Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:54:50.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Periphyton in rice–fish culture system: A case study from Arunachal Pradesh, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2007

D.N. Das ,
S.K. Saikia  and
A.K. Das
D.N. Das*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Rajiv Gandhi University, Itanagar-791 112, India.
S.K. Saikia
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Rajiv Gandhi University, Itanagar-791 112, India.
A.K. Das
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Rajiv Gandhi University, Itanagar-791 112, India.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The farmers of the Apatani tribe in Arunachal Pradesh, India have been raising a concurrent crop of fish successfully in their mountain valley rice plots for the past 40 years. They follow indigenous rice agronomy, ignoring the use of fertilizers, pesticides and even supplementary feed for the fish reared in the system. However, the yield levels of fish, ranging from 250 to 500 kg ha−1season−1, clearly support the role of other available resources within their wet rice fields. The investigation revealed that the rice itself provided the substrates for colonization and growth of periphyton. The colonized periphytic contents (1406–13513 no. cm−2 stem−1) on rice stems and other natural fish feeds within the system seem to have direct effect in this regard. The Apatani technique of rice–fish integration may be considered as one of the periphyton-based aquaculture (PBA) systems which deserve further research attention.

Keywords

Apatani tribeperiphytonrice–fish systemPBAbiological synergy
Type
Preliminary Report
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 316 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 McIntire, C.D. and Phiney, H.K. 1965. Laboratory studies of periphyton production and community metabolism in lotic environments. Ecological Monographs 35:237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Moss, B. 1998. Ecology of Freshwaters, Man and Medium, Past to Future. 3rd ed.Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford.Google Scholar
3 Haroon, A.K.Y. and Pittman, K.A. 2000. Niche measurement and feeding strategies of Barbodes gonionotus and Orechromis spp. from rice fields in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries Research 4:13–26.Google Scholar
4 Denny, P., Bowker, D.W., and Bailey, R.C. 1978. The importance of the littoral epiphyton as food for commercial fish in the recent African man-made lake, Nyuba Ya Munga reservoir, Tanzania. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 10:139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Lucinska, M. 1979. Structure of epiphytic algal communities of the Lobelia lakes in the region of Bory Tucholskie (Poland). Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Suppl. 56 (Algological Studies 24): 324–338.Google Scholar
6 Dickman, M. and Gochnauer, M.B. 1978. A scanning electron microscopic study of periphyton colonization in a small stream subjected to sodium chloride addition. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung der Limnologie 20:1738–1740.Google Scholar
7 Shachenko, T.F. 1996. Periphytic algae of Kana and Kremenchug reservoirs. Gidrobiologicheskii Zhurnal 32:32–41.Google Scholar
8 Philipose, M.T., Nandy, A.C., Chakraborty, D.P., and Ramakrishna, K.V. 1976. Studies on the distribution in time and space of the periphyton of perennial pond at Cuttack, India. Bulletin of Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrack pore 21:1–43.Google Scholar
9 Azim, M.E., Wahab, M.A., van Dam, A.A., Beveridge, M.C.M., and Verdegem, M.C.J. 2001. The potential of periphyton-based culture of two Indian major carps, rohu Labeo rohita (Hamilton) and gonia Labeo gonius (Linnaeus). Aquaculture Research 32:209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Keshavanath, P., Gangadhar, B., Ramesh, T.J., van Rooij, J.M., Beveridge, M.C.M., Baird, D.J., Verdegem, M.C., and van Dam, A.A. 2001. Use of artificial substrates to enhance production of freshwater herbivorous fish in pond culture. Aquaculture Research 32:189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Hanak-Schmager, M. 1974. Seston and periphyton of the River Vistula on the sector from Nowy Bienn to the water stage at Laczony and on the Laczany, Skawina Canal. Acta Hydrobiologia 16:345–364.Google Scholar
12 Hepher, B. 1998. Nutrition of Pond Fishes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
13 Whitton, B.A., Aziz, A., Kawecka, B., and Rother, J.A. 1988. Ecology of deepwater rice fields in Bangladesh 3. Associated algae and macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 169:31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Catling, H.D., Martinez, M.R., and Islam, Z. 1981. Survey of algae associated with deepwater rice in Bangladesh. Cryptogamie Algologie II 2:109–121.Google Scholar
15 Whitton, B.A. and Catling, H.D. 1986. Algal ecology of deepwater rice fields in Thailand. Arch Hydrobiologia 105:289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Sarwar, S.G. 1999. In Durga Prasad, M.K. and Pitchaiah, P.S. (eds) Inland Water Resources, India. Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi.Google Scholar
17 Das, D.N., Mitra, K., Mukhopadhyay, P.K., and Choudhury, D.K. 1994. Periphyton of the deepwater rice field at Pearapur village, Hooghly, West Bengal, India. Environment and Ecology 12:551–556.Google Scholar
18 Saikia, S.K. and Das, D.N. 2004. ‘Aji gnui assonii’—a practice of organic hill farming among the Apatani tribe of Eastern Himalaya. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 11:211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 20th ed.American Public Health Association, Washington DC.Google Scholar
20 King, D.L. and Ball, R.C. 1966. A quantitative measure of aufwuchs production. Transactions of the American Microscopy Society 85:232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Castenholz, R.W. 1961. An evaluation of submerged glass method of estimating production of attached algae. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung der Limnologie 14:155–159.Google Scholar
22 Haroon, A.K.Y. 1998. Diet and feeding ecology of two sizes of Barbodes gonionotus (=Puntius gonionotus) and Oreochromis sp. in rice fields of Bangladesh. NAGA—the ICLARM Quarterly 21:13–19.Google Scholar
23 Pielou, E.C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collection. Journal of Theoretical Biology 13:131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Krebs, C.J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
25 Washington, H.G. 1984. Diversity, biotic and similarity indices: a review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Water Research 18:653–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Saikia, S.K. and Das, D.N. 2003. Diversity indices of zooplankton and water quality in two freshwater ponds of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Geobios 30:113–116.Google Scholar
27 Prescott, G.W. 1984. The Algae: A Review. OttKoeltz Science Publishers, D-624 Koenigstein, West Germany.Google Scholar
28 Edmondson, W.T. (ed.) 1992. Freshwater Biology. 2nd ed.Indian Reprints, International Book and Periodical Supply Service, New Delhi.Google Scholar
29 Dempster, P.W., Beveridge, M.C.M., and Baird, D.J. 1993. Herbivory in the tilapia Orechromis niloticus: a comparison of feeding rates on phytoplankton and periphyton. Journal of Fish Biology 43:385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30 IIRR, IDRC, FAO, NACA, and ICLARM. 2001. Utilizing Different Aquatic Resources for Livelihoods in Asia: A Resource Book. International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, International Development research Centre, Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations, Network of Aquaculture center in Asia–Pacific and International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management. 416 p.Google Scholar
31 Dwiyana, E. and Mendoza, T.C. 2006. Comparative productivity, profitability and efficiency of rice monoculture and rice fish culture system. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 29:145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar