Introduction
Previous reviews have described the vision for future grain production systems, which incorporate perennial crop species to reduce the reliance of agriculture on annual crops, and to redress the environmental degradation of agricultural landscapes (Crews and DeHaan, Reference Crews and DeHaan2015; Crews et al., Reference Crews, Blesh, Culman, Hayes, Jensen, Mack, Peoples and Schipanski2016). Environmental degradation arises from inherent phenological characteristics of annual crops such as their short life cycle resulting in reduced soil cover exposing soils to wind and water erosion, and a shallow rooting habit increasing the opportunity for movement of water and nutrients to below the plant root zone (Dunin and Passioura, Reference Dunin and Passioura2006). However, degradation is also attributable to common management practices used in the cultivation of annual crops, such as tillage, excessive fertilizer use (Gomiero et al., Reference Gomiero, Pimentel and Paoletti2011), and periods of fallow between crops increasing the vulnerability of soil to nitrogen (N) and organic matter loss (Crews and Peoples, Reference Crews and Peoples2005).
To minimize the use of fertilizers, it has been proposed that non-leguminous perennial crops should be grown in mixtures with a N2-fixing legume to supply a proportion of the perennial crop's N requirements (Crews et al., Reference Crews, Blesh, Culman, Hayes, Jensen, Mack, Peoples and Schipanski2016). This approach is analogous to practices widely employed in grazing systems whereby perennial forage grasses are commonly grown in a ‘mixed’ sward containing one or more legume species (Davies, Reference Davies, Tow and Lazenby2001). While Crews et al. (Reference Crews, Blesh, Culman, Hayes, Jensen, Mack, Peoples and Schipanski2016) contend that it is theoretically possible to supply sufficient quantities of N through biological N2 fixation and other endogenous sources to meet much of the perennial crop's needs, the supply of N from the legume will depend upon factors such as the ability to reliably grow sufficient legume biomass to fix adequate quantities of N (Peoples et al., Reference Peoples, Brockwell, Hunt, Swan, Watson, Hayes, Li, Hackney, Nuttall, Davies and Fillery2012), the efficiency of N-transfer between legume and non-legume (Pirhofer-Walzl et al., Reference Pirhofer-Walzl, Rasmussen, Hogh-Jensen, Eriksen, Soegaard and Rasmussen2012), and the ability to achieve a stable mixture of legumes and non-legumes through time (Davies, Reference Davies, Tow and Lazenby2001). It remains unclear whether an intercrop of legumes and perennial grains might improve or reduce perennial crop production in the long-term. Inter-seeded legumes could compete with the perennial crop for space, water, light, and nutrient resources. On the other hand, previous studies have shown that pure stands have reduced resource-use efficiency compared with a mixture of multiple species (Jolliffe, Reference Jolliffe1997; Picasso et al., Reference Picasso, Brummer, Liebman, Dixon and Wilsey2011). To date no field experimentation has been reported, which examines the performance of perennial wheat derivatives grown in mixtures with legumes.
Achieving stable mixtures of forage grasses and legumes is difficult largely due to interspecific competition between the sward components. Perennial forage grass swards grown in crop rotations often become grass-dominant with legume productivity quickly becoming insufficient to meet minimum N-demands of the perennial grass, much less the subsequent cropping phase (Dear et al., Reference Dear, Cocks, Wolfe and Collins1998, Reference Dear, Peoples, Cocks, Swan and Smith1999, Reference Dear, Sandral, Virgona and Swan2004). Novel approaches are required to enhance the stability of mixed swards, particularly if perennial cereal crops are to be grown in conjunction with legumes. Previous researchers (e.g., Harper, Reference Harper1977; Boschma et al., Reference Boschma, Lodge and Harden2010) have postulated that spatially separating legumes from non-legumes at sowing could be a way to reduce the interspecific competition between sward components and achieve a more stable mixture. Although various studies have taken this approach when establishing previous experiments (e.g., Wolfe and Southwood, Reference Wolfe and Southwood1980; Sleugh et al., Reference Sleugh, Moore, George and Brummer2000), few studies have evaluated the effect of alternative sowing configurations on sward productivity and composition (Sandral et al., Reference Sandral, Swan, Li, Goward, Peoples and Hayes2015). Butler et al. (Reference Butler, Stein, Interrante and Malinowski2011) demonstrated that alternating drill rows at sowing reduced interspecific competition of an establishing binary mixture of a perennial forage grass, tall fescue (Schedonerus arundinaceus Schreb.), and a perennial forage legume, alfalfa (lucerne; Medicago sativa L.), compared with swards where both species were sown in each drill row. Spatial separation of species may be required in order to maintain adequate legume density among a vigorous perennial crop canopy.
The current study is an initial examination of the response of three perennial wheatgrass-derived genotypes grown in mixtures with a legume over 2 successive years. The experiment was conducted in south-eastern Australia, where elite breeding lines of perennial wheat derivatives have been previously observed to persist for up to 4 years (Hayes et al., Reference Hayes, Newell, DeHaan, Murphy, Crane, Norton, Wade, Newberry, Fahim, Jones, Cox and Larkin2012; Larkin et al., Reference Larkin, Newell, Hayes, Aktar, Norton, Moroni and Wade2014). The legume was a self-regenerating annual forage, subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.), with known adaptation to the target environment and a demonstrated capacity to fix large quantities of atmospheric N2 (Peoples et al., Reference Peoples, Brockwell, Hunt, Swan, Watson, Hayes, Li, Hackney, Nuttall, Davies and Fillery2012). Features of subterranean clover, such as its prostrate, annual and cool season growth habit contrast that of alfalfa, potentially making it a more compatible species with a perennial wheat in this target environment. The experiment tested two hypotheses: (i) that perennial crop productivity can be maintained with the addition of an annual legume component and (ii) that the annual legume content is enhanced in a perennial crop binary mixture when components are spatially separated at sowing.
Materials and Methods
Treatments
A field experiment was sown on May 14, 2013 at the Cowra Agricultural Research and Advisory Station, NSW, Australia (S 33°48.211′ E 148°42.236′, elevation 385 m) and monitored over a 3 yr period. Soil type at the site was a Red Chromosol (Isbell, Reference Isbell1996) with pHCaCl2 in the soil surface 0.10 m of 5.1. For several years prior to experimentation the site grew alfalfa for grazing. Initial soil cores taken to 1.2 m depth from across the site for characterization purposes indicated there to be 140–150 kg nitrate-N ha−1 in the soil profile, nearly 65% of which was observed in the surface 0.30 m.
The experiment was a split-plot design replicated 3 times with plot dimensions of 7 m × 4 m. Main plots were sown to one of three perennial wheat-derived genotypes including two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) × wheatgrass (Thinopyrum spp.) hybrid entries, 11955 and CPI-147235a (hereafter 235a), and the perennial intermediate wheatgrasss (Th. intermedium (Host) Barkworth & Dewey), CPI-148055 (hereafter wheatgrass). More detail of the pedigree of these lines as well as their previous performance at this location is given in Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes, Newell, DeHaan, Murphy, Crane, Norton, Wade, Newberry, Fahim, Jones, Cox and Larkin2012) and Larkin et al. (Reference Larkin, Newell, Hayes, Aktar, Norton, Moroni and Wade2014). Subplots included four row configuration treatments designed to alter the legume content of the perennial cereal swards; nil legume (perennial cereal only; Nil), legume and perennial cereal sown together in mixed rows (Mix), perennial cereals sown in alternate rows with the legume (1crop:1clover), and two rows of perennial cereal sown to every one row of legume (2crop:1clover).
The sowing rate (kg ha−1) of the cereals was calculated separately for each genotype to achieve a seedling density of 80 plants m−2. All treatments containing legume were sown with subterranean clover cv. Coolamon at a rate of 8 kg ha−1 of pre-coated seed. The experiment was direct drilled with two passes of a cone seeder comprising 8 tynes set at a row spacing of 250 mm with narrow points and press wheels, delivering 16 drill rows per plot. The 1crop:1clover treatment was achieved by condensing the number of rows into which seed of a particular species was drilled from 16 to 8. The crop seed in the 2crop:1clover treatment was condensed from 16 to 10 drill rows per plot and the clover was condensed to the remaining six rows. A mix of diammonium phosphate and superphosphate was broadcast across the experimental area immediately prior to sowing at rates calculated to deliver 22 kg P, 14 kg N and 9 kg S, per hectare.
Seasonal conditions
The long-term average annual rainfall at this site is 620 mm with a reasonably uniform monthly distribution. Higher temperatures in summer typically lead to less effective rainfall due to greater evaporation rates (Table 1). Annual rainfall during the experimental period was drier than average with 2013 and 2014 receiving 26 and 16% less rainfall compared with the long-term average, respectively. Relatively little rainfall was received during the first summer (December 2013–February 2014) and average monthly maximum temperatures during this period were up to 2.5°C hotter than average. Late winter and spring rainfall in both years was generally close to half the long-term monthly average at that site (Table 1).
Table 1. Long-term average (LAR) and monthly rainfall (mm), and long-term average minimum and maximum temperatures (°C) at the Cowra site compared with the experimental period.
Management and sampling
The trial area was sprayed prior to sowing with 2 L ha−1 of 135 g L−1 Paraquat + 115 g L−1 Diquat. Post emergent grass and broadleaf weeds were controlled with herbicides known to be relatively safe on wheat and subterranean clover; separate applications of 250 ml ha−1 of 100 g L−1 pinoxaden + 25 g L−1 cloquintocet-mexyl and 25 g ha−1 of 800 g kg−1 flumetsulam plus 700 ml ha−1 of 200 g L−1 bromoxynil. Also, 1.8 l ha−1 of 340 g L−1 MCPA + 80 g L−1 dicamba was applied to the nil legume treatments only, to remove any background legumes. A small amount of supplementary irrigation was applied to all plots during summer in year 1 using an overhead sprinkler system to assist perennial cereal survival. In year 2 the same herbicides were used for in-crop weed control as in year 1. A further 15 kg ha−1 P and 19 kg ha−1 S was broadcast across the site in May 2014 in the form of single superphosphate.
Plant density was determined on 17 June in year 1 when the majority of seedlings had developed three leaves, by counting the number of perennial crop and legume seedlings in two randomly placed 0.5 m × 0.5 m quadrats per plot. In the 2crop:1clover treatment, establishment densities were determined by counting seedling number in two 0.50 m × 0.75 m quadrats per plot such that each quadrat included two crop and 1 legume sowing row. Spring dry matter (DM) production in year 1 was assessed on October 30 by removing herbage within a 0.5 m × 0.5 m quadrat randomly placed in each plot. Again a larger quadrat, 0.75 m wide, was used in the 2crop:1clover treatment to ensure the sample area included two rows of perennial crop and one row of legume. Herbage was sorted into species, dried at 60°C for 72 h and weighed. Herbage samples were taken using the same technique in year 2 during summer (February 18), fall (May 8) and winter (July 22) to assess available biomass. Subterranean clover was not sampled during summer (February) because it had senesced. Following these DM samplings in year 2, the remaining herbage was grazed by sheep to approximately 1.0 t ha−1 of residual biomass. The hybrid wheat lines showed some reproductive physiology prior to grazing in fall and winter in year 2, such as elongated stems and flowering heads, consistent with previous performance at this site (Hayes et al., Reference Hayes, Newell, DeHaan, Murphy, Crane, Norton, Wade, Newberry, Fahim, Jones, Cox and Larkin2012). A final sampling of biomass in year 2 was timed according to flowering times of each perennial crop species which was November 4 for the wheatgrass hybrid 11955, November 13 for 235a and December 20 for wheatgrass. No grazing took place following the final sampling and perennial crops were left to develop through to grain harvest. Subterranean clover was not sampled at this time due to the fact it had already senesced, attributable to the drier than average spring conditions (Table 1).
