Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:34:31.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International trade of organic food: Evidence of US imports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2012

Lydia Oberholtzer ,
Carolyn Dimitri  and
Edward C. Jaenicke
Lydia Oberholtzer*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Carolyn Dimitri
Affiliation:
Nutrition, Food Studies and Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Edward C. Jaenicke
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the past decade, organic food sales and farmland have grown rapidly worldwide. As the US market for organic food has expanded, anecdotal evidence indicates that imports of organic food have increased. US organic handlers may be importing to meet consumer demand for out-of-season products, as well as products not grown domestically. Handlers may also be importing organic products that are in short supply or to reduce input costs. This paper provides the first examination of imports of organic products into the USA. Data from a national survey of certified organic handlers in 2007 are used to examine the extent, types and origins of imported organic commodities. A Heckman model is employed to investigate the factors that influence an organic handler's decision to import organic products, and the level at which organic handlers import a product. Summary results show that while many of the products being imported into the USA are those that cannot be produced domestically, such as coffee and tropical fruits, some oft-imported commodities are those that can be produced in the USA, such as soybeans, wheat, barley and berries. The summary results also show that organic handlers are procuring almost a half of their imported products from a few countries, including Canada, China, Mexico, Brazil and Indonesia. In the econometric analysis, we found those handlers prioritizing local suppliers negatively affected the facility's decision to import products. The use of a social label, such as Fair Trade, positively affected a handler's decision to import. The size of organic sales was important to both the decision to import and the share imported, with larger firms more likely to import and smaller firms less likely to import. However, once a smaller firm had decided to import, they imported a larger share. Finally, our analysis found that experiencing limited supplies or prioritizing price with suppliers did not influence a handler's decision to import products. Based on the findings, we suggest future research avenues, including studies that address consumer preferences and the impact of increased imports on domestic organic farms.

Keywords

organic foodimportshandlersHeckman modelconsumersproducers
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 255 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Willer, H. and Kilcher, L. (eds) 2012. The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2012. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland and International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
2Dimitri, C. and Oberholtzer, L. 2005. Market-led versus government-facilitated growth: Development of the U.S. and EU organic agriculture sectors. Outlook Report No. WRS0505. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
3United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2007. Report on the international conference on organic agriculture and food security. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
4Nutrition Business Journal (NBJ). 2010. U.S. Organic Food Sales ($Mil) 1997–2009, 20010e-2017e—chart 22. Penton Media Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
5Pearson, D., Henryks, J., and Jones, H. 2011. Organic food: What we know (and do not know) about consumers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 26:171–177.Google Scholar
6Richter, T., Schmidt, O., Freyer, B., Halpin, D., and Vetter, R. 2000. Organic consumers in supermarkets—New consumer group with different buying behavior and demands. In Proceedings from the 13th IFOAM Scientific Conference, Zurich, Switzerland. p. 542–545.Google Scholar
7Sigrid, S. 2002. Local organic food markets: Potentials and limitations for contributing to sustainable development. Empirica 29:145–162.Google Scholar
8Hodes, L. 2007. Policing the organic label: Some consumer advocates question foreign-grown food. Chicago Tribune. Online edition. January 31. http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2007/jan/31/food/chi-0701300527jan31 (accessed May 4, 2012).Google Scholar
9Gale, F. and Buzby, J. 2009. Imports from China and Food Safety Issues. EIB No. 52, US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
10Kim, S. 2011. USDA issues public notice of fraudulent National Organic Program certificates. Press Release, February 11, 2011. USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
11Schmit, J. 2008. Trader Joe's to exclude some food imports from China. USA Today, February 10, 2008.Google Scholar
12Neuman, W. and Barboza, D. 2010. U.S. drops inspector of food in China. The New York Times, June 13, 2010.Google Scholar
13Jaenicke, E.C., Dimitri, C., and Oberholtzer, L. 2011. Retailer decisions about organic imports and organic private labels. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(2):597–603.Google Scholar
14Greene, C., Dimitri, C., Lin, B.H., McBride, W., Oberholtzer, L., and Smith, T. 2009. Emerging issues in the U.S. organic industry. Economic Information Bulletin Number 55. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
15Dimitri, C. and Oberholtzer, L. 2009. Meeting market demand in the organic sector: Handler–supplier relationships in the face of tight supply. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24(2):137–145.Google Scholar
16Clarkson, L. 2007. Testimony of Lynn Clarkson, President of Clarkson Grain Co., Inc to Subcommittee on Horticulture and Organic Agriculture, Agriculture Committee, US House of Representatives, Washington, DC, April 18, 2007.Google Scholar
17US Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA FAS). 2011. Organic products. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Available at Web site http://www.fas.usda.gov/htp/organics/organics.asp (accessed February 1, 2012).Google Scholar
18Dillman, D. 1999. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
19US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA, ERS). 2011. Top 15 US agricultural import sources, by fiscal year, U.S. value. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Available at Web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FATUS/ (accessed February 1, 2012).Google Scholar
20Heckman, J.J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Google Scholar
21Greene, W. 2008. Econometric Analysis, 6th ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
22Zheng, Y., Li, X., and Peterson, H.H. 2011. Consumer preferences for attributes of organic processed foods: The case of soymilk in the United States. Selected Poster at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association annual meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, July 2011.Google Scholar