and University of Minnesota Department of Applied Economics.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2015) 2015 Farm to School Census Respondent Data. Version 10.31.16_web ed. Washington, DC: USDA Food and Nutrition Services.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (USDA AMS) (2016) Food Value Chains and Food Hubs. Washington, DC. Available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/local-regional/food-hubs (Accessed 27 May 2017).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Census of Agriculture (USDA Census) (2016) Local Food Marketing Practices Survey. Washington, DC. Available at https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/Local_Food/ (Accessed 30 May 2017).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA ERS) (2016) Table 14. Sales of Food at Home by Type of Outlet (Including Sales tax). Washington, DC. Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-expenditures/food-expenditures/#Food Expenditures (Accessed 30 May 2017).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services (USDA FNS). (2016 a) Farm to School Works! Washington, DC. Available at https://farmtoschoolcensus.fns.usda.gov/home (Accessed 30 May 2017).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services (USDA FNS) (2016 b) USDA Grants and Loans That Support Farm to School Activities. Washington, DC. Available at https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/f2s/FactSheet_USDA_Grants_and_Loans.pdf (Accessed 30 May 2017).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services (USDA FNS) (2016 c) About the Census: 2015 Farm to School Census. Available at https://farmtoschoolcensus.fns.usda.gov/about (Accessed 30 May 2017).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services (USDA FNS) (2014) About the Census: 2013 Farm to School Census. Washington, DC. Available at https://farmtoschoolcensus.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/asset/document/About%20the%202013%20Farm%20to%20School%20Census.docx (Accessed 30 May 2017).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA NASS) (2016) Direct Farm Sales of Food: Results From the 2015 Local Food Marketing Practices Survey. Washington, DC. Available at https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Online_Resources/Highlights/Local_Food/LocalFoodsMarketingPractices_Highlights.pdf (Accessed 30 May 2017).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development (USDA RD) (2005) Cooperatives in the Dairy Industry. Washington, DC. Available at https://www.rd.usda.gov/files/cir1-16.pdf (Accessed 22 August 2017).Google Scholar
Vogt, RA and Kaiser, LL (2008) Still a time to act: A review of institutional marketing of regionally-grown food. Agriculture and Human Values 25(2), 241–255.Google Scholar