Samples of subterranean clover and of perennial crops collected in October year 1 and July year 2 were retained for N analysis of shoot tissue. Only perennial crop samples were collected in the nil legume treatments. Samples were analyzed for N concentration (%N) and 15N composition using automatic N and carbon analysis (ANCA-SL) interfaced to a 20–20 stable isotope mass spectrometer (Europa Scientific; Crewe, UK). The amounts of above-ground (shoot or herbage) N accumulated by the different treatments was calculated from measures of shoot DM and N concentrations as:
$${\rm Shoot}\;{\rm N} = \left( {\hbox{shoot dry matter}} \right) \times \left( {{ \% {\rm N}/100}} \right)$$
The proportion of subterranean clover herbage N derived from N2 fixation was calculated using the natural 15N abundance method based on the 15N analysis of the subterranean clover and perennial crop samples, and glasshouse-derived determinations of the 15N composition of shoots of subterranean clover grown with N2 as the sole source of N (Unkovich et al., Reference Unkovich, Herridge, Peoples, Cadisch, Boddey, Giller, Alves and Chalk2008). The perennial crop in each treatment was assumed to provide a measure of the 15N composition of the plant-available soil N. Estimations of the contribution of below-ground N to the total N of subterranean clover were calculated by multiplying the clover shoot N data by a root factor of 1.72 representing the equivalent of 42% of the total plant N being associated with nodulated roots (McNeill et al., Reference McNeill, Zhu and Fillery1997; Unkovich et al., Reference Unkovich, Baldock and Peoples2010; Peoples et al., Reference Peoples, Brockwell, Hunt, Swan, Watson, Hayes, Li, Hackney, Nuttall, Davies and Fillery2012). Total amounts of N2 fixed in the various treatments were subsequently calculated as:
$$\eqalign{{\hbox{Total N fixed}} = & \left( {{\hbox{clover shoot N}} \times 1.72} \right) \cr & \times \left( {\% \;{\hbox{clover N fixed}}/100} \right)}$$
All plots were harvested for grain in years 1 and 2 when individual genotypes were considered mature. For the two wheatgrass hybrid entries this occurred in the third week of December in both years; the wheatgrass treatment was harvested 5 weeks later during the final week of January in both years. Samples were taken for the calculation of harvest index by cutting all perennial crop biomass at the soil surface from two randomly placed 0.5 m × 0.5 m quadrats per plot, or two 0.50 m × 0.75 m quadrats per plot in the 2:1 treatment. The remainder of the plots were harvested with a small plot header shortly after quadrat cuts were taken, and the weight of grain recorded for each plot. Harvest data from only the harvest index cuts are presented. Stubble and grain components from the harvest index samples were ground to <2 mm and sub samples tested for N content following LECO combustion. Protein content of these samples was calculated by multiplying %N × 5.7 (AOCS, 1995). All trash from the harvesting operation was collected and removed to minimize the emergence of volunteer cereal seedlings in plots.
Subterranean clover regeneration was assessed in autumn in years 2 and 3 by counting the number of seedlings in two randomly selected 0.250 m2 areas, or in the case of the 2crop:1clover treatment, two 0.375 m2 areas per plot. Basal frequency of the cereals was assessed at the same time by placing two 0.9 m × 1.0 m quadrats, divided into 0.1 m × 0.1 m squares, on each plot and counting the number of squares containing the base of a perennial crop plant. Basal frequency is an accepted method of non-destructively monitoring density of perennial species such as alfalfa beyond year 1 when it is impossible to visually determine the number of individuals comprising an alfalfa crown (Lodge and Gleeson, Reference Lodge and Gleeson1984). The initial measure of basal frequency was taken in year 1 at the same time seedling establishment density was determined. Values from each quadrat were summed, and expressed as a percentage.
Statistical analysis
Analyses of variance were conducted with a replicate + replicate.mainplot blocking structure, and a crop*row configuration treatment structure (Genstat version 17; VSN International Ltd). Analysis of the clover herbage N content data excluded the nil legume treatment in the analysis as this treatment was not sampled. Each sampling of the same variable was analyzed independently. Data were in transformed where it was necessary to normalize the distribution of data and residuals, and this usually occurred with data collected in year 2 where density of perennials in some treatments had declined to very low levels. Transformed data were back-transformed for presentation, and can be identified by the presence of a superscript letter in place of a determination of the least significant difference (l.s.d.). All data were analyzed at the 95% significance level (P < 0.05).
Results
A significant (P < 0.05) perennial crop × row configuration interaction existed for perennial crop density throughout the experiment (Table 2). All perennial crops established at higher densities in the mixed or nil legume treatments compared with the 2crop:1clover or 1crop:1clover treatments. The wheatgrass established at lower densities than either of the hybrid treatments. However, the basal frequency of the hybrid perennial crops declined to negligible levels (<5%) following the first summer, significantly lower than neighboring wheatgrass treatments (16–27%). By year 3 there was no significant difference in basal frequency of the wheatgrass treatments due to sowing configuration (17–22%).
Table 2. Crop establishment density (plants m−2) and basal frequency (%) in the 3 years of experimentation when grown as a nil legume or in combination with subterranean clover in mixed rows (Mix), in alternate rows (1crop:1clover) or in a ratio of 2 rows of perennial crop: 1 row of clover (2crop:1clover).
Values followed by a superscript letter have been back-transformed; values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05.
No significant (P > 0.05) perennial crop × row configuration interaction existed for subterranean clover establishment or regeneration densities (Table 3). Establishment density of subterranean clover in year 1 was unaffected by perennial crop treatment, and was significantly higher in the mix treatments where subterranean clover was sown in every row compared with where it was sown only in every third row (2crop:1clover). There was no subterranean clover detected in the nil legume treatments in the establishment year. The combined density of wheat and subterranean clover in year 1 was highest in the mix treatments (141 plants m−2), followed by 1crop:1clover (113), 2crop:1clover (103) and nil legume (79; P < 0.05, l.s.d. = 16.31). Subsequent subterranean clover regeneration was lower in the treatments sown to the hybrid perennial crop, 11955, than the remaining perennial crop treatments, and highest in the alternate row (1crop:1clover) treatment. Subterranean clover regeneration remained low in the nil legume treatments throughout the 2 yr period indicating that pre-existing seed reserves were low across the site prior to the establishment of experimental treatments.
Table 3. Effect of perennial crop and row configuration treatments on the emergence of subterranean clover (plants m−2) in the 3 years of experimentation.
Non-significant differences at P = 0.05 are marked ‘ns’.
Year 1 above-ground perennial crop biomass was, on average, 35% greater in the 11955 treatments compared with the 235a treatment, and 6-fold greater compared with wheatgrass. Year 1 biomass of all perennial crops was lowest in the alternate row configuration (1crop:1clover) and generally higher in the nil legume treatments (Table 4). There was no significant (P > 0.05) perennial crop × sowing configuration interaction in year 2 spring perennial crop biomass, but significant main effects were observed where wheatgrass was the most productive perennial crop, and the nil legume (2.36 t ha−1) and mix (1.76) treatments were more productive than the 2crop:1clover (1.16) and 1crop:1clover (0.69) treatments (Table 4). Subterranean clover biomass was consistently higher in the 1crop:1clover treatments, yielding 32%, 126 and 128% more in spring year 1, fall and winter year 2, respectively, compared with where it was sown in mixed rows. Clover biomass was generally lowest in the 11955 treatments where crop biomass was greatest, and was almost negligible when sown with 11955 in mixed rows.
Table 4. Perennial crop × row arrangement interactions on seasonal measures of perennial crop and legume herbage production (t ha−1) and determinations of weed incursion (% of total biomass) during the experimental period.
1 Weed incursion at this sampling date was negligible (0.1 t ha−1) and is not reported.
Total above-ground biomass (i.e., the sum of measured subterranean clover, perennial crop and weed dry matter) was significantly less in the nil legume treatment in the wheatgrass plots only in year 1, but in year 2 all nil legume treatments were less productive swards. At the final sampling of biomass in winter of year 2, total biomass in the mix, 1crop:1clover, and 2crop:1clover treatments were 52, 142 and 59% greater, respectively, compared with the nil legume plots (1.2 t ha−1). Weeds comprised 13% of total above-ground biomass in the wheatgrass treatment in year 1, which was significantly (P < 0.01) greater than in either the 11955 (2%) or 235a (5%) treatments, but there was no significant effect of row configuration on weed content in year 1 (average 7%; data not shown). There was no effect of perennial crop or row configuration treatment on weed content at the end of the first summer (average 20%), but in the fall of year 2 weeds comprised a significantly (P < 0.001) lower percentage of total above-ground biomass in the wheatgrass (7%) plots compared with the 235a (48%) and 11955 (62%) treatments (l.s.d.0.05 = 11.2). The nil legume treatments at this sampling also comprised a higher percentage of weeds (52%) compared with the mix (45%), 2crop:1clover (35%), and 1crop:1clover (23%) configurations (l.s.d.0.05 = 12.9). A very similar pattern of weed incursion was also observed in the winter sampling of year 2 (data not shown).
There was no significant (P > 0.05) perennial crop × row configuration interaction in the grain yield data from either year. Grain yields in year 1 were 21% and 7-fold higher in the 11955 treatment compared with the 235a and wheatgrass treatments, respectively (Table 5). Grain protein and kernel size was significantly less in the wheatgrass compared with the hybrid perennial crops, but the N concentration of stubble was higher in the wheatgrass treatments. There was no effect of sowing configuration on yields or grain attributes in year 1 despite there being a greater number of tillers in the mix and nil legume treatments. Grain yields in year 2 were very low (<280 kg ha−1), being highest in the 11955 and lowest in the wheatgrass treatments, and highest in the mixed and nil legume treatments compared with the other spatial configurations. There was no difference in grain protein between the different perennial crops in year 2 at P = 0.05, although there were marked differences in grain size with grain from the hybrid perennial crops 4–6 fold greater compared with the wheatgrass. The wheatgrass stubble %N was almost double (1.77%) that of the average of the hybrid perennial crops (0.95%). Grain protein in year 2 was significantly lower and harvest index higher in the nil legume treatments. However, there was no significant difference in kernel size between row configurations. Nitrogen concentration of stubble was also lowest in the nil legume treatments and highest in the 2crop:1clover treatments (Table 5).
Table 5. Effect of perennial crop and row configuration on grain yield (kg ha−1), grain protein (%), tiller number (m−2), harvest index (HI), thousand kernel weight (TKW; g) and stubble N content (%) at crop maturity in years 1 and 2.
Non-significant differences at P = 0.05 are marked ‘ns’. Values followed by a superscript letter have been back-transformed; values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05.
There was a significant (P < 0.01) negative correlation (R 2 = 0.44) between subterranean clover biomass and clover shoot N concentration in spring year 1, but no relationship was apparent in year 2 (Fig. 1). In year 2 there was no significant difference in subterranean clover herbage %N between treatments (Table 6). Clover's reliance upon N2-fixation for growth was substantially greater in year 2 (63–86%) than year 1 (17–38%), but was not affected by either perennial crop or row configuration treatment in either year. Not surprisingly this greatly influenced the estimates of the total amounts of N2 fixed in each year (1–21 kg N ha−1 in year 1 cf 5–165 kg N ha−1 in year 2; Table 6) except for treatments where clover growth had been suppressed in mixed rows with 11955.
Figure 1. The relationship between subterranean clover biomass and shoot N concentration in spring year 1 and winter year 2.
Table 6. Nitrogen concentration (%), shoot and total plant N (kg N ha−1), and estimates of the proportion (%) and total amounts of N2 fixed (kg N ha−1) by subterranean clover in spring year 1 and winter year 2 when grown in mixtures with three perennial crop types in either mixed rows (mix), in alternate rows (1crop:1clover) or in a ratio of 2 rows of perennial crop: 1 row of clover (2crop:1clover).
Non-significant differences at P = 0.05 are marked ‘ns’. Values followed by a superscript letter have been back-transformed; values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05.
Perennial crop N concentration during the spring of year 1 was significantly (P < 0.05) greater in the wheatgrass herbage (average 2.18%) compared with the hybrid perennial crops (average 1.54%). There was no difference attributable to row configuration in that year (Table 7). In year 2, N concentrations were generally lower in the shoots of 11955 compared with the other perennial crops. Wheatgrass shoot N concentrations were lowest in the nil legume treatment compared with where it was grown alongside subterranean clover. Calculated N accumulation in above-ground perennial crop biomass in year 1 was greatest in the 11955 hybrid, and also greatest in the nil legume treatments. The percentage of total N partitioned in grain was higher in 11955 (45%) compared with the 235a (38%) and wheatgrass treatments (24%). Nitrogen accumulation in year 2 above-ground biomass was substantially less in most treatments compared with year 1 values. Wheatgrass stubble values were similar between years (32 and 37 kg ha−1, respectively), but very little N was harvested in wheatgrass grain in year 2 (Table 8).
Table 7. Nitrogen concentration (%) in herbage of three perennial crop types grown in nil legumes or in or with subterranean clover in mixed rows (Mix), in alternate rows (1crop:1clover) or in a ratio of 2 rows of perennial crop: 1 row of clover (2crop:1clover), sampled in October year 1 and July year 2.
Table 8. Calculated N accumulation (kg N ha−1) in perennial crop biomass and grain at harvest in years 1 and 2.
ns = differences not significant at P = 0.05.
Discussion
Perennial crop productivity
The wheat × wheatgrass hybrids, 235a and 11955, were more vigorous in year 1 and had higher grain yields and larger kernel size than the intermediate wheatgrass. This is consistent with previous field experience (Hayes et al., Reference Hayes, Newell, DeHaan, Murphy, Crane, Norton, Wade, Newberry, Fahim, Jones, Cox and Larkin2012). However, the hybrid lines were less persistent than the wheatgrass, and generally less persistent than previously observed at the same Cowra location (Hayes et al., Reference Hayes, Newell, DeHaan, Murphy, Crane, Norton, Wade, Newberry, Fahim, Jones, Cox and Larkin2012; Larkin et al., Reference Larkin, Newell, Hayes, Aktar, Norton, Moroni and Wade2014). Undoubtedly, the drier seasonal conditions experienced during the current experiment contributed to this outcome.
An unavoidable challenge of conducting agronomy research with perennial wheat derivatives is the fact that breeding is ongoing and no commercial cultivars are yet available for the establishment of field experiments. Line 11955 was included in the current experiment as it was previously shown to have the highest year 1 grain yield and also a demonstrated capacity to persist beyond 1 yr (Larkin et al., Reference Larkin, Newell, Hayes, Aktar, Norton, Moroni and Wade2014). Line 235a was also among the most persistent of the hybrid derivatives evaluated in the target environment (Larkin et al., Reference Larkin, Newell, Hayes, Aktar, Norton, Moroni and Wade2014). The wheatgrass line, CPI148055, was selected because it was the most persistent of the previously tested intermediate wheatgrass lines at this location, and had among the best grain quality attributes of the intermediate wheatgrasses (Hayes et al., Reference Hayes, Newell, DeHaan, Murphy, Crane, Norton, Wade, Newberry, Fahim, Jones, Cox and Larkin2012). More advanced breeding lines of intermediate wheatgrass and wheat × wheatgrass derivatives may now exist (DeHaan et al., Reference DeHaan, Wang, Larsen, Cattani, Zhang and Viinanen2013), but at the time of initiating the current experiment, newer lines had not yet undergone agronomic evaluation in Australia. Continued progress in germplasm development will undoubtedly bring elite germplasm to market in the coming decades (Cox et al., Reference Cox, Van Tassel, Cox and DeHaan2010; Larkin et al., Reference Larkin, Newell, Hayes, Aktar, Norton, Moroni and Wade2014), but until then researchers are forced to work with analog crops, or as in this case, genotypes that are known to be insufficiently robust for commercial deployment. With this in mind, the relative differences between treatments become more important than absolute yields.
Establishment density of all perennial crops decreased when sown in the 2crop:1clover and 1crop:1clover configurations compared with the mix and nil legume treatments, despite being sown at the same seeding rate on an area basis. The sowing regimes meant that for a given perennial crop type, seeding rates per drill row increased by 60% in the (2crop:1clover) treatment and doubled in the (1crop:1clover) treatment, compared with where perennial crop seed was sown in every drill row. Reductions in plant populations have also been observed in a range of conventional grain crops when moving to wider row spacings due to an increase in seeding density within the drill row (Scott et al., Reference Scott, Martin, Riethmuller, Nugent and Nicholls2013). The decrease in crop population may be due to increased intraspecific competition for resources such as water early in seedling development, as suggested by Amjad and Anderson (Reference Amjad and Anderson2006) referring to a dry sandy environment of the Western Australian wheatbelt, but may also potentially be associated with compounds released from germinating seeds which inhibit the development of neighboring seedlings (Linhart, Reference Linhart1976). Our data suggest that some reduction in seeding rates may be possible when seed is concentrated in fewer drill rows, but the extent of the reduction possible before plant densities decline requires further refinement.
Increased seedling density in the mix and nil legume treatments led to improved perennial crop productivity in year 1, suggesting that at lower densities the perennial crops were unable to fully utilize available resources. To use 235a as an example, average seedling density was reduced by 20% in the 2crop:1clover and 1crop:1clover compared with the average of the mix and nil legume treatments and perennial crop biomass production observed in spring of year 1 was also reduced by a corresponding amount (22%) between those same treatments. In relatively high-yielding environments, such as Cowra, yield is maximized through rapid groundcover by a newly sown crop, which maximizes the capture of light and minimizes evaporation of water from the soil surface (Scott et al., Reference Scott, Martin, Riethmuller, Nugent and Nicholls2013). However, excluding the crop from some drill rows inhibits the ability of the crop to achieve complete canopy cover. With drill rows 0.25 m apart, the spacing between perennial crop rows was 0.50 m where the perennial crop was excluded from the intervening drill row and as observed, the perennial crop had relatively little capacity to compensate.
The inability for the perennial crop to compensate and fill the void left by the intervening row was exactly the reason for adopting this strategy when the objective was to facilitate greater legume survival within the perennial crop canopy. While perennial crop productivity was important, it was total productivity, in this case perennial crop plus legume, which determined the overall resource-use efficiency of the system. Total above-ground biomass was significantly less in the wheatgrass nil legume treatment in year 1, reflecting the low productivity of wheatgrass in the establishment year. In year 2 biomass accumulation in the nil legume treatment for each perennial crop was numerically lower than all other treatments, although not all differences were significant (P > 0.05). The change from years 1 to 2 suggests a relative abundance of available resources such as N in the establishment year and highlights the importance of running these types of experiments over several years. The increase in clover N content in year 2 compared with year 1 despite seemingly high initial soil N values is likely explained by the reduced biomass (average 1.1 t ha−1) of clover in year 2 compared with year 1 (1.5 t ha−1), as well as the fact that clover herbage analysis in year 2 was conducted following a winter sampling rather than in spring.
The diversion of resources away from the perennial crop into the production of a forage legume has ramifications for grain production enterprises. In the current study, grain yield was always numerically higher in the nil legume treatments. It remains to be seen whether this holds true over a longer period. The profitability of perennial cropping systems based on crop-legume mixtures is enhanced by substantially reduced N-fertilizer costs, but may also be reliant upon being able to utilize the non-crop biomass, such as through grazing. This is similar to existing cropping systems utilized in Australia and elsewhere, which already integrate grazing livestock and conventional crop production (Bell and Moore, Reference Bell and Moore2012). Using perennial crop biomass for biofuel may also be a feasible option in some locations (Boehmel et al., Reference Boehmel, Lewandowski and Claupein2008). An alternative approach would be to substitute the forage legume with a crop legume and harvest both components for grain (Jensen, Reference Jensen1996). However, in a perennial cropping system it is difficult to envisage how the legume component might be retained in the absence of inter-row disturbance and resowing annually to re-establish the legume, unless viable perennial legume crops are developed. There would also be challenges in finding compatible crops that mature at a similar time to aid harvest (Weik et al., Reference Weik, Kaul, Kubler and Aufhammer2002). The advantages of the forage legume option used here is that it was self-regenerating, and compared with a companion crop legume, more likely to result in a net return of fixed N to the system due to a large proportion of N exported in the legume grain following harvest (Peoples et al., Reference Peoples, Bowman, Gault, Herridge, McCallum, McCormick, Norton, Rochester, Scammell and Schwenke2001).
Grain protein in the current study was not affected by sowing configuration in year 1 suggesting adequate N and water resources were available for grain production in that year, but in year 2 grain protein was significantly lower in the nil legume treatments compared with where legumes had been included in the mix. The reduction in grain protein was not fully explained by the increase in grain yield in the nil legume treatments, suggesting that the presence of legumes increased N-availability to the perennial crop. The other novel finding was the significantly greater N content of the wheatgrass stubble compared with stubble of the hybrid perennial crops. At 1.8%N (equivalent to 10.1% protein) in year 2 it would seem wheatgrass stubble in particular has potential to add significant value to grazing enterprises following harvest. By comparison, other perennial forage grasses grown in a similar environment have been shown to have a protein content of 6–9% at that time of year (Hayes et al., Reference Hayes, Dear, Li, Virgona, Conyers, Hackney and Tidd2010). Further research on the grazing value of perennial crops is warranted. Stubble N (protein) content was not affected by row configuration in year 1, but in year 2 was greater in the 2crop:1clover treatment and lowest in the nil legume treatment where N addition was minimal.
Forage legume growth and N2 fixation
Although subterranean clover seeding rate was the same on an area basis for all except the nil legume treatments, seeding density within the drill row was double and 167% greater in the 1crop:1clover and 2crop:1clover treatments, respectively, compared with the mix treatments. This perhaps explains why establishment density of subterranean clover in year 1 was unaffected by perennial crop type, but was significantly lower in the 2crop:1clover treatment compared with where it was sown in mixed rows. The combined density of wheat and subterranean clover was greatest in the mix compared with other spatial configuration treatments and greatest in the 11955 compared with other perennial crop treatments, which is where competition for resources might be presumed to be greatest in year 1. Indeed, subterranean clover biomass in spring in year 1 was lowest where it was sown in a mixed row configuration with 11955, and regeneration in year 2 was also lowest in the 11955 treatment and lower in the mix compared with the 1crop:1clover treatments. It is interesting that regeneration in the 2crop:1clover treatments in year 2 was significantly less than in the 1crop:1clover treatment and similar to that observed in the mix treatments, particularly considering total plant density (perennial crop plus subterranean clover) was significantly higher in the mix treatments in year 1. This result is likely explained by the lower subterranean clover densities in year 1 leading to lower regeneration in the 2crop:1clover treatments. Donald (Reference Donald1951) described the relative plasticity of subterranean clover growing in a pure sward and how maximum yields, including seed yields, could be achieved at relatively low plant densities. The plant density in all treatments in the current experiment (40–56 plants m−2) were well below the minimum density (296 plants m−2) observed by Donald to achieve maximum yields in pure subterranean clover swards. There appears to be few established benchmarks for minimum subterranean clover density required for optimal levels of production in mixed swards with perennial species. Values in the current experiment appear lower than was achieved by Dear et al. (Reference Dear, Virgona, Sandral, Swan and Orchard2001) in a similar environment where subterranean clover grown in mixtures with perennial forage species regenerated at densities of 66–96 plants m−2. It would seem subterranean clover density at 40–90 plants m−2 is too low for adequate legume abundance and our study suggests a limit exists to the extent seeding density can be intensified within a smaller number of drill rows.
Subterranean clover biomass in year 2 remained lower in the 11955 mix treatment, presumably as a result of increased competition inhibiting the ability of subterranean clover to set seed in year 1, and in year 2 was generally higher in the 1crop:1clover treatments. From the perspective of increasing annual legume composition of mixed swards, the 1crop:1clover approach to sowing would seem to offer potential by providing benefits to legume production and regeneration compared with the mixed row configurations, without the negative effects on legume population observed in the more extreme 2crop:1clover configuration. The lower incursion of weeds in the 1crop:1clover treatment in year 2 provides additional encouragement that the alternate row configuration may present as a viable strategy to achieve a more balanced perennial crop/legume mixture than conventional approaches to sowing.
There was no effect of treatment on the clover's reliance upon N2 fixation for growth, although values were noticeably higher in year 2 (average 76%) compared with year 1 (25%). This was most likely due to the high levels of mineral N in the soil profile at the commencement of the experiment (Peoples et al., Reference Peoples, Brockwell, Hunt, Swan, Watson, Hayes, Li, Hackney, Nuttall, Davies and Fillery2012). However, poor nodulation in year 1 attributable to the factory applied rhizobial inoculant as a seed coating has previously been reported to result in suboptimal nodulation of pasture legumes (Gemell et al., Reference Gemell, Hartley and Herridge2005) and, although not measured in the current study, cannot be ruled out as a factor contributing to the low rates of N2 fixation observed. Nitrogen concentration was also relatively low for subterranean clover in year 1, was negatively correlated with shoot biomass (Fig. 1), and the amount of shoot N fixed per tonne of shoot DM accumulated in all treatments (<10 kg N t−1 DM; calculated from data in Tables 6 and 7) was less than the previously established benchmark of around 20 kg N t−1 DM (Unkovich et al., Reference Unkovich, Baldock and Peoples2010; Peoples et al., Reference Peoples, Brockwell, Hunt, Swan, Watson, Hayes, Li, Hackney, Nuttall, Davies and Fillery2012). All these indicators are consistent with a constraint to the N2 fixation process in year 1.
Legume shoot biomass measured in the current study largely reflected legume abundance, with greater inputs of legume and fixed N observed in treatments with the highest legume content. This presents a paradox in developing viable and sustainable mixtures of perennial cereal crops and self-regenerating annual legumes in as much as mixtures with a strong legume component maximize N-inputs to the cropping system, but also represent increased competition for the perennial crop. In the current study the 1crop:1clover treatments provided promising compromises between reducing competition between species while maximizing legume composition and inputs of biologically fixed N. More research is required to further refine efficiencies and trade-offs in binary mixtures, especially as perennial crops become closer to commercial reality on a broad scale.
The N accumulated in the perennial crop above-ground biomass at maturity (42–123 kg N ha−1), and the component of that N subsequently removed in grain (10–55 kg N ha−1) generally exceeded the total amounts of N2 fixed by the legume in year 1 (1–21 kg N ha−1). By contrast in year 2, the estimated inputs of fixed N by the clover would have been enough to meet the highest perennial crop demand for N observed (40–92 kg fixed N ha−1 in wheatgrass treatments cf 37 kg N ha−1 in wheatgrass biomass). The relatively low levels of N accumulated by the perennial crops and the low grain yields reflected the poor plant persistence over the dry summer and lower plant densities in year 2. If it was assumed that a future perennial wheat crop would experience lower plant mortality rates and achieve similar levels of DM production and grain yields observed in year 1 in the current experiment (i.e., in the order of 120–130 kg N ha−1 accumulated in above-ground biomass) over a period of several years, then the average inputs of fixed N measured in the second year of the experiment (average 63 kg fixed N ha−1) would not fully balance the perennial crop's N requirements.
However, given that 55–76% of the N accumulated would remain in the stubble of the perennial plant and could subsequently be available either to decompose on the soil surface, or be remobilized internally to support summer survival and future organ growth, the present study suggests that perennial crops could feasibly source much of their N requirement from a companion legume such as subterranean clover. This is particularly true in the alternate row configuration where total inputs of fixed N averaged over 100 kg N ha−1. Certainly the annual inputs of fixed N might be sufficient to balance the N removed each year in 1.5–2.0 t of grain ha−1 (in the order of 50–60 kg N ha−1). This will be dependent upon the efficient cycling of N between the legume and the perennial crop, and on achieving synchrony of N-supply and demand between the legume and perennial crop (Crews and Peoples, Reference Crews and Peoples2005; Crews et al., Reference Crews, Blesh, Culman, Hayes, Jensen, Mack, Peoples and Schipanski2016). Modest and strategic applications of fertilizer N during peak periods of perennial crop N demand may be required to ensure the perennial crop requirements can be met.
Crews et al. (Reference Crews, Blesh, Culman, Hayes, Jensen, Mack, Peoples and Schipanski2016) also note the need for N-inputs to exceed harvest-N replacement requirements in order to meet additional N needs of an agro-ecosystem with an aggrading soil organic matter pool, as would be expected under early generation perennial crops. Further research is required to determine whether the spatial separation of perennial crop and legume plants by single species row configurations will pose an obstacle to a perennial crop accessing N provided by a companion legume. Root architecture is acknowledged as an important factor contributing to below-ground N-transfer with fibrous-rooted species seemingly providing an advantage in scavenging N from neighboring legumes (Pirhofer-Walzl et al., Reference Pirhofer-Walzl, Rasmussen, Hogh-Jensen, Eriksen, Soegaard and Rasmussen2012). Proximity of the grass root to the legume root would also no doubt be an important factor. Grazing of forage by livestock is thought to assist with N-cycling by increasing the rate of N-turnover, particularly of above-ground components returned to the soil in a relatively short period of time in forms largely available to plants. However, grazing livestock are likely to cause undue concentration of N in localized areas and introduce variation in nutrient status across a field (Hilder, Reference Hilder1966). Although the majority of the herbage N consumed will be excreted as urine and faeces, livestock such as sheep represent a sink for nutrients such as N and some N losses from urine patches would also likely occur (Virgona et al., Reference Virgona, Gummer and Angus2006; Peoples et al., Reference Peoples, Brockwell, Hunt, Swan, Watson, Hayes, Li, Hackney, Nuttall, Davies and Fillery2012). The plots in the current study were relatively small and grazing was typically intensive with large numbers of sheep on a small area. We therefore anticipate that the distribution of nutrients following grazing was perhaps more even than might be expected in more extensively grazed systems.
Further research is required to understand the N requirements and dynamics of a perennial crop maintaining roots and other survival structures year-round. For example, under controlled conditions and in the absence of grazing, the perennial forage grass, phalaris (Phalaris aquatica L.), showed no real loss of N from the plant as it matured, but a ‘downward migration’ of N from the herbage to the basal portion of the stem and to the root system was observed (Richardson et al., Reference Richardson, Trumble and Shapter1932). It is unknown whether a perennial grain crop would respond similarly to a perennial forage grass, given the known importance of adequate N-translocation to the maturing seed head to support yield and grain quality. Other perennial forage grasses such as cocksfoot (orchardgrass; Dactylis glomerata L.) are known to shed and regrow a large proportion of their root structure from year to year (Ridley and Simpson, Reference Ridley and Simpson1994), which may result in increased net N-loss from the plant unless it can efficiently translocate N to remaining live structures. Most studies of N remobilisation within a plant (e.g., Ourry et al., Reference Ourry, Boucaud and Salette1988) have focused on forage species which may have substantially different internal N-demands than a perennial crop grown for grain.
Future research priorities
This initial experiment provides confidence in the merit of further refining strategies to grow perennial cereal crops in mixtures with legumes. Our investigation suggests that N inputs from a companion forage legume could balance N requirements of perennial cereals yielding 1.5–2.0 t ha−1 grain, annually. Further development of perennial wheat germplasm is necessary to improve longevity of the hybrid wheat × wheatgrass derivatives for future testing. In the meantime, future studies should target environments in which perennial wheat longevity is assured to maximize the opportunity to monitor succession in perennial wheat/legume mixtures over a longer period. It would seem that existing perennial wheat material would benefit by being tested in environments where summer temperatures are lower, and humidity and summer rainfall is higher than at Cowra. An environment similar to the second environment described in the initial evaluation of perennial wheat material in Australia, Woodstock NSW, might perhaps be a more suitable climate (Hayes et al., Reference Hayes, Newell, DeHaan, Murphy, Crane, Norton, Wade, Newberry, Fahim, Jones, Cox and Larkin2012); however, there will always be the risk of periodic drought in any rainfed cropping system.
Much remains unknown in this novel field of perennial crop/legume mixtures research. The choice of companion legume obviously warrants further investigation, and will likely be informed by the range of adapted legume options available in different environments. Maintaining an adequate legume content remains a challenge in perennial-based pasture swards (Davies, Reference Davies, Tow and Lazenby2001; Dear et al., Reference Dear, Virgona, Sandral, Swan and Orchard2001), and characteristics particular to perennial crops, such as the perceived high N demand to fill grain at the end of spring, promise to present additional challenges to be overcome. Alternative spatial configurations at sowing show potential for managing competition dynamics between species, as was observed by the superior legume composition and lower weed incursion in our alternate row (1crop:1clover) treatments. The same approach is showing some promise in better managing legume composition in perennial-based pasture swards for grazing (Butler et al., Reference Butler, Stein, Interrante and Malinowski2011; Sandral et al., Reference Sandral, Swan, Li, Goward, Peoples and Hayes2015). Aspects of our spatial configurations could be further explored, such as to identify the optimal row spacing and the optimal seedling density within a drill row. Our data suggest that opportunity exists to reduce sowing rates in some spatial configurations. Again, these factors will likely be impacted by the choice of companion legume. Arguably, the highest priority for further research remains in better understanding the internal N allocation and demands of a perennial crop. To know how much and when N is required will enable future researchers to identify an optimal legume content within a perennial crop stand and to further develop strategies to achieve the desired legume composition to meet perennial crop N demands.
Acknowledgements
This experiment was initiated with financial support from the Grains Research and Development Corporation through their EverCrop initiative—perennial plants for cropping environments (project number CSA00044). The authors gratefully acknowledge Sue Langfield (NSW DPI) for technical assistance monitoring the field experiment and Laura Goward (CSIRO) for assistance with laboratory analysis. We also gratefully acknowledge Melinda Merrill and the Estes Institute, Estes Park, Colorado USA, for sponsoring the ‘New Roots for Ecological Intensification’ meeting in 2014 which led to the production of this paper.
